ライフサイエンスコーパス: eviction

1 d targets to invest more effort in resisting eviction.

2 ning nucleosomes without ensuing histone H2A eviction.

3 es and suppressing cotranscriptional histone eviction.

4 ex promotes transcription through nucleosome eviction.

5 the CTCF binding site, and, eventually, CTCF eviction.

6 e the ATR kinase, showed no overt nucleosome eviction.

7 ake place in the absence of overt nucleosome eviction.

8 , histone variant incorporation, and histone eviction.

9 BAF complexes have different effects on PRC eviction.

10 ls, finding impaired histone acetylation and eviction.

11 ional to the timescale for active nucleosome eviction.

12 hole whose binding results in stable histone eviction.

13 d has been implicated in promoter nucleosome eviction.

14 tone acetylation is important for nucleosome eviction.

15 oned nucleosomes where it induces nucleosome eviction, alters local histone modifications, and remode

16 NMT3A(R882) cells showed impaired nucleosome eviction and chromatin remodeling in response to anthrac

17 Asf1 mediates histone H3, but not H2B, eviction and deposition during Pol II elongation, sugges

18 Since ASF1 mediates eviction and deposition of histones during transcription

19 cations for ATP-driven mechanisms of histone eviction and deposition.

20 tion, histone variant expression, nucleosome eviction and DNA damage repair.

21 ncreased 5-methylcytosine, resulting in CTCF eviction and exon exclusion.

22 leosome stability and facilitates nucleosome eviction and hence gene expression in vivo.

23 ates a highly dynamic equilibrium of histone eviction and histone deposition and that there is signif

24 ied by Swi-Snf recruitment, promoter histone eviction and Sas3 and Ada2(Gcn5)-dependent histone H3K14

25 ed a striking correlation between nucleosome eviction and strong activator and acetyl-CoA-dependent t

26 tion of Gcn4 and Tup1 enhances Gcn4 promoter eviction and that multiple Tup1-interacting proteins bec

27 tivation, facilitating its eventual promoter eviction and transcriptional shut off.

28 bilizes the nucleosome by preventing H2A-H2B eviction and, thereby, retains the "docking site" for Se

29 se depletion: enhanced Atf1 binding, histone eviction, and histone H3 acetylation.

30 adox points to nucleosome destabilization or eviction as a defining feature of the meiotic resection

31 en involves chromatin remodeling and histone eviction at active promoters.

32 hough transcriptional activation and histone eviction at CHA1 depends on Swi/Snf, Swi/Snf recruitment

33 stone chaperone each required for nucleosome eviction at distinct promoter regions.

34 uggest that Swi/Snf is important for histone eviction at enhancers and that it also functions as a Po

35 the preinitiation complex (PIC), in histone eviction at inducible and constitutively active promoter

36 utants implicated Gcn5, Snf2, and Ydj1 in H3 eviction at most, but not all, Gcn4 target promoters, wi

37 we observed a distinct mechanism of histone eviction at the Alad1b promoter.

38 remodeling complex to restore normal histone eviction at the damage sites.

39 nf recruitment is not sufficient for histone eviction at the induced CHA1 promoter.

40 se three cofactors cooperate similarly in H3 eviction at virtually all yeast promoters.

41 negative kin discrimination is restricted to eviction attempts of older females capable of resistance

42 ivation after glucose shutoff caused histone eviction both at 601 and elsewhere in the ORF.

43 a novel activity, which prevents nucleosome eviction but not remodeling mediated by the ATP-dependen

44 involve chromatin remodeling and nucleosome eviction, but whether dysfunctional telomeres undergo ch

45 ding Protein (TBP) was the most resistant to eviction by PRC1.

46 ome sliding by SNF2h while promoting octamer eviction by the SWI-SNF complex, RSC.

47 lly, inactivation of RNAPII itself abolishes eviction completely.

48 ur discovery points to a direct link between eviction-coupled erasure of the ubiquitin mark from ubH2

49 ent with a role for Vps75 in histone H2A/H2B eviction/deposition during transcription.

50 cify distinct downstream patterns of histone eviction/deposition.

51 pitation studies demonstrate that histone H3 eviction during active transcription is decelerated in a

52 Our studies reveal that H3 incorporation and eviction dynamics identify cells with different cell div

53 sfer activity, resulting in targeted histone eviction from a nucleosome probe.

