ライフサイエンスコーパス: face processing

1 face-sensitive N170 component and configural face processing.

2 ggesting links between the N170 and holistic face processing.

3 he ERP signatures of featural and configural face processing.

4 ecognition as well as hierarchical models of face processing.

5 rgely bilaterally distributed model for self-face processing.

6 buted cortical network that subserves normal face processing.

7 ngs of a low-spatial frequency advantage for face processing.

8 unctional imaging of orientation, motion and face processing.

9 fusiform face area, that is specialized for face processing.

10 le of early experience in the development of face processing.

11 ses from human visual cortex specialized for face processing.

12 augmented in regions involved in emotion and face processing.

13 atial deficits and enhanced emotionality and face processing.

14 e provide a challenge for existing models of face processing.

15 is unique to language or might also apply to face processing.

16 rior temporal regions are involved in visual face processing.

17 d to the functional specialization of normal face processing.

18 dies have implicated other cortical areas in face processing.

19 s, and amygdala, enables rapid and automatic face processing.

20 at face-selective brain areas are central to face processing.

21 inhibitor (SSRI), on brain activation during face processing.

22 and neural activity in response to emotional face processing.

23 Schizophrenia is associated with impaired face processing.

24 in both humans and monkeys, with a focus on face processing.

25 ine face-training program targeting holistic face processing.

26 ces, particularly in regions associated with face processing.

27 gyrus compared with the control group during face processing.

28 reased activity in brain regions involved in face processing.

29 pped into two relatively disparate stages of face processing.

30 gen level-dependent responses during fearful faces processing.

31 more prominent in unfamiliar versus familiar face processing?

32 methodological concern in the measurement of face processing abilities in schizophrenia, namely, that

33 Face processing abilities were investigated using tests

34 amygdala-related connectivity during fearful face processing after the placebo treatment in heroin-de

35 ral correlates of adult social phobia during face processing also manifest in adolescent social phobi

36 ral correlates of adult social phobia during face processing also manifest in adolescents.

37 um disorder (ASD) is associated with altered face processing and decreased activity in brain regions

38 ASD and suggest that oxytocin might promote face processing and eye contact in individuals with ASD

39 Face processing and facial expression recognition were i

40 ropeptide oxytocin has been shown to promote face processing and modulate brain activity in healthy a

41 ption is to identify brain areas involved in face processing and simultaneously understand the timing

42 d in WS, despite abnormalities in aspects of face processing and structural alterations in the fusifo

43 o computations associated with both central (face processing) and peripheral (scene processing) visua

44 ith view-point changes, measures of holistic face processing, and a 5-day diary to quantify potential

45 re presented upside down, to disrupt typical face processing, and an object matching task.

46 The amygdala is important for face processing, and direction of eye gaze is one of the

47 ity is generated in participants with normal face processing, and how functional abnormalities associ

48 categorical emotional perception, configural face processing, and perceptual organization in mental i

49 e occipital face area (OFA), a key region in face processing, and the lateral occipital (LO) cortex,

50 Thus, abnormal amygdala activation during face processing appears to be more pervasive in children

51 Two of the most robust markers for "special" face processing are the behavioral face-inversion effect

52 These results suggest that macaque face processing areas and human mentalizing areas might

53 in regions including associative visual and face processing areas was strongly correlated with the c

54 ghlighting that the functional properties of face-processing areas conform to the principles of predi

55 not retinotopically organized, as with human face-processing areas, showing foveal bias but lacking a

56 ictions and constraints from distinct visual face-processing areas.

