ライフサイエンスコーパス: esotropia

1 s had strabismus (n = 10 exotropia and n = 2 esotropia).

2 imary microstrabismus and two with infantile esotropia).

3 ring both normal maturation and in infantile esotropia.

4 ties in spatial vision in cases of infantile esotropia.

5 eye movements as in humans with early-onset esotropia.

6 9%) cases of exotropia and 4 (4.9%) cases of esotropia.

7 gery in infant eyes with essential infantile esotropia.

8 ic asymmetry seen in patients with infantile esotropia.

9 at increased risk for developing refractive esotropia.

10 or the treatment of refractive accommodative esotropia.

11 as accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

12 th accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

13 ppeared to have had an infantile/early-onset esotropia.

14 in patients made exotropic after surgery for esotropia.

15 and children and in patients with infantile esotropia.

16 orty-nine children with acute-onset comitant esotropia.

17 nt risk for the development of accommodative esotropia.

18 lly in adult patients to treat accommodative esotropia.

19 ts, aged 18 to 60 months, with accommodative esotropia.

20 outcomes in both infantile and accommodative esotropia.

21 iated with poor vision and large uncorrected esotropia.

22 d allowing a 70% positive detection rate for esotropia (14.3; 95% CI, 13.2 to 15.7) being lower than

23 s (16.5%) (95% CI, 14.5-18.6) had congenital esotropia, 177 (13.5%) (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully acc

24 (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully accommodative esotropia, 252 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially

25 mm) were performed for similar magnitudes of esotropia (27.9 [13.4] prism diopters [PD] for plication

26 formed in 7 patients with isolated infantile esotropia (5 untreated and 2 previously treated) and in

27 hreshold was 23.2 (95% CI, 21.0 to 26.5) for esotropia and 13.5 (95% CI, 12.5 to 14.6) for exotropia.

28 hreshold was 20.8 (95% CI, 19.2 to 22.2) for esotropia and 16.3 (95% CI, 15.5 to 17.2) for exotropia.

29 combined with antagonist recession (12 with esotropia and 19 with exotropia; mean [SD] age, 28 [24]

30 combined with antagonist recession (13 with esotropia and 9 with exotropia; mean [SD] age, 38 [21] y

31 sag was associated with divergence paralysis esotropia and asymmetrical LR sag greater than 1 mm with

32 ontal deviations was equally divided between esotropia and exotropia.

33 of medial rectus resection for treatment of esotropia and exotropia.

34 most clearly associated as causal agents for esotropia and intermittent exotropia.

35 The medical records of patients with esotropia and their controls were retrospectively review

36 This advantage was not present with esotropia and vertical deviations in this series.

37 % CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially accommodative esotropia, and 181 (13.8%) (95% CI, 12.0-15.8) had exotr

38 mmodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all exotropia revealed interactions betwe

39 mental retardation, developmental delay, and esotropia, and four of the five affected children develo

40 two had concomitant and one had "V"-pattern esotropia artificially induced by alternating or unilate

41 rmal in the youngest patients with untreated esotropia at 5 months, cumulative abnormal binocular exp

42 ery in the treatment of acute-onset comitant esotropia at 6 months while reducing the duration of gen

43 Preoperative esotropia before resection ranged from 12(Delta) to 30(D

44 ral lateral rectus resections for persistent esotropia by a single surgeon from June 2012 to June 201

45 investigate whether children with congenital esotropia (CET) are more likely than controls to develop

46 Similar findings are true for accommodative esotropia; children treated within the first 4 months of

47 rature and in this patient, included ptosis, esotropia, coloboma of the iris, retina, choroid and opt

48 existing strabismus, new-onset accommodative esotropia, concurrent onset of systemic disease, disrupt

49 , the finding that the youngest infants with esotropia do not differ significantly from normal sugges

50 metry found in older patients with infantile esotropia does not represent an arrest of maturation but

51 sified retrospectively as having early-onset esotropia (EOE) and 150 subjects were classified as havi

52 Twelve observers with early-onset esotropia (EOE), 30 children with untreated amblyopia, a

53 ubjects were classified as having late-onset esotropia (EOE), depending on whether symptoms of (or tr

54 was a significant correction in the angle of esotropia (ET) from 39+/-17Delta (14-55Delta) to 12 +/-

55 lous binocular sensory function in infantile esotropia (ET) has led to the idea that visual evoked po

56 Esotropia (ET) in infancy may initially manifest as a sm

57 In cases of existing esotropia (ET) this procedure also markedly reduced the

58 Patients with high AC/A accommodative esotropia; evidence of stereopsis, binocularity (on Wort

59 ironmental factor, inheritance, risk factor, esotropia, exotropia, strabismus, squint, convergent str

60 ere confusion between the type of deviation (esotropia/exotropia) and/or the surgical procedure (rece

61 and American cohorts, but a somewhat higher esotropia:exotropia ratio than those that, to our knowle

62 The esotropia:exotropia ratio was 5.4:1 (95% CI, 3.4:1 to 7.

63 l deviation appear to be linked to infantile esotropia from before its onset.

