ライフサイエンスコーパス: esophageal pressure

1 hout corresponding changes of end-expiratory esophageal pressure.

2 tient's inspiratory effort from Eadi without esophageal pressure.

3 lue, associated with commensurate changes of esophageal pressure.

4 also recorded, together with subglottic and esophageal pressures.

5 greater than for first-minute measurement of esophageal pressure (0.44, p < 0.05) and tended to be gr

6 End-expiratory esophageal pressure also decreased (P=0.002).

7 Pulmonary mechanics including esophageal pressure and calculations of DP(AW), DP(TP),

8 Esophageal pressure and chest wall elastance-based metho

9 Esophageal pressure and chest wall elastance-based metho

10 Esophageal pressure and chest wall elastance-based metho

11 Esophageal pressure and EMG activity of an extrinsic (hy

12 ral pressure, one based on directly measured esophageal pressure and the other based on chest wall el

13 ral pressure, one based on directly measured esophageal pressure and the other based on chest wall el

14 Real-time measurements of esophageal pressure and tidal volume were integrated wit

15 The mean difference between twitch esophageal pressure and twitch endotracheal tube pressur

16 Airways flow and pressure, esophageal pressure, and Eadi were continuously recorded

17 d on lung mechanics (ExPress, stress index), esophageal pressure, and oxygenation (higher positive en

18 Flow, airway pressure, esophageal pressures, and peak electrical activity of th

19 ese methods, one targeting an end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressure of 0 c

20 ese methods, one targeting an end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressure of 0 c

21 he strategies of targeting an end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressure of 0 c

22 ure in patients with positive end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressures (p <

23 ure in patients with positive end-expiratory esophageal pressure-based transpulmonary pressures (p <

24 genioglossus electromyogram (EMG-GG) and the esophageal pressure deflection (DP) during obstructive a

25 G was linearly related to the deflections in esophageal pressure (DP) during the last three occluded

26 as tightly correlated with that derived from esophageal pressure during tidal ventilation and allowed

27 There were no changes in LES or esophageal pressures during the study period in the sham

28 defined as the transpulmonary (airway minus esophageal) pressure during end-inspiratory pause of a t

29 ximum (EMGdi/EMGdi,max), respiratory effort (esophageal pressure expressed as percentage of the maxim

30 cantly better at 24, 48, and 72 hours in the esophageal-pressure-guided group (P=0.01 by repeated-mea

31 xygen at 72 hours was 88 mm Hg higher in the esophageal-pressure-guided group than in the control gro

32 to measurements of esophageal pressure (the esophageal-pressure-guided group) or according to the Ac

33 Airway pressure and flow, esophageal pressure, hemodynamic variables (cardiac outp

34 e end-expiratory pressure identified through esophageal pressure measurement before and after a recru

35 < 0.05), whereas ExPress, stress index, and esophageal pressure methods gave similar positive end-ex

36 d by the ExPress, stress index, and absolute esophageal pressures methods were unrelated with lung re

37 trial are more reliable than measurements of esophageal pressure or frequency-to-VT ratio during the

38 nificantly associated with the maximal sniff esophageal pressure (p = 0.02).

39 ve stimulation can be used to predict twitch esophageal pressure (Pes(tw)) and twitch transdiaphragma

40 ent physiological and technical knowledge on esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements in patients recei

41 Esophageal pressure (Pes) monitoring can be performed du

42 Pharyngeal caliber, airflow, and esophageal pressure (Pes) were simultaneously monitored

43 ment is usually based on recordings of flow, esophageal pressure (Pes), and transdiaphragmatic pressu

44 ic features involve progressive increases in esophageal pressure (Pes), terminated by arousal (AR) as

45 By measuring esophageal pressure (Pes), we sought to characterize inf

46 ssure recordings to measure peak inspiratory esophageal pressure (Pesins) during exercise and this wa

47 atory rate, tidal volume, negative change in esophageal pressure, pressure time product, and the airw

48 methods based on lung mechanics or absolute esophageal pressures provide positive end-expiratory pre

49 We used esophageal pressure recordings to measure peak inspirato

50 ients in acute respiratory failure, elevated esophageal pressures suggest that chest wall mechanical

51 inspiratory effort, and work of breathing by esophageal pressure swings (DeltaPes) and pressure time

52 In conclusion, continuous monitoring of esophageal pressure swings during a spontaneous breathin

53 A trend index that quantified esophageal pressure swings over time was more reliable t

54 h PEEP adjusted according to measurements of esophageal pressure (the esophageal-pressure-guided grou

55 per liter of ventilation, negative change in esophageal pressure, the airway occlusion pressure 100 m

56 Negative change in esophageal pressure, the airway occlusion pressure 100 m

57 ay be related to the progressive increase in esophageal pressure throughout a failed weaning trial, w

58 o determine whether repeated measurements of esophageal pressure throughout a trial are more reliable

59 Esophageal pressure, tidal compliance, bladder pressure,

60 Dyssynchrony was quantified by measuring the esophageal pressure time product during the assisted bre

61 The inspiratory effort measured by the esophageal pressure time product increased proportionall

62 roportional assist ventilation led to higher esophageal pressure time product than variable pressure

63 mpliance (r(2) = 0.43; p = 0.03) and isotime esophageal pressure-time product (r(2) = 0.47; p = 0.03)

64 Esophageal pressure-time product/min decreased from 165

65 ffort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time product/min, and work of breath

66 ffort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time product/min, and work of breath

67 tandard of care, a ventilator strategy using esophageal pressures to estimate the transpulmonary pres

68 tion velocity and latency to high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT) studies to refine t

69 phageal motility provided by high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) as this new techn

70 defined and subclassified by high-resolution esophageal pressure topography, and 10 asymptomatic indi

71 waveform display (not always available), an esophageal pressure transducer (invasive), or a relaxed

72 riate analysis sniff trans-diaphragmatic and esophageal pressure, twitch trans-diaphragmatic pressure

73 stimulation, twitch gastric pressure, twitch esophageal pressure, twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure,

74 s syndrome presented significantly increased esophageal pressure variations (25 +/- 9 vs 6 +/- 3 cm H

75 Esophageal pressure variations decreased from 9.8 (5.8-1

76 nula on indexes of respiratory effort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time

77 ere the indexes of respiratory effort (i.e., esophageal pressure variations, esophageal pressure-time

78 twitch endotracheal tube pressure to twitch esophageal pressure was 0.93, and that for twitch endotr

79 gmatic pressure was 10.7 cm H2O, mean twitch esophageal pressure was 6.7 cm H2O, and mean twitch endo

80 Peak esophageal pressure was lower (p < .05) during insufflat

81 ndrome in whom airflow, airway pressure, and esophageal pressure were recorded during the recruitment

82 generated approximately 60% of their maximal esophageal pressure with each breath until they could no