ライフサイエンスコーパス: expert

1 gray literature (bibliographies, Google, and experts).

2 photography with remote interpretation by an expert.

3 ical evaluation made by a movement disorders expert.

4 l media and targeted emails to international experts.

5 ISO uptake on PET/CT was assessed by trained experts.

6 nel of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia experts.

7 o small, homogeneous caseloads supervised by experts.

8 erence in the data quality of nonexperts and experts.

9 skill identified competency of residents vs experts.

10 sident critical errors was no different from experts.

11 lance through November 11, 2016; references; experts.

12 and independently by two movement-disorders experts.

13 cHP that reach consensus among international experts.

14 vated by the comments received by our domain experts.

15 t single-cell data presently relies on human experts.

16 on clinical expertise of appropriate disease experts.

17 tified in consultation with a team of global experts: (1) efficacy, (2) duration, (3) ease of adheren

18 All echocardiograms were re-reviewed by experts (2012 World Heart Federation criteria) for inclu

19 iterature and its appraisal, 2) a meeting of experts, 3) a 2-stage Delphi process (online), and 4) a

20 With the consensus of international experts, a case report form for SJS/TEN has been created

21 Over 180 experts across multiple disciplines are engaged in the M

22 , and a collaborative workshop that gathered experts across several maternal immunisation initiatives

23 Two physician experts adjudicated each event, categorizing each defini

24 software (quantitative perfusion SPECT) by 2 experts, adjusting the VP if needed.

25 tients often have coexisting heart diseases, expert advice from cardiologists will improve clinical o

26 was within 1 nearest-neighbor classifier of experts after ASSET training.

27 ing features of the SHAPE profile that human experts agree 'looks' like a riboSNitch.

28 Consensus was when all experts agreed on a management strategy.

29 o the modular polyketide synthase novice and expert alike.

30 unctional clusters, consistent with previous expert analysis.

31 er agreement between 2 experts and between 1 expert and 1 naive sleep investigators gave similar resu

32 ic ability of the DNN-CAD vs endoscopists (2 expert and 4 novice), who were asked to classify the ima

33 Only 4 experts and 16 residents (40%) adequately decompressed a

34 over time through ongoing collaboration with experts and a range of stakeholders, and be dependent on

35 disseminated data requests to international experts and agencies.

36 The inter-rater agreement between 2 experts and between 1 expert and 1 naive sleep investiga

37 dence-informed consensus process of donation experts and bioethicists to produce an ethics guide.

38 mechanisms, and whether differences between experts' and novices' responses are apparent only after

39 Experts are able to use peripheral vision very efficient

40 ssifications for each image demonstrate that experts are diagnosing pre-plus and plus disease at earl

41 reagents, limiting both adoption by the non-expert as well as applicability, particularly in industr

42 intuition, there is disagreement even among experts as to how the quantities [Formula: see text], [F

43 served between gilts and 10% tainted meat by experts as well as consumers.

44 e discrepancies are caused by differences in expert assessment of conflicting data.

45 d to describe the process and outcomes of an expert assessment of the evidence about causality.

46 with accuracy comparable to that achieved by expert assessment with positron emission tomography.

47 eves a high level of concordance with manual expert assessment.

48 Flies are expert at navigating cluttered environments, and while t

49 Jaipur, India) with MDD, and experienced ILD experts at the Center for ILD (CILD; Seattle, WA) with M

50 marizes the scientific evidence presented by experts at the First African Endocrine Disruptors meetin

51 report forms: local site investigators, ILD experts at the National Data Coordinating Center (NDCC;

52 eiver operating characteristic curve for the experts (AUC, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.89]; AUC, 0.8 [95% CI

53 This review provides an expert-based update of recent advances in the methods to

54 rder to increase access to (mostly) African, expert bioinformatics trainers.

55 tion examinations has been advocated by many experts, but whether doing so would affect the capacity

56 eases, patients should be offered specialist expert care delivered by experienced multidisciplinary t

57 Clinical Research Network, which consists of expert centers in the clinical management of these disor

58 MiTO experts check them for plausibility.

59 iagnosis requires a methodical approach with expert clinical evaluation and investigations.