54 , inactivation of Gcn5p decreases nucleosome eviction from both GAL1 and a long ( approximately 8 kb)

55 it forms en route to deposition or following eviction from chromatin remains limited.

56 g proteins after their ubiquitination at and eviction from chromatin; as a deubiquitinase, specific t

57 eir deposition onto DNA, and aiding in their eviction from DNA.

58 Nucleosome eviction from Msn2p binding sites was common across the

59 ular disulfide bonds in protamines and their eviction from sperm during fertilization.

60 duals are specifically targeted for forcible eviction from the group, often suffering severe injury,

61 Histone eviction from the PHO5 promoter during activation occurs

62 ion by RNAPII affect the kinetics of histone eviction from the PHO5 promoter.

63 alating aggression, culminating in temporary evictions from the group.

64 the Swi/Snf complex is required for histone eviction in a manner that is independent of transcriptio

65 ation and enhanced RSC occupancy and histone eviction in coding sequences and stimulates the rate of

66 etylation-mediated nucleosome remodeling and eviction in coding sequences that stimulates transcripti

67 Defective H3 eviction in cofactor mutants was coupled with reduced Po

68 RSC, and H2AZ are dispensable for robust H3 eviction in otherwise wild-type cells.

69 ntiation, revealing a common principle of H3 eviction in the proliferating and endocycling domains of

70 ve linked the activity of SWI/SNF to histone eviction in trans from gene promoters.

71 (Pol) II, but a factor that mediates histone eviction in vivo has not yet been identified.

72 may account for SWI/SNF-dependent nucleosome eviction in vivo.

73 H3 eviction is a fast process occurring within the G2 phase

74 These findings indicate that nucleosome eviction is crucial for robust transcription of highly e

75 This finding suggests that histone eviction is modulated by factors that are not linked to

76 ting to an active state including nucleosome eviction is required for activation of protein expressio

77 that BAF opposes PRC by rapid, ATP-dependent eviction, leading to the formation of accessible chromat

78 s ATP dependent, consistent with a transient eviction mechanism.

79 r, p300, and acetyl-CoA-dependent nucleosome eviction mediated by the histone chaperone Nap1.

80 ion of the telomeric chromatin or nucleosome eviction near the telomere terminus.

81 More eviction occurred on genes with 'closed' promoters, asso

82 Surprisingly, BAF-mediated PRC eviction occurs in the absence of RNA polymerase II (Pol

83 altered histone exchange kinetics may affect eviction of Cse4 from noncentromeric loci.

84 Preventing the eviction of EED from the Kiss1 promoter disrupted pulsat

85 hat CHD1 directs short spacing, resulting in eviction of H1 and chromatin unfolding, whereas ISW1 dir

86 ts PARP1/ARTD1, and initiates PARP1-mediated eviction of H1 from the chromatin fiber.

87 al changes, and arginine mutants prevent the eviction of H2A and dissociation of polyubiquitinated DD

88 dependent chromatin disruption reflects both eviction of H2A-H2B dimers and the presence of queued Po

89 eosomes at DSBs is transient, and that rapid eviction of H2A.Z is required for DSB repair.

90 dopsis HSFs, which cause a rapid and dynamic eviction of H2A.Z nucleosomes at target genes.

91 active transcription complexes is coupled to eviction of H2A.Z nucleosomes, and disassembly is couple

92 fore propose that the transcription-mediated eviction of H2A/H2B dimers is an important mechanism tha

93 The partial eviction of H3 from the nucleosomes is dependent on ubiq

94 say, we demonstrate that Rad26p promotes the eviction of histone H2A-H2B dimer and prevents the reass

95 e fact that Rtt109p regulates the deposition/eviction of histone H2B in addition to its role in stimu

96 Here, we show that Rtt109p promotes the eviction of histone H3 from a fast inducible yeast gene,

97 revealed that the SWI/SNF complex catalyzed eviction of histones from the Gal4-bound nucleosomes.

98 nnate immune responses, and modification and eviction of histones from viral chromatin.

99 by either sliding nucleosomes on DNA or the eviction of histones.

