ライフサイエンスコーパス: experimenter

1 ick results with minimal investment from the experimenter.

2 r discrimination task were controlled by the experimenter.

3 eward distribution in exchanges with a human experimenter.

4 egy of selecting the box visited last by the experimenter.

5 ions made by either the animal itself or the experimenter.

6 inducing response variability unknown to the experimenter.

7 attentional state, which are unknown to the experimenter.

8 or observed the same actions performed by an experimenter.

9 and viewing duration were controlled by the experimenter.

10 ing observation of precision grip by a human experimenter.

11 rope, and then pass the stick forward to an experimenter.

12 uring one-to-one social interactions with an experimenter.

13 ctually built to prespecified designs by the experimenter.

14 received placebo unbeknownst to them and the experimenter.

15 can be explained by ostensive cues from the experimenter.

16 s were compared with those obtained by human experimenters.

17 to 82.4+/-0.7 % over 77.1+/-0.9 % from human experimenters.

18 ion, with yields comparable to skilled human experimenters.

19 some of the theoretical assumptions made by experimenters.

20 d will invite increased 'species hopping' by experimenters.

21 patients themselves, their families, and the experimenters.

22 Among cigarette experimenters (1 puff), ever e-cigarette use was associa

23 three different purposes: (1) to imitate the experimenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experi

24 eudo-passive (subject's hand is moved by the experimenter across a stationary surface).

25 Previous studies have shown that when an experimenter actively controls what an individual sees t

26 Hormonal studies using an experimenter-administered cocaine binge model and an esc

27 failed to demonstrate any effects of either experimenter-administered cocaine or food self-administr

28 onounced after self-administered rather than experimenter-administered cocaine, a pattern that was no

29 on of intake of a taste cue when paired with experimenter-administered morphine or cocaine using our

30 or chronic effects on short-term memory, but experimenter administration of WIN in adolescence, at do

31 However, the experimenter also accidentally dropped the marker on top

32 The subjects were screened from the experimenter and seated in a sound-isolated room in a lo

33 ative behaviour such as eye contact with the experimenter and social smile in response to the social

34 It requires no contact between a human experimenter and tested animals, overcoming the confound

35 Because these small biases are difficult for experimenters and readers to notice, large experiments d

36 essed as a single correct decision shared by experimenters and subjects that satisfies internal coher

37 the physical presence of female but not male experimenters and was independent of gaze direction and

38 imenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experimenter, and (3) to simply perform the movement.

39 ined to respond to pointing cues given by an experimenter, and then tested on their ability to locate

40 from the faces of their conspecifics, human experimenters, and natural predators.

41 r small meals, had constant interaction with experimenters, and stayed in an environment with constan

42 Moreover, comparison of the effects of experimenter-applied stressors and psychosocial stressor

43 the rate of non-indicative gestures when the experimenter approaches the location of the hidden food.

44 nter-generated food seeking-placement by the experimenter at the food site), and context (spatial cue

45 e sounds to attract the attention of a human experimenter (attention-getting sounds) differs in grey

46 iple factors some of which can be set by the experimenter based on pilot/preliminary data.

47 These experiments have often relied on the experimenter being able to randomly modulate mechanisms

48 within an attentional condition, but despite experimenters' best efforts, attention likely varies fro

49 dardization, and emphasis on minimization of experimenter bias.

50 of touch was always given by the same female experimenter blind to condition type.

51 ctively controls what an individual sees the experimenter can affect simple decisions with alternativ

52 The inability to blind the experimenter can be circumvented by having an independen

53 y knows when individuals move their eyes the experimenter can change complex moral decisions.

54 pe of setup is also advantageous in that the experimenter can change the sample at any point (tempera

55 data does not give satisfactory results, the experimenter can draw no conclusions regarding the exist

56 Using this system, a single computer and experimenter can track diverse behaviors from up to 60 i

57 ically studied under conditions in which the experimenter cannot control the composition of the membr

58 mice and rats: health considerations (of the experimenter); choice of species, age, strain and sex; h

59 eption of response delay, appear to be under experimenter control.

60 typically focuses on regression models, with experimenter-controlled features as predictors and spike

61 only when elevated intracellular Ca(2+) and experimenter-controlled illumination coincide.

62 stant VT; (2) subject-controlled VT; and (3) experimenter-controlled VT.

63 In Conception 1, the experimenter controls production rates via exogenous ind

64 ate room within hearing range, and owner and experimenter conversing in the same room as the parrot b

65 the baboons were insensitive to whether the experimenter could actually perceive the food item, and

66 xamples to current thinking clearly show how experimenters could adequately control for the constrain

67 ement of the rat at the chocolate site by an experimenter) cues.

