ライフサイエンスコーパス: ethic

1 d equity in societies with a strong communal ethic.

2 rucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and medical ethics.

3 g where there are questions regarding animal ethics.

4 an unprecedented challenge for research and ethics.

5 providing lectures or courses on publication ethics.

6 re based on clinical judgment, evidence, and ethics.

7 the institutional review board for research ethics.

8 providing lectures or courses on publication ethics.

9 rapidity, required sample volume and animal ethics.

10 ssumed that Nazi medical authorities spurned ethics.

11 ld has largely conformed to a do-it-yourself ethic, although the challenges of big image data cannot

12 ently omits or segregates content related to ethics and broader impacts of science.

13 gns that have been criticised for reasons of ethics and clinical relevance.

14 philosophical currents such as deontological ethics and consequentialism.

15 ome countries, the authors argue that beyond ethics and equity issues, it makes economic sense to inv

16 Ethics and gender were considered.

17 A framework to guide ethics and health policy statement was established, whic

18 l of stakeholders was convened to develop an ethics and health policy statement.

19 rs, the health risks of living donation, the ethics and legality of an organ market, and the economic

20 tions, functional goals and quality of life, ethics and media relations.

21 ospective study was approved by the Regional Ethics and Research and Development Committees.

22 ators and re-users, (3) disclose data re-use ethics, and (4) encourage increased recognition of publi

23 eing a permanent ICU staff member, degree in ethics, and degree in intensive care.

24 ritical appraisal, contributes to veterinary ethics, and encourages the pro-active development of pro

25 ort articulates a path forward for research, ethics, and governance of clinical applications involvin

26 We also discuss privacy, ethics, and regulatory considerations, issues of global

27 hem as needed, the relevance of professional ethics, and the need to be wise and not just smart.

28 nd psychology, transplantation, social work, ethics, and transplant administration met and reviewed c

29 Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.

30 Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.

31 Materials and Methods Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.

32 s committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics approval number, S-320/2012), and informed consen

33 Ethics approval was granted by local committee.

34 Ethics approval was granted by South Manchester Research

35 Institutional review board research ethics approval was granted to use anonymized computed t

36 Materials and Methods Ethics approval was obtained from the centralized instit

37 This study received ethics approval, and all participants provided written i

38 After ethics approval, data were collected from 1799 consecuti

39 After ethics approval, in 8 oncologic patients with dental imp

40 The study had local research ethics approval.

41 the Norwegian committee for medical research ethics approved the study.

42 erials and Methods This was a retrospective, ethics-approved study of patients who had undergone lapa

43 Materials and Methods An ethics-approved, retrospective review of prospective dat

44 39, Germany introduced mandatory lectures on ethics as part of the medical curriculum.

45 protocol was approved by the local research ethics board and by Health Canada.

46 The study was approved by the local ethics board and did not require informed consent.

47 The retrospective study was approved by the ethics board and did not require informed consent.

48 otocol that was approved by a local research ethics board and Health Canada and was compliant with th

49 Study was local research ethics board and Health Canada approved and HIPAA compli

50 re included, which was approved by the local ethics board and written informed consent was obtained f

51 Research ethics board approval was not necessary because cadaveri

52 Research ethics board approval was not necessary because this stu

53 Materials and Methods Research ethics board approval was obtained and all patients sign

54 Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospectiv

55 Institutional research and ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospectiv

56 SUBJECTS AND Following ethics board approval, second year residents were random

57 Materials and Methods The clinical research ethics board approved chart review, and the requirement

58 The local ethics board approved retrospective study of prospective

59 The institutional research ethics board approved this study and waived informed con

60 The local ethics board approved this study.

61 formed consent was waived after the research ethics board approved this study.

62 tudy was obtained from the hospital research ethics board, and the need to obtain informed consent wa

63 de I-IV COPD provided informed consent to an ethics board-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol and under

64 t to be included in this institutional human ethics board-approved prospective study between January

65 s and Methods In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, healthy volunte

66 In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, with parental w

67 An ethics board-approved, retrospective study was conducted

68 trial approved by the institutional research ethics board.

69 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics board.

70 The study was approved by the local research ethics board.

71 from 2008 to 2015 was approved by the local ethics board.

72 estern University's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.

73 proved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board; informed consent was not required.

