ライフサイエンスコーパス: examiner

1 ewing distance over two sessions by the same examiner.

2 Tissue texture also was assessed by the examiner.

3 nd digital image software by a single masked examiner.

4 is "no-flicker zone" was interpolated by the examiner.

5 ants are influenced by the handedness of the examiner.

6 clinically and radiographically by a masked examiner.

7 participant data and a random effect for the examiner.

8 e and 1 year after treatment by a calibrated examiner.

9 Measurements were performed by a masked examiner.

10 ed from records of the Office of the Medical Examiner.

11 Measurements were performed by a masked examiner.

12 disappearance test were assessed by a masked examiner.

13 relation to method for MGJ determination and examiner.

14 in clinical settings involving more than one examiner.

15 sed measurements were performed by a blinded examiner.

16 Intra-examiner differences varied for each examiner.

17 ay bottles to shield their identity from the examiner.

18 is of the specific goals and purposes of the examiner.

19 nical protocols, with assessment by a single examiner.

20 and medical history were obtained by another examiner.

21 digitally and saved for analysis by a masked examiner.

22 at 3 and 6 months by a calibrated and masked examiner.

23 by the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner.

24 38 patients by two experienced periodontist examiners.

25 iper to the nearest 0.1 mm by two calibrated examiners.

26 in diabetic subjects by independent, masked examiners.

27 diographic measures were taken by calibrated examiners.

28 dication was assessed by > or =3 independent examiners.

29 on arrows observed by at least three of five examiners.

30 Calibrated periodontists served as dental examiners.

31 row image seen by at least three of the five examiners.

32 rameter measurements were made by calibrated examiners.

33 atings provided, and the satisfaction of the examiners.

34 d open bone levels were taken by independent examiners.

35 nts were averaged over all sites, teeth, and examiners.

36 vitis (GI) were assessed on all teeth by two examiners.

37 al examinations were performed by calibrated examiners.

38 surements were repeated a week later by both examiners.

39 lly dysplastic nevi were confirmed by expert examiners.

40 cuity (VA) was measured by masked, certified examiners.

41 measured with OCT and USP by three different examiners.

42 leeding (FMBS) as assessed by two calibrated examiners.

43 A) was determined by certified visual acuity examiners.

44 g bleb classification score by two different examiners.

45 ocket depth (PPD) was measured by calibrated examiners.

46 ence relies on the expertise of latent print examiners.

47 lity for mean total SWV (MTSWV) was good for examiner 1 (ICC = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.

48 easurements showed 70% and 55% agreement for examiners 1 and 2, respectively.

49 surement deviations were within +/- 1 mm for examiners 1 and 2, respectively.

50 CI]: 0.30, 0.87; P = .003) and excellent for examiner 2 (ICC = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.92; P < .001).

51 ach tooth, KTW was assessed by 2 independent examiners after MGJ identification by the visual (VM), f

52 iolingual, lingual, and distolingual) by two examiners (AK and KC) each using the three probes in the

53 ves from baseline, both assessed by a masked examiner and confirmed by a retest.

54 ential fires were collected from the medical examiner and interviews with local fire officials.

55 subjective, dependent upon the skills of the examiner and invariably dictated by the patients' abilit

56 taken from a stent by a calibrated, blinded examiner and open measurements were repeated at the 9-mo

57 IOP was measured using Icare ONE by clinic examiner and parent/guardian, then using Goldmann applan

58 A visual analog scale (VAS) was used by the examiner and subject to assess the defect change from ba

59 The examiner and subject VASs were statistically significant

60 ulus, frequency of dental visits, and dental examiner and survey phase.

61 management procedures that emphasized center examiner and therapist training and adherence to protoco

62 In this study, the authors linked medical examiner and vital statistics records on underlying caus

63 Medical examiner and/or vital statistics data have been used to

64 e cecal intubation times among inexperienced examiners and patient acceptance during unsedated or mil

65 en a feasible option for most county medical examiners' and coroners' offices.

66 f tool-specific gestures demonstrated by the examiner, and imitation of meaningless gestures.