60 A literature review, expert clinical interviews, and patient interviews were

61 Diagnoses made by expert clinician and by the C-PASS were compared.

62 inition for suicidal behavior was derived by expert clinician consensus review of 2,700 narrative EHR

63 , a guidance development group consisting of expert clinicians involved in the care of patients with

64 nd other tests, and management tools used by expert clinicians to care for persons with ME/CFS; 4) co

65 undiagnosed diseases, fostering a breadth of expert collaborations, determining best practices for tr

66 ATGC transcriptomics provides access to non-expert computer users and small research groups to a sca

67 Methods An expert consensus conference was convened including key s

68 Expert consensus diagnosis was used to classify function

69 This prompted the development of this expert consensus document by key leaders from North Amer

70 This Expert Consensus Document emphasizes that recognition of

71 The lack of strong evidence and expert consensus on these topics has identified gaps in

72 n situ (MIS) is increasing in incidence, and expert consensus opinion recommends surgical excision fo

73 deline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations)

74 pending on the quality of evidence, or E for expert consensus or clinical experience.

75 Cognitive diagnosis was made by an expert consensus panel based on published criteria.

76 This expert consensus provides an overview of the pharmacolog

77 Here, we summarize and integrate expert consensus recommendations and medical management

78 Specific, expert consensus recommendations are provided for the ro

79 ecommendations is classified as SORT level C expert consensus recommendations.

80 We also provide expert consensus that mechanisms causing ARDS in adults

81 Evidence was graded, and expert consensus was obtained.

82 SH)-and clear diagnostic criteria defined by expert consensus were only recently established.

83 he goal of this conference was to develop an expert consensus-driven working framework for comprehens

84 EAACI) aimed to propose definitions based on expert consensus.

85 tic review from those that can be based upon expert consensus.

86 alyses, published literature on methodology, expert consultation, and consensus among the writing gro

87 ion through April 2017; reference lists; and expert contacts.

88 rot curation, and that, despite appearances, expert curation in UniProt is scalable.

89 e knowledge extracted from the literature by expert curators.

90 A computational expert data analysis program, FlavonQ-2.0v, has been dev

91 ask Force on Colorectal Cancer, with invited experts, developed a consensus statement and recommendat

92 for individuals with diabetes, but also for expert diabetes educators.

93 Guidelines, the guideline is reviewed and 2 experts discuss how they would apply it to a 57-year-old

94 and Rounds, the guideline is reviewed and an expert discusses its application to 3 patients prescribe

95 Expert DM is characterized by improved quality, consiste

96 approach of blending the data with clinical expert domain knowledge identified four features, which

97 al distribution (i.e. beam pattern) of human expert echolocation transmissions, as well as spectro-te

98 s varied between site investigators and CILD experts, emphasizing the value of MDD in ILD diagnosis.

99 An international panel of experts endorsed consensus diagnostic criteria of IOI.

100 ng DNN-CAD, the novice endoscopists, and the expert endoscopists.

101 Domain expert feedback indicates that our visual approach can h

102 tervals (CIs) for VP localization by SVM and experts for AC stress images (bias, 1; 95% CI, -5 to 7 m

103 ASTRO guideline was reviewed by ASCO content experts for clinical accuracy and by ASCO methodologists

104 An international panel of 31 experts from 28 centres, including six endocrine surgeon

105 of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), experts from academia and regulatory agencies met with c

106 assessment, and recommendations are given by experts from across the region.

107 idney failure, and requires collaboration of experts from different disciplines, such as nephrology,

108 the American Heart Association and included experts from general cardiology, electrophysiology (adul

109 Therefore, we convened a number of experts from the areas of preclinical and clinical hepat

110 ety for Paediatric Research; two independent experts from the USA and two from Australia.

111 Among these, experts gave the highest level of importance to the iden

112 An open survey of experts generated an initial list of items, which was re

113 MD was assessed in a masked manner by an expert grader.

114 Affiliated expert groups focus on the interface between allergic re

115 SIOC performed by surgeons in two different expert groups.

116 Expert guidelines recommend reducing or discontinuing lo

117 Some experts have expressed concern that current trainees are

118 A panel of expert hernia-surgeons was assembled.

119 Clinical experts highlighted four asthma features/domains which d

120 hms could play a role that is independent of expert human graders in the current management of AMD an

121 l screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) by expert human grading of retinal images is challenging.

