コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ynovitis in the hand of a 58-year-old cattle farmer.
2 crue to the broader community as well as the farmer.
3 n exposure to some pesticides and RA in male farmers.
4 the strong and consistent role of innovative farmers.
5 allergic and non-allergic wheeze among male farmers.
6 ible admixture, between hunter-gatherers and farmers.
7 lation that was the source of Europe's first farmers.
8 ed in pottery vessels of Neolithic Old World farmers.
9 dmixture events between hunter-gatherers and farmers.
10 aptation, particularly for rural subsistence farmers.
11 62 rainforest hunter-gatherers and sedentary farmers.
12 States with dense populations of prehispanic farmers.
13 hat also relates to later European Neolithic farmers.
14 ction through additional restrictions on pig farmers.
15 o the implementation of veterinary advice by farmers.
16 economic losses and threaten livelihoods of farmers.
17 uction is unaffected by the frequency of non-farmers.
18 trates a win-win for biodiversity and coffee farmers.
19 rance as a consequence of selection by early farmers.
20 illion hectares and benefit around 1 million farmers.
21 r significant distances for use by scores of farmers.
22 y in which veterinary advice is delivered to farmers.
23 e digestible commodity for early prehistoric farmers.
24 particularly for small-scale and subsistence farmers.
25 ents that would otherwise have been given to farmers.
26 ies have found lower risks of lung cancer in farmers.
27 o European and Anatolian and Levantine early farmers.
28 ls of genetic admixture among European early farmers.
29 directional differences between foragers and farmers.
30 l and peripheral nerve conduction of Chinese farmers.
31 be focused remotely, a convenience to shrimp farmers.
32 persistence arose in a haplotype present in farmers.
33 ridging knowledge and action gaps for shrimp farmers.
34 reached levels later found in early European farmers.
36 was less common (~19%) among Early Neolithic farmers (~5450 BC) and virtually absent in Mesolithic hu
39 A total of 72 Thai families, consisting of a farmer, a spouse, and a child, participated in this stud
42 e on ecosystems and indirect effects through farmers' adaptations are likely to affect ES bundles thr
43 These influences are distinct from the early farmer admixture that transformed the genetic landscape
45 ns and farmers' concerns were addressed, the farmers adopted recommended management practices, thereb
46 cultural scientists living in villages among farmers, advancing participatory innovation and technolo
48 articular food supply chains is necessary if farmers, agri-food industries and consumers are to share
50 hunter-gatherer-related admixture into early farmers also increased over the course of two millennia.
52 in terms of contributions to food security, farmer and beekeeper livelihoods, social and cultural va
54 ethnic origin [Han and non-Han], occupation [farmer and non-farmer], annual household income [< yen10
57 a methodology used in the UK for guidance to farmers and agronomists on ways of reducing lodging risk
59 virus-associated yield losses in cassava for farmers and can additionally enable the exploitation of
60 er reproductive allocation conflicts between farmers and cultivars constrain crop yield, possibly exp
61 , genetic affinities between later Anatolian farmers and fourth to third millennium BC Chalcolithic s
62 ive in Madagascar long before the arrival of farmers and herders and before many Late Holocene faunal
63 on structure and differential growth between farmers and hunter-gatherers are necessary to explain bo
65 uld they continue, may increase costs for US farmers and may even destabilize crop production over ti
66 d 6.06% in produce products (P < 0.001) from farmers and organic retail markets, but none from conven
67 nefits of biological control that will allow farmers and others to internalize the benefits that ince
69 c diversity is an indispensable resource for farmers and professional breeders responding to changing
71 ivestock monitoring is anticipated to assist farmers and the agricultural industry to improve animal
72 enetic dissimilarity between early Anatolian farmers and the inhabitants of Ganj Dareh supports a mod
73 esearchers is to construct tools relevant to farmers and their advisers that improve upon their curre
77 een Mediterranean and Central European early farmers and those of Greece and Anatolia, extending the
78 pigs, and the potential impact of improving farmers and traders' clinical diagnosis ability-its time
80 show that the communication network between farmers' and their perceptions of profit and loss affect
81 efect represents a serious problem for wheat farmers, and apart from the circumstantial evidence that
82 e attainable level to 97.0% among 71 leading farmers, and from 62.8% to 79.6% countywide (93,074 hous
84 of a similar length to those from Neolithic farmers, and shorter than those of Caucasus and Western
85 eeding goal for early nineteenth century pig farmers, and that Asian variants of genes related to thi
87 and 13 low-As plots managed by 16 different farmers, and we explore the implications for mitigation.
