戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 rucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and medical ethics.
2 g where there are questions regarding animal ethics.
3  an unprecedented challenge for research and ethics.
4 providing lectures or courses on publication ethics.
5 re based on clinical judgment, evidence, and ethics.
6  the institutional review board for research ethics.
7 providing lectures or courses on publication ethics.
8  rapidity, required sample volume and animal ethics.
9 ssumed that Nazi medical authorities spurned ethics.
10 ently omits or segregates content related to ethics and broader impacts of science.
11 gns that have been criticised for reasons of ethics and clinical relevance.
12 philosophical currents such as deontological ethics and consequentialism.
13 ome countries, the authors argue that beyond ethics and equity issues, it makes economic sense to inv
14                                              Ethics and gender were considered.
15                         A framework to guide ethics and health policy statement was established, whic
16 l of stakeholders was convened to develop an ethics and health policy statement.
17 rs, the health risks of living donation, the ethics and legality of an organ market, and the economic
18 tions, functional goals and quality of life, ethics and media relations.
19 ospective study was approved by the Regional Ethics and Research and Development Committees.
20 ators and re-users, (3) disclose data re-use ethics, and (4) encourage increased recognition of publi
21 eing a permanent ICU staff member, degree in ethics, and degree in intensive care.
22 ritical appraisal, contributes to veterinary ethics, and encourages the pro-active development of pro
23 ort articulates a path forward for research, ethics, and governance of clinical applications involvin
24                     We also discuss privacy, ethics, and regulatory considerations, issues of global
25 hem as needed, the relevance of professional ethics, and the need to be wise and not just smart.
26 nd psychology, transplantation, social work, ethics, and transplant administration met and reviewed c
27                                              Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.
28                                              Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.
29                        Materials and Methods Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.
30 s committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics approval number, S-320/2012), and informed consen
31                                              Ethics approval was granted by local committee.
32                                              Ethics approval was granted by South Manchester Research
33          Institutional review board research ethics approval was granted to use anonymized computed t
34                                Institutional ethics approval was granted, and informed consent was ob
35                        Materials and Methods Ethics approval was obtained from the centralized instit
36                          This study received ethics approval, and all participants provided written i
37                                        After ethics approval, data were collected from 1799 consecuti
38                                        After ethics approval, in 8 oncologic patients with dental imp
39                 The study had local research ethics approval.
40 the Norwegian committee for medical research ethics approved the study.
41 erials and Methods This was a retrospective, ethics-approved study of patients who had undergone lapa
42                     Materials and Methods An ethics-approved, retrospective review of prospective dat
43 39, Germany introduced mandatory lectures on ethics as part of the medical curriculum.
44  protocol was approved by the local research ethics board and by Health Canada.
45          The study was approved by the local ethics board and did not require informed consent.
46  The retrospective study was approved by the ethics board and did not require informed consent.
47 otocol that was approved by a local research ethics board and Health Canada and was compliant with th
48                     Study was local research ethics board and Health Canada approved and HIPAA compli
49 re included, which was approved by the local ethics board and written informed consent was obtained f
50                                     Research ethics board approval was not necessary because cadaveri
51                                     Research ethics board approval was not necessary because this stu
52               Materials and Methods Research ethics board approval was obtained and all patients sign
53                       Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospectiv
54                   Institutional research and ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospectiv
55                       SUBJECTS AND Following ethics board approval, second year residents were random
56  Materials and Methods The clinical research ethics board approved chart review, and the requirement
57                                    The local ethics board approved retrospective study of prospective
58                   The institutional research ethics board approved this study and waived informed con
59                                    The local ethics board approved this study.
60 formed consent was waived after the research ethics board approved this study.
61 tudy was obtained from the hospital research ethics board, and the need to obtain informed consent wa
62 de I-IV COPD provided informed consent to an ethics board-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol and under
63 t to be included in this institutional human ethics board-approved prospective study between January
64 s and Methods In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, healthy volunte
65               In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, with parental w
66                                           An ethics board-approved, retrospective study was conducted
67 trial approved by the institutional research ethics board.
68 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics board.
69 The study was approved by the local research ethics board.
70  from 2008 to 2015 was approved by the local ethics board.
71 estern University's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.
72 proved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board; informed consent was not required.
