1 rucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and medical
ethics.
2 g where there are questions regarding animal
ethics.
3 an unprecedented challenge for research and
ethics.
4 providing lectures or courses on publication
ethics.
5 re based on clinical judgment, evidence, and
ethics.
6 the institutional review board for research
ethics.
7 providing lectures or courses on publication
ethics.
8 rapidity, required sample volume and animal
ethics.
9 ssumed that Nazi medical authorities spurned
ethics.
10 ently omits or segregates content related to
ethics and broader impacts of science.
11 gns that have been criticised for reasons of
ethics and clinical relevance.
12 philosophical currents such as deontological
ethics and consequentialism.
13 ome countries, the authors argue that beyond
ethics and equity issues, it makes economic sense to inv
14 Ethics and gender were considered.
15 A framework to guide
ethics and health policy statement was established, whic
16 l of stakeholders was convened to develop an
ethics and health policy statement.
17 rs, the health risks of living donation, the
ethics and legality of an organ market, and the economic
18 tions, functional goals and quality of life,
ethics and media relations.
19 ospective study was approved by the Regional
Ethics and Research and Development Committees.
20 ators and re-users, (3) disclose data re-use
ethics,
and (4) encourage increased recognition of publi
21 eing a permanent ICU staff member, degree in
ethics,
and degree in intensive care.
22 ritical appraisal, contributes to veterinary
ethics,
and encourages the pro-active development of pro
23 ort articulates a path forward for research,
ethics,
and governance of clinical applications involvin
24 We also discuss privacy,
ethics,
and regulatory considerations, issues of global
25 hem as needed, the relevance of professional
ethics,
and the need to be wise and not just smart.
26 nd psychology, transplantation, social work,
ethics,
and transplant administration met and reviewed c
27 Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.
28 Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.
29 Materials and Methods
Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained.
30 s committee of the University of Heidelberg (
ethics approval number, S-320/2012), and informed consen
31 Ethics approval was granted by local committee.
32 Ethics approval was granted by South Manchester Research
33 Institutional review board research
ethics approval was granted to use anonymized computed t
34 Institutional
ethics approval was granted, and informed consent was ob
35 Materials and Methods
Ethics approval was obtained from the centralized instit
36 This study received
ethics approval, and all participants provided written i
37 After
ethics approval, data were collected from 1799 consecuti
38 After
ethics approval, in 8 oncologic patients with dental imp
39 The study had local research
ethics approval.
40 the Norwegian committee for medical research
ethics approved the study.
41 erials and Methods This was a retrospective,
ethics-
approved study of patients who had undergone lapa
42 Materials and Methods An
ethics-
approved, retrospective review of prospective dat
43 39, Germany introduced mandatory lectures on
ethics as part of the medical curriculum.
44 protocol was approved by the local research
ethics board and by Health Canada.
45 The study was approved by the local
ethics board and did not require informed consent.
46 The retrospective study was approved by the
ethics board and did not require informed consent.
47 otocol that was approved by a local research
ethics board and Health Canada and was compliant with th
48 Study was local research
ethics board and Health Canada approved and HIPAA compli
49 re included, which was approved by the local
ethics board and written informed consent was obtained f
50 Research
ethics board approval was not necessary because cadaveri
51 Research
ethics board approval was not necessary because this stu
52 Materials and Methods Research
ethics board approval was obtained and all patients sign
53 Institutional research
ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospectiv
54 Institutional research and
ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospectiv
55 SUBJECTS AND Following
ethics board approval, second year residents were random
56 Materials and Methods The clinical research
ethics board approved chart review, and the requirement
57 The local
ethics board approved retrospective study of prospective
58 The institutional research
ethics board approved this study and waived informed con
59 The local
ethics board approved this study.
60 formed consent was waived after the research
ethics board approved this study.