88 Han and non-Han], occupation [farmer and non-farmer], annual household income [< yen10 000, yen10 000
89 y associated with adherence, whereas being a farmer (AOR = 0.07, 95 % CI: 0.01-0.75, p < 0.028), havi
90 0 years ago, closely related groups of early farmers appeared in Germany, Hungary and Spain, differen
91 rtion of Europeans descending from Neolithic farmers approximately 10 thousand years ago (KYA) or Pal
92 o Europe and from the ancestors of Neolithic farmers approximately 25 kya, around the Last Glacial Ma
99 were: (i) veterinary surgeons believed that farmers are unlikely to actively seek advice on lameness
100 tion between Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and farmers as well as differences between transitional and
101 L1 and STAT6 were hypomethylated in DNA from farmers' as compared to nonfarmers' children, while regi
105 xistence between indigenous groups and early farmers before farming communities absorbed the foragers
108 nne) is the grass species of choice for most farmers, but lacks resilience against extremes of climat
109 tified the value native predators provide to farmers by consuming coffee's most damaging insect pest,
110 his crop alone, and bats may further benefit farmers by indirectly suppressing pest-associated fungal
115 proportions of CD27(+) memory B cells among farmers' children and inversely related to proportions o
116 ating BAFF levels were maximal at birth, and farmers' children had higher BAFF levels than nonfarmers
118 em in game theory; that is to say, if enough farmers choose to grow Bt maize then because the pest is
120 release was shown to be high, and improving farmers' clinical diagnosis ability does not appear suff
123 sufficient training and technical support to farmers." Cluster analyses, based on participant opinion
124 uce prevalence, but those most acceptable to farmers combine specific information about lactation per
126 ter economic benefits for Indian smallholder farmers compared with growing the Asiatic cotton Gossypi
127 tions that have diluted this early Neolithic farmer component, explaining why modern-day Sardinian po
129 ximizing long-term cultivar performance: ant farmers could neither increase carbohydrate provisioning
131 occurred because possession of the wealth of farmers--crops, dwellings, and animals--could be unambig
132 rried Burkholderia inhibit the growth of non-farmer D. discoideum clones that could exploit the farme
133 erraces are also created by feedback between farmers' decisions and the ecology of the paddies, which
134 propose an evolutionary game, based on local farmers' decisions that predicts specific power laws in
135 al pathogenesis is therefore of value to the farmer, diagnostician, phytobacteriologist, and taxonomi
139 on a growing body of evidence on smallholder farmers, distributed irrigation systems, and land and wa
140 or and undernourished people are smallholder farmers, diversifying production on these smallholder fa
141 or can it be explained with stress: Although farmers do show more stress before harvest, that does no
143 eed to be considered by sorghum breeders and farmers during sorghum production to produce grain with
145 riculture may lead to downstream exposure of farmers' families to pesticide residues inadvertently ta
148 ently, 30% of the identified accessions from farmers' fields were matched to specific released variet
149 native method to track released varieties in farmers' fields, using cassava, a clonally propagated ro
151 ahead which enables national governments and farmers forecast crop yield to ensure supplies of afford
152 he genomes of a approximately 7,000-year-old farmer from Germany and eight approximately 8,000-year-o
153 maize's metapopulation dynamics may prevent farmers from accessing germplasm suitable to a rapidly c
154 arts of Europe by migrations, first of early farmers from the Near East and then Bronze Age herders f
155 eal the origin and the demographic impact of farmers from the Neolithic period spreading into Europe.
157 r-gathering populations present up to 50% of farmer genomic ancestry, and that substantial admixture
160 p relationships and show that early European farmers had approximately 44% ancestry from a 'basal Eur
162 the alterations in pesticide use may benefit farmer health in China and globe, which has positive imp
163 tence strategy facilitated the adaptation of farmers-herders to the challenges of global temperature
166 he Agricultural Health Study enrolled 52,394 farmers in 1993-1997 and collected additional informatio
167 d evaluated yield potential by surveying 735 farmers in 2008-2012 and then conducting 6 rice field ex
170 mated to have separated from Early Neolithic farmers in Anatolia some 46,000 to 77,000 years ago and
171 e] is a staple food for more than 90 million farmers in arid and semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Afr
172 essential to the food security of many small farmers in Asia and Africa and is a model system for oth
175 g provides livelihoods for around 15 million farmers in Ethiopia and generates a quarter of the count
177 fferences between transitional and intensive farmers in mandibular variation which is consistent with
179 ultural Health Study, a prospective study of farmers in North Carolina and Iowa, we evaluated the ass
180 d from the same ancestral gene pool as early farmers in other parts of Europe, suggesting that migrat
181 Cowpea is an important crop for subsistence farmers in sub-Saharan Africa, yet its CWR are under-col
184 plex interactions among hunter-gatherers and farmers in the Danube basin, demonstrating that in some
185 he relationship between hunter-gatherers and farmers in the Lower Danube basin, a geographically inte
186 e made during the domestication of barley by farmers in the southern and northern regions of the Leva
189 tan and all Sudan wheat-growing regions) and farmers in these regions will be hit hardest by increasi
190 idence among wives of pesticide applicators (farmers) in the prospective Agricultural Health Study.
