ライフサイエンスコーパス: face-to-face

1 han 5 A, where guanidinium groups can stack "face to face".

2 egrees , and they have a propensity to stack face to face.

3 of weight loss, particularly when delivered face to face.

4 r is comprised of two pentamer rings stacked face to face.

5 interacting single layers: edge-to-edge and face-to-face.

6 ke particle and two of these rings associate face-to-face.

7 weight loss counseling for approximately 14 face-to-face, 10- to 15-minute sessions over 6 months fo

8 AK1 in which two kinase domains are arranged face to face and interact through a surface on the large

9 Both arms will consist of three face to face and three telephone call follow up consulta

10 cancer type) to receive bCBT, including five face-to face and three online sessions (n = 45) or care

11 ormal caregivers (of these 28 were conducted face-to-face and 11 by telephone).

12 of selective peptide-DNA association between face-to-face and edge-to-edge packing by tailoring the s

13 larization hysteresis was observed along the face-to-face and edge-to-face axes at room temperature.

14 ecules are positioned for charge-transfer in face-to-face and edge-to-face orientations, held togethe

15 arate occasions by different interviewers to face-to-face and real-time interactive videoconferencing

16 leosomes are separated by approximately 2 nm face-to-face and rotated by 34 degrees with respect to e

17 ants were interviewed with computer-assisted face-to-face and self-completion questionnaires.

18 l be delivered through individually tailored face-to-face and telephone consultations, supported by m

19 ience sampling approach and a combination of face-to-face and telephone surveys, 588 Latino adults in

20 here were no significant differences between face-to-face and videoconference administration.

21 s, recruitment of participants at diagnosis, face to face, and with the use of short questionnaires y

22 ve when used as a triage mechanism to reduce face-to-face appointment requirements.

23 cule model system that could adopt an offset face-to-face aromatic stacking geometry.

24 on that is possible within p-doped aromatic (face-to-face) arrays.

25 lder who were nondisabled during an 18-month face-to-face assessment (i.e., zero-time).

26 nferencing did not differ significantly from face-to-face assessment in this population.

27 s by real-time videoconferencing compared to face-to-face assessment within a rural American Indian c

28 id misuse is accomplished by having frequent face-to-face assessments, performing urine drug tests, m

29 rs in which the anthracene units are stacked face-to-face at the critical Schmidt distance.

30 rameters in the case of multiply substituted face-to-face benzene dimers.

31 ture exhibits protofibrils built of pairs of face-to-face beta-sheets.

32 role represented as (Me(4)Ph(5)Cor)Co, one a face-to-face biscorrole linked by an anthracene (A), bip

33 )Co(2) (with Y = A, B, X, O or S), and one a face-to-face bismacrocyclic complex, (PCY)Co(2), contain

34 receive either the DVDB intervention, three face-to-face breathing retraining sessions, or standard

35 adolescents, even after their involvement in face-to-face bullying is taken into account.

36 ous 12 months; victimization by traditional (face-to-face) bullying; and perpetration of traditional

37 n reporting framework iteratively by meeting face to face, by teleconference, and by Web survey durin

38 Interviews were conducted face-to-face, by telephone or email.

39 r via a combination of online management and face-to-face care.

40 control sample was comparable to that of the face-to-face case sample.

41 ontinued T-CBT (n = 34; 20.9%) compared with face-to-face CBT (n = 53; 32.7%; P = .02).

42 Face-to-face CBT leads to quicker and greater reductions

43 fferences at posttreatment between T-CBT and face-to-face CBT on the Ham-D (P = .22) or the PHQ-9 (P

44 Participants received 20 individual face-to-face CBT sessions of 50 minutes each or sequenti

45 lative to baseline; however, those receiving face-to-face CBT were less depressed than those receivin

46 baseline (P < .001), participants receiving face-to-face CBT were significantly less depressed than

47 gram that incorporated the primary tenets of face-to-face CBT-I.

48 1, indicating that T-CBT was not inferior to face-to-face CBT.

