ライフサイエンスコーパス: familiarity

1 ifference in memory strength (recollection > familiarity).

2 objects (age of acquisition, frequency, and familiarity).

3 he conscious retrieval of episodic traces or familiarity.

4 ial distance, temporal soon-ness, and social familiarity.

5 he conscious retrieval of episodic traces or familiarity.

6 is partner-bond specific rather than due to familiarity.

7 ced proportionally to the increment in taste familiarity.

8 t to rely on two processes: recollection and familiarity.

9 studies, including effects of complexity and familiarity.

10 and PhC contribute to the assessment of item familiarity.

11 ediction error parameter that updated facial familiarity.

12 s a function of both stimulus and contextual familiarity.

13 er study event or on assessments of stimulus familiarity.

14 each played a role, as did kin dynamics and familiarity.

15 sequent memory performance and environmental familiarity.

16 pported by the processes of recollection and familiarity.

17 reas the reverse was true for a MEG index of familiarity.

18 duces exploration of novel stimuli mimicking familiarity.

19 h relatively high levels of recollection and familiarity.

20 al lobe (MTL) substrates of recollection and familiarity.

21 ocampal lesions impair both recollection and familiarity.

22 ry can be supported by both recollection and familiarity.

23 of two component processes--recollection and familiarity.

24 process-pure indicators of recollection and familiarity.

25 he hippocampus supports recollection but not familiarity.

26 consist of two components: recollection and familiarity.

27 recollection, while adjacent cortex supports familiarity.

28 ggests that the hippocampus is important for familiarity.

29 red to be characteristic of recollection and familiarity.

30 s is essential for recollection, but not for familiarity.

31 o showed impaired recollection but preserved familiarity.

32 gs of milkshake pleasantness, intensity, and familiarity.

33 s signaled confidence regardless of stimulus familiarity.

34 ts and how this link is affected by stimulus familiarity.

35 by recollection, strong familiarity, or weak familiarity.

36 tional magnetic resonance imaging studies of familiarity.

37 using auditory tasks that varied in stimulus familiarity.

38 erformance and tracked both recollection and familiarity.

39 ance movements that varied in terms of their familiarity.

40 ted use in practice, possibly due to lack of familiarity.

41 generalization, but with less sensitivity to familiarity.

42 information, independently of long-term face familiarity.

43 Surgical team familiarity accounted for an additional reduction of 16

44 ion led to subtle shifts in recollection and familiarity accuracy.

45 ants rated each video on a measure of visual familiarity after being scanned.

46 Familiarity alters face recognition: Familiar faces are

47 of misperceptions about its use and lack of familiarity among health care professionals about modern

48 ugh this triad may at first strike a cord of familiarity among seasoned clinicians, the disease mecha

49 h that location, regardless of environmental familiarity and across multiple testing days.

50 f this technique, including lack of operator familiarity and an insufficient evidence base for guidin

51 r understand the relationship between action familiarity and AON engagement, here we examine how obse

52 more chaotic worldview may subsequently gain familiarity and be over-reinforced, with implications fo

53 dependent coding of declarative memory-based familiarity and confidence of choices in human PPC.

54 MS) neurons whose activity signaled stimulus familiarity and confidence, as assessed by subjective re

55 As anticipated, familiarity and expected satiation were positively relat

56 l nucleus (MD) of the thalamus would support familiarity and indirectly also be involved in recollect

57 Familiarity and knowledge about ocular diseases is essen

58 There is evidence for both familiarity and novelty as critical factors for preferen

59 Thus, the category-specific segregation of familiarity and novelty preferences is based on quick vi

60 found to correlate with reductions in odour familiarity and odour matching to visual cues, whereas t

61 Industrial familiarity and recent advances in the underpinning scie

62 in schizophrenia, we found evidence for both familiarity and recollection deficits across studies, su

63 ee verbal recognition memory tasks assessing familiarity and recollection each using different proced

64 We indexed strong familiarity and recollection for previously studied word

65 the hypothesis that under some circumstances familiarity and recollection processes activate competin

66 lysis to investigate the role of the cMEC in familiarity and recollection processes that underlie non

67 How do memory retrieval processes (i.e., familiarity and recollection processes) interact with mo

68 wever, ACC activity in response to competing familiarity and recollection retrieval processes is inco

69 MRI (1.5 mm isotropic), we observed distinct familiarity and repetition-related recognition signal pr

70 atuses may add to the facilitative effect of familiarity and result in greater energy intake in overw

71 fficient for a race model to decide stimulus familiarity and retrieval confidence.