68 ied the image pairs in accordance with the 5 experimenter-defined categories under conditions of nond

69 ts were due to an impairment in learning the experimenter-defined rule and in applying a learned rule

70 on were due to an impairment in learning the experimenter-defined rule and not in applying a learned

71 nd dopamine (DA) overflow following repeated experimenter-delivered cocaine injections, are often use

72 In animals that could learn ICS, experimenter-delivered stimulation always elicited dopam

73 howed increased 50-kHz USVs before receiving experimenter-delivered ventral tegmental area (VTA) and

74 depended on which person, the subject or the experimenter, determined the amount of food on the plate

75 wed them to be delivered sequentially and at experimenter-determined times.

76 tantia nigra, in a blind design in which the experimenter did not know the pretreatment regime.

77 mization) and double-blinded so patients and experimenters did not know which control configuration w

78 ural activity to external variables that the experimenter directly observed and manipulated, many of

79 to each other is often more potent than what experimenters do to them.

80 ged in accurate trade behavior as long as an experimenter enforced the structure of the interaction;

81 was integrated within our method to help the experimenter evaluate the significance of a symmetry-con

82 applied to resolved AC harmonics and rely on experimenter experience to assist in experiment-theory c

83 Modifications of experimenter eye contact influenced participants' eye mo

84 Experimenter eye-contact was either direct or averted.

85 its were associated with less looking at the experimenter for video interactions only.

86 ment affected young chimpanzees' choice of 2 experimenters from whom to request food.

87 rvers that prerecorded video sequences of an experimenter gazing left or right were a live video link

88 rary stories, technical expository text, and experimenter-generated "textoids." Recent psychological

89 ng along a runway encountering chocolate) or experimenter-generated (placement of the rat at the choc

90 ted food seeking-running to the food site-or experimenter-generated food seeking-placement by the exp

91 replenished at the self-generated-but not at experimenter-generated-locations.

92 Why do experimenters give subjects short breaks in long behavio

93 s) were investigated as to whether they used experimenter-given cues when responding to object-choice

94 subject species were able to use all of the experimenter-given cues, in contrast to previous reports

95 Two methods assessed the use of experimenter-given directional cues by a New World monke

96 species preferentially selected the box the experimenter had marked intentionally (especially during

97 with littermates, novel test conditions, or experimenter handling.

98 ues developed in other contexts, as here the experimenter has precise control only over the rotation

99 female and a young adult male watched as an experimenter hid a miniature model food in 1 of 4 sites

100 ed geometric forms (lexigrams) watched as an experimenter hid an object in the woods outside her outd

101 nclosure for a hidden item after watching an experimenter hide a miniature item in the analogous loca

102 Here parrots watched an experimenter hide two equally desirable foods under two

103 known as "Einstein from noise," in which the experimenter honestly believes they have recorded images

104 ibly used the tokens to obtain foods from an experimenter; however, they did not spontaneously trade

105 dies, therefore, the animals were freed from experimenter-imposed "categories" that typify forced cho

106 from hormone-induced appetite suppression or experimenter-imposed food restriction, is sufficient to

107 ne craving increases after prolonged forced (experimenter-imposed) abstinence from the drug (incubati

108 uctance response when greeting an unfamiliar experimenter in comparison with the control group.

109 affiliative expression) performed by a human experimenter in their first week of life.

110 interacted with their infants and with adult experimenters in their native language.

111 subjects and ventilator-dependent patients, experimenter-induced increases in ventilator tidal volum

112 Here, we show that pairing BTP induced by experimenter-induced movement of the tumor-bearing hindl

113 stems are head mounted, run for days without experimenter intervention, and can record and stimulate

114 it smoking among current smokers, and, among experimenters, lower odds of abstinence from conventiona

115 ited box, so that during any given trial the experimenter marked 2 boxes, 1 intentionally and 1 accid

116 Air hunger relief was similar when the experimenter mimicked these VT changes.

117 The experimenter moved the blindfolded participant's left in

118 Interestingly, however, neither experimenter- nor self-administered chronic cocaine admi

119 co-orient, visual co-orienting with a human experimenter occurred at a low frequency to distal objec

120 lar events leading to LTP and LTD are known, experimenters often report problems in using standard in

121 Experimenters often wish to relate changes in amyloid fo

122 ents the gorillas selected between two human experimenters, one who could see them and one who could

123 ent of gaze direction and whether the female experimenter or the subject was moving.

