ライフサイエンスコーパス: feeding tube

1 or feeding through a transpylorically placed feeding tube.

2 hildren requiring placement of a nasoenteric feeding tube.

3 r determining postpyloric positioning of the feeding tube.

4 6.7-Fr (2.2-mm) fiberoptic scope through the feeding tube.

5 insufflated air could be aspirated from the feeding tube.

6 air confirms the transpyloric position of a feeding tube.

7 ch the bridle failed to prevent removal of a feeding tube.

8 d able to take liquid medication by mouth or feeding tube.

9 t was surgically cannulated with a pediatric feeding tube.

10 07-1.15) had a higher likelihood of having a feeding tube.

11 Only one patient (5%) required a feeding tube.

12 Fourteen patients received ZD1839 through a feeding tube.

13 ctor was attached to the proximal end of the feeding tube.

14 se bacterial biofilms inside the nasogastric feeding tubes.

15 moving their properly positioned nasoenteric feeding tubes.

16 Nasal bridling of feeding tubes.

17 tenting, and endoscopic placement of enteric feeding tubes.

18 impaired residents in US nursing homes have feeding tubes.

19 ation with fluids (5%), and complications of feeding tubes (5%).

20 le) were significantly more likely to have a feeding tube (adjusted risk ratio, 3.38), have spent tim

21 Although the use of feeding tubes among older individuals stirs considerable

22 e-based enteral diet or water via a duodenal feeding tube and subsequently injected with glycerol.

23 Protocols directed the placement of the feeding tube and the infusion of enteral nutrition and d

24 first attempt at placement of a transpyloric feeding tube and the initiation of feeding was significa

25 r hundred twenty-eight residents (59.7%) had feeding tubes and 215 (30.0%) had tracheostomies.

26 The bacterial flora of nasogastric feeding tubes and faecal samples were analysed for a low

27 Representative strains, recovered from both feeding tubes and faecal samples, were whole genome sequ

28 nificant difference in dependence on gastric feeding tubes and tracheostomies between treatment group

29 fusions, 36% were nourished via transpyloric feeding tubes, and 7% received total parenteral nutritio

30 diographs, fluoroscopic placement of enteral feeding tubes, and insertion of vena cava filters.

31 process, an essential channel, the so-called feeding tube apparatus, is thought to cross both membran

32 Enteral feeding tubes are often used in this situation, yet bene

33 Complications related to malpositioned feeding tubes are usually preventable.

34 An unweighted nasoenteral feeding tube attached to a three-way stopcock and a 60 m

35 Blind placement of a feeding tube can result in serious complications.

36 Feeding tubes can be placed by bedside, endoscopic, fluo

37 Endoscopically placed small bowel feeding tubes can safely deliver enteral nutrition to pa

38 se reports of complications of malpositioned feeding tubes continue to surface; most are due to inadv

39 EN was defined as insertion of a nasojejunal feeding tube, delivering at least 50% of nutritional nee

40 Studies on percutaneous jejunal feeding tubes demonstrate: high complication rate and sh

41 Late effects included feeding tube dependence in 17% of patients alive and fre

42 ractionation may increase rates of long-term feeding tube dependence.

43 Organ dysfunction was defined as feeding tube dependency, functioning tracheostomy, or so

44 Loco-regional control, speech quality and feeding-tube dependency were assessed during follow-up v

45 1) in all patients except four: one who was feeding-tube dependent and three who required soft diet.

46 PF group, three (3%) of 91 patients remained feeding-tube dependent, compared with eight (11%) of 71

47 At 12 months, five patients were completely feeding-tube dependent.

48 ould have required fluoroscopic placement of feeding tube due to failed blind technique had successfu

49 In three subjects from group 1, the feeding tube entered the first part of the duodenum, whi

50 ition group, enteral nutrition was given via feeding tube for 14 days.

51 but this patient had had the same bridle and feeding tube for 170 consecutive days.