49 Eighteen sessions of T-CBT or face-to-face CBT.

50 GSH-I) compared with traditional, individual face-to-face CBT.

51 itted, 44 currently depressed) to complete a face-to-face clinical interview and neuropsychological t

52 yze the anticodon pairs complementary to the face-to-face codon couplets.

53 et intervention is based on well-established face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy incorporating

54 pted to meet these conundrums were fourfold: face to face communication; shaping decisions; increment

55 tered nurse (RN) who reported frequent daily face-to-face communication about patient care with the p

56 ry care teams which relied on frequent daily face-to-face communication among more team members, and

57 Human face-to-face communication is essentially audiovisual.

58 ry care teams with a greater number of daily face-to-face communication ties among team members were

59 al information available to listeners during face-to-face communication.

60 the 'phosphoryl-transfer' competent dimeric face-to-face complex, which precedes and is distinct fro

61 ement of two arenes to assume a near-perfect face-to-face configuration in its ground state conformat

62 The spacerless monomer 12 adopts a face-to-face conformation with a separation of only 3.6

63 2 questionnaire mailings with an in-between face-to-face consensus meeting, an international multidi

64 o telephoned the practice seeking a same-day face-to-face consultation with a GP.

65 As compared with face-to-face consultations, e-consults were more often r

66 Mobile telephone interventions involve no face to face contact, making conventional process evalua

67 chniques for process evaluation involving no face to face contact.

68 rt and the other delivered remotely, without face-to-face contact between participants and weight-los

69 Main Outcome Measure Duration of face-to-face contact between patient and psychiatrist.

70 Face-to-face contact came when both colonized the Moqueg

71 Overall, 13 of 15 secondary cases had face-to-face contact with measles patients, 8 with prior

72 ods until 6 months of age and 3 personalized face-to-face contacts (at 5.5, 7.0, and 9.0 months).

73 their use of assistive listening devices for face-to-face conversation and, while part of an audience

74 ties evolve from small groups, integrated by face-to-face cooperation, to huge anonymous societies of

75 counseling (HF-F2F) (n = 74), low-frequency face-to-face counseling (LF-F2F) (n = 76), high-frequenc

76 that T-CBT improves adherence compared with face-to-face delivery, but at the cost of some increased

77 and mode of delivery, although most employed face-to-face didactic techniques.

78 n the crystal structure of the wt CTD in the face-to-face dimer is absent.

79 he BRAF(KD) in a complex with MEK1 reveals a face-to-face dimer sensitive to MEK1 phosphorylation but

80 erences compared to the CTD structure in the face-to-face dimer.

81 usly, the CTD dimer was thought to involve a face-to-face dimerization observed in the early crystall

82 d in a systematic review, Delphi survey, and face-to-face discussion and consensus meeting to establi

83 and peer consultation were also used through face to face discussions, phone calls, text messages, an

84 Even when primary care physicians have face-to-face discussions with patients before referring

85 al etching and allows routine fabrication of face-to-face disk arrays and gap structures in the range

86 n solution and locks the two porphyrins in a face-to-face disposition.

87 A new loading technique using face-to-face double-filament geometry is developed that

88 A face-to-face education intervention did not significantl

89 Both intervention groups included a face-to-face education session delivered by a nurse focu

90 ter and whether they were diagnosed during a face-to-face (eg, hospitalization, outpatient visit) or

91 usands" are groups, these are, respectively, face-to-face embodied groups and collective symbolic gro

92 g, hospitalization, outpatient visit) or non-face-to-face encounter (eg, phone, e-mail).

93 12-month program that involved 1 face-to-face encounter with a nurse and regular telephon

94 t included CDIs identified during outpatient face-to-face encounters and 1 that also included CDIs id

95 Automated online counseling simulates face-to-face encounters and may be a useful tool to deli

96 confined to patients who had >/=10 phone or face-to-face encounters in 2 years.

97 standing of the mechanisms driving our daily face-to-face encounters is still limited; the field lack

98 dition of cases identified during outpatient face-to-face encounters would account for 80% of CDIs.

