ライフサイエンスコーパス: family planning

1 uctive health by donor type and purpose (eg, family planning).

2 olescent birth rate) and 5.6 (unmet need for family planning).

3 es could be a valuable, additional method of family planning.

4 orn survival and maternal health (MDG 5) and family planning.

5 as implications for clinical care and future family planning.

6 al, labour, birth, and post-partum care, and family planning.

7 ing medical management, prognostication, and family planning.

8 improvement of maternal health and access to family planning.

9 mmit on Family Planning in 2012 inspired the Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) initiative and the 120x20

10 e, socioeconomic status difference 56%), and family planning (46% coverage, socioeconomic status diff

11 of 37% adherence in sick-child care, 46% in family planning, 60% in labor and delivery, and 61% in A

12 alth activities amounted to 15.9% and ODA to family planning 7.2%.

13 e health to provide childbirth care; support family planning; address sexual health; and prevent, tre

14 ission of paternal mutations is important in family planning after chemotherapy and donor selection f

15 Family planning alone could prevent 57% of all deaths be

16 INTERPRETATION: The demand for family planning among the states and union territories i

17 uss how these insights may be used to inform family planning and cancer risk assessment based on a wo

18 ions around socially sensitive services (eg, family planning and human immunodeficiency virus) differ

19 n and guidance on how to increase the use of family planning and inform future efforts, especially in

20 Midwifery with both family planning and interventions for maternal and newbo

21 s need to be set against the cost of various family planning and reproductive health interventions.

22 tion and Development set broad new goals for family planning and reproductive health.

23 ctive primary health care (eg, immunisation, family planning), and 14 have progressed to comprehensiv

24 oms, attending sexually transmitted disease, family planning, and obstetrics and gynecology clinics.

25 ening in sexually transmitted disease (STD), family planning, and primary care clinical settings.

26 rvices would still meet much of the need for family planning, and that some progress could be made to

27 ors; worse access to medical care, including family planning; and worse underlying maternal health.

28 ity infrastructure and direct observation of family planning, antenatal care (ANC), sick-child care,

29 ility, population growth, and unmet need for family planning are high.

30 As part of the Oxford Family Planning Association study, we compared mortality

31 followed by coverage of satisfied demand for family planning by women of reproductive age (19% vs 63%

32 nd seeking care at maternal and child health/family-planning centres in Matlab, Bangladesh, for the p

33 Faith-linked controversies include family planning, child protection (especially child marr

34 ntibodies, only 6% of patients from a nearby family planning clinic gave a positive reaction in both

35 rual cycles who presented to a participating family planning clinic requesting emergency contraceptio

36 women with polycystic ovaries attending the family planning clinic, and 20 staff volunteers as healt

37 h gestational diabetes attending a high-risk family planning clinic.

38 egative for HPV at recruitment from a single family-planning clinic, and who had further follow-up.

39 en attending sexually transmitted disease or family planning clinics at 7 sites.

40 ervical specimens from 4,980 women attending family planning clinics in the northwestern United State

41 evalence in women aged 18-24 years attending family planning clinics in the prevaccine period (2005-2

42 Females aged 13 to 21 years who attended 2 family planning clinics in the San Francisco bay area; 4

43 ed data from chlamydia screening programs in family planning clinics in two geographic areas of the U

44 Screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis in family planning clinics is associated with a reduced inc

45 data on females aged 15-19 years who visited family planning clinics more than once from 1988 to 1992

46 T. vaginalis prevalence ranged from 5.4% in family planning clinics to 22.3% in jails.

47 n attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics, 4.3% (n = 174) were positive by

48 inner-city sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics, as well as five high school-bas

49 g clinics, as well as five high school-based family planning clinics, was performed, and the resultin

50 kers than in women attending gynecologic and family planning clinics.

51 ercion and unsafe relationships for women in family-planning clinics.

52 National Health and Family Planning Commission of China.

53 and Technology Support, National Health and Family Planning Commission of The People's Republic of C

54 National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of C

55 The difficulties of evaluating family planning communication programs may be surmountab

56 e contraception and access to devices during family planning counselling visits.

57 This study ascertained family planning decisions by women with bipolar disorder

58 that a career in cardiology may have on the family planning decisions of female cardiologists, the W

59 Improved family-planning education, access, and support are urgen

60 Tanzania should focus on the unmet need for family planning, especially in the Western and Lake regi

61 del builds onto the UN Population Division's Family Planning Estimation Model and uses data from mult

62 An updated version of the Family Planning Estimation Tool (FPET) was used to const

63 raceptive use, and unmet need and demand for family planning for 29 states and union territories in I

64 s for maternal and newborn health, excluding family planning, for the countries with the lowest HDI,

65 Recent increases in family planning (FP) use have been reported among women

66 ventions, including clean water, sanitation, family planning, girls' education, and social safety net

67 pass urologic care in order to achieve their family planning goals.