72 including method capability, receiving unit familiarity, and method past performance.

73 ry storage, the concepts of recollection and familiarity, and the question of how different medial te

74 Familiarity appears to mature relatively early in develo

75 idual items and objects, but how novelty and familiarity are encoded and transmitted in the brain is

76 icance statement: Recognition of novelty and familiarity are important for learning, memory, and deci

77 ased on the assumption that recollection and familiarity are independent or dependent processes.

78 qualitative experiences of recollection and familiarity are typically confounded with a quantitative

79 al lesions should have strong experiences of familiarity as often as controls do; however, unlike con

80 rhinal cortex is required for rats to encode familiarity as part of stimulus representations.

81 cally associated with stronger memories than familiarity-based decisions.

82 he hippocampus is related to the encoding of familiarity-based item memory, independent of subsequent

83 uishable roles of the hippocampus and PrC in familiarity-based item recognition and recollection-base

84 hether the hippocampus might in fact support familiarity-based memories whenever they are as strong a

85 one prominent view links PrC processes with familiarity-based memory and PhC with recollection, an a

86 encode item-specific information to support familiarity-based recognition but are disproportionately

87 an item was previously encountered, whereas familiarity-based recognition is characterized instead b

88 at the hippocampus is critically involved in familiarity-based recognition memory.

89 tex (PER) has a well established role in the familiarity-based recognition of individual items and ob

90 tex (PER) has a well established role in the familiarity-based recognition of individual items and ob

91 FC damage were impaired in recollection- and familiarity-based recognition, and they did not exhibit

92 As predicted by our model, overriding a familiarity-based response led to increased activity in

93 tributed positivity that was associated with familiarity-based source memory in the high-unitization

94 butes to performance, rather than increasing familiarity-based source memory.

95 ons of the perirhinal cortex attenuate rats' familiarity-based stimulus generalization.

96 the former account, PrC is critical for item familiarity but not recollection of associations between

97 and exclusively based on an increase in item familiarity but not recollection.

98 The responses encode, not only stimulus familiarity, but also the expectation for a class of sou

99 anticipation does not contribute to explicit familiarity, but can result in predictive potentiation o

100 rough prediction errors that update stimulus familiarity, but recognition is a function of both stimu

101 s in whisker control strategy with increased familiarity, but these changes were different to those o

102 Perirhinal neurons respond to novelty and familiarity by changing firing rates, but recent work su

103 In the first instance we determine view familiarity by exhaustive comparison with the set of vie

104 n, perirhinal neurons respond to novelty and familiarity by increasing or decreasing firing rates.

105 s, these results dissociate recollection and familiarity by selective MTL damage.

106 indings, furthermore, indicate that stimulus familiarity can be represented in temporal cortex withou

107 rovide converging evidence for the idea that familiarity can contribute to source recognition, partic

108 ed to nest with sisters, regardless of prior familiarity, confirming the use of phenotype matching.

109 nique to the perirhinal cortex (i.e., object familiarity), consistent with dual-process theories, but

110 ition to individual surgeon experience, team familiarity contributed to reductions in operative time,

111 The anxiolytic effect of social familiarity could be elicited over multiple training ses

112 edium-to-large effect sizes, suggesting that familiarity could be potentially used as a compensatory

113 ontext was put in conflict with non-episodic familiarity cues, rats relied on item in context using e

114 del yields estimates of recollection (r) and familiarity (d').

115 The familiarity deficits were more variable with frequent sm

116 In outbred mice and rats, familiarity determined willingness to cooccupy the tube,

117 Familiarity discrimination has a significant impact on t

118 at the core or medial shell of the NAc on a familiarity discrimination task and a location discrimin

119 rain an artificial neural network to perform familiarity discrimination using the training views.

120 Although it is generally believed that familiarity does not contribute to source memory, recent

121 ts independently of the processes supporting familiarity-driven recognition judgments.

122 Our data indicate that the language familiarity effect is not based on comprehension but rat

123 red to Indian melodies, thus showing a tonal familiarity effect on tension ratings, amusics provided

124 Even in these conditions a language-familiarity effect was observed: Both Chinese and Englis

125 ese study results to obtain recollection and familiarity estimates that account for methodological di

126 had little to no effect on neutral items or familiarity estimates.

