ライフサイエンスコーパス: faith

1 ues they claimed to be more central to their faith.

2 psychiatrists should intervene in matters of faith.

3 and the surrogate's optimism, intuition, and faith.

4 a slew of cognitive traits predispose us to faith.

5 lth and HIV, gender, end-of-life issues, and faith activities including prayer.

6 rs, and, in some countries, non-governmental faith and community-based organisations with access to p

7 r with biomedicine, for reasons ranging from faith and cultural congruence to accessibility, cost, an

8 g, supernatural agents, credible displays of faith, and other psychologically active elements conduci

9 ge approaches that incorporate neurobiology, faith, and psychology for enhanced understanding of pati

10 neity of viewpoints, both within and between faiths, and their effect on health care is important for

11 human embryo, with a focus on the Christian faith as well as Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish and Islamic per

12 ng (sense of meaning: b = 0.34; P = .003 and faith: b = 0.42; P = .03), and quality of life (b = 0.76

13 g recognition of the capacities and scope of faith-based groups for improving community health outcom

14 ports in this Series review controversies in faith-based health care and recommendations for how publ

15 As the first report in the Series on faith-based health care, we review a broad body of publi

16 rse evidence reported supports the idea that faith-based health providers continue to play a part in

17 th-care providers, with a focus on Christian faith-based health providers in sub-Saharan Africa (on w

18 ent is being negotiated, the contribution of faith-based health-care providers is potentially crucial

19 oduce some empirical evidence on the role of faith-based health-care providers, with a focus on Chris

20 patients with the services received) within faith-based health-providers and national systems show s

21 stems to be strengthened by the alignment of faith-based health-providers with national systems and p

22 , t = -6.21, p < .001, with scores higher in faith-based intensive care units and smaller-bed-size ho

23 tnerships between public sector agencies and faith-based organisations.

24 Hospital bed size, teaching status, and faith-based status were included in our analyses.

25 Differences in religious faith-based viewpoints (controversies) on the sanctity o

26 among mental health providers, patients, and faith communities.

27 as direct impact on public health, religious faith, fair-trades and wildlife.

28 tems of medicine, especially traditional and faith healers in low-income and middle-income countries,

29 Patients who placed a high priority on faith in God had less formal education (P <.0001).

30 Patients and caregivers ranked faith in God second, whereas physicians placed it last (

31 t decisions: cancer doctor's recommendation, faith in God, ability of treatment to cure disease, side

32 cision makers may put too much or too little faith in it.

33 t affected their sense of self); diminishing faith in medicine (patients were disappointed with aspec

34 Clinicians put their faith in peer-reviewed articles as quality-assured and r

35 e this as an illogical reaction to a loss of faith in science, we argue that the boundaries between s

36 Their faith in the uniform benefits of positive appraisals neg

37 My faith in the value of collaborative, interdisciplinary w

38 tested in large randomized trials before our faith in them is realized.

39 ovide a voice for the patients who put their faith in us.

40 Future studies should clarify how faith influences individual decisions regarding treatmen

41 e first study to demonstrate that, for some, faith is an important factor in medical decision making,

42 r research and increased interaction between faith leaders and health-care providers to improve healt

43 Increased appreciation in faith leaders of the effect of their teachings on health

44 Faith-linked controversies include family planning, chil

45 stood factor is the influence of a patient's faith on how they make medical decisions.

46 We compared the importance of faith on treatment decisions among doctors, patients, an

47 Drawing from both development and faith perspectives, this Series paper examines trends th

48 Bacterial diversity (Faith phylogenetic diversity, P = .003) and composition

49 If faith plays an important role in how some patients decid

50 her than making sudden cooperative 'leaps of faith' powerfully reinforces the stability and effective

51 This Series paper outlines some faith-related controversies, describes how they influenc

52 e compatibility of organ donation with their faith remains, especially in relation to deceased-organ

53 care and recommendations for how public and faith sectors might collaborate more effectively.

54 ter these, however, we enter the realm where faith takes precedence.

55 sm to reduce poverty in Africa rests more on faith than science.

56 The faith that "comparative analysis of the behaviour of mod

57 Patients frequently rely on religious faith to cope with cancer, but little is known about the

58 a way that preserves the primacy of keeping faith with patients while conceding the legitimacy of so