99 hat also included CDIs identified during non-face-to-face encounters.

100 uld not be captured without inclusion of non-face-to-face encounters; thus, surveillance approaches t

101 Data were drawn from a face-to-face epidemiologic survey of 34,653 adults inter

102 ssible abnormal findings are scheduled for a face-to-face examination in the eye clinic.

103 lled trial (+CBT - standard care plus either face-to-face (F2F) or online CBT over 10 weeks versus st

104 two metalloporphyrin units are arranged in a face-to-face fashion through a tetrasubstituted 1,5-hexa

105 uare-pyramidal stiborane units oriented in a face-to-face fashion.

106 MDH) building blocks into nanoscale cage and face-to-face (ff) dimeric structures.

107 % agreement between the TECS reading and the face-to-face findings of the physician.

108 e of bleeding requiring medical attention by face-to-face follow-up for 10 years.

109 of psychosis was assessed by self-reports in face-to-face follow-up interviews.

110 Survivors were invited to a face-to-face follow-up, and 287 cardiac arrest survivors

111 icle composed of two heptameric rings joined face-to-face forming an aqueous chamber containing the p

112 to-face (etf), a mixture of edge-to-face and face-to-face (ftf), and no anthracene-anthracene interac

113 n cancer diagnosis compared with usual care (face-to-face [FTF] diagnosis)?

114 lso more likely to produce lip-smacks during face-to-face grooming where the visual aspect of the sig

115 were similar between the DVDB group and the face-to-face group (0.04, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.24).

116 her in the control group (72.4%) than in the face-to-face group (45.7%; absolute difference, 27%; 95%

117 rence 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.44), and in the face-to-face group (5.33, SD 1.06) than in the usual car

118 p, with a significant difference between the face-to-face group and the control group (2.4 kg; 95% co

119 (+/-SD) weight gain was 2.5+/-6.7 kg in the face-to-face group, 4.7+/-8.6 kg in the Internet group,

120 DVDB group, 55 (42%) of 132 patients in the face-to-face group, and 132 (50%) of 262 in the usual ca

121 in the DVDB group, four (3%) patients in the face-to-face group, and 20 (8%) patients in the usual ca

122 terized feedback, text messages, and monthly face-to-face groups at the WIC clinics.

123 opose an evolutionary-developmental model of face-to-face groups that scaffolds theorizing the evolut

124 adding mHealth interventions to traditional face-to-face health counseling may be an effective way t

125 morbidity Survey (NCS) were obtained in 5388 face-to-face household interviews conducted between 1990

126 Face-to-face household interviews with adolescents and q

127 Face-to-face household surveys were undertaken with 84,8

128 SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional, face-to-face, household surveys of 61,392 community adul

129 bonding to form extended layers and through face-to-face hydrophobic or van der Waals interactions t

130 Interviews were conducted either face to face in participant's homes or another convenien

131 Two trimers associate face-to-face in the crystal lattice to form a hexamer; f

132 Face to face, in-depth, semi structured interviews were

133 various limitations: they often lack direct face-to-face interaction between participants, are typic

134 For size-mismatched single layers, face-to-face interaction caused irreversible stacking, l

135 It frees up the teacher to use the face-to-face interaction time in the operating room and

136 students that optimal patient care requires face-to-face interaction to collect information on the p

137 Thus, even very limited experience of face-to-face interaction with other humans may be suffic

138 Before the fMRI scan, mothers were filmed in face-to-face interaction with their infant, and maternal

139 As in face-to-face interaction, online exchanges are structure

140 students spend many hours daily in intense, face-to-face interaction.

141 edia, video, E-mail and telephone as well as face-to-face interaction.