64 Age-specific incidence curves for congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially acco

65 The medical records of 32 patients with esotropia greater at distance seen during a 17-year peri

66 Esotropia greater at distance than at near can be relate

67 ry study, 23% of children with accommodative esotropia had an affected first-degree relative, and 91%

68 age at surgery, most patients with infantile esotropia had asymmetrical MVEPs after surgery.

69 a dichoptic method to simulate a small angle esotropia had no effect on the contrast sensitivities re

70 h normal infants and patients with infantile esotropia had robust nasal-temporal asymmetries in motio

71 reated within the first 4 months of constant esotropia have better outcomes.

72 New developments pertaining to infantile esotropia have helped clarify the pathophysiology of the

73 onkeys with small- and large-angle infantile esotropia have striking maldevelopments of binocular (di

74 Younger age, esotropia, hyperopia, and botulinum injection were assoc

75 Esotropia, hyperopia, and botulinum injection were indep

76 nant form of strabismus was infantile-onset: esotropia in 54%, exotropia in 26%, and dyskinesia in 10

77 The etiology of the MFS was esotropia in 58 (92.1%), anisometropia in 2 (3.2%), and

78 consider factors that may predict refractive esotropia in an individual and therefore help identify t

79 ection may be an effective tool in resolving esotropia in certain patients with restrictive strabismu

80 ery in the treatment of acute-onset comitant esotropia in children.

81 ge was defined as 0-8 prism diopters (PD) of esotropia in exotropic patients and within 4 PD of ortho

82 ion, similar to that observed in concomitant esotropia in maximal adduction.

83 els, and exotropia was easier to detect than esotropia in white and black models.

84 Congenital esotropia increased the odds of developing a psychiatric

85 itant strabismus, with a focus on congenital esotropia, intermittent exotropia, and adult strabismus.

86 le surgery for the correction of large-angle esotropia is associated with a high success rate.

87 e (approximately 25 degrees) infantile-onset esotropia (large-eso).

88 for the correction of large-angle infantile esotropia may be associated with a favorable long-term m

89 Paralytic esotropia may be caused by lateral rectus superior compa

90 tification of risk factors for accommodative esotropia may help to determine which children with hype

91 sian) were simulated to have strabismus from esotropia of 21 prism diopters () to exotropia of 21.

92 In humans, esotropia of early onset is associated with a profound a

93 ralysis, three with nonparalytic concomitant esotropia of similar angle, and 15 healthy controls.

94 Small-angle esotropia or hypertropia may result from common involuti

95 a 7.8-fold increased risk for accommodative esotropia over nonanisometropic patients.

96 ficant for exotropia (P = .0002) but not for esotropia (P = .4).

97 or congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all ex

98 xty healthy term infants and 34 infants with esotropia participated.

99 as a cause of primary nonsyndromic comitant esotropia (PNCE).

100 Constant, large-angle esotropia present in the first few months of life may be

101 6 months (mean 14.5 months) and the angle of esotropia ranged from 65 to 100 PD (mean 72 PD).

102 and 73 visits of 54 patients with infantile esotropia, ranging in age from 2 months to 5 years.

103 Nineteen patients with esotropia received bupivacaine injections in the lateral

104 e causally related to the onset of infantile esotropia remains a mystery.

105 ren, with right and left fully accommodative esotropia, respectively, pointed at targets located cent

106 Congenital esotropia, similar to those with intermittent exotropia

107 smic monkey had infantile-onset, small-angle esotropia (small-eso approximately 2 degrees) induced by

108 ly treated) and in 3 patients with infantile esotropia syndrome associated with mild neurological dis

109 a 70% positive detection rate was higher for esotropia than for exotropia (P < .001 for both).

110 e strabismic animals had early-onset natural esotropia (the visual axes deviated nasally), normal vis

111 In children with accommodative esotropia, the critical period for susceptibility of ste

112 pic, two had naturally occurring "A"-pattern esotropia, two had concomitant and one had "V"-pattern e

113 Esotropia was easier for lay observers to detect than ex

114 Overall, surgeries on patients with esotropia were more likely to be successful than on thos

115 tropia) and four with convergent strabismus (esotropia) were compared to those from four normally rea

116 time in normal infants and in patients with esotropia who had received successful, timely correction

117 ly members were defined as affected; two had esotropia with an accommodative element; and three under

118 rove outcomes in children with accommodative esotropia with high AC/A.

119 ffective treatment for large-angle infantile esotropia, with stable results over time.