61 tudy was obtained from the hospital research
ethics board, and the need to obtain informed consent wa
62 de I-IV COPD provided informed consent to an
ethics board-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol and under
63 t to be included in this institutional human
ethics board-approved prospective study between January
64 s and Methods In this institutional research
ethics board-approved prospective study, healthy volunte
65 In this institutional research
ethics board-approved prospective study, with parental w
66 An
ethics board-approved, retrospective study was conducted
67 trial approved by the institutional research
ethics board.
68 tive study was approved by the institutional
ethics board.
69 The study was approved by the local research
ethics board.
70 from 2008 to 2015 was approved by the local
ethics board.
71 estern University's Health Sciences Research
Ethics Board.
72 proved by the University of Toronto Research
Ethics Board; informed consent was not required.
73 ss syndrome, and with approval from research
ethics boards, we collected a minimal dataset on patient
74 e existed not only a Nazi version of medical
ethics but also a systematic teaching of such ethics to
75 iderations demonstrates that the language of
ethics can fruitfully be deployed to shed new light on p
76 The language of
ethics can help responsible parties get a clearer sense
77 On the basis of substantive
ethics,
clinical practice, policy, and other concerns ar
78 Ethics commission approval was obtained for this prospec
79 val was granted by South Manchester Research
Ethics Committe.
80 the University of Zambia Biomedical Research
Ethics Committee (011-04-12).
81 as approved by the University of Otago Human
Ethics Committee (Health; Reference Number HD14/42).
82 l (Boston, MA, USA) and the Rwandan National
Ethics Committee (Kigali, Rwanda).
83 The study was approved by the medical
ethics committee and all subjects gave written informed
84 etrospective study was approved by the local
ethics committee and compliant with the Declaration of H
85 and Methods This prospective study had local
ethics committee and German Federal Institute for Drugs
86 evaluation of data was approved by the local
ethics committee and informed consent was waived.
87 study was approved by the Cantonal Research
Ethics Committee and informed written consent was obtain
88 s and the Cancer Imaging Archive after local
ethics committee and institutional review board approval
89 was approved by the Academic Medical Center
Ethics Committee and the Great Ormond Street Hospital Et
90 Methods The study was approved by the local
ethics committee and the local Veterinary Office.
91 case-control study was approved by the local
ethics committee and the research department of Nottingh
92 With the approval of the Hospital
Ethics Committee and waiver of the informed consent requ
93 study was approved by the national research
ethics committee and was performed with informed consent
94 the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research
Ethics Committee and with written consent.
95 proval of the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2
ethics committee and written consent.
96 Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta
97 Local research
ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta
98 Materials and Methods Institutional
ethics committee approval and informed consent were obta
99 With
ethics committee approval and informed consent, mammogra
100 Research
ethics committee approval and patient written informed c
101 erformed between 2006 and 2016 with research
ethics committee approval and written informed consent f
102 Local
ethics committee approval and written informed consent w
103 Methods Institutional review board and local
ethics committee approval and written informed consent w
104 Materials and Methods The study received
ethics committee approval for animal experimentation.
105 nical trials obtained the appropriate IRB or
Ethics Committee approval prior to enrolling any patient
106 Research
ethics committee approval was granted to record eye-trac
107 No
ethics committee approval was needed.
108 Materials and Methods Local
ethics committee approval was obtained at all sites for
109 Formal
ethics committee approval was obtained for the study, an
110 Local
ethics committee approval was obtained, and 34 patients
111 Institutional
ethics committee approval was received for this prospect
112 s Written informed consent and institutional
ethics committee approval were obtained.
113 The study received
ethics committee approval, and all women gave written in
114 With
ethics committee approval, data from the Trauma Registry
115 With
ethics committee approval, records for 103 consecutive p
116 The study protocol had institutional
ethics committee approval, with written informed consent
117 elsinki and was performed according to local
ethics committee approval.
118 tudy was HIPAA-compliant with local research
ethics committee approval.
119 udy had institutional review board and local
ethics committee approval.
120 als and Methods This study had institutional
ethics committee approval.
