ライフサイエンスコーパス: facial expression

1 otential threat (i.e., suspicious or fearful facial expression).

2 f emotional information (fearful and neutral facial expressions).

3 rocessing of facial affect during changes in facial expression.

4 prosody and through the face in the form of facial expression.

5 ical or continuous neural representations of facial expression.

6 cement and decreased recognition of negative facial expression.

7 nisms that participate in self-monitoring of facial expression.

8 mood and attenuated recognition of negative facial expression.

9 technology that involves the coding of human facial expression.

10 t are programmed to innervate the muscles of facial expression.

11 y viewed as being specialized for processing facial expression.

12 ing macaque faces depicting the fear grimace facial expression.

13 ammals, since dogs do not display human-like facial expressions.

14 pothalamus, and periaqueductal grey to angry facial expressions.

15 vity, and left amygdala response to negative facial expressions.

16 sociability and enhanced recognition of sad facial expressions.

17 amygdala and hypothalamus responses to angry facial expressions.

18 ongside emotional words, stories, movies, or facial expressions.

19 enhanced recognition of positive vs negative facial expressions.

20 al pyramidal motor system controls voluntary facial expressions.

21 ed through modification of ancestral primate facial expressions.

22 have evolved from ancestral primate rhythmic facial expressions.

23 ala to angry and fearful compared with happy facial expressions.

24 nts, only one was impaired at the imagery of facial expressions.

25 ciality, pleasure, and motivation, and coded facial expressions.

26 tivity, and autonomic responses to emotional facial expressions.

27 including gaze direction, body gesture, and facial expressions.

28 whether similar overlap occurs in real-life facial expressions.

29 in transmitting diagnostic cues for decoding facial expressions.

30 -specific modulation of spatial attention to facial expressions.

31 th amygdala responsiveness to threat-related facial expressions.

32 roduction) or lagged (monitor) initiation of facial expressions.

33 Most mammalian species produce facial expressions.

34 acial features in processing of naturalistic facial expressions.

35 ll stimuli, including social signals such as facial expressions.

36 recognition of faces and interpretations of facial expressions.

37 on their recognition of six basic emotional facial expressions.

38 nses by blocking the processing of disgusted facial expressions.

39 ive (fearful) and positive (happy) emotional facial expressions.

40 mplicated in the recognition of emotion from facial expressions.

41 neural network responding to angry and other facial expressions.

42 onses in GSP to one class of social stimuli, facial expressions.

43 vation patterns during processing of fearful facial expressions.

44 tion (rTMS) while participants discriminated facial expressions.

45 temporal cortex in monkeys are modulated by facial expressions.

46 frontal cortex responses to fearful vs happy facial expressions.

47 influence somatic and cognitive responses to facial expressions.

48 irment in her ability to recognize fear from facial expressions.

49 ntrated on processes associated with viewing facial expressions.

50 the ability to accurately evaluate emotional facial expressions.

51 passive viewing of dynamic angry and neutral facial expressions.

52 uralistic angry, fearful, happy, and neutral facial expressions.

53 l vocalizations (e.g., crying), and (silent) facial expressions.

54 a are essential for the voluntary control of facial expressions.

55 in eye contact, gaze follow, and reciprocate facial expressions.

56 n produce an extraordinarily large number of facial expressions.

57 ained visuocortical facilitation to aversive facial expressions.

58 wing the positive anticipation and agonistic facial expressions.

59 onset, to fearful, but not neutral or happy, facial expressions.

60 creased amygdala responsiveness to emotional facial expressions.

61 y derived from neural responses to emotional facial expressions.

62 d expressive reactions to negative emotional facial expressions.

63 ce for a facilitation of processing positive facial expressions.

64 ization (39.4%), social behavior (21.8%) and facial expressions (16%).

65 ts [1] to exhibit and recognize a variety of facial expressions [2].

66 right amygdala habituation to threat-related facial expressions, a phenotype associated with resilien

67 tested whether these individuals can imagine facial expressions, a process also hypothesized to be un

68 fically, while the perception of incongruent facial expressions activates somatosensory-related repre

69 g on the timing of responses to morphs after facial expression adaptation.

70 These findings confirm that, like for facial expression, adolescents' recognition of basic emo

71 -oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response on a facial expression affective-reactivity task in both elde

72 significantly more infants had no change in facial expression after sucrose administration (seven of

73 o such a second-order face did not produce a facial-expression aftereffect on the first-order faces.