67 hs certified by coroners compared to medical examiners, and the odds of underreporting did not vary b

68 tion during MR imaging, in which a physician examiner applied mechanical force to the humeral head, w

69 A single examiner applied the PSPRS at every visit for 162 patien

70 Other questions for the initial examiner are when to consult the surgeon and if analgesi

71 rologic soft signs, which were scored by the examiner as well as a blind rater observing videotapes.

72 f the aggregate experience revealed that the examiners as a group exceeded 90% accuracy at the outset

73 re 0.72, 0.91, and 0.95 respectively for the examiners as a whole.

74 ized tissue were assessed by the same masked examiners as after the 6-month RCT.

75 A single examiner assessed all the children.

76 At 4.5 years of age a masked examiner assessed stereopsis on these patients using 3 d

77 A traveling examiner assessed visual acuity at age 4.5 years.

78 Two independent, calibrated examiners assessed brushing duration, evenness of distri

79 Six examiners assessed photographs from a subset of 100 cons

80 Two calibrated examiners assessed the presence/absence and increase/dec

81 Trained examiners assessed thrust presence by gait observation.

82 kedly stronger predictors than corresponding examiner assessments.

83 Examiners' assessments were compared with a reference.

84 g a single examination) assessed by a masked examiner at 8 weeks.

85 coverage (PRC) were recorded by a calibrated examiner at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperati

86 easurements were performed by one calibrated examiner at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

87 rement of PDs between right- and left-handed examiners at various locations in the mouth (P>0.17 in a

88 should include multiple examiners to reduce examiner bias and should alternate the probing method to

89 Follow-up measurements were recorded by examiners blind to the allocation.

90 A prospective single-center, examiner-blind study comparing the effects of a staggere

91 This was a randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, nine-period crossover study conducted in

92 The study was a two-treatment, examiner-blind, randomized parallel group, controlled st

93 ntry measurements were taken by a calibrated examiner blinded to the treatment.

94 Examiners blinded to waveform analysis assessed patients

95 Calibrated external examiners, blinded to the child's study group, assessed

96 and skin reaction in AD using a patient and examiner-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crosso

97 htly higher PD measurements than left-handed examiners, but this difference did not reach statistical

98 5.3; 11 women and 11 men) by two independent examiners by using shear-wave elastography.

99 We present an approach to examiner calibration study design where the number of ca

100 obtained in a pilot study to design a formal examiner calibration study, where sample sizes were adju

101 quent in procedures performed by experienced examiners compared with those with comparatively less ex

102 Inter-examiner comparisons showed that the correlation for FP

103 Calibrated examiners conducted oral examination, self-reported slee

104 Trained examiners conducted standardized eye examinations, inclu

105 4.2 +/- 10.9 years) were referred by medical examiners/coroners to Mayo Clinic's Sudden Death Genomic

106 Using medical examiner data, we found that significant underascertainm

107 Only 22 states have medical examiner death investigation systems in place and have n

108 the accuracy and reliability of latent print examiners' decisions, a challenging and complex problem

109 the accuracy and reliability of latent print examiners' decisions, in which 169 latent print examiner

110 ERA cohort and case-control studies, TMD was examiner determined according to established research di

111 on criteria were as follows: (a) The medical examiner determined that the infant had sustained a head

112 An examiner determined visible plaque index (VPI), marginal

113 Intra-examiner differences varied for each examiner.

114 icide cases were ascertained in four medical examiner districts covering seven entire Florida countie

115 The handedness of the periodontal examiner does not appear to influence the recorded measu

116 miners' decisions, in which 169 latent print examiners each compared approximately 100 pairs of laten

117 raphs was dependent on the experience of the examiner (EE kappaw = 0.618; LE kappaw = 0.426).

118 Oral mucositis was measured by a trained examiner every 2 to 3 days using the Oral Mucositis Inde

119 ts I and II of the National Board of Medical Examiners examination, and special consideration student

120 k factors: needle gauge, puncture technique, examiner experience, coagulation status, puncture target

121 rve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue while providing maximal clinical inform

122 rve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue, while providing maximal clinical infor

123 Complete medical examiner files were obtained, and 160 variables were cod

124 ertion-related SUDY were referred by Medical Examiners for a cardiac channel molecular autopsy.

125 Animals were assessed by blinded examiners for motor disability and LID severity using st

126 242) between voxel sizes only for one of the examiners, for a measurement of height.

