ライフサイエンスコーパス: false alarm

1 emory responses (intrusions, perseverations, false alarms).

2 pain is maladaptive, essentially an ongoing false alarm.

3 e emergency warnings of volcanic activity as false alarms.

4 ing FN400 and LPC modulation associated with false alarms.

5 with FASD, the ethanol-exposed rats had more false alarms.

6 d sensitivity, greater automation, and fewer false alarms.

7 nals and in fact many signals turn out to be false alarms.

8 see text] (thus reducing the probability of false alarms about pathogen adaptation).

9 ast to leading models of recognition memory, false alarms also appeared to be based partially on reco

10 al data and the developed method, we compute false alarm and miss error probabilities in wild-type ce

11 , the method computes and reveals changes in false alarm and miss probabilities in A20-deficient cell

12 two types of incorrect cell decisions called false alarm and miss.

13 nistration, reflected in both an increase in false alarms and a reduction in detected targets.

14 The false alarms and security accompanying aminotransferase

15 To minimize the number of false alarms, animals have evolved a variety of physiolo

16 According to signal detection theory, false alarms are attributed to noise in the visual nervo

17 Enhancing hits and generating false alarms both scaled with stimulation intensity.

18 eaction times to targets, and committed more false alarms but had comparable detection accuracy to yo

19 performance, decreasing hits and increasing false alarms, but not altering reaction times.

20 re are many instances in which it generates "false alarms," causing animals to reject harmless foods.

21 d purposes, and in other settings, to avoid "false" alarms due to isolated events and homogenize the

22 That false alarms evoked more activity than misses indicates

23 atients showed significantly higher rates of false alarms following incorrect cues ("BX" errors) and

24 Unit staffing and false alarm frequency were not associated with response

25 railing of the immune system may result from false alarms generated by the innate immune system, resu

26 We propose the "false alarm" hypothesis, in which AGEs that are present

27 Peak shifting also may cause false alarms if target peaks shift out of or interfering

28 the opposite direction, leading to elevated false alarms in a simulated baggage search.

29 cantly affected the detection of targets and false alarms in both tasks.

30 l cholinergic inputs increased the number of false alarms in nonsignal trials.

31 , including speech, a pre-requisite to avoid false alarms in normal vocal communication.

32 In biological terms, a higher false alarm metric in this abnormal TNF signaling system

33 the usual signal detection categories: hits, false alarms, misses and correct rejects.

34 reases in reaction time (RT) variability and false alarms on choice reaction time (CRT) tasks.

35 etection of letters on the identity task and false alarms on the rhyme task.

36 interacted with memory load in its effect on false alarms on the rhyme task.

37 n as well as during false recognition (i.e., false alarms) or whether false recognition resembles fam

38 Nearby collinear flankers increase the false alarm rate (reports of the target being present wh

39 could be used to design a sensor with a low false alarm rate and an excellent ability to discriminat

40 Across flank distances, both the false alarm rate and d' (with no external noise) are cor

41 le a high probability of detection and a low false alarm rate if an adequate number of such particles

42 ed the amount of external noise at which the false alarm rate increases by the radical2 (which we ref

43 The detector had a false alarm rate of only 0.31 per day and a positive pre

44 aired ability to reject new items (increased false alarm rate), whereas the identification of old ite

45 y (d') and increasing the filling-in effect (False Alarm rate).

46 dularity levels were associated with a lower false alarm rate.

47 e, and resistance to dirt with an acceptable false alarm rate.

48 te extended field operation with an ultralow false alarm rate.

49 ies (>10(6) particles), an ultralow decoding false-alarm rate (<10(-9)), the ability to manipulate pa

50 ficity) and the false-positive rate (ie, the false-alarm rate or 1 - sensitivity) and compared these

51 d' (a measure based on the hit rate and the false-alarm rate).

52 lity, with 97% successful detection and a 5% false-alarm rate.

53 her d' values; the increased noise to higher false alarm rates (the filling effect).

54 and explosive threats while maintaining low false alarm rates.

55 t identification as well as for reduction in false alarm rates.

56 1950 and yields hit rates above 0.5, whereas false-alarm rates are below 0.1.

57 s were observed for Go correct-hit and No-Go false-alarm reaction times with increased reaction times

58 a decreased LPC amplitude was observed with false alarms relative to correct rejections.

59 Attenuation of the FN400 also occurred for false alarms (responses largely driven by familiarity) r

60 ("old" response to a related shape; related-false alarm) revealed preferential true recognition-rela

61 ocial and economic environments can tolerate false alarms, such predictions would be impractical for

62 on misses, and was significantly greater on false alarms than on correct rejections.

63 In good memory performers (R-hits minus false alarm), the coupling was stronger in R than NR bet

64 s cathodal stimulation reduced the number of false alarms to lure pictures in subsequent recognition

65 Hits and false alarms were associated with significantly more cor

66 The correct detection of targets and false alarms were measured for each task.

67 et sequences that should have been ignored ("false alarms") were analyzed as a function of cue-target

68 a more liberal response bias (more hits and false alarms) when testing memory for the scenes 24 h la

69 decrease in item hit rate with no change in false alarms, whereas patients showed the opposite patte