73 ss syndrome, and with approval from research ethics boards, we collected a minimal dataset on patient
74 e existed not only a Nazi version of medical ethics but also a systematic teaching of such ethics to
75 iderations demonstrates that the language of ethics can fruitfully be deployed to shed new light on p
76                              The language of ethics can help responsible parties get a clearer sense
77                  On the basis of substantive ethics, clinical practice, policy, and other concerns ar
78                                              Ethics commission approval was obtained for this prospec
79 val was granted by South Manchester Research Ethics Committe.
80 the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (011-04-12).
81 as approved by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (Health; Reference Number HD14/42).
82 l (Boston, MA, USA) and the Rwandan National Ethics Committee (Kigali, Rwanda).
83        The study was approved by the medical ethics committee and all subjects gave written informed
84 etrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee and compliant with the Declaration of H
85 and Methods This prospective study had local ethics committee and German Federal Institute for Drugs
86 evaluation of data was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was waived.
87  study was approved by the Cantonal Research Ethics Committee and informed written consent was obtain
88 s and the Cancer Imaging Archive after local ethics committee and institutional review board approval
89  was approved by the Academic Medical Center Ethics Committee and the Great Ormond Street Hospital Et
90  Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee and the local Veterinary Office.
91 case-control study was approved by the local ethics committee and the research department of Nottingh
92            With the approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee and waiver of the informed consent requ
93  study was approved by the national research ethics committee and was performed with informed consent
94  the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee and with written consent.
95 proval of the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 ethics committee and written consent.
96                                              Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta
97                               Local research ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta
98          Materials and Methods Institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta
99                                         With ethics committee approval and informed consent, mammogra
100                                     Research ethics committee approval and patient written informed c
101 erformed between 2006 and 2016 with research ethics committee approval and written informed consent f
102                                        Local ethics committee approval and written informed consent w
103 Methods Institutional review board and local ethics committee approval and written informed consent w
104     Materials and Methods The study received ethics committee approval for animal experimentation.
105 nical trials obtained the appropriate IRB or Ethics Committee approval prior to enrolling any patient
106                                     Research ethics committee approval was granted to record eye-trac
107                                           No ethics committee approval was needed.
108                  Materials and Methods Local ethics committee approval was obtained at all sites for
109                                       Formal ethics committee approval was obtained for the study, an
110                                        Local ethics committee approval was obtained, and 34 patients
111                                Institutional ethics committee approval was received for this prospect
112 s Written informed consent and institutional ethics committee approval were obtained.
113                           The study received ethics committee approval, and all women gave written in
114                                         With ethics committee approval, data from the Trauma Registry
115                                         With ethics committee approval, records for 103 consecutive p
116         The study protocol had institutional ethics committee approval, with written informed consent
117 elsinki and was performed according to local ethics committee approval.
118 tudy was HIPAA-compliant with local research ethics committee approval.
119 udy had institutional review board and local ethics committee approval.
120 als and Methods This study had institutional ethics committee approval.
121 ccessed the detail presented on the Research Ethics Committee approved participant information sheet
122                                      A local ethics committee approved the study and all patients gav
123                            The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived informed
124      Materials and Methods The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived the requi
125                      The Lithuanian Regional Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (permission
126                   The institutional research ethics committee approved the study, and parental consen
127                            The institutional ethics committee approved the study, and written informe
128                                        Local ethics committee approved the study, with patient inform
129 vided signed consent, and the local research ethics committee approved the study.
130                            The institutional ethics committee approved the use of this protocol.
131                                    The local ethics committee approved this prospective study, and wr
132                    Materials and Methods The ethics committee approved this retrospective multicenter
133                            The institutional ethics committee approved this study and waived informed
134                                    The local ethics committee approved this study, and informed paren
135                                    The local ethics committee approved this study.
136 Methods This study was approved by the local ethics committee at all participating sites.
137 ealthcare institutional review board and the Ethics Committee at Hopital Albert Schweitzer approved t
138               This study was approved by the ethics committee at the institution.
139 nimal experiments were approved by the local ethics committee for animal experiments.
140 hods The protocol was approved by the French Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments.
141                The study was approved by the ethics committee for studies in humans and the animal ca
142             Approval was waived by the local ethics committee for this retrospective study.
143  exemption was granted by the local research ethics committee for this retrospective study.