74 suggesting that it is a general property for facial-expression aftereffects.

75 is to the presentation of happy and fearful facial expressions alone.

76 responsiveness of this structure to fearful facial expressions, an effect that predicts superior per

77 ding changes in volition/motivation, posture/facial expression and derealization/depersonalization.

78 Facial expression and eye gaze provide a shared signal a

79 y of our lineage, including the evolution of facial expression and facial asymmetry.

80 n perception of basic social signals such as facial expression and gaze direction, and preferential a

81 te regions of the amygdala are responsive to facial expression and gaze/head orientation.

82 tigate this view, the present study examines facial expression and identity recognition abilities in

83 Explicit instructions to attend to facial expression and tone of voice can elicit increased

84 ulated by explicit instructions to attend to facial expression and tone of voice only in the ASD grou

85 e whether explicit instructions to attend to facial expression and tone of voice will elicit more nor

86 teractions is likely to draw on cues such as facial expression and tone of voice.

87 where it might be implicated in controlling facial expression and urinary voiding, and also in bladd

88 the synergic action of muscles implicated in facial expression and urine voiding.

89 pecific "preparatory" system learns aversive facial expressions and autonomic responses such as skin

90 explicit racial slurs and statements, biased facial expressions and body language may resist consciou

91 mygdala hold information about self-executed facial expressions and demonstrates an intimate overlap

92 he question of whether we can identify fetal facial expressions and determine their developmental pro

93 g was qualitatively similar across different facial expressions and different intensities.

94 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (emotional facial expressions and executive functioning) and were c

95 They tend to ascribe anger to ambiguous facial expressions and exhibit enhanced and prolonged re

96 tage to induce in viewer monkeys spontaneous facial expressions and looking patterns in the laborator

97 cause they tend to generate more nonspecific facial expressions and perhaps code pain intensity less

98 f chimpanzee communication, including graded facial expressions and referential vocalizations.

99 dala processes both the degree of emotion in facial expressions and the categorical ambiguity of the

100 g control over enactment of subtly different facial expressions and therefore skills in emotional com

101 associated with greater severity on directed facial expressions and unusual sensory interests.

102 y relevant unconditioned stimuli of critical facial expressions and verbal feedback.

103 aces varying freely in viewpoint, hairstyle, facial expression, and age; and for well known cars embe

104 al assessment, recognizing and responding to facial expression, and social response appropriateness,

105 fect expressions but not positive or neutral facial expressions, and impaired in Stroop cognitive con

106 MA impaired recognition of angry and fearful facial expressions, and the larger dose (1.5 mg/kg) incr

107 Facial expressions appear to exert special influence ove

108 Although still nascent, coded facial expression appears to work reliably as a pain ass

109 Facial expressions are a central part of human communica

110 Because facial expressions are indeed created by moving one's fa

111 roducing facial expressions, suggesting that facial expressions are not just inflexible and involunta

112 In humans, facial expressions are rich sources of social informatio

113 study, we aimed to test whether domestic dog facial expressions are subject to audience effects and/

114 Emotional facial expressions are thought to have evolved because t

115 Although facial expressions are widely considered to be the unive

116 rimate lineage, also have the ability to use facial expressions as a means of gaining social informat

117 ed significant progress towards more complex facial expressions as gestational age increased.

118 Whether the brain represents facial expressions as perceptual continua or as emotion

119 ontrollable appearance cues (e.g., clothing, facial expressions) as shown previously, but also by fea

120 emonstrated fear conditioning in response to facial expressions, as the startle-blink reflex was pote

121 ") and using manual analysis with changes in facial expressions assessed using the Mouse Grimace Scal

122 to approach photographic stimuli displaying facial expressions associated with positive attention an

123 cantly influence the outcome of higher-order facial expressions associated with social communication

124 ponent displays either an angry or a neutral facial expression at the beginning of each trial and del

125 assessment while viewing fearful and neutral facial expressions at baseline and again 8 weeks later.

126 rTMS selectively impaired discrimination of facial expressions at both sites but had no effect on a

127 the extent to which mothers mirrored infant facial expressions at two months postpartum predicted in

128 ing facial proportions, but the same neutral facial expression, baldhead and skin tone, as stimuli.