127 Examiners frequently differed on whether fingerprints we

128 retinal degeneration presenting to a single examiner from 2008 to 2013.

129 An examiner graded iris color, and ethnicity was reported b

130 One examiner graded the lens for presence of nuclear (NSC),

131 However, the potential influence of examiner handedness (right or left) on the measurement o

132 The examiner held both forearms near the wrists while asking

133 Professional and lay examiners improved their sensitivity on silicone breast

134 had the same measurements taken by the same examiner in 2 additional sessions on the same day (9 AM-

135 dequate for the caregiver in 17% and for the examiner in 55% of studies.

136 e examined in 33 patients by eight different examiners in five private dental offices.

137 urrently, assessment is performed by medical examiners in situ.

138 physical examination questionnaires to guide examiners, including 1 state without a formal screening

139 Three masked examiners independently evaluated the radiographic image

140 After surgery, each of the four remaining examiners independently reviewed the radiographs for fur

141 The Medical Examiner Information System was searched for all cases o

142 owever, errors can occur even when an expert examiner is confident.

143 in young people, a new role for the medical examiner is emerging.

144 by an experienced (EE) and less experienced examiner (LE).

145 Eighty-five percent of examiners made at least one false negative error for an

146 Five examiners made false positive errors for an overall fals

147 alyzed using customized software by a single examiner masked to the subjects' clinical details.

148 This randomized, examiner masked, split mouth study evaluated a new model

149 Examiners masked to maternal-infant exposure status admi

150 , we conducted a two-year randomized, dental-examiner-masked clinical trial.

151 randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, examiner-masked study was undertaken to evaluate the cli

152 This randomized, controlled, examiner-masked, five-period crossover study examined pl

153 This randomized, controlled, examiner-masked, four-period cross-over study examined p

154 The study was a two-treatment, examiner-masked, randomized, parallel-group, controlled

155 assessment with respect to gestational age, examiner masking and consideration of additional exposur

156 ze intrasession repeatability, 1 experienced examiner measured 30 healthy eyes 5 times successively.

157 A single examiner measured weights, heights, and skinfold thickne

158 At each visit, masked and certified examiners measured binocular distance visual acuity (DVA

159 Masked examiners measured IOP at every study visit.

160 Trained examiners measured probing depth, clinical attachment le

161 lity were found to be much higher than intra-examiner measurement for all four methods of assessment.

162 evaluated by two calibrated and independent examiners (MG and TP).

163 rystals facilitate disease diagnosis but the examiner must be aware that they are only present 54% of

164 aboration with the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), developed the first standardized in-tr

165 commended that the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), who develops the US Medical Licensing

166 ne fill were recorded by a single calibrated examiner not involved with the surgical treatment prior

167 hildren were classified into groups based on examiner observations of their behavior.

168 In the prospective study, all 12 examiners observed statistically significant differences

169 tal admissions, and reports from the medical examiner of fatal injuries.

170 aths referred to the Office of Chief Medical Examiner of New York City between 1993 and 1998.

171 t, with an intraclass correlation among four examiners of 0.94.

172 Imaging data were evaluated by certified examiners of the Vienna Reading Center using a standardi

173 Duplicate examinations were conducted by one examiner on 17 subjects (506 scoring sites), using the g

174 This study evaluated examiners on key decision points in the fingerprint exam

175 (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0028) between the two examiners only when measuring the width in two posterior

176 unnatural deaths) are carried out by medical examiner or coroner systems.

177 to other drugs) require linkage with medical examiner or multiple-cause records, because this code id

178 promoting recall of events suggested by the examiner, or generating confabulations.

179 dontitis patients were monitored by a single examiner over a 6-month period.

180 Two independent examiners participated.

181 Another masked examiner performed an irrigation test 1 week later and i

182 sal CBCT images were generated, on which two examiners performed 648 linear measurements and evaluate

183 observational study using data from medical examiner, prescription drug monitoring program, and opia

184 o had suffered a cardiac arrest, and medical examiner prohibition of donation.

185 Experienced breast examiners prospectively identified patients with breast

186 The study demonstrated high intra-examiner RAL reproducibility.

187 depression with self-reported function after examiner-rated function was added to the analysis as a c

188 sis and medical burden and self-reported and examiner-rated functional assessments.