57 s to examine brain function during emotional face processing as a predictor of response to treatment

58 high-spatial frequency information in early face processing, as indexed by the N170 face-sensitive E

59 dimension in unfamiliar relative to familiar face processing, both in early perceptual stages as well

60 firm the amygdala's pivotal role in abnormal face processing by people with ASD at the cellular level

61 ial cognition in autism [3], we investigated face processing by using the "bubbles" method [4] to mea

62 How this information is exchanged between face-processing centers and brain areas supporting socia

63 the magnitude of activation within emotional face processing circuitry; and (ii) functional connectiv

64 isual cortex, and subcortex during emotional face processing (cluster-level P corrected for familywis

65 ical gaze, aberrant amygdala activity during face processing compared with neurotypically developed (

66 ess activation in neural networks related to face processing, compared with healthy subjects, and to

67 shapes the functional specialization of the face-processing cortex during development.

68 s done on an individual with especially pure face processing deficits.

69 It is not clear if face-processing deficits are also expressed on an attent

70 Primate face processing depends on a distributed network of inte

71 The results suggest that face-processing difficulties in toddlers with ASD involv

72 Many aspects of face processing (e.g., prosopagnosia, recognition, and c

73 alization for upright (compared to inverted) face processing emerges in the visual system, the presen

74 n coefficient = 0.57), specific to emotional face processing (F = 17.97, P < .001), and independent o

75 se results reveal differential influences on face processing from attention and emotion, with the amy

76 als spend reduced amounts of time engaged in face processing from birth.

77 populations of neurons involved in dedicated face-processing functions.

78 ace space, and other key properties of human face processing have been identified at the single neuro

79 age features, behavioral and fMRI studies of face processing have been interpreted as incompatible wi

80 esence of a face is first inferred in the IT face processing hierarchy.

81 intermediate representation of a three-level face-processing hierarchy in the brain: mirror-symmetric

82 FA) is thought to be a computational hub for face processing; however, temporal dynamics of face info

83 ion, we examined neural mechanisms mediating face processing in 22 youths (mean age 14.21 +/- 3.11 yr

84 e effects of oxytocin on the neural basis of face processing in adults with Asperger syndrome (AS).

85 circuit coupling during fearful versus happy face processing in anxious, but not healthy, participant

86 Thus, the study of face processing in autism is not only important because

87 hearing brain preferentially reorganize for face processing in born-deaf people.

88 ral lobe served as the major network hub for face processing in controls, this was not the case for t

89 reactivity of the amygdala during emotional face processing in healthy subjects (controls).

90 possible mechanistic architecture underlying face processing in humans.

91 facial features found in the middle patch of face processing in IT as documented by Freiwald, Tsao, a

92 ception task, none of the regions supporting face processing in normals were found to be significantl

93 cortical topology of the neural circuit for face processing in participants with an impairment in fa

94 We examined implicit emotional face processing in pediatric PTSD, predicting abnormalit

95 inspired by electrophysiological evidence on face processing in primates, is able to generate represe

96 aces than to nonface objects is critical for face processing in primates.

97 ntials that have been studied in relation to face processing in schizophrenia, but the results have b

98 site of a defective anatomical substrate for face processing in schizophrenia.

99 le of facial features in the middle patch of face processing in the macaque IT cortex may be closely

100 a dedicated cortical area exists to support face processing in the macaque.

101 nds in contrast to most past FMRI studies of face processing in this disorder.

102 tensive network of brain regions involved in face processing including the fusiform gyrus (FFG) and p

103 al areas known to participate in emotion and face processing, including the amygdala, orbital and med

104 Emotional face processing influenced somatosensory responses to bo

105 illnesses such as autism, in which atypical face processing is a hallmark of social dysfunction.

106 Although face processing is a priority of the primate visual syst

107 lography (M/EEG) studies have suggested that face processing is extremely rapid, indeed faster than a

108 Face processing is mediated by interactions between func

109 Yet, the underlying mechanism of face processing is not completely revealed.

110 at the functional-division-of-labor model on face processing is over-simplified, and that coding stra

111 Thus, bottom-up face processing is relatively local and linearly integra

112 ural systems that underlie both language and face processing is revealed through studies using event-

113 behavior and brain responses have shown that face processing is tuned to selective orientation ranges

114 Right hemisphere dominance in face processing is well established and unilateral right

115 a visual-limbic subnetwork during emotional face processing may be a functional connectomic intermed

116 on has suggested that the systems underlying face processing may be similarly sculpted by experience

117 t faces are recognized by a content-specific face processing mechanism.