129 ere, we demonstrate the utility of surprised facial expressions because exemplars within this emotion

130 "pain/distress" also demonstrates that this facial expression becomes significantly more complete as

131 o matrix of fearful, sad, happy, and neutral facial expressions before they were deployed to Iraq.

132 entials (nociceptive cortical activity), and facial expression (behavior) were acquired in individual

133 heless correctly guess the type of emotional facial expression being displayed, but could not guess o

134 hemodynamic response to implicitly presented facial expressions between depressed and healthy control

135 thiness or attractiveness, but we found only facial expressions biased decisions.

136 nitively to differentiate fearful from other facial expressions but they acquire fear conditioning no

137 is a key structure for processing emotional facial expressions, but it remains unclear what aspects

138 It is possible to quantify facial expression by coding patterns of facial muscle co

139 we examined whether perception of high-level facial expressions can be affected by adaptation to low-

140 Facial expressions can be either voluntarily or emotiona

141 d the dimension of valence within the single facial expression category of surprise.

142 Assessment of facial expression changes, as a novel means of pain scor

143 xperience of pain seems to generate a unique facial expression comprising several action units.

144 lcus was equally sensitive to all changes in facial expression, consistent with a continuous represen

145 universal language of emotion, some negative facial expressions consistently elicit lower recognition

146 at information about both dynamic and static facial expressions could be robustly decoded from Mf are

147 Thus, amygdala response to facial expressions could reflect the processing of prima

148 acebo showed reduced recognition of positive facial expressions, decreased speed in responding to pos

149 fundamental role in enhancing recognition of facial expression despite the complex stimulus changes a

150 or faces learnt through video clips, dynamic facial expression did not create better transfer of lear

151 Gender discrimination of the same facial expressions did not modulate somatosensory-evoked

152 o segments depicting appeasing or aggressive facial expressions directed at the viewer.

153 for differences in the looking patterns and facial expressions displayed by the viewers.

154 ned stimuli included images of three neutral facial expressions, each of which was paired with one of

155 This bias may arise because facial expressions evoke positive and negative emotional

156 We investigated whether non-rigid motion of facial expression facilitates the learning process.

157 resonance scanning while viewing pictures of facial expressions from the Ekman and Friesen series.

158 such as eye-contact induced reciprocation of facial expression, gaze aversion, and gaze following, th

159 mans have revealed that the motor control of facial expressions has a distributed neural representati

160 Historically, animal facial expressions have been considered inflexible and i

161 ls to look normally at the eye region in all facial expressions, her selective impairment in recogniz

162 art of M3 may also have an adverse effect on facial expression in patients presenting with neurologic

163 s unclear to what extent there exists common facial expression in species more phylogenetically dista

164 has examined amygdala response to emotional facial expressions in adolescents with disruptive behavi

165 The authors examined neural responses to facial expressions in adults and adolescents with social

166 monstrated elevated responses to threatening facial expressions in amygdala, as well as left fusiform

167 recognition of positive relative to negative facial expressions in an emotional test battery.

168 l correlates of implicit processing of happy facial expressions in depression and identified regions

169 mpairments in the neural processing of happy facial expressions in depression were evident in the cor

170 ance imaging assessed the neural response to facial expressions in generalized social phobia and gene

171 esent Review deals with the motor control of facial expressions in humans.

172 r system during observation and execution of facial expressions in nine-month-old infants, implicatin

173 quantify and compare human and domestic dog facial expressions in response to emotionally-competent

174 that while the amygdala can process fearful facial expressions in the absence of conscious perceptio

175 t of sensorimotor alpha in the processing of facial expressions, including affect.

176 amygdala responded selectively to changes in facial expression, independent of changes in identity.

177 te valence for the remaining stimulus (e.g., facial expressions), indicating a representation of vale

178 gnition contend that to understand another's facial expressions, individuals map the perceived expres

179 ce-selective areas exhibited relatively less facial expression information.

180 do not seem to be affected by facial injury, facial expression, intellectual disability, drug history

181 recognition has been dominated by studies on facial expression interpretation; very little is known a

182 nd emotion ambiguity (the uncertainty that a facial expression is categorized as fearful or happy).

183 er a resolution to the controversy about how facial expression is processed in the brain by showing t

184 Processing facial expressions is an essential component of social i

185 Processing affective facial expressions is an important component of interper

186 ted the hypothesis that amygdala response to facial expressions is driven by emotional association le

187 Keeping track of self-executed facial expressions is essential for the ability to corre

188 uman amygdala in the evaluation of emotional facial expressions is unclear.