74 ss syndrome, and with approval from research ethics boards, we collected a minimal dataset on patient

75 e existed not only a Nazi version of medical ethics but also a systematic teaching of such ethics to

76 iderations demonstrates that the language of ethics can fruitfully be deployed to shed new light on p

77 The language of ethics can help responsible parties get a clearer sense

78 On the basis of substantive ethics, clinical practice, policy, and other concerns ar

79 Ethics commission approval was obtained for this prospec

80 val was granted by South Manchester Research Ethics Committe.

81 the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (011-04-12).

82 as approved by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (Health; Reference Number HD14/42).

83 l (Boston, MA, USA) and the Rwandan National Ethics Committee (Kigali, Rwanda).

84 The study was approved by the medical ethics committee and all subjects gave written informed

85 etrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee and compliant with the Declaration of H

86 and Methods This prospective study had local ethics committee and German Federal Institute for Drugs

87 evaluation of data was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was waived.

88 study was approved by the Cantonal Research Ethics Committee and informed written consent was obtain

89 s and the Cancer Imaging Archive after local ethics committee and institutional review board approval

90 was approved by the Academic Medical Center Ethics Committee and the Great Ormond Street Hospital Et

91 Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee and the local Veterinary Office.

92 case-control study was approved by the local ethics committee and the research department of Nottingh

93 With the approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee and waiver of the informed consent requ

94 study was approved by the national research ethics committee and was performed with informed consent

95 the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee and with written consent.

96 proval of the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 ethics committee and written consent.

97 Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta

98 Local research ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta

99 Materials and Methods Institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta

100 With ethics committee approval and informed consent, mammogra

101 Research ethics committee approval and patient written informed c

102 erformed between 2006 and 2016 with research ethics committee approval and written informed consent f

103 Local ethics committee approval and written informed consent w

104 Methods Institutional review board and local ethics committee approval and written informed consent w

105 Materials and Methods The study received ethics committee approval for animal experimentation.

106 nical trials obtained the appropriate IRB or Ethics Committee approval prior to enrolling any patient

107 Research ethics committee approval was granted to record eye-trac

108 No ethics committee approval was needed.

109 Materials and Methods Local ethics committee approval was obtained at all sites for

110 Formal ethics committee approval was obtained for the study, an

111 Local ethics committee approval was obtained, and 34 patients

112 Institutional ethics committee approval was received for this prospect

113 s Written informed consent and institutional ethics committee approval were obtained.

114 The study received ethics committee approval, and all women gave written in

115 With ethics committee approval, data from the Trauma Registry

116 With ethics committee approval, records for 103 consecutive p

117 The study protocol had institutional ethics committee approval, with written informed consent

118 elsinki and was performed according to local ethics committee approval.

119 tudy was HIPAA-compliant with local research ethics committee approval.

120 udy had institutional review board and local ethics committee approval.

121 als and Methods This study had institutional ethics committee approval.

122 ccessed the detail presented on the Research Ethics Committee approved participant information sheet

123 A local ethics committee approved the study and all patients gav

124 The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived informed

125 Materials and Methods The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived the requi

126 The Lithuanian Regional Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (permission

127 The institutional research ethics committee approved the study, and parental consen

128 The institutional ethics committee approved the study, and written informe

129 Local ethics committee approved the study, with patient inform

130 vided signed consent, and the local research ethics committee approved the study.

131 The institutional ethics committee approved the use of this protocol.

132 The local ethics committee approved this prospective study, and wr

133 Materials and Methods The ethics committee approved this retrospective multicenter

134 The institutional ethics committee approved this study and waived informed

135 The local ethics committee approved this study, and informed paren

136 The local ethics committee approved this study.

137 Methods This study was approved by the local ethics committee at all participating sites.

138 ealthcare institutional review board and the Ethics Committee at Hopital Albert Schweitzer approved t

139 This study was approved by the ethics committee at the institution.

140 nimal experiments were approved by the local ethics committee for animal experiments.

141 hods The protocol was approved by the French Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments.

142 The study was approved by the ethics committee for studies in humans and the animal ca

143 Approval was waived by the local ethics committee for this retrospective study.

144 exemption was granted by the local research ethics committee for this retrospective study.