68 ion, malaria treatment, bednet distribution, family planning, growth monitoring, and health education

69 Family planning had consistent policies but only recent

70 enda, international funding and promotion of family planning has waned in the past decade.

71 newborn health, child health, immunisation, family planning, HIV/AIDS, and malaria.

72 riented, highly focused health programmes in family planning, immunisation, oral rehydration therapy,

73 The London Summit on Family Planning in 2012 inspired the Family Planning 202

74 Promotion of family planning in countries with high birth rates has t

75 e was low (median 0.20, range from -0.03 for family planning in Senegal to 0.40 for ANC in Tanzania).

76 evelopment Goals makes greater investment in family planning in these countries compelling.

77 The primary endpoints were met need for family planning in women aged 15-49 years, proportion of

78 orn, and child mortality, and unmet need for family planning, in which we used a health systems evalu

79 We assessed current levels of family planning indicators and changes between 2012 and

80 ates and projections of levels and trends in family planning indicators for subpopulations.

81 lity in the last 12 months (whether received family planning information or not) were associated with

82 Those providing health care to families planning international adoption should know abo

83 ding unintended and adolescent pregnancy and family planning; international reproductive health surve

84 Some of the greatest coverage gaps are in family planning, interventions addressing newborn mortal

85 sing is political willingness to incorporate family planning into the development arena.

86 Family planning is a shared responsibility, but availabl

87 Timely family planning is important for women at risk of POF.

88 Family planning is one of the four pillars of the Safe M

89 ewborn, and child health services, including family planning, is needed.

90 ratios in the Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning (MCH-FP) area (which has received extens

91 Forty-four percent of CBRHAs were providing family planning methods at the time of the training and

92 Condoms and vasectomy are male-controlled family planning methods but suffer from limitations in c

93 mutation and its effect on public health and family planning, most FX premutation carriers are unawar

94 genetic cause of CMT is often necessary for family planning, natural history studies, and for entry

95 Increased funding to family planning, nutrition, and immunisation projects we

96 Family planning, obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN), or sexu

97 .63 of 1 in sick-child care to 0.75 of 1 for family planning on average.

98 s old, neither she nor her husband had had a family planning operation, and she resided in a trial vi

99 e recruited women aged 18-25 years attending family planning or abortion care visits and not desiring

100 n attending a New Orleans, Louisiana, public family planning or sexually transmitted disease clinic f

101 trends, pregnancy prevention initiatives and family planning policies that address the special needs

102 ries already have appropriate population and family-planning policies but are receiving too little in

103 m planners can tailor interventions to match family planning preferences and create more sustainable

104 Those related to family planning, pregnancy intention, and reproductive h

105 ates from the Texas Medicaid fee-for-service family-planning program, Texas excluded them from a stat

106 In the past 40 years, family-planning programmes have played a major part in r

107 cation - have long been utilized by national family planning programs to create awareness about contr

108 Voluntary family-planning programs reduce unplanned pregnancies by

109 nd unsafe abortion, including investments in family planning services and safe abortion care, are cru

110 ly improved in areas with improved access to family planning services compared with outcomes in contr

111 significantly lower in the area with better family planning services compared with the comparison ar

112 We aimed to assess the effects of family planning services on abortion rates in two simila

113 Ghana, have shown that increasing access to family planning services reduces fertility and improves

114 woman are addressed, as is the importance of family planning services to those about to be released.

115 that selection of cost-effective delivery of family planning services would still meet much of the ne

116 d researchers, since it has implications for family planning services, prevention of obstetric compli

117 there is widespread availability of quality family planning services.

118 be provided in combination with good quality family planning services.

119 as received extensive services in health and family planning since 1977) with those in the comparison

120 fective, safe, and reversible is desired for family planning throughout the world.

121 changes in maternal and newborn survival and family planning, to inform priorities to end preventable

122 communities randomised as part of a previous family planning trial in this cohort.

123 ention group than in the control group after family planning visits (7.9 vs 15.4 per 100 person-years

124 effect on pregnancy rates in women attending family planning visits (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0

125 Met need for family planning was greater in the intervention clusters

126 majority said that in China decisions about family planning were shared by the couple (82%).

127 ther reproductive health activities, such as family planning, which has been the focus of recent worl

128 To meet the unmet need for family planning with modern contraceptives would be syne