ライフサイエンスコーパス: far-red light

1 g to green and red light rather than red and far red light.

2 es per square meter and is not reversible by far red light.

3 er white light to an immobilized state under far-red light.

4 chrome is that it cannot be photoreversed by far-red light.

5 red light, with little effect under blue or far-red light.

6 pocotyls in seedlings grown under continuous far-red light.

7 may expand its signaling activity to red and far-red light.

8 phytochrome A and hypocotyl elongation under far-red light.

9 hyE) predominantly regulate responses to red/far-red light.

10 n in dim white, red, and blue light, but not far-red light.

11 tinuous red light and to the ratio of red to far-red light.

12 essor of phytochrome A-mediated responses to far-red light.

13 permits them to thrive in niches enriched in far-red light.

14 ein PIF3 and the reversal of this binding by far-red light.

15 induction is rapidly abrogated by subsequent far-red light.

16 ocotyl, and fail to de-etiolate under red or far-red light.

17 as an elongated hypocotyl specifically under far-red light.

18 by red light, and this effect is reversed by far-red light.

19 atous plaque in which it can be activated by far-red light.

20 was reversed by subsequent irradiation with far-red light.

21 hromic kinases that are modulated by red and far-red light.

22 ectral range for photosynthesis by absorbing far-red light.

23 s hypersensitive responses to blue light and far-red light.

24 ows strongly reduced responses in continuous far-red light.

25 f any change in responsiveness to continuous far-red light.

26 saI in darkness even after illumination with far-red light.

27 ugh use of the phytochromes, which sense red/far-red light.

28 s the responses of these genes to continuous far-red light.

29 s of light (VLFR) and high fluences (HIR) of far-red light.

30 AT3 promoter responds differently to red and far-red light.

31 d physiological processes in response to red/far-red light.

32 synthesis in two cyanobacteria that grow in far-red light.

33 to continuous blue and red light but not to far-red light.

34 nase assays, show hyposensitive responses to far-red light.

35 f cyanobacteria that is capable of utilizing far-red light.

36 sferases accumulated the most in response to far-red light.

37 ght above 700 nm and enable cells to grow in far-red light.

38 showed that some cyanobacteria could utilize far-red light.

39 nanometers) and enhances oxygen evolution in far-red light.

40 90/717 nm following a brief irradiation with far-red light.

41 important for phyA-mediated deetiolation in far-red light.

42 ected in seedlings grown under low-intensity far-red light.

43 clear import of phyA-5 under low fluences of far-red light.

44 hypersensitivity to continuous red, but not far-red, light.

45 Arabidopsis Long Hypocotyl in Far-Red Light 1 (HFR1), a bHLH transcription factor, pla

46 e a new Arabidopsis mutant, laf1 (long after far-red light 1) that has an elongated hypocotyl specifi

47 uced in wild-type Col-0 plants by continuous far-red light, 85% show reduced responsiveness in the fh

48 The red/far red light absorbing photoreceptor phytochrome-B (phy

49 ms, a red light absorbing species, Pr, and a far-red light absorbing form, Pfr.

50 he Y263F change prevents a red light-induced far-red light absorbing phytochrome chromophore configur

51 istinct red light-absorbing Pr conformer and far red light-absorbing Pfr conformer.

52 states, a red light-absorbing Pr form, and a far red light-absorbing Pfr form.

53 en the red light-absorbing (Pr) form and the far-red light-absorbing (Pfr) form is the central featur

54 erconversion of red light-absorbing (Pr) and far-red light-absorbing (Pfr) states.

55 red-light-absorbing ground state (Pr) and a far-red light-absorbing active state (Pfr).

56 The far-red light-absorbing form of phytochrome (Pfr) A stim

57 gnated PIF7, interacts specifically with the far-red light-absorbing Pfr form of phyB through a conse

58 a red light-absorbing ground state Pr, and a far-red light-absorbing photoactivated state Pfr.

59 Photoreceptors, especially the far-red light-absorbing phytochrome A, play a crucial ro

60 Red/far-red light-absorbing phytochromes (phys) also play a

61 Photomorphogenesis is regulated by red/far-red light-absorbing phytochromes and blue/UV-A light

62 The red and far-red light-absorbing phytochromes and UV-A/blue light

63 The red and far-red light-absorbing phytochromes interact with the c

64 Phytochromes are red/far-red light-absorbing receptors encoded by a gene fami

65 light-absorbing state and the photoactivated far-red light-absorbing state revealed a large scale reo

66 en the red light-absorbing form, Pr, and the far-red-light-absorbing form, Pfr.