142 omly assigned to receive additional neonatal face-to-face interactions (mutual gaze and intermittent

143 To recruit older individuals, face-to-face interactions are more effective than less p

144 Surprisingly, although face-to-face interactions are of higher affinity, interm

145 These studies suggest that face-to-face interactions from birth promote young prima

146 social cognition, but how this translates to face-to-face interactions involving real people remains

147 mer is further dimerized through hydrophobic face-to-face interactions involving the Phe and Tyr grou

148 However, the impact of this variation in face-to-face interactions on infant social development i

149 ompounds forces the acridyl rings to undergo face-to-face interactions while rendering T-shaped orien

150 Macaca mulatta) who engaged in more neonatal face-to-face interactions with mothers have increased so

151 rimates, including humans, mothers engage in face-to-face interactions with their infants, with frequ

152 unnecessary healthcare contacts particularly face-to-face interactions.

153 nfants show active social expressions during face-to-face interactions.

154 tems, implies very intensive intermolecular (face-to-face) interactions among the TSAN cores within t

155 rs (105 participants), a group that received face-to-face intervention (105), and a group that receiv

156 ons have demonstrated efficacy comparable to face-to-face interventions.

157 tion treatment, compared with more intensive face-to-face interventions.

158 A DCE was carried out during a face-to-face interview among older adults as part of the

159 om the US census bureau gathered data during face-to-face interview and obtained socio-demographic, s

160 project focused on oral health that included face-to-face interview items regarding oral health-relat

161 mized experiment using a computerized versus face-to-face interview mode.

162 A face-to-face interview on sexual behavior and intravagin

163 Sao Paulo, Brazil, and were randomized to a face-to-face interview or audio computer-assisted self-i

164 ected at kindergartens and parish centers by face-to-face interview to caregivers, using an adapted I

165 Information on children was obtained by a face-to-face interview with mothers, with a response rat

166 Data were collected using face-to-face interview, clinical examination and laborat

167 icipants to underreport risk behavior in the face-to-face interview.

168 ex and condom use collected through ACASI or face-to-face interviewing (FTFI) with a validated object

169 This was a qualitative study using face to face interviews with consultant ophthalmologists

170 ed in exposure prone procedures, followed by face to face interviews with surgeons and scrub nurses,

171 for major depressive disorder at baseline in face-to-face interviews (in 2001-2002) were reinterviewe

172 We designed and analysed a poll using face-to-face interviews among caregivers of children und

173 ss medication adherence on the basis of both face-to-face interviews and clinical notes.

174 in their own homes through computer-assisted face-to-face interviews and self-interview.

175 The study data were derived from face-to-face interviews conducted in 2 nationally repres

176 Face-to-face interviews conducted in surveys of 2 nation

177 10/66 standardized protocol, which includes face-to-face interviews for dietary habits and a cross-c

178 ld surveys of adults aged 18 years or older (face-to-face interviews in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Peru,

179 tfeeding at age 14 and 24 weeks, assessed at face-to-face interviews in the clinic.

180 Understanding of these terms was assessed in face-to-face interviews of 105, mostly African-American

181 We designed and analysed polls based on face-to-face interviews of a random sample of parents an

182 agnosis data collected from 2003 to 2017, in face-to-face interviews or via questionnaires, and invol

183 Data were collected via individual, face-to-face interviews using a researcher-developed sem

184 Design, Setting, and PARTICIPANTS: Face-to-face interviews using the Alcohol Use Disorder a

185 Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted between 2010 and

186 Face-to-face interviews were conducted between December

187 Between 2001 and 2003, face-to-face interviews were conducted for the NCS-R in

188 Face-to-face interviews were conducted from 2005 to 2010

189 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Face-to-face interviews were conducted in the 2001-2002

190 Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 538 persons

191 Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients and

192 Private face-to-face interviews were done in local languages and

193 ed to the INDIGO Research Network, by use of face-to-face interviews with 732 participants with schiz

194 We carried out face-to-face interviews with a consecutive sample of ind

195 Design, Setting, and PARTICIPANTS: Face-to-face interviews with a representative US adult s

196 We conducted face-to-face interviews with a representative US noninst

197 Sept 5, 2005, and May 26, 2006, qualitative face-to-face interviews with clinicians, hospital manage

198 We conducted face-to-face interviews with family members (N = 15) who

199 In face-to-face interviews, 62 parents who had made one of

200 alysis were conducted by hand with data from face-to-face interviews, observations, field notes, and

201 Both surveys used face-to-face interviews, the same diagnostic criteria, a

202 Using qualitative methods and in-depth, face-to-face interviews, we asked Connecticut PCPs to de

203 In face-to-face interviews, we assessed QoL with the Macula

204 chemicals and animals was collected through face-to-face interviews.