145 The local ethics committee of animal experimentation approved all

146 y protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the coordinating center on behalf of

147 The ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna app

148 Ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna, IR

149 The Ethics Committee of The Transplantation Society convened

150 s This prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Munster (

151 ve data evaluation was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics

152 sed cohort study was approved by a dedicated ethics committee overseen by the national government, an

153 based cohort study was approved by a medical ethics committee overseen by the national government, an

154 st interim analysis, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee recommended closure of the vosaroxin-co

155 e research was approved by the institutional ethics committee review board, and the volunteers provid

156 After approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee was obtained, we recruited potential re

157 With the approval of the local ethics committee, 100 consecutive patients (mean age, 61

158 After study approval by the local ethics committee, all participants provided written info

159 This study was approved by the ethics committee, and all participants gave written info

160 The study was approved by the local research ethics committee, and all participants gave written info

161 this study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave informed consent

162 The study was approved by the regional ethics committee, and all patients gave written consent.

163 Methods The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee, and all patients or their parents gave

164 The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed

165 Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed

166 This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from

167 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was waived.

168 Methods The study was approved by a research ethics committee, and participants gave written informed

169 quired data was approved by an institutional ethics committee, and the requirement for informed conse

170 ve data evaluation was approved by the local ethics committee, and the requirement to obtain informed

171 hods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from

172 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was acqui

173 s This prospective study was approved by our ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

174 The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

175 AA-compliant study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

176 This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

177 prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

178 This in vivo study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai

179 case-control study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was waive

180 study was approved by the national research ethics committee, and written patient consent was obtain

181 This is not a conventional ethics committee, frequently giving rise to a board's bu

182 dy was approved by the University's research ethics committee, which conforms to the declaration of H

183 ctive case-control study was approved by the ethics committee, which waived the need for patient cons

184 smaller were included in this institutional ethics committee-approved study.

185 re retrospectively included in this regional ethics committee-approved study.

186 d consent to participate in this prospective ethics committee-approved study.

187 itten informed consent was obtained for this ethics committee-approved study.

188 rol study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

189 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

190 by the institutional review board and local ethics committee.

191 The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee.

192 trospectively analyzed after approval by the ethics committee.

193 his study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

194 Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

195 compliant study was approved by the regional ethics committee.

196 the study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

197 on of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee.

198 al studies were approved by the local animal ethics committee.

199 The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

200 ospective study was approved by the regional ethics committee.

201 Methods Approval was obtained from the local ethics committee.

202 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

203 on of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee.

204 inistry of Health and by the local competent ethics committee.

205 protocol was approved by the regional animal ethics committee.

206 All procedures were approved by the animal ethics committee.

207 This study was approved by an independent ethics committee.

208 The protocol was approved by the ethics committee.

209 ilot study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

210 ethical approval of the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee.

211 dy was approved by the institutional medical ethics committee.

212 nimal experiments were approved by the local ethics committee.

213 vely acquired data was approved by the local ethics committee.

214 analysis was approved by the local research ethics committee.

215 Each treatment was approved by the clinical ethics committee.

216 This study was approved by the regional ethics committee; all patients gave written informed con

217 mmittee and the Great Ormond Street Hospital Ethics Committee; both committees waived the requirement

218 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee; informed consent was obtained from all

219 The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee; written informed consent was obtained.

220 This study was approved by the local ethics committee; written informed consent was obtained.

221 rious adverse events (SAEs) were reported to ethics committees and a central safety monitor.

222 f the full Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committees and the Society of Critical Care Medic

223 Institutional and regional medical ethics committees approved the study, and all patients s

224 The Ethics Committees at both hospitals and the Institutiona

225 archived protocols approved by six research ethics committees between 13 January 2000 and 25 Novembe

226 rotocols approved between 2000 and 2003 by 6 ethics committees in Canada, Germany, and Switzerland we

227 mendations approved by consensus of the full Ethics Committees of American College of Critical Care M

228 In 2014, the Cancer Prevention and Ethics Committees of ASCO commissioned another update to

229 ective study was approved by the independent ethics committees of Kanton Bern and Kanton Zurich, and

230 The study was approved by the human research ethics committees of the participating hospitals, and in

231 This study was approved by the local ethics committees on human studies, and written informed

232 cluding researchers, regulatory authorities, ethics committees, and policymakers.

233 prospective study was approved by the local ethics committees, and written informed consent was obta

234 nally, journals, funders, sponsors, research ethics committees, regulators, and legislators should en

235 The case-control study was approved by local ethics committees; all patients signed informed consent.

236 This study was approved by the local ethics committees; informed consent was obtained.

237 emmas and conflicts; (b) moral efficacy; (c) ethics communication; (d) ethical environment; and (e) o

238 odel designed to look for manifest or latent ethics conflicts and address them.