122 nal cardiology, as well as a hospitalist and experts in alarm management.

123 junction with interviews with several domain experts in biology.

124 ical scenarios, the diagnostic confidence of experts in cHP was heightened by the presence of these d

125 diation oncologists, neuropsychologists, and experts in clinical outcomes assessments, working in col

126 (QfO) is an open collaboration framework for experts in comparative phylogenomics and related researc

127 multi-specialty task force of international experts in critical care medicine and endocrinology and

128 biennial event that brings together leading experts in different fields of cardiovascular research.

129 Experts in each aspect of transgender health have summar

130 International experts in genetics, immunology, metabolism, endocrinolo

131 ective, the workshop assembled international experts in genetics, medical and gynecologic oncology, c

132 isms, a panel was recently convened of world experts in immunology, human translational research, and

133 Forty-five experts in interstitial lung disease from 14 countries p

134 Materials and Methods Three teams of experts in neuroimaging, cardiac imaging, and bone imagi

135 In this Beyond the Guidelines, 2 experts in obesity management, a bariatric surgeon and a

136 TtMIE, performed by experts in patients with low comorbidity, may serve as a

137 A panel of national experts in pediatric dermatology, procedural/cosmetic de

138 multidisciplinary and multinational group of experts in pediatric oncology and infectious diseases th

139 The workbench is developed and maintained by experts in RNA bioinformatics and the Galaxy framework.

140 al event that aims to bring together leading experts in subfields of cardiovascular biomedicine to fo

141 w, assembled by a group of multidisciplinary experts in the field and endorsed by the American Societ

142 uch a potential obstacle, a panel of leading experts in the field attempts here to define several aut

143 Experts in the field contributed their experimental and

144 ld with species identification documented by experts in the field.

145 e meeting was to bring together subspecialty experts in the fields of adult and pediatric hepatology,

146 eeting brought together pioneers and leading experts in the fields of stem cells, biomaterials and im

147 raphies of pertinent articles and queries of experts in this field led to 3 additional studies.

148 raphies of pertinent articles and queries to experts in this field.

149 ia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives as

150 ultidisciplinary working group that included experts in trial design and conduct to examine how eligi

151 The 18-member task force consisted of experts including pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, a

152 sus panel consisting of neuroendocrine tumor experts, including oncologists, gastroenterologists, and

153 For each disease, a pair of clinical experts independently classified all outcomes and resolv

154 combination of currently available tools and expert input.

155 ed retinal screening photographs with remote expert interpretation to determine the presence and seve

156 Of the 53 experts invited to participate, a multinational panel of

157 The subject matter experts invited to the Omics and Precision Oncology Work

158 munication of the analysis with the clinical expert is more straightforward than with traditional mod

159 rent methods have a low accuracy while human-expert knowledge and experimental insights can be used f

160 National expert laboratories recruited hospitals with diagnostic

161 ZFIN curators provide expert manual curation and integration of comprehensive

162 The Trauma Readiness Index for experts (mean [SD], 74 [4]) was significantly different

163 was created through discussions between five expert members of the European Society for Paediatric an

164 re trained by supervised learning from human expert moves, and by reinforcement learning from self-pl

165 lminating in a consensus meeting attended by experts (N = 12) with representatives from each group.

166 views with donors, government officials, and expert observers involved in CHW programs delivering HIV

167 Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care; four experts of the European Society for Paediatric Research;

168 uideline and includes a discussion between 2 experts on how they would apply it to a 64-year-old man

169 zation's (WHO's) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization deemed that all countries must s

170 early 2009 WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization reviewed available data and conc

171 commended by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization.

172 to gather input from external subject matter experts on their individual perspectives regarding evide

173 patient radiation exposure when performed by expert operators in current practice.

174 red to transfemoral access when performed by expert operators.

175 he identified knowledge gaps on the basis of expert opinion about their importance and relevance.

176 dations outlined in this review are based on expert opinion and on relevant publications from PubMed,

177 llergy which, despite being based largely on expert opinion and plausible assumptions, suggested that

178 ical practice update, available evidence and expert opinion are used to generate best practice recomm

179 ased review of the published data and on the expert opinion of a multidisciplinary consensus panel co

180 egories were derived with empirical data and expert opinion, as were markers of hemodynamic vulnerabi

181 literature, previously published models, and expert opinion.