205 Questionnaire (VFQ-25) were elicited during face-to-face interviews.

206 mation on risk factors was collected through face-to-face interviews.

207 line survey was supplemented by 31 follow-up face-to-face interviews.

208 Participants took part in face-to-face interviews.

209 informal care received was collected during face-to-face interviews.

210 efore and during pregnancy was collected via face-to-face interviews.

211 de is rearranged to put complementary codons face-to-face, it becomes apparent that the code displays

212 High-frequency face-to-face lifestyle modification counseling (HF-F2F)

213 ith marked decreases in the effectiveness of face-to-face, mail, and telephone recruitment methods.

214 TS.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans interacting face to face make use of auditory cues from the talker's

215 ecialists in the American Uveitis Society, a face-to-face meeting (AIR Workshop) held at the National

216 to participate in one internet-based and one face-to-face meeting to address the above-stated goals.

217 ced contact with interventionist (EC) (brief face-to-face meeting upon returning for care visit, inte

218 he representatives of the ICD-11 revision, a face-to-face meeting was held at the United Nations Offi

219 Regular face-to-face meetings were also commonly employed.

220 tissue-type plasminogen activator), and (5) face-to-face meetings with on-site visits.

221 pating institutions held regular virtual and face-to-face meetings.

222 ficant differences among mail, telephone, or face-to-face methods of collecting self-reports.

223 rable distributions to those collected using face-to-face methods.

224 turns of some N-glycoproteins, to facilitate face-to-face monosaccharide-aromatic interactions.

225 (control group); web-based intervention and face-to-face nurse support (POWeR+Face-to-face [POWeR+F]

226 ested the efficacy of delivering the program face to face or over the Internet.

227 ctate whether glycopeptides engage GRFT in a face-to-face or an intermolecular binding mode.

228 icipants who were delivered the intervention face-to-face or by telephone (mean difference -0.05; 95%

229 rs, in a general population setting, without face-to-face or telephone counseling.

230 ith clinical periodontal disease for use via face-to-face or telephone interviews.

231 In low-income smokers who did not receive face-to-face or telephone smoking cessation counseling,

232 ril density shows a lattice-like assembly of face-to-face packed peptide dimers that corresponds to t

233 inated by a beta-barrel structure, formed by face-to-face packing of two, three-stranded beta-sheets.

234 eta fibril are formed by peptide dimers with face-to-face packing.

235 outpatient settings or diagnosed during non-face-to-face patient-provider interactions.

236 Due to the interdimer offset face-to-face pi-pi and/or herringbone interactions, 1(2+

237 Due to the interdimer offset face-to-face pi-pi and/or herringbone interactions, all

238 units, rigid turns were designed that allow face-to-face pi-pi interactions between appended linear

239 e are on opposite sides) form stacks through face-to-face pi-pi interactions, while in polymorph A th

240 -pyrazol-1,4-diyl)dinitramidate, with unique face-to-face pi-pi stacking, can be potentially used as

241 hat the tetraoxa derivative forms remarkable face-to-face pi-pi stacks in the solid state, a favorabl

242 y a differential ability to establish stable face-to-face pi-pi-stacking with the LRH-1 residue His-3

243 The crystal packing for 20 shows offset face-to-face pi-stacking interactions that link the porp

244 noncovalent bonding interactions, including face-to-face [pi...pi] stacking and orthogonal [C-H...pi

245 Using the Delphi method over three face-to-face plenary meetings, consensus definitions wer

246 ention and face-to-face nurse support (POWeR+Face-to-face [POWeR+F]; up to seven nurse contacts over

247 rcome patient-centered barriers to accessing face-to-face programs and provide feasible delivery meth

248 For one medical ICU team, face-to-face prompting of critical care physicians if th

249 Face-to-face prompting was superior to an unprompted ele

250 ved and the remaining two dimers are aligned face-to-face provides a model of the dimers of dimers of

251 Typically, people talk to us face-to-face, providing concurrent auditory and visual i

252 rare, regular, or frequent in response to a face-to-face questionnaire.