239 ority had a palliative care consult (15%) or ethics consult (4%) while in the ICU.

240 ired, and, in some cases, assisted by formal ethics consultations in vexing situations.

241 he Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics, Denmark.

242 ntrinsic religiosity or adherence to Islamic ethics do not appear to associate with negative attitude

243 Incorporating engineering ethics early during the planning stages of organoid and

244 h suggests the need for culturally sensitive ethics education and bereavement support in different cu

245 o explain general features of human society, ethics, etc.

246 ditor clarifies the landscape approach as an ethic for land management, demonstrates how it relates t

247 Kiran Jobanputra and colleagues describe an ethics framework to support the ethics oversight of inno

248 ation experts and bioethicists to produce an ethics guide.

249 Wiley has updated its publishing ethics guidelines, first published in 2006.

250 From early days, ethics in measurements have been a concern and that rema

251 Proactive ethics intervention involves a trained bioethicist in th

252 zed to either an intervention arm (Proactive Ethics Intervention) (n = 174) or control arm (n = 210).

253 Proactive Ethics Intervention, at the 95% CI, was not associated w

254 Our study finds that Proactive Ethics Intervention, provided to all patients in a criti

255 ys, we advocate for the early integration of ethics into neurotechnology.

256 cant independent effects of the frequency of ethics issues and organizational ethics support on moral

257 Responses to ethics items were rated on a 5-point scale ranging from

258 d quality; discusses principles from the ACP Ethics Manual, Sixth Edition, that should apply to all p

259 To shed greater light on the process and ethics of biomarker-based drug development, we conducted

260 What would enhance the speed, validity, and ethics of clinical studies of such countermeasures?

261 cumstances are explored and the contemporary ethics of each are compared.

262 mal models, selecting appropriate endpoints, ethics of informed consent, and regulatory issues.

263 items designed to assess their views on the ethics of pediatric donation after cardiac death.

264 ed in the scholarly literature assessing the ethics of penile transplantation.

265 essay, Karine Dube and coauthors discuss the ethics of preclinical and clinical studies relevant to a

266 has profound implications for the design and ethics of public policies.

267 However, concerns have been raised about the ethics of such research, leading to an ongoing debate as

268 Exposure and design issues include the ethics of using a placebo, the potential for overexposur

269 re, internal medicine, and surgery, nursing, ethics, organ donation and procurement, psychology, law,

270 s are not specifically addressed by existing ethics oversight mechanisms, but these mechanisms might

271 describe an ethics framework to support the ethics oversight of innovation projects in medical human

272 rations of the implications of our ideas for ethics, policy, and practice.

273 Four concepts of PCC align with clinical ethics principles and are associated with enhanced patie

274 the guidelines of the National Committee of Ethic Reflection on Animal Experimentation.

275 The study was approved by the institutional ethics review board and all participants gave informed w

276 Respondent's recommendation to an ethics review board and personal preference as a potenti

277 The local ethics review board approved this prospective study of 1

278 s This prospective study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.

279 This retrospective study was approved by an ethics review board, and the requirement to obtain infor

280 This study was approved by the ethics review board, and written informed consent was ob

281 ue samples were acquired after institutional ethics review committee approval and informed consent fr

282 some, requiring the intervention of a Senior Ethics Reviewer or advice from external experts familiar

283 study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Lancaster (reference

284 study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee; written informed consent was o

285 ions, the role of social media in scientific ethics, several instructional examples of egregious scie

286 such as cooperative intent, knowledge, work ethic, skill, and/or physical vitality.

287 and in the context of evolving international ethics standards; and (3) care to assure that approaches

288 ated the relationship between organizational ethics support and distress.

289 Increasing organizational ethics support may be a key approach.

290 mental analysis revealed that organizational ethics support moderated the moral efficacy-voice-moral

291 requency of ethics issues and organizational ethics support on moral distress.

292 ethical environment; and (e) organizational ethics support.

293 We discuss issues (e.g., sampling, ethics) that arise when doing research online and point

294 r that is consistent with their professional ethics, the professionals themselves seem to have a poor

295 lity of human acts according to Aristotelian ethics: the object of the act (step 1) and some of its c

296 thics but also a systematic teaching of such ethics to students in Nazi Germany.

297 but scholars have started to examine medical ethics under Nazism only in recent years.

298 hical committee for animal care and research ethics was obtained.

299 s and archival sources show that lectures on ethics were an integral part of the medical curriculum i

300 All ethics were approved, and participants provided written