52 ntranasally, intravenously, or orally or via feeding tube (gavage) and assayed virus shedding.

53 ity scoring system) and/or requirement for a feeding tube >or= 2 years after registration and/or pote

54 determine the internal length of nasogastric feeding tube in adults.

55 determine the internal length of nasogastric feeding tube in adults.

56 lized enteric structures clearly through the feeding tube in all subjects and patients.

57 Nursing staff attempted to place a feeding tube in the desired position, and placement was

58 ates active bedside placement of postpyloric feeding tubes in critically ill adult patients.

59 Bridling of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients is a low-morbid

60 revent the accidental removal of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients.

61 d endoscopists to successfully place enteral feeding tubes in patients who previously required open p

62 Studies involving placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes include description of new methods for end

63 d bags, hemodialysis tubing, and nasogastric feeding tubes, increase body burden levels.

64 ng home residents who are tube fed had their feeding tube inserted during an acute care hospitalizati

65 -level factors independently associated with feeding tube insertion rates, including bed size, owners

66 h advanced cognitive impairment, the rate of feeding tube insertion varied from 0 to 38.9 per 100 hos

67 U use was associated with increased rates of feeding tube insertion, even after adjusting for patient

68 burdensome transition and the likelihood of feeding-tube insertion, hospitalization in an intensive

69 The mean rate of feeding tube insertions per 100 admissions was 7.9 in 20

70 stric insufflation allows rapid placement of feeding tubes into the small bowel with fewer attempts c

71 RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19), and the use of feeding tubes (IRR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.64) and tracheo

72 Early enteral feeding through a nasoenteric feeding tube is often used in patients with severe acute

73 The feeding tube is then anchored to the umbilical tape with

74 data and expert opinion suggest that use of feeding tubes is not beneficial for older persons with a

75 Days on feeding tube, length of mechanical ventilation and ICU/h

76 tes that bacterial flora within the neonatal feeding tubes may influence the bacterial colonisation o

77 lth Evaluation II score, presence of enteral feeding tube, mechanical ventilation, and recent history

78 Standard 12-Fr (4.0-mm) feeding tubes (n = 19) were placed.

79 dents with advanced cognitive impairment had feeding tubes (N = 63,101).

80 Test meals were fed through an intragastric feeding tube on Sprague-Dawley male rats after 18 h fast

81 were determined based on the position of the feeding tube on the radiograph.

82 le of 20 adult MICU patients who were having feeding tubes placed (13 Salem sump tubes, 7 small-bore

83 Two patients from group 2 had feeding tubes placed on two separate occasions.

84 Feeding tube placement by a dedicated team using electro

85 Transpyloric small intestine feeding tube placement can be difficult and tedious.

86 Poor reporting of feeding tube placement errors hinders the adoption of ef

87 Despite feeding tube placement in 35 patients (85%), the mean we

88 the potential for rapid, accurate, and safe feeding tube placement in patients requiring nutritional

89 Feeding tube placement into either duodenum or jejunum w

90 We determined the success rate of feeding tube placement into or beyond the second portion

91 thromycin significantly improved the rate of feeding tube placement into the duodenum or jejunum (ery

92 this review is to describe recent reports of feeding tube placement problems and to examine possible

93 tubated, using a blind, bedside transpyloric feeding tube placement protocol.

94 udy, we compared complications after bedside feeding tube placement using a blind technique in 2005 t

95 on of new methods for endoscopic nasoenteric feeding tube placement using a push technique with a sti

96 Median time to feeding tube placement was 10 mins (range 5 to 60).

97 Rate of feeding tube placement was based on a 20% sample of all

98 ntensive procedures (mechanical ventilation, feeding tube placement, and cardiopulmonary resuscitatio

99 hod, less time and money will be expended in feeding tube placement, making capnometry an efficacious

100 ation, intravascular hemodynamic monitoring, feeding tube placement, tracheostomy, and vena cava filt

101 eport describes a novel technique of enteral feeding tube placement, using external magnetic guidance

102 This report describes a new technique of feeding tube placement.

103 spice use were weakly or not associated with feeding tube placement.