253 lose friends' who were more likely to have a face-to-face relationship.

254 ne random sequence generator to either a 4-h face-to-face RESPECT mental health training programme or

255 oviding CBT over the telephone compared with face-to-face resulted in lower attrition and close to eq

256 Data collection will occur at all face to face reviews including baseline, 6, and 12 weeks

257 d registered nurses, took part in individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews.

258 A qualitative design involving face-to-face, semi-structured interviews audio-recorded

259 Patient satisfaction was explored using face-to-face, semi-structured qualitative interviews.

260 Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted fr

261 Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted w

262 ECM) was used to arrange two microelectrodes face-to-face separated by a micrometric gap.

263 adings, they turn network-like when the mean face-to-face separation between NPs becomes smaller than

264 ncrease access to testing in comparison with face-to-face services, but the evidence is unclear.

265 ssigned at a one-to-one ratio to either five face-to-face sessions of ConquerFear (attention training

266 ional design principles (49%) and present in face-to-face settings (47%), and it had a moderately lar

267 Additionally, online behaviors that indicate face-to-face social activity (like posting photos) are a

268 Face-to-face social interactions enhance well-being.

269 Human eyes serve two key functions in face-to-face social interactions: they provide cues abou

270 Human behaviour is thought to spread through face-to-face social networks, but it is difficult to ide

271 udes information about vaccination, flu, and face-to-face social networks.

272 onsiderable self-association behavior due to face-to-face stacking in solution was observed for donor

273 Structural analyses suggest a face-to-face stacking of DNA nanosheets with peptides al

274 s arrhythmia (RSA) was measured in the three face-to-face still-face episodes, and social behaviors o

275 nistration of OT or placebo to father in the face-to-face still-face paradigm.

276 : A Five Areas Approach' book plus 3-4 short face to face support appointments totalling up to 2 hour

277 tten CBT materials with limited telephone or face-to-face support).

278 We conducted a cross-sectional face-to-face survey of adults in 2011, enumerating "clos

279 Face-to-face survey of more than 43 000 adults aged 18 y

280 SIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective face-to-face survey of patients from the single-center D

281 Data were drawn from face-to-face surveys of 34,653 adult participants in the

282 Face-to-face surveys of more than 43,000 adults ages 18

283 METHODS AND Face-to-face surveys were conducted between 2015 and 201

284 er(s) and blind individuals as determined by face-to-face surveys.

285 ngs of care, and involved 3 delivery modes - face to face, telephone or technology based.

286 l disposition), including all contact types (face-to-face, telephone or home visit), by a general pra

287 es of survey administration vary and include face-to-face, telephone, mail, and Internet.

288 a number of scenarios using a standardized, face-to-face time trade-off (TTO) interview method.

289 le is known about its efficacy compared with face-to-face treatment delivery.

290 f services performed outside the traditional face-to-face visit and give practitioners incentives to

291 t revenue losses due to opportunity costs of face-to-face visit time.

292 Patient preference has shifted from face-to-face visit to discussion over the telephone beca

293 The intervention included one face-to-face visit; weekly mailed materials that promote

294 Face-to-face visits are important to monitor response, t

295 cians have traditionally been reimbursed for face-to-face visits.

296 onsist of two parallel gold surfaces mounted face to face with a thin spacer and feature an inlet and

297 ements and as fortified foods, was completed face to face with parents.

298 ed a psycho-oncologic intervention delivered face-to face with a control condition.

299 structures consist of two beta-sheets packed face-to-face, with each beta-sheet consisting typically

300 in conjugation with each other are linked up face-to-face within platforms that are held approximatel