189 The ability to perceive and differentiate facial expressions is vital for social communication.

190 Our analyses of facial expression judgments of likely voters are consist

191 to each other's eyes, mutually engaging with facial expressions, kisses and greetings.

192 llingness to consume a food and not just the facial expressions made during feeding.

193 tofrontal cortex (OFC) struggle to recognize facial expressions, make poor social judgments, and freq

194 Comparing facial expressions may be particularly problematic, give

195 A small number of facial expressions may be universal in that they are pro

196 he right pSTS were better at differentiating facial expressions measured outside of the scanner.

197 We previously showed that facial expressions modulate functional MRI activity in t

198 screen) evoked by the perception of various facial expressions (neutral, fearful, aggressive, and ap

199 ated whether gaze cues paired with emotional facial expressions (neutral, happy, suspicious and fears

200 Images of four distinct monkey facial expressions--neutral, aggressive (open mouth thre

201 volume and reduced responsiveness to fearful facial expressions observed in psychopathic individuals.

202 association tracts in the recognition of the facial expression of emotion and identify specific tract

203 acial movements coalesce into a recognisable facial expression of pain/distress.

204 inadequate to reliably distinguish universal facial expressions of "fear" and "disgust." Rather than

205 uman speech rhythm evolved from the rhythmic facial expressions of ancestral primates.

206 e reduced the identification of the negative facial expressions of anger and fear.

207 enteen healthy participants (8 females) with facial expressions of anger, disgust, fear, happiness, s

208 Here we investigated whether facial expressions of different basic emotions modulate

209 ccurred, infants were less likely to display facial expressions of distaste initially when eating the

210 HCF infants displayed fewer facial expressions of distaste while eating the bitter a

211 se to morphed images to directly address how facial expressions of emotion are represented in the bra

212 nts from both cultures visually discriminate facial expressions of emotion by relying on culturally d

213 Modulation of the processing of facial expressions of emotion by serotonin significantly

214 iological and social evolutionary pressures, facial expressions of emotion comprise specific facial m

215 & Scholl (F&S), we have shown that perceived facial expressions of emotion depend on the congruency b

216 However, many more facial expressions of emotion exist and are used regular

217 The commonality of facial expressions of emotion has been studied in differ

218 Past research on facial expressions of emotion has focused on the study o

219 Darwin's seminal works, the universality of facial expressions of emotion has remained one of the lo

220 Here, we show that dynamic facial expressions of emotion provide a sophisticated si

221 Understanding the different categories of facial expressions of emotion regularly used by us is es

222 d Bayesian classifiers, we show that dynamic facial expressions of emotion transmit an evolving hiera

223 systematically vary intensities of six basic facial expressions of emotion, and employed a self-paced

224 r results question the universality of human facial expressions of emotion, highlighting their true c

225 heir mental representations of the six basic facial expressions of emotion.

226 lood oxygenation level-dependent response to facial expressions of emotion.

227 in behavioral as well as neural responses to facial expressions of emotion.

228 oted social signals evolved for this purpose-facial expressions of emotion.

229 uring subliminal and supraliminal viewing of facial expressions of emotion.

230 pyramidal system enables humans to simulate facial expressions of emotions not actually experienced.

231 The amygdala is preferentially activated by facial expressions of fear.

232 trapyramidal motor system drives spontaneous facial expressions of felt emotions, and a cortical pyra

233 and 7-month old infants were presented with facial expressions of happiness, anger, and fear.

234 ng participants (N = 20) were presented with facial expressions of happy and sad emotion at three int

235 with visible skin lesions, such as disgusted facial expressions of others.

236 d patients produce diagnostically meaningful facial expressions of pain because they tend to generate

237 imuli depicting individuals being harmed and facial expressions of pain were compared between incarce

238 and anger, and no impairment in recognizing facial expressions of surprise or happiness.

239 (Equus caballus) could discriminate between facial expressions of their conspecifics captured in dif

240 in a new expression after several different facial expressions of these faces had been shown during

241 Viewing facial expressions often evokes facial responses in the

242 Here we tested the effects of macaque facial expressions on neural activation within these two

243 oscience mainly focused on the processing of facial expressions, overlooking the exploration of emoti

244 t; and impaired speech (p = 0.014), abnormal facial expression (p = 0.022), and difficulty rising fro

245 cific aspects of the endogenous Hmx1 lateral facial expression pattern.