182 enters use local protocols that are based on expert opinion.

183 ubjective process involving surveillance and expert opinion.

184 Database, and performance recommendations by expert opinion.

185 vides an effective data-driven supplement to expert opinion.

186 l studies, clinical practice guidelines, and expert opinion/statements to summarize existing evidence

187 The expert opinions and experience of the members of the con

188 ears or have used maps drawn from historical expert opinions.

189 on consistency was significantly superior in experts (P < 0.001) and residents (P < 0.05) than novice

190 e algorithm outperformed the panel of ataxia experts (p = 0.001).

191 An ASCO Expert Panel ( Table A1 ) was assembled to review the gu

192 three recommendation areas identified by the expert panel (leveraging partnerships, refining assessme

193 The expert panel (N = 12) agreed that 63 items should be inc

194 A blinded independent expert panel adjudicated all events.

195 Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the me

196 The expert panel concluded that (a) the most likely explanat

197 Results The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the ACS HNC Survivorship Ca

198 Results The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the ASTRO guideline recomme

199 Results The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the recommendations from th

200 Recommendations The ASCO Expert Panel emphasized that caring for HNC survivors re

201 An expert panel in psoriasis, pediatric dermatology, pediat

202 Methods The ASCO NSCLC Expert Panel made recommendations based on a systematic

203 During an expert panel meeting that took place during the 9th C1 I

204 Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of members of the ASCO Ad Hoc Palliative Ca

205 Expert panel of ophthalmic oncologists, pathologists, an

206 the surveyed trial units and members of the expert panel of the consensus meeting (N = 51), followed

207 o the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Cholesterol Levels in Children.

208 n behalf of the American Heart Association's Expert Panel on Payment and Delivery System Reform, serv

209 An expert panel rated 90 candidate metrics on a 9-point Lik

210 The expert panel recognised that Zika virus alone may not be

211 The Expert Panel reiterated the importance of using the most

212 An expert panel reviewed current guidelines in the light of

213 An ASCO Expert Panel reviewed the content and recommendations, o

214 An expert panel reviewed the results of the MINDACT study a

215 Following recommendations from a recent expert panel strategic review, we present illustrations

216 iety of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the liter

217 iety of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to h

218 f members of the ASCO Ad Hoc Palliative Care Expert Panel to develop an update.

219 ntario and ASCO convened a Working Group and Expert Panel to develop evidence-based recommendations i

220 An ASCO Expert Panel updated the literature search and reviewed

221 Methods An Expert Panel updated the systematic review of the litera

222 A 3-round modified Delphi process with an expert panel was conducted from June 8, 2015, to January

223 Methods Recommendations were developed by an expert panel with multidisciplinary representation using

224 An international expert panel, active within the European Society for Blo

225 onsensus among the related physicians and an expert panel.

226 r critical care guidelines were addressed by expert panels using a modified Delphi process, termed th

227 formance (neither in sighted, nor blind echo expert participants).

228 Three expert pathologists independently reviewed baseline and

229 tive training approaches for those requiring expert perceptual skills or those in need of perceptual

230 Expert perspective.

231 ally-constructed knowledge graph and against expert physician opinions.

232 s on AC and non-AC images were compared with expert placement on coronary CT angiography.

233 Two-class SVM models were computed from the expert placements with 10-fold cross validation to separ

234 maturity with accuracy similar to that of an expert radiologist and to that of existing automated mod

235 model based on hand radiographs with that of expert radiologists and that of existing automated model

236 Two expert radiologists segmented each tumor.

237 r cohorts (three with the trait scored by an expert rater and one with the trait self-reported).

238 Meta-analysis of the three expert-rater-scored cohorts revealed six associated loci

239 tral gland were delineated on T2w MRI by two expert raters and were used to construct statistical sha

240 n the proposed indices were compared against expert rating using PERCIST, BPIVOL and BPISUV showed be

241 priori threshold of consensus was >/= 75% of experts rating a diagnostic item as very important or im

242 Two independent masked experts read the scans, and both outcomes were combined

243 ondary objectives included comparison to the expert reader and assessment of intrareader reproducibil

244 Three expert readers from different institutions assessed the

245 and their accuracy was close to that of the expert readers in the original studies (range, 83.3%-87.