104 fits of enteral nutrition are techniques for feeding tube placement.

105 entilation for 1 month with tracheostomy and feeding tube placement.

106 ometry is a safe method for verifying proper feeding tube placement.

107 rubin concentration is useful for predicting feeding tube position.

108 Of the 74 feeding tubes positioned in the small bowel, 13 feeding

109 s patients with early tracheostomy had fewer feeding tube procedures and higher odds of discharge hom

110 autopositioning and regurgitation-resistant feeding tubes provide instruments for the early supply o

111 The feeding tubes remained in place 10 +/- 4 days and patien

112 patients, or when the risk of unintentional feeding tube removal is high.

113 monitored daily for prevalence and cause of feeding tube removal, percentage of goal calories receiv

114 including fall to the knees without injury, feeding tube removal, systolic blood pressure >200 mm Hg

115 lso be iatrogenic from intracatheter jejunal feeding tubes, stent perforation, sclerotherapy, or surg

116 Of the seven small-bore feeding tubes tested, all were successfully placed on in

117 correctly predicted the position of only one feeding tube, the 26th, which was in the stomach.

118 Based on visual landmarks, we advanced the feeding tube through the pylorus and into the duodenum i

119 pose that the channel is a gap junction-like feeding tube through which the mother cell nurtures the

120 aken more invasive routes using intragastric feeding tubes to infuse alcohol directly into the stomac

121 , changing mealtime position, and/or placing feeding tubes to prevent aspiration.

122 tics associated with a greater likelihood of feeding tube use included younger age, nonwhite race, ma

123 Feeding tube use is independently associated with both t

124 Additionally, feeding tube use was more likely among residents living

125 sident factors independently associated with feeding tube use.

126 transfers (2.4 percentage-point reduction), feeding-tube use (1.2 percentage-point reduction), and I

127 fe and, for patients with advanced dementia, feeding-tube use and hospital transfers within the last

128 The feeding tube was advanced and a final chest roentgenogra

129 The distal end of the feeding tube was attached to the ETCO2 monitor.

130 The feeding tube was considered to be in the small bowel whe

131 The feeding tube was considered to be postpyloric when the t

132 After the feeding tube was inserted to 30-cm length and before the

133 standard 12-Fr, 114-cm flexible nasoenteral feeding tube was modified by inserting a small magnet in

134 After two unsuccessful attempts, the feeding tube was placed under fluoroscopy.

135 inuous electrocardiographic tracing from the feeding tube was then monitored throughout the tube inse

136 or was used in one fourth of patients, and a feeding tube was used in four tenths of patients.

137 The enteral feeding tube was withdrawn prematurely from 48.5% of pat

138 ce complications from small-bore nasogastric feeding tubes was effective.

139 es placed (13 Salem sump tubes, 7 small-bore feeding tubes) was then studied.

140 Tracheostomy and dependence on a gastric feeding tube were used as surrogate measures for treatme

141 ne critically ill patients from group 2, the feeding tubes were advanced to the distal duodenum or je

142 Feeding tubes were aspirated by applying suction with a

143 ding tubes positioned in the small bowel, 13 feeding tubes were in the duodenum and 61 were in the je

144 The feeding tubes were inserted by the oral (n = 8) or nasal

145 In the control group, feeding tubes were inserted through the nares and into t

146 Standard 10-Fr flexible nasoenteral feeding tubes were inserted under direct vision by the n

147 Seventy-five feeding tubes were inserted.

148 Ninety-nine (74/75) percent of the feeding tubes were positioned in the small bowel.

149 All feeding tubes were successfully placed after two attempt

150 When gastric insufflation was used, 23 of 25 feeding tubes were successfully placed in the small bowe

151 Approximately 1.2 million feeding tubes with stylets are placed annually in the US

152 A small-bore feeding tube, with stylet in place, was placed 5 cm thro