ライフサイエンスコーパス: external validity

1 ty and turning its attention to questions of external validity.

2 nts associated with internal, construct, and external validity.

3 ed in one model only, raising concerns about external validity.

4 system demonstrated evidence of internal and external validity.

5 cute cholecystitis have limited contemporary external validity.

6 ne that our definition has minimum bias with external validity.

7 this trial are its pragmatic nature and high external validity.

8 proposed prediction rules have shown limited external validity.

9 exclusion and adjustment that further limit external validity.

10 his was supplemented with domains related to external validity.

11 The PIAMA risk score showed good external validity.

12 , inter-rater reliability, repeatability and external validity.

13 ty of SRT experiments and, ultimately, SRT's external validity.

14 rces and threatened the study's internal and external validity.

15 exercise treadmill testing may have limited external validity.

16 nical trials remain susceptible to a lack of external validity.

17 s to assess surgical research's internal and external validity.

18 measurement that threaten both internal and external validity.

19 , which impairs internal validity and, thus, external validity.

20 -analysis, is mistakenly thought to increase external validity.

21 omains: study design, internal validity, and external validity.

22 imizing loss to follow-up, and 7) threats to external validity.

23 sion or exclusion) and should thus have high external validity.

24 rnal dimensions which have good reliability, external validity and are responsive to a change in heal

25 An analysis of the literature assessing external validity and generalizability of this intervent

26 ials often make it difficult to assess their external validity and sustainability.

27 The aim was to confirm the external validity and transportability of the Status Epi

28 ce or narrow eligibility criteria that limit external validity, and implementation of proven therapie

29 itations include sample selectivity, limited external validity, and multiple testing.

30 ual studies were rated by internal validity, external validity, and quality of design.

31 cales indicate good psychometric properties, external validity, and test-retest reliability.

32 ncluding concerns abou research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well

33 vations, not only for long-term survival and external validity, but also for other potential genetic

34 those obtained in bootstrapped samples; and external validity by applying the equations to an extern

35 ficacy versus effectiveness, internal versus external validity, data types, limitations, and analysis

36 ness research share problems of internal and external validity despite more attention to internal val

37 ted social traits, which provides additional external validity for our learning task and the winning

38 e introduce criteria (bias, reliability, and external validity) for the assessment of responder defin

39 liable internal validity and, thus, reliable external validity (generalizability) in biological resea

40 The impact of these factors on internal and external validity in both observational and randomized c

41 on, blinding, standardized protocols) and to external validity in effectiveness studies (e.g., commun

42 Considering external validity in important target populations increa

43 dies based in higher income countries, their external validity in terms of applicability to settings

44 recommendations for greater consideration of external validity in the design and reporting of RCTs.

45 However, reporting of the determinants of external validity in trial publications and systematic r

46 suggesting a need for increased emphasis on external validity in youth treatment research.

47 There is concern among clinicians that external validity is often poor, particularly for some p

48 that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalise from the

49 nd governmental regulators alike all neglect external validity, leaving clinicians to make judgments.

50 terventions will strengthen the internal and external validity, minimize research waste and add value

51 h acute lung injury was used to evaluate the external validity of a simple prediction model for short

52 The external validity of conventional two- to three-year car

53 We examined the external validity of existing HF risk scores, optimized

54 l approaches limited study comparability and external validity of findings.

55 Internal and external validity of NRMI 2 was defined using the CCP as

56 he transplant population that may affect the external validity of research findings.

57 These differences may affect the external validity of study findings, reflect access to c

58 methods to improve not only the internal and external validity of surgical trials but also their asse

59 The small patient population may limit the external validity of the findings observed.

60 ults, further strengthening the internal and external validity of the findings.

61 Few studies assessed internal or external validity of the models or their use in clinical

62 duce the false positive rate and to increase external validity of the predictive gene set, a jackknif

63 After assuring the external validity of the predictors, an important next s

64 the biases of trial design, which impact the external validity of the results.

65 sting and analysis of variance to assess the external validity of the results.

66 model (r = -0.45; P = .046), confirming the external validity of the scheme.

67 To increase the external validity of the study, we conducted lab-in-the-

68 for more complex patients, which limits the external validity of the trial's findings.

69 The external validity of these findings must be examined fur

70 wever, there is a paucity of research on the external validity of these methods that examines whether

71 deed rest on experiments lacking established external validity, often without even a small "menu of o

72 Relevance depends on external validity (or generalisability)--ie, whether the

73 o -0.6), constipation dimension had moderate external validity (r = -0.2 to -0.3).

74 Pain and diarrhoea dimensions had good external validity (r = -0.3 to -0.6), constipation dimen

75 The external validity study found a correlation coefficient

76 addressed important internal, construct, and external validity threats, limiting their clinical gener

77 External validity was confirmed by the correlation coeff

78 External validity was confirmed by the correlation coeff

79 External validity was explored by regressing ADVS scores

80 f the treatment trials was fair to good, and external validity was limited by the minimal ethnic or g

81 Predictive and external validity were evaluated within an independent e

82 ) computer personality judgments have higher external validity when predicting life outcomes such as

83 and Youden indices to evaluate internal and external validity with a retrospective institutional val

84 s of the Track mutation carriers showed good external validity with the COHORT mutation carriers afte