246 f bone involvement were compared with visual expert reading.

247 ng cases with adenocarcinoma within IP, some experts recommend to routinely obtain biopsies from IP f

248 Expert recommendations include the need for better insig

249 nuary 2009 to July 2017, bibliographies, and expert recommendations.

250 of retina specialists, image reading center experts, retinal histologists, and optics engineers.

251 nalysis require login/password access to its expert review (ER) companion system.

252 The purpose of this expert review is to update gastroenterologists on these

253 A diagnostic change between referral and expert review occurred in 19.7% of patients, with an est

254 prospectively assess the clinical impact of expert review of lymphoma diagnosis in France.

255 ties in a western country and highlights how expert review significantly contributes to a precise lym

256 Our experts review the data on which the guideline is based,

257 identified as "possible AERD." Two clinical experts reviewed all charts to confirm a diagnosis of "c

258 discuss how they can inform (and misinform) expert reviewers.

259 Health expert's estimate that the yearly cost of all the food b

260 Using an online mapping survey aimed at expert(s) in each country, we obtained data for all 28 c

261 nization's (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization recommended conducting th

262 zation's (WHO's) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) recommended that all 126 countries using

263 cer, the information in COSMIC is curated by expert scientists, primarily by scrutinizing large numbe

264 ts sent with a provisional diagnosis seeking expert second opinion (37.8%) than for patients sent wit

265 An expert surgeon rated the procedure using an Operating Ro

266 ngs (CAM) program, an international group of experts surveyed the existing literature, performed a ma

267 We used expert surveys to characterize the management systems by

268 We created the Bioinformatics ExperT SYstem (BETSY) that includes a knowledge base whe

269 BETSY is a backwards-chaining rule-based expert system comprised of a data model that can capture

270 Our study illustrates that such an expert system of mitotic progression is able to highligh

271 A workshop of experts systematically analyzed the available informatio

272 velopment of pipelines, we have investigated expert systems.

273 Clinical experts then identified a set of asthma features/domains

274 ve management, and mesh reinforcement, among experts; there was limited evidence and broad variabilit

275 the 2008 WHO classification, in real time by experts through the Lymphopath Network.

276 onvened a group of transplant clinical trial experts to address these problems.

277 nd case series, along with the experience of experts to create recommendations using a consensus (Del

278 These features allow non-experts to explore biomolecular design in silico.

279 ion skills, health disparities, and advocacy experts to produce recommendations.

280 gy and Allergology Societies commissioned 10 experts to review the literature and create joint nation

281 emy of Sciences recently convened a panel of experts to undertake a comprehensive study of current pr

282 tories included 40 surgical residents and 10 expert traumatologists.

283 resident performance with the performance of expert traumatologists.

284 rmative way, both for computer-savvy and non-expert users.

285 h reference standard assessments by delirium experts using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of M

286 l streptococci or nonoral pathogens using an expert-validated list kept confidential during the cours

287 elines, a multidisciplinary writing group of experts was convened to review and appraise available ev

288 Based on visual verification by three experts, we report the accuracy of cell segmentation to

289 a preference-based survey was used to obtain expert weighting of criteria.

290 e find strong quantitative agreement between experts when RNA scientists 'gaze' at SHAPE data and ide

291 d, WHO convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts who assessed the review findings and reached con

292 y based on an international panel of SJS/TEN experts who performed a Delphi consensus-building exerci

293 Overall, 21 out of 29 experts who were invited to participate in the online De

294 The workshop included US and international experts with backgrounds in allergy/allergens, immunolog

295 develop the BEC, the AAP convened a panel of experts with knowledge of CBCT and substantial experienc

296 stancing-Embracing model, we discuss whether experts with well-developed and highly accessible schema

297 egistries through June 2016; references; and experts, with surveillance of the literature through Jun

298 stries through October 2015, references, and experts, with surveillance of the literature through Oct

299 orkers (i.e. Amazon Mechanical Turk) against expert workers.

300 nario planning technique in an international expert workshop to address this question.