100 PTBP1 proceeded to assemble an EDC with the eviction of hnRNP proteins, the late recruitment of SR p

101 deler, is required for activation-associated eviction of Htz1 specifically from promoters of the Thr4

102 This down-regulation is accompanied by eviction of Ifh1p and recruitment of Crf1p, followed by

103 Hence, by eviction of incorrect polymerases at the fork, the clamp

104 Thus, chaperone-assisted eviction of linker histones and Shugoshins is a fundamen

105 Eviction of Mcm requires replication; during replication

106 structure at the PD-1 locus, leading to the eviction of NFATc1 from its site.

107 eads to hyperstimulation of ATPase activity, eviction of nucleosomal H2A-H2B, and deposition of H2A.Z

108 that deletion of the HBR domain impairs the eviction of nucleosomes at the promoters and open readin

109 ption in vivo are typically characterized by eviction of nucleosomes from chromatin and are experimen

110 Third, yFACT is required for eviction of nucleosomes from the GAL1-10 promoter during

111 likely in SAGA, stimulates modification and eviction of nucleosomes in transcribed coding sequences

112 urthermore, we observe transcription-coupled eviction of nucleosomes on strong TSSs during intraeryth

113 henotypes are correlated with a delay in the eviction of nucleosomes surrounding the DSB.

114 tial sensitivity of particles, including the eviction of nucleosomes.

115 eine treatment results in a dosage-dependent eviction of Rad51 from ssDNA.

116 onse to hyperosmotic shock induces the rapid eviction of Rgc2 from Fps1 and consequent channel closur

117 deling enzyme can catalyze the ATP-dependent eviction of Sir3p from recombinant nucleosomal arrays, a

118 intron lariats, and contribute to the timely eviction of splicing factors.

119 matid resolution during mitosis required the eviction of such H1S/T18ph by the chaperone SET, with th

120 between yeast and human Rev1, including the eviction of template G from the DNA helix and the pairin

121 rotein 1 (NAP1), cooperates with CBP/p300 in eviction of the acetylated histones from the chromatin t

122 recruitment promotes histone acetylation and eviction of the histone octamer from the chromatin-assem

123 Kumar and Wigge now reveal that eviction of the histone variant H2A.Z from nucleosomes p

124 Eviction of the Kex2-encoding plasmid indicated that cle

125 Eviction of the stalled helicase allows leading strands

126 Eviction of the stalled helicase involves K48-linked pol

127 lide a nucleosome past a TF, with concurrent eviction of the TF from the DNA, and the TF did not sign

128 Furthermore, TSA treatment resulted in the eviction of the transcription factor nuclear factor-1 fr

129 itously, as well as the impact of nucleosome eviction on transcription genome-wide, is poorly underst

130 sults suggested a direct role for Yta7 in H3 eviction or degradation.

131 specific histones to mediate their storage, eviction or deposition from/or into chromatin.

132 Eviction or destabilization of nucleosomes from chromati

133 Furthermore, we show that the stimulated eviction or reduced deposition of histones by Rtt109p pr

134 otype, Spt6 inactivation caused localized H3 eviction over 1-2 nucleosomes at 5' ends of Ty elements.

135 acetylation, Swi-Snf recruitment and histone eviction proceed, but transcription is reduced, suggesti

136 The high H3.1/H3.3 ratio and H3.1 eviction process also occurs in endocycling cells before

137 Prior to their eviction, promoter-associated histones are transiently h

138 fecting FACT reduce the transient nucleosome eviction seen at these promoters during a normal cell cy

139 esting that Swi/Snf is important for histone eviction that occurs during Pol II elongation.

140 the marked effect of DNA nicking on histone eviction that underscores the powerful potential of topo

141 Transcriptional activation caused histone eviction throughout the GAL1-YLR454W ORF, except at 601,

142 dition to its role in stimulating histone H3 eviction, thus providing insight into chromatin assembly

143 at dominant female meerkats employ stressful evictions to suppress reproduction among their probable

144 Rapid RNAP2 eviction, transcriptional shutdown, nucleosome invasion,

145 Accordingly, compound-mediated KDM1A eviction was associated with elevated levels of local hi

146 Robust PIC-dependent H2A.Z eviction was observed at active and infrequently transcr

147 By contrast, H2A.Z eviction was unaffected upon depletion of INO80, a remod

148 s such as histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 eviction were faster in absence of HMO1.