ライフサイエンスコーパス: evolutionary tree

1 inconsistent with the hypothesis of a single evolutionary tree.

2 he appropriate positioning of ostrich in the evolutionary tree.

3 methylation, is highly conserved across the evolutionary tree.

4 require correct placement of the root of the evolutionary tree.

5 g relatively few branches of the prokaryotic evolutionary tree.

6 osition to vary in different branches of the evolutionary tree.

7 is highly conserved on some branches of the evolutionary tree.

8 xture processes describing branches along an evolutionary tree.

9 y of any amino acid at any given node in the evolutionary tree.

10 t cause of the observed similarities between evolutionary trees.

11 o allow the construction of all-encompassing evolutionary trees.

12 n hypothetical lineages implied by estimated evolutionary trees.

13 tick based on absolute dates of the nodes in evolutionary trees.

14 create a correlation between the respective evolutionary trees.

15 alternative to current two-dimensional (2D) evolutionary trees.

16 Starting with an evolutionary tree, 20-50 protein query sequences for a g

17 mixed membership models produced from common evolutionary trees allows us to quickly and accurately r

18 Finally, evolutionary tree analyses revealed significant clusteri

19 Evolutionary tree analysis suggested the domesticus mtDN

20 bacterial genomes throughout the prokaryotic evolutionary tree and are required for accurate chromoso

21 uences cluster as a monophyletic group on an evolutionary tree and differ from those of Bos/ Bison by

22 It is situated in a deep branch in the evolutionary tree and is particularly noteworthy in havi

23 ld a key position at the base of the primate evolutionary tree and will be highly informative for the

24 -Tu) found at ancient nodes in the bacterial evolutionary tree, and measure their activities as a fun

25 t to which different subsets of taxa span an evolutionary tree, and provides a quantitative tool for

26 at very divergent points in the human mtDNA evolutionary tree, and the 1555G mutations occur in many

27 that gene products clustered together in the evolutionary tree are encoded by genes with similarities

28 First, the sequences used to create evolutionary trees are carefully selected to provide cov

29 Bifurcating evolutionary trees are commonly used to describe genetic

30 tion (ME) methods of phylogenetic inference, evolutionary trees are constructed by searching for the

31 Evolutionary trees are often estimated from DNA or RNA s

32 the best superposition of the corresponding evolutionary trees based on tree automorphism group.

33 Evolutionary trees built from shared plasmid maintenance

34 loci in the nine human populations leads to evolutionary trees consistent with the known ethnohistor

35 This idea is the basis for an evolutionary tree constructed using the notion that resp

36 nd correlations with serotype assignments of evolutionary trees constructed for different regions of

37 amino-acid sequences, which is critical for evolutionary-tree construction.

38 Disparities between evolutionary trees deduced from receptor sequences vs. f

39 In addition, KSD features evolutionary trees derived for each family and detailed

40 ization image browser; phyloGif, for drawing evolutionary tree diagrams; a redesigned Custom Track fe

41 icates that their data requirement for large evolutionary trees essentially matches the conjectured p

42 The theory of our approach, called the "evolutionary tree" (ET)-TDT, is developed for two cases:

43 We used this measure to create an evolutionary tree for multiple cancers.

44 ny approaches previously used to reconstruct evolutionary trees from gene content of extant species c

45 wards introduced novel methods for computing evolutionary trees from genetical data, initially for hu

46 different habitats and compare these data to evolutionary trees generated using theoretical models of

47 Sequence manipulation tools, such as evolutionary tree generation, novel sequence assignment,

48 events when assessing the similarity between evolutionary trees improves the performance of the metho

49 eding isolates were nearest neighbors on the evolutionary tree in all cases.

50 ion on the so-called "trunk lineages" of the evolutionary tree is most pervasive.

51 An evolutionary tree is reconstructed during the calculatio

52 hat the three-domains tree may be incorrect: evolutionary trees made using newer methods place eukary

53 G or G (2) statistic) statistic between the evolutionary tree model and the multinomial model with t

54 ntify mixtures corresponding to parsimonious evolutionary tree models.

55 The evolutionary tree obtained for these proteins shows that

56 The evolutionary tree of 2-, 1-, and 0-ferric transferrins i

57 ombines parsimony and likelihood to build an evolutionary tree of disease haplotypes, with each node

58 Inferring an accurate evolutionary tree of life requires high-quality alignmen

59 us variation in species diversity across the evolutionary tree of life than is generally assumed.

60 To place it in the evolutionary tree of life, as has been done for the othe

61 responses in the three major branches of the evolutionary tree of life.

62 The evolutionary tree of plant serine/threonine protein kina

63 on regarding the orangutan's position on the evolutionary tree of Pongidae and Hominidae.

64 nson et al., I report for the first time the evolutionary tree of the ENase-like protein superfamily

65 We build an evolutionary tree of these subfamilies and conclude that

66 We use evolutionary trees of haplotypes to study phenotypic ass

67 In conclusion, the correlation between evolutionary trees of interacting domains cannot exclusi

68 of binding sites to the correlation between evolutionary trees of interacting domains.

69 rove the accuracy of sequence alignments and evolutionary trees of membrane proteins.

70 at are based on the co-evolution hypothesis "evolutionary trees of protein families (that are known t

71 The evolutionary trees of the 1a and 3a ORFs were more compa

72 genomes and can use the data to estimate an evolutionary tree or network.

73 Further down the evolutionary tree, other organisms show a similar but sm

74 aphy) is compared with the order inherent in evolutionary trees (phylogeny), provide a more convincin

75 goal has motivated several attempts to apply evolutionary tree reconstruction methods to assays of tu

76 distances are additive and are suitable for evolutionary tree reconstruction.

77 many successes but important aspects of the evolutionary tree remained disputed.

78 M), assigns mutations to the branches of the evolutionary tree stochastically, and then test statisti

79 Mapping these data onto an evolutionary tree suggests that this gene became extensi

80 ionships at critical areas in the vertebrate evolutionary tree that have, so far, been phylogenetical

81 set monkeys are on a different branch of the evolutionary tree that led to humans, our data demonstra

82 relations must be done in the context of the evolutionary tree that relates species.

83 We compute the likelihood of specific evolutionary trees, thereby informing the phylogenetic r

84 Also, details on evolutionary tree topology are missing as they use simil

85 ew study rearranges the base of the dinosaur evolutionary tree, upending 130 years of consensus.

86 A new method is presented for inferring evolutionary trees using nucleotide sequence data.

87 duce PhyloDet (short for PhyloDetective), an evolutionary tree visualization tool that enables biolog

88 sms represented by the root of the universal evolutionary tree were most likely complex cells with a

89 Evolutionary trees were estimated from the nonrecombinan

90 These isolates cluster in the evolutionary tree with strains responsible for clinical