144                                    The local ethics committee of animal experimentation approved all
145 y protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the coordinating center on behalf of
146                                          The ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna app
147                                              Ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna, IR
148                                          The Ethics Committee of The Transplantation Society convened
149 s This prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Munster (
150 ve data evaluation was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics
151 sed cohort study was approved by a dedicated ethics committee overseen by the national government, an
152 based cohort study was approved by a medical ethics committee overseen by the national government, an
153 st interim analysis, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee recommended closure of the vosaroxin-co
154 e research was approved by the institutional ethics committee review board, and the volunteers provid
155       After approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee was obtained, we recruited potential re
156               With the approval of the local ethics committee, 100 consecutive patients (mean age, 61
157            After study approval by the local ethics committee, all participants provided written info
158               This study was approved by the ethics committee, and all participants gave written info
159 The study was approved by the local research ethics committee, and all participants gave written info
160 this study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave informed consent
161       The study was approved by the regional ethics committee, and all patients gave written consent.
162  Methods The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee, and all patients or their parents gave
163          The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed
164  Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed
165         This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from
166         This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from
167          The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from
168 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was waived.
169 Methods The study was approved by a research ethics committee, and participants gave written informed
170 quired data was approved by an institutional ethics committee, and the requirement for informed conse
171 ve data evaluation was approved by the local ethics committee, and the requirement to obtain informed
172 hods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from
173 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was acqui
174 s This prospective study was approved by our ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
175          The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
176 AA-compliant study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
177         This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
178  prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
179 This in vivo study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
180 case-control study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was waive
181  study was approved by the national research ethics committee, and written patient consent was obtain
182                   This is not a conventional ethics committee, frequently giving rise to a board's bu
183 dy was approved by the University's research ethics committee, which conforms to the declaration of H
184 ctive case-control study was approved by the ethics committee, which waived the need for patient cons
185  smaller were included in this institutional ethics committee-approved study.
186 re retrospectively included in this regional ethics committee-approved study.
187 d consent to participate in this prospective ethics committee-approved study.
188 itten informed consent was obtained for this ethics committee-approved study.
189 rol study was approved by the local research ethics committee.
190 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.
191  by the institutional review board and local ethics committee.
192 The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee.
193 trospectively analyzed after approval by the ethics committee.
194 his study was approved by the local research ethics committee.
195  Methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee.
196 compliant study was approved by the regional ethics committee.
197 the study was approved by the local research ethics committee.
198 on of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee.
199 al studies were approved by the local animal ethics committee.
200          The study was approved by the local ethics committee.
201 ospective study was approved by the regional ethics committee.
202 Methods Approval was obtained from the local ethics committee.
203 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.
204 on of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee.
205 inistry of Health and by the local competent ethics committee.
206 protocol was approved by the regional animal ethics committee.
207   All procedures were approved by the animal ethics committee.
208    This study was approved by an independent ethics committee.
209             The protocol was approved by the ethics committee.
210 ilot study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.
211  ethical approval of the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee.
212 dy was approved by the institutional medical ethics committee.
213 re approved by the Utrecht University Animal Ethics Committee.
214 nimal experiments were approved by the local ethics committee.
215  analysis was approved by the local research ethics committee.
216 vely acquired data was approved by the local ethics committee.
217  Each treatment was approved by the clinical ethics committee.
218      This study was approved by the regional ethics committee; all patients gave written informed con
219 mmittee and the Great Ormond Street Hospital Ethics Committee; both committees waived the requirement
220 tive study was approved by the institutional ethics committee; informed consent was obtained from all
221 The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee; written informed consent was obtained.
222         This study was approved by the local ethics committee; written informed consent was obtained.
223 rious adverse events (SAEs) were reported to ethics committees and a central safety monitor.
224 f the full Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committees and the Society of Critical Care Medic
225           Institutional and regional medical ethics committees approved the study, and all patients s
226                                        Local ethics committees approved the study; all participants g
227                                          The Ethics Committees at both hospitals and the Institutiona
228  archived protocols approved by six research ethics committees between 13 January 2000 and 25 Novembe
229 rotocols approved between 2000 and 2003 by 6 ethics committees in Canada, Germany, and Switzerland we
230 mendations approved by consensus of the full Ethics Committees of American College of Critical Care M
231           In 2014, the Cancer Prevention and Ethics Committees of ASCO commissioned another update to
232 ective study was approved by the independent ethics committees of Kanton Bern and Kanton Zurich, and
233 The study was approved by the human research ethics committees of the participating hospitals, and in
234         This study was approved by the local ethics committees on human studies, and written informed
235 cluding researchers, regulatory authorities, ethics committees, and policymakers.