192 s in crop suitability affecting impoverished farmers intersect with changes in ranges of restricted-r
193 pproaches, elicitation of variety names from farmer interviews and morphological plant descriptors, h
195 ions between rainforest hunter-gatherers and farmers introduced by the spread of farming were not acc
196 e economic impact of bovine Tuberculosis for farmers is dominated by the costs associated with testin
198 nonfarmers and infectiously endow them with farmer-like characteristics, indicating that Burkholderi
201 arms' environment and their products sold in farmers markets and warrants taking necessary measures t
202 rawberry consumption from roadside stands or farmers' markets (matched odds ratio, 19.6; 95% confiden
207 are nodes, and links are established when a farmer mentions two concepts in their stated definition
209 ntegrated into technology packages that meet farmers' needs across the great diversity of production
210 and include increase in yields, increase in farmers' net revenue and reduction in pesticide applicat
211 t is neither ancestral to the first European farmers nor has contributed substantially to the ancestr
212 y were more likely to be traders rather than farmers (odds ratio [OR], 6.15; 95% confidence interval
213 and synchronously after the arrival of early farmers of Anatolian origin [1-3], who largely replaced
215 ta from five hunter-gatherers and five first farmers of Estonia whose remains date to 4,500 to 6,300
217 naffected by Holocene climatic fluctuations, farmers of regions further inland had to apply irrigatio
220 lethal crisis of the first Central European farmers of the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik Culture
222 s of their ancestry from the first Neolithic farmers of western Anatolia and the Aegean, and most of
223 n backyard and small-scale herds, where poor farmers often attempt to limit the disease's economic co
226 , and 8.38% in chicken meat (P < 0.001) from farmers, organic, and conventional retail markets respec
228 keratitis was significantly associated with farmers (P = 0.0001), daily laborers (P = 0.0001), unemp
230 tion in N applications of 55-60% compared to farmers' practice and/or further 20% N saving compared w
231 trol strategies failed to account for forest farmers' prolonged stays at forest farms/fields (61% dur
232 E. coli shared among farms, flies, dogs and farmers, providing direct evidence of carbapenem-resista
234 elect more resistant individuals and to help farmers reduce parasite transmission by identifying and
235 s without yield declines or economic harm to farmers, reducing the potential for pest resistance, non
237 zing on the explosion of data emanating from farmers, researchers, and the public, as novel sampling
240 eople, testing for HIV was more common among farmers (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.79) and students (0.73,
242 t, and a chromene that potently enhances the farmer's spore production and depresses a nonfarmer's sp
243 This generated an incentives dilemma for farmers: selecting IPM activities for individual fields
244 Mesolithic whereas all other European early farmers show greater genetic similarity to modern-day Sa
245 a from ancient hunter-gatherers and European farmers showed that the Kalash share genetic drift with
251 e began nine thousand years ago when Mexican farmers started to collect the seeds of the wild grass,
253 r, but sizeable, contribution from Anatolian farmers, suggesting multiple admixture events between hu
255 patial, and province-level census data, with farmer surveys to examine the climatic, demographic, and
256 interventions are directly the reduction of farmers' take-home exposures and indirectly frequent cle
258 trast to central and northern early European farmers, the Chalcolithic El Portalon individuals additi
259 By approximately 6,000-5,000 years ago, farmers throughout much of Europe had more hunter-gather
261 tion of different exposure pathways from the farmer to their children can provide clear targets to re
265 stems for delivering positive incentives for farmers to forgo deforestation have been designed but no
267 omplete the social stage, the ability of non-farmers to produce spores falls off rapidly with an incr
270 ic developments create strong incentives for farmers to shift from transplanted to direct-seeded rice
273 demic researchers, industry researchers, and farmers to understand and manage plant-microbiome intera
276 . 5900-2400 cal B.C.), which show that early farmers used livestock manure and water management to en
277 enue does not significantly increase because farmers using irrigation spend significantly more than f
278 find that genetic diversity in the earliest farmers was conspicuously low, on a par with European fo
279 e find that mobility among European Holocene farmers was significantly higher than among European hun
280 nesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and
281 N partial factor productivity (PFPN) of the farmers were 336.7 kg ha(-1), 8131.8 kg ha(-1) and 24.2
282 instructions on FRAMp usage were revised and farmers were given the options to skip and select specif
285 pproaches to address the local challenges of farmers while empowering discovery across industry and a
287 .3; 15 statistics, five studies] in homes of farmers who applied pesticides more recently or frequent
288 cial importance to decrease the yield gap of farmers who can't -or won't- use nitrogen fertilizer.
289 inoculation of the skin in veterinarians or farmers who have exposure to animal products of concepti
290 We also provide the first evidence that farmers who use neonicotinoid seed coatings reduce the n
291 opulation closely related to Early Neolithic farmers, who had colonized Europe 4000 years earlier.
292 eans and Near Easterners; and early European farmers, who were mainly of Near Eastern origin but also
293 me-wide ancient DNA from Anatolian Neolithic farmers, whose genetic material we obtained by extractin
295 conservation of biodiversity by smallholder farmers with agricultural intensification is increasingl
297 asma samples from orchard workers and cotton farmers with long-term exposure to organophosphorus pest
299 r group members, a late Pleistocene would-be farmer would have had little incentive to engage in the
300 ing yield gaps (that is, differences between farmers' yields and what are attainable for a given regi
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。