67 The red- and far-red-light-absorbing photosensory pigments or phytoch

68 ate photomorphogenic development include red/far-red-light-absorbing phytochromes and blue/UV-A-light

69 Arg133 helping stabilize and destabilize the far-red-light-absorbing state of Phy (Pfr), respectively

70 red-light-absorbing, ground state (Pr) and a far-red-light-absorbing, photoactivated state (Pfr).

71 transfer bands could be responsible for the far-red light absorption leading to PS I photochemistry

72 To overcome these problems, we prepared the far-red light-activatable prodrug of PTX by conjugating

73 nd interconverted between the red (dark) and far red (light-activated) forms.

74 We demonstrate its application to far-red-light-activated prodrugs.

75 pigment-protein complex, photosystem II, in far-red-light-adapted thylakoid membranes of the viridis

76 Subsequent exposure to far-red light after the red light pulse reverses FHY1 ph

77 Ultraviolet, blue, red, and far-red light all have demonstrated roles in modulating

78 red light, red followed by far-red light, or far-red light alone.

79 nd further desensitizes seedlings to red and far-red light and accelerates flowering time, with the t

80 on mutants show an elongated hypocotyl under far-red light and are impaired in other far-red high-irr

81 covered, and further connections between red/far-red light and carbon were modeled.

82 eds, LeEXP4 mRNA accumulation was blocked by far-red light and decreased by low water potential but w

83 ur light environments: white, blue, red, and far-red light and in the dark.

84 ) regulates gene expression under continuous far-red light and is rapidly destabilized upon red light

85 Far-red light and long photoperiods promote flowering in

86 hyposensitivity to continuous low-intensity far-red light and shows reduced very-low-fluence respons

87 f hypocotyl elongation, which is specific to far-red light and therefore specific to the phytochrome

88 dulates photomorphogenesis primarily through far-red light and to a lesser extent through blue- and r

89 h cases was at least partially reversible by far-red light, and appeared biphasic over a range of red

90 ected in seedlings treated with red light or far-red light, and it is largely independent from phytoc

91 and phyB2 tomato mutants and was reversed by far-red light applied immediately after the red or blue

92 ree organs in response to a 1-h treatment of far-red light are highly distinctive.

93 ring in response to altered ratios of red to far-red light are largely unknown.

94 Plant responses to red and far-red light are mediated by a family of photoreceptors

95 In aquatic environments, red and far-red light are rapidly attenuated with depth; therefo

96 ng that blue, yellow, and red light, but not far-red light, are absorbed by the neutral radical state

97 ulated by brief treatments with both red and far-red light, as is characteristic of very low-fluence

98 However, normal far-red light-associated transcript accumulation pattern

99 osphorylated and ubiquitinated under red and far-red light before being degraded with a half-life of

100 far-red light response, cotyledon expansion, far-red light block of greening, and light-induced expre

101 af1 has reduced responsiveness to continuous far-red light but retains wild-type responses to other l

102 longation zone when shifted from the dark to far-red light, but not blue or red light.

103 Stromule formation was sensitive to red and far-red light, but not to blue light.

104 ich has reduced responsiveness to continuous far-red light, but responds normally to other light wave

105 switched between Pr and Pfr forms by red and far-red light, but the consequence of a bleaching phytoc

106 The absorption of red or far-red light by one domain affects the conformation of

107 ontaining photoreceptors that detect red and far-red light by photointerconversion between a dark-ada

108 s of cAMP and cGMP by up to sixfold, whereas far-red light can be used to down-regulate activity.

109 opening is reversed by green light and that far-red light can be used to probe phytochrome-dependent

110 Depending on the fluence rate of far-red light, carbon either attenuated or potentiated l

111 ying light intensities and ratios of red and far-red light caused by shading and neighbor proximity.

112 responses are maximally sensitive to red and far red light, complementary chromatic adaptation is uni

113 Finally we show that both shaded, low red/far-red light conditions and high temperature induce mor

114 When grown under far-red light conditions ars4ars5 shows the same elongat

115 gulation of photomorphogenesis under red and far-red light conditions involves both positively and ne

116 radation of PIFs in response to both red and far-red light conditions to promote photomorphogenesis.

117 RBCS, CHS, and PORA, under both darkness and far-red light conditions.

118 uadruple mutant pifq both in the dark and in far-red light conditions.

119 to examine effects of those mutations on the far-red light control of genome expression.

120 protochlorophyllide reductase (POR) genes by far-red light coupled with irreversible plastid damage.