127 Thus, strain familiarity, even to one's own strain, is required for t

128 ormance on this task is guided by a sense of familiarity for the constant negatives.

129 se findings cannot be explained by increased familiarity for the CS+.

130 ry tests designed to assess recollection and familiarity for the studied pictures.

131 This fMRI study examined recall and familiarity for words and scenes using the novel recogni

132 With greater familiarity, however, they moved more rapidly, protracte

133 to humans, are able to take into account the familiarity, i.e. the shared interaction history, when c

134 revealed common grey matter associations of familiarity, identification and cross-modal recognition

135 eaker discrimination) and voice recognition (familiarity, identification, naming and cross-modal matc

136 dicted by the level of contextual and facial familiarity in a computational model derived from predic

137 c procedures to investigate recollection and familiarity in schizophrenia.

138 r temporal sulcus varies with the contextual familiarity in the model, whereas activity in the fusifo

139 ral and behavioral correlates of novelty and familiarity in the olfactory system of Drosophila.

140 Team familiarity in the operating room may influence outcomes

141 is familiar, patients should express strong familiarity (in the absence of recollection) more often

142 The expression of the social familiarity-induced anxiolysis (SFiA) appears dependent

143 Both identity-independent familiarity information and face identity could be decod

144 Familiarity involved an earlier (300-400 ms) prefrontal

145 pisode in which an item was encountered, and familiarity involves simply knowing that an item was pre

146 Familiarity, IQ, and Child Behavior Checklist scores wer

147 Familiarity is a scalar strength signal that permits jud

148 icits reflect impairments in recollection or familiarity is less well understood.

149 the involvement of PrC in representing item familiarity is not ubiquitous.

150 therefore impaired following MD damage, but familiarity is not.

151 sensitivity of ERPs to one retrieval process-familiarity-is somewhat limited.

152 by a complex interplay between relatedness, familiarity, local density, and sex.

153 predicted by a model where recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to Remember a

154 of the AON, as well as illuminate how action familiarity manipulations can be used to explore simulat

155 ecent behavioral studies have suggested that familiarity may also support source recognition when ite

156 (genetic relatedness) or mutualistic (social familiarity) mechanisms.

157 ement, here we examine how observed movement familiarity modulates AON activity in humans using dynam

158 This fostered familiarity not only with their particular medical histo

159 types differed from each other, and that the familiarity of a berry product is likely to be an import

160 as stimuli and manipulating the category and familiarity of context sounds.

161 ource information, under conditions in which familiarity of events could not produce successful perfo

162 umans that are associated with the perceived familiarity of faces, buildings, and chairs.

163 at required learning new voices, judging the familiarity of famous voices, and discriminating pitch d

164 ed for discriminations based on the relative familiarity of individual objects.

165 During scanning, participants judged the familiarity of previously studied and novel items from a

166 n effects can depend on the pre-experimental familiarity of stimuli.

167 ia in a task that required them to judge the familiarity of successively presented famous or non-famo

168 Familiarity of the anatomy of this region and recognitio

169 Subjects also judged the familiarity of the cue itself.

170 ew effect that varied according to the rated familiarity of the eliciting item.

171 cally on the balance between the novelty and familiarity of the microbial communities they encounter.

172 with the duration depending on the level of familiarity of the opponents.

173 the hypothesis that benefit increased as the familiarity of the stimuli decreased for wideband amplif

174 Findings suggest dentists may wish to assess familiarity of their patients with dental terminology an

175 ematically investigate the effects of social familiarity on anxiety-like behavior in rats.

176 ps multiple times and examined the effect of familiarity on the hippocampal response at event onset v

177 from memory in RSC, and it did not depend on familiarity or cognitive task in OPA.

178 ted with later memory based on recollection, familiarity or priming with ERP waveform for later forgo

179 cessful recognition can be based on stimulus familiarity or recollection of event details.

180 tion was accompanied by recollection, strong familiarity, or weak familiarity.

181 icantly affected by liver expertise, LI-RADS familiarity, or years of postresidency practice (ICC ran

182 tial neuroanatomical correlates for impaired familiarity perception and belief evaluation in patients

183 Third, regions involved in familiarity perception and belief evaluation, two proces

184 Thus, task familiarity permits use of model-based reasoning in para

185 of preference across object categories, with familiarity preference dominant in faces and novelty pre

186 ppocampus supports both the recollection and familiarity processes.