121 ccessed the detail presented on the Research
Ethics Committee approved participant information sheet
122 A local
ethics committee approved the study and all patients gav
123 The institutional
ethics committee approved the study and waived informed
124 Materials and Methods The institutional
ethics committee approved the study and waived the requi
125 The Lithuanian Regional
Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (permission
126 The institutional research
ethics committee approved the study, and parental consen
127 The institutional
ethics committee approved the study, and written informe
128 Local
ethics committee approved the study, with patient inform
129 vided signed consent, and the local research
ethics committee approved the study.
130 The institutional
ethics committee approved the use of this protocol.
131 The local
ethics committee approved this prospective study, and wr
132 Materials and Methods The
ethics committee approved this retrospective multicenter
133 The institutional
ethics committee approved this study and waived informed
134 The local
ethics committee approved this study, and informed paren
135 The local
ethics committee approved this study.
136 Methods This study was approved by the local
ethics committee at all participating sites.
137 ealthcare institutional review board and the
Ethics Committee at Hopital Albert Schweitzer approved t
138 This study was approved by the
ethics committee at the institution.
139 nimal experiments were approved by the local
ethics committee for animal experiments.
140 hods The protocol was approved by the French
Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments.
141 The study was approved by the
ethics committee for studies in humans and the animal ca
142 Approval was waived by the local
ethics committee for this retrospective study.
143 exemption was granted by the local research
ethics committee for this retrospective study.
144 The local
ethics committee of animal experimentation approved all
145 y protocol was approved by the institutional
ethics committee of the coordinating center on behalf of
146 The
ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna app
147 Ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna, IR
148 The
Ethics Committee of The Transplantation Society convened
149 s This prospective study was approved by the
ethics committee of the University Hospital of Munster (
150 ve data evaluation was approved by the local
ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (ethics
151 sed cohort study was approved by a dedicated
ethics committee overseen by the national government, an
152 based cohort study was approved by a medical
ethics committee overseen by the national government, an
153 st interim analysis, the Data Monitoring and
Ethics Committee recommended closure of the vosaroxin-co
154 e research was approved by the institutional
ethics committee review board, and the volunteers provid
155 After approval from the Human Research
Ethics Committee was obtained, we recruited potential re
156 With the approval of the local
ethics committee, 100 consecutive patients (mean age, 61
157 After study approval by the local
ethics committee, all participants provided written info
158 This study was approved by the
ethics committee, and all participants gave written info
159 The study was approved by the local research
ethics committee, and all participants gave written info
160 this study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee, and all patients gave informed consent
161 The study was approved by the regional
ethics committee, and all patients gave written consent.
162 Methods The study was approved by the local
Ethics Committee, and all patients or their parents gave
163 The study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed
164 Methods The study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed
165 This study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from
166 This study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from
167 The study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from
168 tive study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee, and informed consent was waived.
169 Methods The study was approved by a research
ethics committee, and participants gave written informed
170 quired data was approved by an institutional
ethics committee, and the requirement for informed conse
171 ve data evaluation was approved by the local
ethics committee, and the requirement to obtain informed
172 hods This two-part study was approved by the
ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from
173 tive study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee, and written informed consent was acqui
174 s This prospective study was approved by our
ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
175 The study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
176 AA-compliant study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
177 This study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
178 prospective study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
179 This in vivo study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtai
180 case-control study was approved by the local
ethics committee, and written informed consent was waive
181 study was approved by the national research
ethics committee, and written patient consent was obtain
182 This is not a conventional
ethics committee, frequently giving rise to a board's bu
183 dy was approved by the University's research
ethics committee, which conforms to the declaration of H
184 ctive case-control study was approved by the
ethics committee, which waived the need for patient cons
185 smaller were included in this institutional
ethics committee-approved study.
186 re retrospectively included in this regional
ethics committee-approved study.
187 d consent to participate in this prospective
ethics committee-approved study.
188 itten informed consent was obtained for this
ethics committee-approved study.
189 rol study was approved by the local research
ethics committee.