121 of a unique CBCR called IflA (influenced by far-red light), demonstrating that a second CBCR called

122 Furthermore, the response to far-red light depended on functional FHY1 but not on FIN

123 light and brassinosteroid pathways mainly by far-red-light-dependent modulation of brassinosteroid le

124 Moreover, treatments with red or red/far-red light did not alter the concentrations of citrat

125 ped; they can operate with low-power density far-red light-emitting diode light.

126 oximity and shade (i.e. to the perception of far-red light-enriched light filtered through or reflect

127 ngs of their contrasting growth responses to far-red light enrichment.

128 ering and can be fully induced by end-of-day far-red light (EOD FR) treatments.

129 pmental responses associated with end-of-day far-red light (EOD-FR) signaling were investigated in ma

130 on was reversed by subsequent treatment with far-red light, establishing that light-induced accumulat

131 Under relatively bright, high red:far-red light, ethylene production by seedlings of wild-

132 romotion in response to end-of-day pulses of far-red light, even in a phyA-null background, supports

133 ith a continuous light treatment enriched in far-red light, flowers developed directly from previousl

134 tal results confirmed that cells grown under far-red light form biofilms with a significantly increas

135 nsitivity of hypocotyls to red light (R) and far-red light (FR) and an overall dwarfing of the mature

136 e reduction in the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR) as a warning of competition with neig

137 Far-red light (FR) pretreatment and transfer to white li

138 plant photoreceptor known to be activated by far-red light (FR).

139 ging plants have to adapt to a high ratio of far-red light (FR)/red light (R) light in the canopy bef

140 g responses to the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR; an indicator of competition) by suppr

141 able from wild-type seedlings under constant far-red light (FRc), and phyC deficiency had no effect i

142 ng responsiveness specifically to continuous far-red light (FRc), thereby suggesting a locus likely t

143 and high irradiance responses to continuous far-red light (FRc).

144 th those induced by continuous monochromatic far-red light (FRc; perceived exclusively by phyA) in WT

145 ococcidiopsis thermalis PCC 7203 grown under far-red light (FRL; >725 nm) contains both chlorophyll a

146 red light by canopy leaves and reflection of far-red light from neighboring plants.

147 me phyA, phyB, and hy1 mutants as well as in far-red light-grown seedlings, indicating that neither C

148 1 transcript level is only seen in dark- and far-red light-grown spa1-100 mutants.

149 Additionally, dark-grown and far-red-light-grown spy-4 seedlings were found to have s

150 Under far-red light (>710 nm), the level of P700(+) was high i

151 fted from white light D2O-seawater medium to far-red light H2O-seawater medium, the observed deuterat

152 Far red light had an inhibiting effect on germination fo

153 e light induces the StBEL5 promoter, whereas far-red light had no effect.

154 ty, such that axillary buds growing in added far-red light have greatly increased receptor transcript

155 SCL21 transcript itself is down-regulated by far-red light in a phytochrome A- and PAT1-dependent man

156 mportant reduction in sensitivity to red and far-red light in the control of hypocotyl elongation, wh

157 n, apparently by sensing the ratio of red to far-red light in the environment.

158 was selectively insensitive to both red and far-red light in the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation

159 ve mutation rsf1 (for reduced sensitivity to far-red light) in the Arabidopsis Columbia accession by

160 ced responsiveness to continuous red but not far-red light, in both wild-type and ABO backgrounds, co

161 lysis of fruit treated with red light or red/far-red light indicated that phytochromes do not regulat

162 he behavior of these two chimeras in red and far-red light indicates: (i) that the NH2-terminal halve

163 The chromophore conformations of the red and far red light induced product states "Pfr" and "Pr" of t

164 eetiolation, anthocyanin accumulation, and a far-red light-induced inability of seedlings to green up

165 Further analysis reveals that far-red light-induced phosphorylation and degradation of

166 primary photoreceptor for mediating various far-red light-induced responses in higher plants.

167 ceptor phytochrome A (phyA) mediates various far-red light-induced responses.

168 In early seedling development, far-red-light-induced deetiolation is mediated primarily

169 By contrast, carbon potentiated far-red-light induction of GLN2 and ASN2 in light-grown

170 Far-red light inhibited red light induction of these mRN

171 This opening was green light reversible and far-red light insensitive, indicating that stomata of th

172 ed light, and the mRNA accumulation from red/far-red light irradiation was equal to that found in the

173 As far-red light is only perceived by phyA, our results sug

174 t mutant, confirming that gene expression in far-red light is regulated solely by phytochrome A.