189 Measures included examiner ratings of depression diagnosis and medical bur

190 ion of service to the ABO, all directors and examiners received ties for men and scarves for women be

191 Before administering anesthesia, the same examiner recorded a Hamp index value of each proximal fu

192 Examiners recorded decayed, missing, and filled teeth (D

193 ning death should include the use of medical examiner records and underlying- and multiple-cause vita

194 e birth and fetal death records, and medical examiner records in Maryland during 1993-1998.

195 vey using death certificate data and medical examiner records to compare mortality rates for total in

196 Using vital statistics or medical examiner records, 94.7% of poisoning deaths were capture

197 ncy and medical records departments, medical examiner records, and surveys of area physicians, buildi

198 and 47% (n = 116) through review of medical examiner records.

199 Police reports, medical examiners' records, and interviews with police and schoo

200 pendent upon host-related, probe-related, or examiner-related variables.

201 ntervals (CI) determined the degree of inter-examiner reliability between grading of these clinical v

202 Inter-examiner reliability for the four clinical outcomes rang

203 We evaluated inter-examiner reliability in grading of clinical variables as

204 The kappa value for inter-examiner reliability was 0.78 and 0.90 for the original

205 e (0.58 mm, 1.16 mm, and 1.74 mm) based upon examiner repeatability using an automated probe.

206 suicide victims were identified from medical examiner reports in Shelby County, Tennessee; King Count

207 d, and 160 variables were coded from medical examiner reports to compare features and clinical charac

208 njuries were studied using data from medical examiners' reports in North Carolina for the years 1977-

209 The results demonstrated high examiner reproducibility for linear and volumetric param

210 Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility has been shown to be substantia

211 of this study was to assess intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in measuring KTW by using 3 dif

212 Examiner reproducibility was examined by repeat evaluati

213 Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was high (intraclass correlatio

214 Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was high, regardless of treatme

215 A total of 79 of 91 county medical examiners responded.

216 Adjusting studies for netting out examiner reversals reduced heterogeneity significantly.

217 res after adjusting outcomes that netted out examiner reversals.

218 An experienced standard examiner (S) trained three dental hygienists (A, B, and

219 The medical examiner's cases were more frequently from emergency dep

220 pital Association and State Board of Medical Examiner's Databases.

221 ls) were obtained from the San Diego Medical Examiner's office between 1997 and 2005.

222 ovided by radiologic services to the medical examiner's office for identification of deceased victims

223 t fatalities referred from the state medical examiner's office for the evaluation of possible child a

224 uggest that cases whose source was a Medical Examiner's office represent high tissue quality.

225 We collaborated with a medical examiner's office to assist in finding a diagnosis for t

226 es conducted at the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

227 es conducted at the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

228 a 6-year period recorded at a state Medical Examiner's Office.

229 gation in the United States' largest medical examiner's office.

230 ve states assessed by calibrated and blinded examiners; secondary outcome measures included decayed,

231 When ventriculomegaly is suspected, the examiner should make a direct attempt to find the medial

232 act agreement measurements (95% CI) for each examiner-standard pair, respectively, were as follows: A

233 Varying examiner styles impact the structure of resulting data.

234 utilized to minimize the impact of different examiner styles in clinical settings involving more than

235 analyses indicated the presence of distinct examiner styles which are based on the frequency that a

236 Graphical analyses were used to profile examiner styles with respect to using the GI index.

237 clerkship) in mean National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination scores (range, 0-100), pre

238 tten examinations (National Board of Medical Examiners subject tests and/or internally prepared exami

239 A total of 36 states have at least 1 medical examiner system at the county, district, or state level

240 some have medical examiner systems, medical examiner systems exist in 8% of counties and serve 43% o

241 Few state or county medical examiner systems have been implemented since 1990.

242 In this century, medical examiner systems have gradually replaced coroner systems

243 nge has slowed in recent years, with medical examiner systems now serving about 48% of the national p

244 Medical examiner systems that operate without coroner involvemen

245 s have coroner systems and some have medical examiner systems, medical examiner systems exist in 8% o

246 Overall, right-handed examiners tended to record slightly higher PD measuremen

247 Masked examiners tested VA.

248 For both examiners, the correlations for FP (AK = 0.77, KC = 0.46

249 er live OSCE including more efficient use of examiners' time, increased fairness, and better monitori

250 The image reconstruction enables the examiner to evaluate a two-dimensional image using multi

251 w technology has enhanced the ability of the examiner to identify normal and complex fetal heart anat

252 four-dimensional ultrasound allows the fetal examiner to more accurately accomplish this task.