187 ssion of SRP and its behavioral correlate of familiarity recognition, but not in the expression of OD

188 nt negative problems, thus displaying intact familiarity recognition.

189 s of uncertainty were patient engagement and familiarity, referrals to psychiatrists, language barrie

190 o expectation violation (P < 0.0001) but not familiarity regions, demonstrating specificity for delus

191 ust response suppression with repetition and familiarity-related facilitation.

192 l analyses indicated that the repetition and familiarity-related signals in the DG/CA3 were strikingl

193 Increased familiarity resulted in a decreased offset response, ind

194 ching-to-sample tests are thought to measure familiarity resulting from single exposures.

195 al dissociation between novelty/encoding and familiarity/retrieval signatures, assumed to reflect dif

196 ith contextual variables such as environment familiarity, risk of collision, and availability of visu

197 n and maintenance of a social ecology (e.g., familiarity seeking --> dominance of national chain stor

198 (e.g., residential mobility --> anxiety --> familiarity seeking), and (c) niche construction studies

199 Here, we show that social familiarity selectively reduced anxiety-like behaviors i

200 to familiar events, switching from an online familiarity signal to an offline novelty signal during a

201 slow reduction in scale provides a potential familiarity signal.

202 we describe a neuroanatomical substrate for familiarity signaling, the interpeduncular nucleus (IPN)

203 ectional control of NP by the IPN depends on familiarity signals and novelty signals arising from exc

204 perirhinal cortex (PrC) supports item-based familiarity signals for all stimulus categories or wheth

205 In the hippocampus, we found no evidence for familiarity signals for any object category.

206 Familiarity signals for chairs were present in both stru

207 These results demonstrate that familiarity signals through unique IPN circuitry that op

208 s uncertainty about whether it also supports familiarity (simply knowing that an item was encountered

209 ace area (PPA) showed effects for recall vs. familiarity specific to scenes.

210 rm area (VWFA) showed effects for recall vs. familiarity specific to words, and the parahippocampal p

211 he mid-frontal effect is graded according to familiarity strength are not attributable to the confoun

212 to investigate the relationship between the familiarity strength of recognition memory test items (p

213 ing the 300-500 ms latency range both by the familiarity strength of the item and, separately, by an

214 (later retrieved accompanied by a feeling of familiarity), subsequent primed (later retrieved without

215 f stimulus-specific adaptation, which tracks familiarity, suggesting that the two processes could coe

216 ed a level of sensitivity to changes in item familiarity superior to that reported previously in very

217 lysis to fMRI data to investigate aspects of familiarity that are shared by all familiar identities a

218 ate objects) and a putative ERP correlate of familiarity, the mid-frontal 'old/new' effect.

219 pports recollection or both recollection and familiarity--the two latent cognitive processes theorize

220 at unitization increases the contribution of familiarity to source recognition.

221 Familiarity to the mother and the novelty afforded by th

222 D-cycloserine, when paired with familiarity training sessions, selectively enhanced the

223 The influence of language familiarity upon speaker identification is well establis

224 In contrast, neither kinship nor familiarity was linked to body mass or telomere loss in

225 To ensure that familiarity was not a factor, no pattern and no word was

226 In contrast, familiarity was spared in each task.

227 ower recollection scores than controls while familiarity was unaffected.

228 ally, effects of orthographic regularity and familiarity were apparent as early as the P150 time wind

229 Recollection and familiarity were assessed in an object recognition memor

230 Over 10 months, recollection and familiarity were assessed using an odor recognition test

231 e hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.

232 lization was inversely correlated with taste familiarity, whereas the high lateralization of Arc/Arg3

233 This suggests that models of familiarity, which assign a critical role to the MD, sho

234 ern in the amygdala, wherein damage impaired familiarity while sparing recollection.

235 bout both individual identities and personal familiarity, while clarifying and extending the organiza

236 ing speed to theta frequency, a correlate of familiarity with a testing enclosure, increased signific

237 a high level of bioinformatics expertise and familiarity with a wide range of informatics tools.