190 tive study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee.
191 by the institutional review board and local
ethics committee.
192 The study protocol was approved by the local
ethics committee.
193 trospectively analyzed after approval by the
ethics committee.
194 his study was approved by the local research
ethics committee.
195 Methods The study was approved by the local
ethics committee.
196 compliant study was approved by the regional
ethics committee.
197 the study was approved by the local research
ethics committee.
198 on of Helsinki and was approved by the local
ethics committee.
199 al studies were approved by the local animal
ethics committee.
200 The study was approved by the local
ethics committee.
201 ospective study was approved by the regional
ethics committee.
202 Methods Approval was obtained from the local
ethics committee.
203 tive study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee.
204 on of Helsinki and was approved by the local
ethics committee.
205 inistry of Health and by the local competent
ethics committee.
206 protocol was approved by the regional animal
ethics committee.
207 All procedures were approved by the animal
ethics committee.
208 This study was approved by an independent
ethics committee.
209 The protocol was approved by the
ethics committee.
210 ilot study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee.
211 ethical approval of the Nottingham Research
Ethics Committee.
212 dy was approved by the institutional medical
ethics committee.
213 re approved by the Utrecht University Animal
Ethics Committee.
214 nimal experiments were approved by the local
ethics committee.
215 analysis was approved by the local research
ethics committee.
216 vely acquired data was approved by the local
ethics committee.
217 Each treatment was approved by the clinical
ethics committee.
218 This study was approved by the regional
ethics committee; all patients gave written informed con
219 mmittee and the Great Ormond Street Hospital
Ethics Committee; both committees waived the requirement
220 tive study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee; informed consent was obtained from all
221 The study protocol was approved by the local
ethics committee; written informed consent was obtained.
222 This study was approved by the local
ethics committee; written informed consent was obtained.
223 rious adverse events (SAEs) were reported to
ethics committees and a central safety monitor.
224 f the full Society of Critical Care Medicine
Ethics Committees and the Society of Critical Care Medic
225 Institutional and regional medical
ethics committees approved the study, and all patients s
226 Local
ethics committees approved the study; all participants g
227 The
Ethics Committees at both hospitals and the Institutiona
228 archived protocols approved by six research
ethics committees between 13 January 2000 and 25 Novembe
229 rotocols approved between 2000 and 2003 by 6
ethics committees in Canada, Germany, and Switzerland we
230 mendations approved by consensus of the full
Ethics Committees of American College of Critical Care M
231 In 2014, the Cancer Prevention and
Ethics Committees of ASCO commissioned another update to
232 ective study was approved by the independent
ethics committees of Kanton Bern and Kanton Zurich, and
233 The study was approved by the human research
ethics committees of the participating hospitals, and in
234 This study was approved by the local
ethics committees on human studies, and written informed
235 cluding researchers, regulatory authorities,
ethics committees, and policymakers.
236 prospective study was approved by the local
ethics committees, and written informed consent was obta
237 nally, journals, funders, sponsors, research
ethics committees, regulators, and legislators should en
238 The case-control study was approved by local
ethics committees; all patients signed informed consent.
239 This study was approved by the local
ethics committees; informed consent was obtained.
240 emmas and conflicts; (b) moral efficacy; (c)
ethics communication; (d) ethical environment; and (e) o
241 odel designed to look for manifest or latent
ethics conflicts and address them.
242 ority had a palliative care consult (15%) or
ethics consult (4%) while in the ICU.
243 ired, and, in some cases, assisted by formal
ethics consultations in vexing situations.
244 he Regional Committee on Biomedical Research
Ethics,
Denmark.
245 ntrinsic religiosity or adherence to Islamic
ethics do not appear to associate with negative attitude
246 Incorporating engineering
ethics early during the planning stages of organoid and
247 h suggests the need for culturally sensitive
ethics education and bereavement support in different cu
248 o explain general features of human society,
ethics,
etc.