253 ciated variants were reported to the medical examiner to notify surviving relatives and recommend cli

254 structures using this technology allows the examiner to view cardiac anatomy in a manner that was li

255 e comparison studies should include multiple examiners to reduce examiner bias and should alternate t

256 erent mean PD between right- and left-handed examiners (unadjusted P<0.05; differences at or near 0.5

257 Certified examiners unaware of exposure to antenatal corticosteroi

258 Two independent examiners used both methods, in random order, to assess

259 Blinded expert examiners used the validated Team Emergency Assessment M

260 sessed at 4(1/2) years of age by a traveling examiner using the Aphakia Treatment Study HOTV protocol

261 ed on the optic disc by the same experienced examiner using the Cirrus OCT instrument, the classic gl

262 ime points by trained and calibrated dentist examiners using a standardized, national diagnostic prot

263 were compared between right- and left-handed examiners using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a rand

264 rs of OBS (48 mos) were scored by calibrated examiners using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and Ind

265 distances in the phantoms were made by three examiners using various transducers.

266 each implant was measured by four different examiners, using both EPT devices, and compared.

267 Medical examiners-usually physicians and generally with training

268 ometric characteristics of the subjects, and examiner variation, revealed that hip and knee flexion r

269 fficient was calculated to account for inter-examiner variation.

270 ow-up of 0.25 to 5.2 y, 248 adults developed examiner-verified incident TMD.

271 g varied by death investigator type (medical examiner versus coroner) or race/ethnicity.

272 mechanisms, and deaths recorded by a medical examiner versus coroner.

273 m of death, death investigator type [medical examiner versus coroner], county median income, and coun

274 Before surgery, one of five calibrated examiners viewed periapical and bitewing radiographs of

275 lue of mean IOP difference (ICare ONE clinic examiner vs Goldmann applanation) was 3.3 +/- 4.0 mm Hg

276 plication of force to the humeral head by an examiner was associated with as much as 6 mm of anterior

277 ere blinded to screening results, and the NP examiner was blinded to screening and HIV status.

278 The clinical examiner was calibrated and blinded to the surgical proc

279 Retesting by the same examiner was identical and occurred within the same sess

280 Icare ONE IOP by clinic examiner was within 3 mm Hg of Goldmann applanation in 6

281 erpretation of the HH SD-OCT scans by masked examiners was performed, and the sensitivity and specifi

282 The National Board of Medical Examiners was selected to work with ASCO.

283 ta provided by the National Board of Medical Examiners were available for 52,035 (77.4%) of these res

284 Examiners were blind to stress ratings and cortisol leve

285 ointment by technicians in a scheme to which examiners were blind.

286 Participants and examiners were blinded to whether stimulation was active

287 Examiners were masked to the treatment group assignment.

288 rcent believed that at least two independent examiners were needed to determine competence, and 44% f

289 ntal recordings between the first and second examiners were within +/-1 mm in 90% to 100% of examined

290 An examiner who was blind to the quadrants that had been sc

291 neuropsychological status was assessed by an examiner who was unaware of protocol assignment.

292 underwent retinoscopy with cycloplegia by an examiner who was unaware of the results from the PR2000

293 pathologic conditions, impairments, and the examiners who conducted the assessments.

294 and anthropometric measurements were made by examiners who were unaware of the children's original tr

295 This effect is mitigated to a degree by the examiners, who slightly overcompensate for patient diffi

296 Acuity was then assessed by an examiner with a standard chart-based near ETDRS acuity t

297 ropsychological instrument that provides the examiner with information on a wide range of cognitive s

298 chnologies have been combined to provide the examiner with the ability to make accurate and comprehen

299 s guidelines for the process) and the use of examiners with little cardiovascular training.

300 The patient was sitting in front of the examiner, with the hand lying palm up on the examination