ライフサイエンスコーパス: expander

1 s, dispersers, and a new class that we call "expanders".

2 ich the Cayley graph Cay(G; S) is an epsilon-expander.

3 dendritic cells were the most potent Vdelta2 expanders.

4 ss II(+) but not negative cells into Vdelta2 expanders.

5 y breast procedures were most frequent after expander (2021/1000 discharges) and least frequent after

6 sible by laser beam shaping using a 4:1 beam expander and a circular aperture for spatial mode filter

7 up to 5 weeks with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 T cell expander and high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2).

8 Ninety-day complications were lowest after expander and highest after AT breast reconstruction (TE

9 hemodilutents: a non-oxygen-carrying plasma expander and two hemoglobin solutions with different oxy

10 r method at least matches quantum randomness expanders and classical world empirical extractors as me

11 No systemic toxicity was noted with the expanders and histology showed the material to be highly

12 ; malfunction of the filler port of a tissue expander; and wound dehiscence.

13 Self-expanding hydrogel tissue expanders appear to offer an intriguing reconstructive a

14 The expanders are placed in their dry, contracted states, an

15 compare short- and long-term outcomes after expander, autologous (AT), and direct-to-implant (DI) br

16 econstruction and in those undergoing tissue expander breast reconstruction.

17 nned revisions were highest among the tissue expander cohort (TE = 59.2% vs AT = 34.4% vs DI = 45.9%,

18 In this study, a shell-free tissue expander comprised only of a chemically cross-linked bio

19 nanoparticles, as a function of micelle pore expander concentration or stirring rate.

20 ts, dermis-fat grafts, or inflatable balloon expanders for orbital enlargement.

21 sent a new java-based graphical tool, called EXPANDER, for gene expression analysis and visualization

22 These expanders have an advantage of tissue expansion without

23 he implant for women who opt for a two-stage expander-implant reconstruction.

24 P = 0.034, respectively) when compared with expander/implants.

25 roduction of human serum albumin as a plasma expander in the 1940s, considerable research has allowed

26 One expander in the BT group versus 5 in the control group r

27 r-particularly in terms of implanted orbital expanders-is the recent spate of long-term complications

28 le and controllable self-expansion, hydrogel expanders may offer yet another alternative or adjunctiv

29 atment should be directed towards the tissue expander or the implant for women who opt for a two-stag

30 l patients undergoing mastectomy with tissue expander placement during a 2-year period.

31 of botulinum toxin for mastectomy and tissue expander placement significantly reduced postoperative p

32 frequent reconstruction technique was tissue expander placement.

33 95% CI, 0.51-0.73) and the immediate tissue expander reconstruction subgroup (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30

34 and postoperative pain, facilitating tissue expander reconstruction.

35 ts had chest wall reconstructions; three had expanders removed for infection before radiation therapy

36 Conventional tissue expanders require a silicone shell inflated either by ex

37 0.09 to 0.04]), hypotension requiring volume expanders (RR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.25]; RD, -0.09 [9

38 ize (2 +/- 2 cm versus 2 +/- 3 cm; P = 0.4), expander size and volume (429 +/- 119 mL versus 510 +/-

39 OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.88), and the tissue expander subgroup (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.72).

40 4 women who underwent mastectomy with tissue expander (TE: 70.5%), autologous (AT: 18.1%), or direct

41 oup analyses versus each of the other volume expanders tested (e.g., dextran, gelatin, hydroxyethyl s

42 After 3 hrs, an infusion of the PV expander under study was started at a volume of 12mL/kg

43 of the current macromolecular plasma volume expanders, we found that it filtered readily into lymph,

44 The new type of hydrogel expanders were characterized in vitro as well as in vivo

45 Hydrogel tissue expanders were recently adapted for use in congenital an

46 on the granule cell layer as a combinatorial expander, where each granule cell represents a unique co