246 onth-old infants, implicating this system in facial expression processing from a very young age.

247 es abnormal amygdala activation in emotional facial expression processing in adults with callous-unem

248 arning and abnormal neural activation during facial expression processing.

249 Emotional facial expressions provide important nonverbal cues in h

250 t the neural computations that contribute to facial expression recognition in each region are functio

251 ous work has tested this theory by examining facial expression recognition in participants with Mobiu

252 Reverse simulation models of facial expression recognition suggest that we recognize

253 gnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and (ii) the facial expression recognition task (FERT), a decision-ma

254 In the facial expression recognition task, citalopram and rebox

255 s (rpSTS) that responds more strongly during facial expression recognition tasks than during facial i

256 d nonsynesthetic participants on measures of facial expression recognition, but not on control measur

257 On the final day, facial expression recognition, emotion-potentiated start

258 ery of emotional processing tasks comprising facial expression recognition, emotional categorization,

259 Recent work shows that facial expression reflects pain as well or better in dem

260 Facial expressions represent one of the most salient cue

261 s suggest that there is a local component in facial-expression representation, in addition to holisti

262 ychology propound that visual recognition of facial expressions requires an intermediate step to iden

263 embodied cognition propose that recognizing facial expressions requires visual processing followed b

264 the signs (which was related to the ongoing facial expression research at the research centre).

265 ardized observational methods in comparative facial expression research.

266 Further comparison between individual facial expressions revealed that although proportional g

267 of unknown conspecifics portraying different facial expressions, showing appropriate behavioural and

268 Here, focusing on the decoding of facial expression signals, we merge behavioral and compu

269 n covert vigilance and avoidance of aversive facial expressions, social anxiety appears to confer a s

270 that a combination of head orientation with facial expression, specifically involving both the eyes

271 reated second-order faces with happy and sad facial expressions specified solely by local directions

272 The facial expressions subtests of the Diagnostic Analysis o

273 ants attended to the emotion category of the facial expression, suggesting an interaction between the

274 the human's attentional state when producing facial expressions, suggesting that facial expressions a

275 Early in the signaling dynamics, facial expressions systematically transmit few, biologic

276 of 10 Hz for 500 ms, selectively impaired a facial expression task but had no effect on a matched fa

277 ttle is known about the form and function of facial expression temporal dynamics.

278 r activations to fearful relative to neutral facial expressions than did healthy comparison subjects

279 -emotion associations from happy and fearful facial expressions than it is to the presentation of hap

280 The number of facial coverbal gestures (facial expressions that are tied to speech) and the numb

281 Direct gaze is an integral part of facial expressions that signals cooperation or conflict

282 ear (happy, angry) and ambiguous (surprised) facial expressions, then re-rated similar stimuli after

283 The systematic study of facial expressions through a computerised system has ide

284 Do facial expressions transmit diagnostic signals simultane

285 a responses tracked the valence of surprised facial expressions, unconfounded by arousal.

286 UFS is also characterized by an abnormal facial expression upon smiling, and bilateral weakness i

287 cant risk of kidney failure, and an abnormal facial expression upon smiling, laughing, and crying.

288 ted amygdala reactivity to fearful and angry facial expressions using functional magnetic resonance i

289 r social information conveyed by conspecific facial expressions using the framework of optimal foragi

290 vocal tract during lip-smacking (a rhythmic facial expression) versus chewing.

291 nisms that participate in self-monitoring of facial expression, we simultaneously recorded the elicit

292 Ekman facial expressions were also used to quantify emotion re

293 Sample images of their facial expressions were collected from 230 human subject

294 However, when responses to all facial expressions were combined, pediatric patients exh

295 Amygdala responses to emotional facial expressions were examined in pediatric (N=18) and

296 al fixation while blocks of different monkey facial expressions were presented.

297 Four different facial expressions were tested: (i) neutral, (ii) aggres

298 ey watched videos of conspecifics displaying facial expressions with direct or averted gaze.

299 aging to measure neural responses to dynamic facial expressions with positive and negative valence an

300 hesized that amygdala responses to emotional facial expressions would be susceptible to pharmacologic