ライフサイエンスコーパス: factor analyses

1 We performed factor analyses and applied factor scores to derive diet

2 at baseline and follow-up were reduced using factor analyses, and factors (both at baseline and at th

3 Further item-level factor analyses are needed to determine the appropriate

4 eas that provide fundamental tools for human factors analyses are summarized, and several current app

5 se the mobility of B3 based on anisotropic B-factor analyses at ultrahigh resolution, consistent with

6 Statistical methods used included factor analyses, Cox and linear regression, and twin mod

7 data sets for different locations and times; factor analyses for heat vulnerability are more robust t

8 lations in one of the first large-scale risk factor analyses for new herd breakdowns to combine data

9 tal disorders were analyzed via confirmatory factor analyses for the entire National Comorbidity Surv

10 iatric screening tools to perform prognostic factor analyses for treatment safety during the first 4

11 Factor analyses have documented four underlying indices

12 Prognostic factor analyses have proven useful in predicting outcome

13 The majority of previous factor analyses, however, have used only surrogate measu

14 The majority of previous factor analyses, however, have used only surrogate measu

15 Common factor analyses identified three correlated factors (def

16 e was replicated with additional exploratory factor analyses in the same sample at 4-month and 8-mont

17 Confirmatory factor analyses, including item response theory calibrat

18 HPV variant and behavioral risk factor analyses indicated that long-term detection of th

19 Factor analyses indicated that the 31 items loaded well

20 These progression data and the risk factor analyses may be helpful to investigators conducti

21 Applying factor analyses methods to phenotypic data (2006-2009) o

22 We performed factor analyses of 8 metabolic risks at baseline and fol

23 report presents the results of confirmatory factor analyses of patterns of comorbidity among 10 comm

24 No adequate factor analyses of signs and symptoms of mania have been

25 Factor analyses of the raw absorbance data sets (categor

26 Coping strategies were characterized via factor analyses of the responses.

27 Factor analyses of the test scores produced three factor

28 between food groups were tested by using one-factor analyses of variance.

29 ontrols with gene function and transcription factor analyses potentially related to elevated inflamma

30 Factor analyses resulted in 3 symptom factor scores: mus

31 Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in a two factor solution compri

32 We performed factor analyses separately for men and women in the enti

33 Factor analyses showed that empathy and apathy are disti

34 Factor analyses suggest that the structure underlying me

35 Most studies presented risk factor analyses that were not intended to be used for pr

36 ses and 2,410 controls were grouped by using factor analyses to describe various aspects of lifestyle

37 w-up by using risk-stratified and prognostic factor analyses to determine if treatment outcomes diffe

38 s supported by multiparameter solvent effect factor analyses utilizing the KOMPH2 equation which, in

39 asize the postengraftment timing of IA; risk factor analyses verify previously recognized risk factor

40 Finally, as is standard in global risk factor analyses, we used the effect size of risk factors

41 Principal component factor analyses were performed using eight IRS-related p

42 Risk factor analyses were performed using the Fisher exact te

43 Risk-factor analyses were performed with respect to the cofac

44 Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed.

45 For each dietary factor, analyses were done at baseline, for trial years

46 trol for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors; analyses were stratified by the presence of cor

47 nstruct validity was assessed in exploratory factor analyses which supported a refinement in the conc

48 e has good structural validity (confirmatory factor analyses with Comparative Fit Index > 0.90 and Ro

49 In exploratory factor analyses with data from subgroup 1, three factors

50 ensionality of the items was evaluated using factor analyses with results suggesting 3 factors in fai

51 ensionality of the items was evaluated using factor analyses, with results suggesting three factors i

52 Factor analyses yielded 3 factors in the wife and husban