175 Additionally, exposure to yellow but not far-red light leads to comparable increases in the expre

176 Continuous far-red light led to seedlings showing stronger staining

177 t changing R:FRs or lowering R:FRs by adding far-red light led to the appearance of small nuclear bod

178 eds display strong hyposensitive response to far-red light-mediated seed germination and light-regula

179 After photoactivation with far red light, MLu facilitates production of cytotoxic o

180 diminished effect of an end-of-day pulse of far-red light on hypocotyl elongation, and a decrease in

181 locked by abscisic acid (ABA), water stress, far-red light, or dormancy, but was low or undetected in

182 single pulses of red light, red followed by far-red light, or far-red light alone.

183 ay a role in all responses to 'high fluence' far-red light perceived by the light-labile phytochrome

184 tointerconversion between red light (Pr) and far-red light (Pfr)-absorbing states.

185 In addition, the long hypocotyl in far-red light phenotype of the laf6 mutant could not be

186 is part of an extensive acclimation process, far-red light photoacclimation (FaRLiP), which occurs in

187 Far-red light photoacclimation appears to be controlled

188 Far-red light photoacclimation leads to substantial remo

189 Phytochromes are red/far red light photochromic photoreceptors that direct ma

190 Here we propose that the red/far-red light photoreceptor HvPHYTOCHROME C (HvPHYC), ca

191 The red/far-red light photoreceptor phytochrome mediates photomo

192 has been shown to require a phytochrome red/far-red light photoreceptor, FphA, which is cytoplasmic

193 Phytochromes are red/far-red light photoreceptors that direct photosensory re

194 rs that interact physically with the red and far-red light photoreceptors, phytochromes, are called P

195 Of the five phytochromes-a family of red/far-red light photoreceptors-in Arabidopsis, phytochrome

196 propose new roles for SCF regulation of the far-red light/phyA and sugar signaling pathways.

197 Upon activation by far-red light, phytochrome A signals are transduced thro

198 of treatments (Norflurazon, lincomycin and a far-red light pre-treatment) leading to plastid damage i

199 s in Arabidopsis, we show that phyA mediates far-red light promotion of flowering with modes of actio

200 High intensity far-red light provides a way to specifically assess the

201 light pulse is reversible with a subsequent far-red light pulse, clearly showing that phytochrome me

202 under a light program of alternating red and far-red light pulses and were named eid (for empfindlich

203 vels of active phytochrome (Pfr) with red or far-red light pulses subsequent to blue-light treatments

204 celerated by a reduced ratio of red light to far-red light (R/FR), which indicates the proximity of c

205 f changes in the relative amounts of red and far-red light (R:FR ratio) and the initiation of the sha

206 hotoreceptor that senses the ratio of red to far-red light (R:FR) to regulate the shade-avoidance res

207 as a reduction in the ratio of red light to far-red light (R:FR).

208 -limited and super-resolution imaging in the far-red light range, is optimally excited with common re

209 ribution of light quality, including the red/far-red light ratio (R/FR) that informs plants about pro

210 Plants interpret a decrease in the red to far-red light ratio (R:FR) as a sign of impending shadin

211 Low red light/far-red light ratio (R:FR) serves as an indicator of imp

212 phytochrome B mutation and of low red light:far-red light ratio on branching were largely due to red

213 The influence of red/far-red light ratio on the fibre length prompted us to e

214 The red light:far-red light ratio perceived by phytochromes controls p

215 egetation-induced reduction in the red light:far-red light ratio provides a competition signal sensed

216 th light quality (as crowding and the red-to-far-red light ratio) and phosphate availability, such th

217 carpel development to spt mutants by low red/far-red light ratios, simulating vegetation shade, which

218 The far-red light receptor phytochrome A (phyA) and the bZIP

219 by photosensory receptors including the red/far-red light-receptor phytochromes and the blue/UV-A li

220 th to floral development is regulated by red-far-red light receptors (phytochromes) and blue-ultravio

221 These signaling components include the red/far-red light receptors, phytochromes, at least one blue

222 Phytochrome-mediated detection of far-red light reflection from neighboring plants activat

223 Far-red light regulates many aspects of seedling develop

224 phenotype of phyB-9 or phyA-211 under red or far-red light, respectively, and RFI2 likely functions d

225 impaired in phytochrome-mediated end-of-day far-red light response, cotyledon expansion, far-red lig

226 utation in HRB1 also enhances the end-of-day far-red light response, inhibits leaf expansion and peti

227 We have characterized a far-red-light response that induces a novel pathway for

228 as the major photoreceptor/effector for most far-red-light responses, although phyB and cry1 modulate

229 Far-red light reversed this effect of red light, and the

230 orm (Pfr) depressed the ATPase activity, and far-red light reversed this effect.

