ライフサイエンスコーパス: escape response

1 ical or electrical synapses causes defective escape response.

2 locomotion during the Caenorhabditis elegans escape response.

3 t for flies to efficiently initiate the loom escape response.

4 s in line with expectations for a last-ditch escape response.

5 movements that are critical for a C. elegans escape response.

6 st, heterozygous mutants show an exaggerated escape response.

7 1000 Hz) of flies and their need for a rapid escape response.

8 creen for defects in the acoustically evoked escape response.

9 ons in circuits similar to those in the fish escape response.

10 sb420 mutants were active during an elicited escape response.

11 of the hindbrain circuitry that supports the escape response.

12 of slow swimming during stereotyped acoustic escape responses.

13 e and initiate diverse drought avoidance and escape responses.

14 he inability of the larvae to perform normal escape responses.

15 ease in release at the warning signal during escape responses.

16 the system rather than in acutely mediating escape responses.

17 range of nociceptive cues and signal robust escape responses.

18 volved in the organization of sensory-evoked escape responses.

19 e required for the speed and coordination of escape responses.

20 s of the crayfish nerve cord drive tail-flip escape responses.

21 ese subunits were defective in their hypoxia escape response-a rapid cessation of feeding and withdra

22 a combination of a bacterial respiration and escape response and the neutrophil respiratory burst but

23 effects of an acute stressor (restraint) on escape responses and lick/guard reflexes to stimulation

24 nished spontaneous contractions and abnormal escape response, and impaired excitation-contraction cou

25 it sluggishness, uncoordination, a defective escape response, and male sterility.

26 ior but can also inhibit ingestion and evoke escape responses, and both stimulate grooming.

27 agonists and antagonists in abdomen posture, escape responses, and fighting have led to the suggestio

28 ications of spontaneous swimming and tactile escape response, as well as measurements of axonal proje

29 ted Tau and with recovery of the stereotypic escape response behavior.

30 In contrast, Wistar rats showed no initial escape response but a prolonged period of freezing that

31 tshocks commenced, animals could initiate an escape response by pressing the lever, terminating foots

32 re enemies, taking advantage of fish C-start escape responses by startling fish toward their strike--

33 endrite of the Mauthner (M)-cell triggers an escape response (C-start) in goldfish.

34 ell defined neural circuit that underlies an escape response can be habituated, providing for the fir

35 ess Mauthner cells are incorporated into the escape-response circuit, but they divide their target te

36 nstrating plasticity in the formation of the escape-response circuit.

37 these extra cells are incorporated into the escape-response circuit.

38 tacognition in animals, one must ensure that escape responses do not increase the overall density of

39 Escape response (dropping/non-dropping off a plant upon

40 kable level of recovery, exhibiting a robust escape response following developmental delay.

41 ns between sensory input and motor output in escape responses have suggested two alternative patterns

42 Touch elicits an escape response in Caenorhabditis elegans where the anim

43 expression of BLINK1 reversibly inhibits the escape response in light-exposed zebrafish larvae.

44 However, the kinematic performance of the escape response in mutant larvae was very similar to wil

45 RpoS also regulates the mucosal escape response in pathogenic strains of V. cholerae.

46 elegans, anterior touch initiates a backward escape response in which lateral head movements are supp

47 he body of Caenorhabditis elegans elicits an escape response in which the animal quickly reverses and

48 relatively simple neural circuit driving the escape response in zebrafish offers an excellent opportu

49 neration and results in significantly faster escape responses in dystrophic embryos.

50 ours to partially override the light-induced escape responses in the male.

51 e interneurons in transgenic animals impairs escape responses, indicating their crucial role in survi

52 nt at an early age, whereas the speed of the escape response is paramount, and that directional respo

53 A key feature of escape responses is the fast translation of sensory info

54 estigated links between a personality trait (escape response), life-history and state variables (grow

55 derstand how stimuli evoke sudden, ballistic escape responses, like fish fast-starts, a precise pathw

56 When a zebrafish makes a fast escape response, Mauthner cells directly activate contra

57 synaptic transmission between neurons in the escape response neural circuit of adult flies.

58 rosophila giant fiber system (GFS), a simple escape response neuronal circuit, by increasing targetin

59 The neural pathway that governs an escape response of Drosophila to sudden changes in light

60 level of heat stimulus from the stereotyped escape response of individual nematodes Caenorhabditis e

61 s of ectopic Mauthner cells (M-cells) in the escape response of larval zebrafish.

62 TDT, or jump muscle), which functions in the escape response of the Drosophila adult.

63 dfish, Carassius auratus, triggers the rapid escape response of the fish in response to various stimu

64 the Giant Fiber circuit, which mediates the escape response of the fly.

65 n together, we show that hypoxia triggers an escape response of the primary root that is controlled b

66 Escape responses of cockroaches, Periplaneta americana,

67 detection enables crayfish to produce reflex escape responses only to very abrupt mechanical stimuli.

68 Their escape response provides one of most effective mechanism

69 are recruited during different forms of the escape response that fish use to avoid predators.

70 is thought to produce different forms of the escape response that fish use to avoid predators.

71 at their head or tail, nematodes display an escape response that is mediated by bacterially produced

72 and a DeltaHP0102 mutant exhibited low acid-escape response that might account for the poor coloniza

73 ne which has its primary effect on the fly's escape response, the other on wing morphogenesis, are mu

74 decades on habituation of startle and other escape responses, the underlying neural mechanisms are s

75 ally coordinates the different phases of the escape response through the synaptic activation of the f

76 ious touch and temperature, with stereotyped escape responses through activation of multimodal nocice

77 The escape response to a visual threat is, however, flexible

78 , activation of LiGluR reversibly blocks the escape response to touch.

79 ant fiber pathway mediates a jump-and-flight escape response to visual stimuli.

80 s eliminated short-latency, high-performance escape responses to both head- and tail-directed stimuli

81 ological control points in regulating stress-escape responses to different environmental stimuli.

82 cific TRPV3 transgenic mice showed increased escape responses to noxious heat relative to their wild-

83 In contrast, learned escape responses to the same thermal stimulus were signi

84 In behavioral tests, rats performed learned escape responses to thermal stimulation of the paws by 4

85 The hypoxia escape response was restored by reintroducing either Gyc

86 As seen during escape responses, we observed a time-locked decrease in

87 uding scototaxis, activity, exploration, and escape response were assessed after 7 and 14 days.

88 spontaneous coiling of the trunk, diminished escape responses when touched, and an absence of swimmin

89 he head of Caenorhabditis elegans induces an escape response where the animal rapidly backs away from

90 icient fish exhibit an abnormal touch-evoked escape response with excessive body contractions and a p

91 es evoke slower, more kinematically variable escape responses with relatively long latencies as well