249 Kiran Jobanputra and colleagues describe an
ethics framework to support the ethics oversight of inno
250 ation experts and bioethicists to produce an
ethics guide.
251 Wiley has updated its publishing
ethics guidelines, first published in 2006.
252 From early days,
ethics in measurements have been a concern and that rema
253 Proactive
ethics intervention involves a trained bioethicist in th
254 zed to either an intervention arm (Proactive
Ethics Intervention) (n = 174) or control arm (n = 210).
255 Proactive
Ethics Intervention, at the 95% CI, was not associated w
256 Our study finds that Proactive
Ethics Intervention, provided to all patients in a criti
257 ys, we advocate for the early integration of
ethics into neurotechnology.
258 cant independent effects of the frequency of
ethics issues and organizational ethics support on moral
259 Responses to
ethics items were rated on a 5-point scale ranging from
260 d quality; discusses principles from the ACP
Ethics Manual, Sixth Edition, that should apply to all p
261 To shed greater light on the process and
ethics of biomarker-based drug development, we conducted
262 What would enhance the speed, validity, and
ethics of clinical studies of such countermeasures?
263 cumstances are explored and the contemporary
ethics of each are compared.
264 mal models, selecting appropriate endpoints,
ethics of informed consent, and regulatory issues.
265 items designed to assess their views on the
ethics of pediatric donation after cardiac death.
266 ed in the scholarly literature assessing the
ethics of penile transplantation.
267 essay, Karine Dube and coauthors discuss the
ethics of preclinical and clinical studies relevant to a
268 has profound implications for the design and
ethics of public policies.
269 However, concerns have been raised about the
ethics of such research, leading to an ongoing debate as
270 Exposure and design issues include the
ethics of using a placebo, the potential for overexposur
271 re, internal medicine, and surgery, nursing,
ethics,
organ donation and procurement, psychology, law,
272 s are not specifically addressed by existing
ethics oversight mechanisms, but these mechanisms might
273 describe an ethics framework to support the
ethics oversight of innovation projects in medical human
274 rations of the implications of our ideas for
ethics,
policy, and practice.
275 Four concepts of PCC align with clinical
ethics principles and are associated with enhanced patie
276 The study was approved by the institutional
ethics review board and all participants gave informed w
277 Respondent's recommendation to an
ethics review board and personal preference as a potenti
278 The local
ethics review board approved this prospective study of 1
279 s This prospective study was approved by the
ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.
280 This retrospective study was approved by an
ethics review board, and the requirement to obtain infor
281 This study was approved by the
ethics review board, and written informed consent was ob
282 ue samples were acquired after institutional
ethics review committee approval and informed consent fr
283 some, requiring the intervention of a Senior
Ethics Reviewer or advice from external experts familiar
284 study was approved by the National Research
Ethics Service Committee North West-Lancaster (reference
285 study was approved by the National Research
Ethics Service Committee; written informed consent was o
286 ions, the role of social media in scientific
ethics,
several instructional examples of egregious scie
287 and in the context of evolving international
ethics standards; and (3) care to assure that approaches
288 ated the relationship between organizational
ethics support and distress.
289 Increasing organizational
ethics support may be a key approach.
290 mental analysis revealed that organizational
ethics support moderated the moral efficacy-voice-moral
291 requency of ethics issues and organizational
ethics support on moral distress.
292 ethical environment; and (e) organizational
ethics support.
293 We discuss issues (e.g., sampling,
ethics)
that arise when doing research online and point
294 r that is consistent with their professional
ethics,
the professionals themselves seem to have a poor
295 lity of human acts according to Aristotelian
ethics:
the object of the act (step 1) and some of its c
296 thics but also a systematic teaching of such
ethics to students in Nazi Germany.
297 but scholars have started to examine medical
ethics under Nazism only in recent years.
298 hical committee for animal care and research
ethics was obtained.
299 s and archival sources show that lectures on
ethics were an integral part of the medical curriculum i
300 All
ethics were approved, and participants provided written