124 aracterized their stress responses to either experimenter- or self-imposed stressors.

125 In two experiments, an experimenter ordered a volunteer to make a key-press act

126 Here we show that if an experimenter passively knows when individuals move their

127 rror neurons (MNs) while monkeys observed an experimenter performing (Action condition) or withholdin

128 acaque PMv while the monkey was observing an experimenter performing a grasping action and orienting

129 During testing, the experimenter placed a marker on top of the baited box to

130 es (Pan troglodytes) had a direct view of an experimenter placing a food item beneath one of several

131 ts in an incongruent condition, in which the experimenter pointed to or gazed at an unbaited containe

132 lly employ stimulus conditions chosen by the experimenter, potentially obscuring the contribution of

133 e CS-UCS pairing rate on brain activity, the experimenters presented continuously, intermittently, an

134 sure of mice and rats to male but not female experimenters produces pain inhibition.

135 when the selected response was guided by the experimenter rather than the participant.

136 d quantum communication schemes depend on an experimenter's ability to retain the coherent properties

137 The success of these efforts relies on the experimenter's ability to target arbitrarily small subse

138 cue-giver, and the impact of a change in the experimenter's attentional state during cue presentation

139 to highlight key factors that influence the experimenter's choice of the best strategy for multigene

140 subtle, suggesting that they understood the experimenter's communicative intent.

141 of the testing environment are not under the experimenter's control.

142 video, participants frequently looked at the experimenter's face, and they did this more often when b

143 rmance only on initial probe trials when the experimenter's gaze was not directed at the baited cup.

144 ll make spontaneous inferences about a human experimenter's goal by attending to the environmental co

145 ntation as well as during the observation of experimenter's goal-directed acts (canonical-mirror neur

146 and 3, a model could remove a grape from the experimenter's hand while the witness watched.

147 cipants' attention is diverted away from the experimenter's hypothesis, rather than the highly reflec

148 that subjects understood something about the experimenter's intentions.

149 o elaborates her gestures in relation to the experimenter's pointing, which enables her to find food

150 s successfully interpreted pointing when the experimenter's proximity to the hiding place was varied

151 But all studies to date are limited by the experimenter's selected stimuli, which are generally pho

152 (Action MNs), but one-third also encoded the experimenter's withheld action (Inaction MNs).

153 not only their understanding of what a human experimenter sees, but also what information they use to

154 Experimenter sex can thus affect apparent baseline respo

155 f 15 fast-food meals that were chosen by the experimenter (study 2) in a randomized, controlled trial

156 onditions were used in different phases: the experimenter tapping on the correct object, gazing plus

157 Among experimenters, the percentage of students who said they

158 This allows the experimenter to compute posterior probabilities of diffe

159 re particularly useful because they allow an experimenter to control the timing and levels of gene ex

160 lectrical microstimulation, which allows the experimenter to manipulate the activity of small groups

161 nerated movement) than when they expected an experimenter to move their own hand (externally generate

162 es in plant extracts, the method allowed the experimenter to rapidly check the various steps involved

163 lyze gene expression that often restrict the experimenter to studying only a few mRNA species, wherea

164 valuated further monetary transfers from the experimenter to themselves and to the other participant,

165 uction of the optical compartment allows the experimenter to vary the optical pathlength using specia

166 It is impossible to blind the experimenter to which treatment is active, it is difficu

167 biological datasets, and it serves to direct experimenters to areas of low data coverage or with high

168 munoprecipitation (competition ChIP) enables experimenters to measure protein-DNA dynamics at a singl

169 We advise experimenters to use a new protocol, a modified optical

170 ciability has directed the attention of many experimenters toward the possible biological correlates

171 st is very cheap to run and requires minimal experimenter training, yet seems sensitive to a variety

172 In experiment 2, the experimenter used supportive questioning to help keep pa

173 Short-term AAS "experimenters" were also largely indistinguishable from

174 keys selectively retrieved the grape from an experimenter who was incapable of seeing the grape rathe

175 incapable of seeing the grape rather than an experimenter who was visually aware.

176 , or the GAL4-UAS system, which provides the experimenter with spatial control over transgene express

177 the heat-shock promoter, which provides the experimenter with temporal control over transgene induct

178 ions from retina to midbrain tectum provides experimenters with a good model for assessing the functi

179 Among experimenters with conventional cigarettes, ever use of

180 recision grip of an object carried out by an experimenter, with somewhat fewer showing modulation dur

181 The experimenter wore mirrored goggles that observers believ