118 he OFA is the first stage in two influential face-processing models, both of which suggest that it co

119 pathways, suggests that core elements of the face processing network were present in the common anthr

120 s known to comprise the distributed cortical face-processing network in humans, including superior te

121 hus, two temporal lobe areas extend the core face-processing network into a familiar face-recognition

122 personally familiar faces engage the macaque face-processing network more than unfamiliar faces.

123 We targeted the recently discovered face-processing network of the macaque monkey that consi

124 rvature-processing network to the well-known face-processing network suggests a possible functional l

125 f connectivity from posterior regions of the face-processing network to the lateral ventral prefronta

126 ividual faces in core posterior areas of the face-processing network, familiar face recognition emerg

127 These two areas, but not the core face-processing network, responded to familiar faces eme

128 connected networks, such as the attention or face-processing network.

129 forming a critical first step on which other face processing operations can build.

130 fusiform region in both early and midlatency face-processing operations, with only the latter showing

131 Is it specific to face processing, or is it a visual expertise area?

132 lvement of somatosensory cortex (SCx) during face processing over and above visual responses, we dire

133 fects on components previously implicated in face processing: P1 (positive component ~100 ms post-sti

134 main components classically associated with face processing (P100 and N170).

135 nd processed to the mature size by the lumen-facing processing peptidase.

136 tal cortical areas typically associated with face processing predicted individual numerical problem s

137 These data suggest that face processing proceeds through two stages: an initial

138 and reward, affective, salience, memory, and face-processing regions during mother's voice perception

139 being mediated by task-related modulation of face-processing regions of fusiform cortex.

140 ions modulate functional MRI activity in the face-processing regions of the macaque monkey's amygdala

141 hat opponent social categories coactivate in face-processing regions, which compete and may resolve i

142 In boys with autism, language and social/face processing-related regions displayed abnormal asymm

143 f WMS is a dissociation between language and face processing (relative strengths) and spatial cogniti

144 l networks on conspecific and nonconspecific face processing remain unclear.

145 The pattern of face processing seen in the Broad Autism Phenotype showe

146 mic computational role FFA plays in multiple face processing stages and indicate what information is

147 ific visual memory traces and later semantic face processing stages.

148 ce-part information at an early stage in the face-processing stream.

149 nd, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced fMRI face processing study.

150 differences in activation in the subcortical face processing system (superior colliculus, pulvinar nu

151 The human face processing system comprises a core system that anal

152 plex high-level perceptual system, the human face processing system.

153 olia in a species known to possess a complex face-processing system [8-10]: the rhesus monkey (Macaca

154 Thus, the macaque face-processing system exhibits regional specialization

155 Here, we investigate whether the macaque face-processing system, a three-level hierarchy in the v

156 new organizational principle of the macaque face-processing system.

157 sed increased fMRI activation throughout the face-processing system; microstimulation of the body pat

158 al MRI to compare amygdala activity during a face processing task in children and adults with bipolar

159 the current study, participants engaged in a face processing task while brain responses were recorded

160 trols, 25 remitted) to complete an emotional face-processing task during fMRI at Level-3.

161 thanol while performing a modified emotional faces processing task.

162 of the background tests, on any of the other face processing tasks, and even for recognition of any o

163 uli that elicit a well known marker of early face processing, the N170 event-related potential (ERP).

164 and showed significantly increased holistic face processing to the point of being similar to that of

165 autistic children (N = 27, whose pattern of face processing was intermediate).

166 face recognition algorithms to model primate face processing, we demonstrate that the face patterns o

167 ned influences of familiarity and priming on face processing were examined as contrast polarity was m

168 results support a multiple-route network of face processing with nonhierarchical components and shed

169 etween self-recognition and more generalized face processing within the human brain.