231 through direct physical interaction and red/far-red light reversible phosphorylation to fine-tune th

232 teristic phytochrome-mediated red light- and far-red light-reversible low-fluence induction of the G-

233 tified a long hypocotyl mutant under red and far-red light, rfi2-1 (red and far-red insensitive 2 to

234 y to simultaneously sense red light-rich and far-red light-rich environments through deactivation of

235 y because it enables plants to deetiolate in far-red light-rich environments typical of dense vegetat

236 mitted farther through seawater than the red/far-red light sensed by land plant phytochromes.

237 multiple photoreceptors, among which the red/far-red light-sensing phytochromes have been extensively

238 causes a 100-fold shift in the threshold for far-red light sensitivity.

239 tochromes comprise a principal family of red/far-red light sensors in plants.

240 re dimeric proteins that function as red and far-red light sensors influencing nearly every phase of

241 the mutants in the dark and following red or far-red light short treatments or continuous light, than

242 Plants grown under continuous blue or far-red light showed NPA-induced hypocotyl inhibition si

243 egulated by phyA in response to a continuous far-red light signal.

244 he interaction of carbon with blue, red, and far-red-light signaling and set the stage for further in

245 hanges in gene expression in response to red/far-red light signals in part by physically interacting

246 he light-to-dark) switch, the blue, red, and far-red light signals, and UV-B irradiation.

247 liar shade or neighbor proximity (low red to far-red light), some plant species exhibit shade-avoidin

248 ation to inhibition by white, blue, red, and far-red light stimuli.

249 veness to continuous red, but not continuous far-red light, suggesting a role in phyB signaling but n

250 duced sensitivity to both continuous red and far-red light, suggesting involvement in both phyA and p

251 yl phenotype of the atmdr1-100 mutants under far-red light, suggesting that phyA acts downstream of A

252 nses to limiting fluence rates of continuous far-red light that are absent in the parental phyA-105 m

253 nsive photoacclimative response to growth in far-red light that includes the synthesis of chlorophyll

254 rowing wild-type seedlings with supplemental far-red light that induces shade avoidance responses.

255 When stimulated by far-red light, the intense TTA upconversion blue emissio

256 However, once illuminated with far-red light, the prodrug effectively killed SKOV-3 ova

257 In far-red light, the regulation of genes such as CHS and C

258 Photoconversion of AtBphP2 with far-red light then generates Pr but this Pr is also unst

259 Land plant phytochromes perceive red and far-red light to control growth and development, using t

260 in plants, which measure the ratio of red to far-red light to control many aspects of growth and deve

261 vely ablated tumors by the illumination with far-red light to the mice, presumably through the combin

262 light conditions (continuous white, red and far-red light) to examine more closely the light regulat

263 their expression in hypocotyl is induced by far-red light treatment.

264 Moreover, a far-red-light treatment at the end of day also reduced P

265 sponses that are fully induced by end-of-day far-red light treatments.

266 hondria was photoreversibly modulated by red/far-red light treatments.

267 Red-light and red-light/far-red-light treatments during ripening did not influen

268 exposure and to complete this process under far-red light (typical of dense vegetation canopies).

269 are bacterial photoreceptors that sense red/far red light using the biliverdin chromophore.

270 Plants sense and respond to red and far-red light using the phytochrome (phy) family of phot

271 gulation of lettuce seed dormancy by red and far red light was determined at various hydration levels

272 ponse to the relative proportions of red and far red light was regulated by SIG5 through phytochrome

273 For example, the phytochromes perceive far-red light (wavelengths between 700 and 800 nm) refle

274 dling responses to continuous white, red, or far-red light (Wc, Rc or FRc, respectively) were examine

275 nsed through a reduced ratio between red and far-red light, we show here through computational modeli

276 tion activities in plants exposed to red and far-red light were 30% to 85% less than in blue light/UV

277 bidopsis thaliana) mutants hypersensitive to far-red light were isolated under a light program of alt

278 Here, blue-green reversibility and far-red light were used to probe the stomatal responses

279 A and phyB in red light were not observed in far-red light, which inhibited growth persistently throu

280 L3 (FHY3) promotes seedling de-etiolation in far-red light, which is perceived by phytochrome A (phyA

281 sing tissue penetrable and clinically useful far-red light, which kills the cancer cells through the

282 oximity as a decrease in the ratio of red to far-red light, which triggers a series of developmental

283 Here we present clear evidence that even far-red light with wavelengths beyond 800 nm, clearly ou