236  prospective study was approved by the local ethics committees, and written informed consent was obta
237 nally, journals, funders, sponsors, research ethics committees, regulators, and legislators should en
238 The case-control study was approved by local ethics committees; all patients signed informed consent.
239         This study was approved by the local ethics committees; informed consent was obtained.
240 emmas and conflicts; (b) moral efficacy; (c) ethics communication; (d) ethical environment; and (e) o
241 odel designed to look for manifest or latent ethics conflicts and address them.
242 ority had a palliative care consult (15%) or ethics consult (4%) while in the ICU.
243 ired, and, in some cases, assisted by formal ethics consultations in vexing situations.
244 he Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics, Denmark.
245 ntrinsic religiosity or adherence to Islamic ethics do not appear to associate with negative attitude
246                    Incorporating engineering ethics early during the planning stages of organoid and
247 h suggests the need for culturally sensitive ethics education and bereavement support in different cu
248 o explain general features of human society, ethics, etc.
249  Kiran Jobanputra and colleagues describe an ethics framework to support the ethics oversight of inno
250 ation experts and bioethicists to produce an ethics guide.
251             Wiley has updated its publishing ethics guidelines, first published in 2006.
252                             From early days, ethics in measurements have been a concern and that rema
253                                    Proactive ethics intervention involves a trained bioethicist in th
254 zed to either an intervention arm (Proactive Ethics Intervention) (n = 174) or control arm (n = 210).
255                                    Proactive Ethics Intervention, at the 95% CI, was not associated w
256               Our study finds that Proactive Ethics Intervention, provided to all patients in a criti
257 ys, we advocate for the early integration of ethics into neurotechnology.
258 cant independent effects of the frequency of ethics issues and organizational ethics support on moral
259                                 Responses to ethics items were rated on a 5-point scale ranging from
260 d quality; discusses principles from the ACP Ethics Manual, Sixth Edition, that should apply to all p
261     To shed greater light on the process and ethics of biomarker-based drug development, we conducted
262  What would enhance the speed, validity, and ethics of clinical studies of such countermeasures?
263 cumstances are explored and the contemporary ethics of each are compared.
264 mal models, selecting appropriate endpoints, ethics of informed consent, and regulatory issues.
265  items designed to assess their views on the ethics of pediatric donation after cardiac death.
266 ed in the scholarly literature assessing the ethics of penile transplantation.
267 essay, Karine Dube and coauthors discuss the ethics of preclinical and clinical studies relevant to a
268 has profound implications for the design and ethics of public policies.
269 However, concerns have been raised about the ethics of such research, leading to an ongoing debate as
270       Exposure and design issues include the ethics of using a placebo, the potential for overexposur
271 re, internal medicine, and surgery, nursing, ethics, organ donation and procurement, psychology, law,
272 s are not specifically addressed by existing ethics oversight mechanisms, but these mechanisms might
273  describe an ethics framework to support the ethics oversight of innovation projects in medical human
274 rations of the implications of our ideas for ethics, policy, and practice.
275     Four concepts of PCC align with clinical ethics principles and are associated with enhanced patie
276  The study was approved by the institutional ethics review board and all participants gave informed w
277            Respondent's recommendation to an ethics review board and personal preference as a potenti
278                                    The local ethics review board approved this prospective study of 1
279 s This prospective study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.
280  This retrospective study was approved by an ethics review board, and the requirement to obtain infor
281               This study was approved by the ethics review board, and written informed consent was ob
282 ue samples were acquired after institutional ethics review committee approval and informed consent fr
283 some, requiring the intervention of a Senior Ethics Reviewer or advice from external experts familiar
284  study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Lancaster (reference
285  study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee; written informed consent was o
286 ions, the role of social media in scientific ethics, several instructional examples of egregious scie
287 and in the context of evolving international ethics standards; and (3) care to assure that approaches
288 ated the relationship between organizational ethics support and distress.
289                    Increasing organizational ethics support may be a key approach.
290 mental analysis revealed that organizational ethics support moderated the moral efficacy-voice-moral
291 requency of ethics issues and organizational ethics support on moral distress.
292  ethical environment; and (e) organizational ethics support.
293           We discuss issues (e.g., sampling, ethics) that arise when doing research online and point
294 r that is consistent with their professional ethics, the professionals themselves seem to have a poor
295 lity of human acts according to Aristotelian ethics: the object of the act (step 1) and some of its c
296 thics but also a systematic teaching of such ethics to students in Nazi Germany.
297 but scholars have started to examine medical ethics under Nazism only in recent years.
298 hical committee for animal care and research ethics was obtained.
299 s and archival sources show that lectures on ethics were an integral part of the medical curriculum i
300                                          All ethics were approved, and participants provided written

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top