戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                                             Extracted data were as follows: RNA or DNA genome, enveloped
2 ndependently rated risk of bias and strength of evidence; 1 extracted data, and a second checked accuracy.
3                                                         All extracted data were statistically analyzed and the results we
4                                                     We also extracted data on measles-related Google searches.
5                                                     We also extracted data on the smear and culture status of index cases
6 in the English language, up to and including July 2016, and extracted data were organized into evidence tables.
7 screened titles and abstracts, read full-text articles, and extracted data.
8 dently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data.
9                  We indexed diseases and topics covered and extracted data on the search characteristics of each systemat
10 ies from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases and extracted data from 24 qualified RCTs.
11                               We assessed study quality and extracted data on study design, patient characteristics, and
12                  We reviewed 55 671 papers and reports, and extracted data from 1147 eligible records.
13    We screened studies using systematic review software and extracted data from published reports.
14                                     We screened studies and extracted data from published reports independently.
15                  Independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data.
16            Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data.
17     Two authors working independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias.
18                                            DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data were analyzed by pairwise and network meta-ana
19  Two reviewers independently assessed papers for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.
20 Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the study quality.
21              Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently extracted data from eligible studies and assessed study quali
22                                 Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and overall quality
23                DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated methodologic quality.
24                Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and ranked study quality; 2 rated overall stre
25                Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, patients, interventi
26                Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and graded certainty o
27                                            One investigator extracted data and a second checked accuracy.
28  the articles that met selection criteria, one investigator extracted data and a second investigator reviewed the data fo
29                          Data Extraction: Two investigators extracted data, assessed study quality, and graded the eviden
30                          Data Extraction: Two investigators extracted data, assessed study quality, and graded the streng
31                                    A systematic analysis of extracted data was performed with software using random and f
32                   One author independently screened papers, extracted data using a modified version of the Reporting of P
33                  Data Extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality using the U.S. Prev
34                                            Paired reviewers extracted data about study characteristics and assessed biase
35                                               Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality independently.
36                                                    We split extracted data by prefecture and applied GBD methods to gener
37 dependently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles, then extracted data from fair- and good-quality trials.
38                              We screened in duplicate, then extracted data and appraised risk of bias in duplicate with a
39                                                          We extracted data and assessed evidence on each outcome as high,
40                                                          We extracted data for patients with skin involvement at anti-TNF
41                                                          We extracted data from ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com, a large, mu
42                                                          We extracted data from eligible studies for study characteristic
43                                                          We extracted data from GBD 2015 to assess mortality, causes of d
44                                                          We extracted data from published reports and contacted the origi
45                                                          We extracted data from published reports.
46                                                          We extracted data from studies presenting pesticide suicide data
47                                                          We extracted data from the ECDC database for all paediatric pati
48                                                          We extracted data, in duplicate, related to items of selection b
49 s inactivation rates in wastewater and similar matrices, we extracted data to construct a model predicting the T90 (1 x l
50                          In this population-based study, we extracted data from the Royal College of General Practitioner

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
コーパス検索結果について
ご利用ガイド
ご利用規定
新規対訳・お問い合わせ
Copyright 1993 - ライフサイエンス辞書プロジェクト