238 research, however, has shown that conceptual familiarity with actions also modulates motor activation

239 ve impressions of a virtual visit, increased familiarity with and research investigating this emergin

240 = very uncomfortable, 7 = very comfortable), familiarity with available surveillance guidelines (7-po

241 ation of tCS clinical trial data is aided by familiarity with basic neurophysiological principles, po

242 cerevisiae is included for readers with some familiarity with budding yeast research but who may have

243 e shared, individualized decision-making and familiarity with CF-specific gastrointestinal challenges

244 Familiarity with common complications combined with a st

245 involving the integration of social cues of familiarity with contextual and emotional information to

246 ls, the Triplifier does not require detailed familiarity with core Semantic Web technologies, and it

247 and methodology is much less widespread than familiarity with DE techniques.

248 To assess individuals' familiarity with each movement, participants rated each

249 nt events with established memories, so that familiarity with either a behavioral strategy or an envi

250 s an awareness of their specific needs and a familiarity with emergent treatment options.

251 s experts in the realm of aesthetic surgery, familiarity with facial anatomy is essential.

252 of the consumer's understanding of science, familiarity with label messaging, and potential to facil

253 As familiarity with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN)

254 and microscopy, for instance graduate-level familiarity with laser beam steering and optical compone

255 They wanted greater familiarity with MSM in Kenya to better understand the r

256 Familiarity with nucleic acid methods and next-generatio

257 Second, prior familiarity with odor stimuli can bias smell test perfor

258 rove of considerable value provided thorough familiarity with optimal HRCT techniques and methods of

259 Part 2 assumes familiarity with part 1 and focuses on the common clinic

260 onal model is not only a matter of increased familiarity with personality trait profiles, it requires

261 Additionally, residents have a greater familiarity with similar situations in the area than mig

262 We propose that P2 characterizes familiarity with sound objects, whereas beta-band oscill

263 Even basic familiarity with spreadsheets already suffices to define

264 Familiarity with stimuli that bring neither reward nor p

265 Familiarity with subtle radiographic findings of these c

266 of survivors and 26.2% of siblings reported familiarity with the ACA (12.1% of uninsured v 29.0% of

267 od cancer survivors' coverage priorities and familiarity with the ACA are unknown.

268 curate examination interpretation, clinician familiarity with the application and findings of the var

269 Thus, familiarity with the causes, clinical presentation and p

270 his effect could be mostly attributed to the familiarity with the contextual cues.

271 Familiarity with the developmental anatomy and normal va

272 dge of normal male reproductive function and familiarity with the diagnostic evaluation and treatment

273 cases are likely unrecognized due to lack of familiarity with the disease.

274 Questions about familiarity with the diseases, familiarity with their ri

275 In addition to familiarity with the dosing and monitoring of vitamin K

276 cause experience-mediated changes arise from familiarity with the features of the object through simp

277 ved-volume judgments were more dissimilar as familiarity with the foods increased.

278 An unrelated modulation by the participant's familiarity with the items was also observed.

279 Familiarity with the morphologic and ophthalmoscopic fea

280 is not based on comprehension but rather on familiarity with the phonology of one's native language.

281 Familiarity with the physiology and perioperative implic

282 93% of producers; 66% of consumers) reported familiarity with the Policy.

283 Sixty percent of PDs reported familiarity with the Practice Gaps section of JAMA Derma

284 Familiarity with the rationale, implications, benefits,

285 ting that speaker discrimination may rely on familiarity with the sound structure of one's native lan

286 amplification features would increase as the familiarity with the stimuli decreased.

287 munication is facilitated by widespread user familiarity with the tercile format.

288 where from 1 d to 1 week, depending on one's familiarity with the tools and data peculiarities.

289 Here we manipulated familiarity with the training route between a feeder and

290 their level of eating as a function of their familiarity with their eating partner.

291 uring early development, and retain chemical familiarity with their genetic mother despite egg cross-

292 estions about familiarity with the diseases, familiarity with their risk factors and participants' so

293 Increasing medical providers' familiarity with these agents will allow their incorpora

294 Awareness and familiarity with these anomalies are necessary to avoid

295 Familiarity with these entities is important as imaging

296 Familiarity with this dangerous entity is important.

297 Therefore familiarity with this rare complication is indeed essent

298 luding those only loosely related; perceived familiarity with treatment options; and spirituality.

299 avoid a delayed diagnosis or a misdiagnosis, familiarity with typical and atypical imaging features i

300 et of mnemonic signals that include stimulus familiarity, within- and between-domain associations, as