ライフサイエンスコーパス: field strength

1 ound to be nonlinearly dependent on electric field strength.

2 ll as with cation concentration and electric field strength.

3 many nanoseconds, depending on the electric field strength.

4 a characteristic sigmoidal dependence on the field strength.

5 nificant effect on cognitive function at any field strength.

6 r, sensory perceptions did vary according to field strength.

7 Subjects were blinded to field strength.

8 t on both exosome concentration and electric field strength.

9 only weakly affected by the applied electric field strength.

10 stigators and found to depend on the plasmon field strength.

11 buffer exchange and an increase in electric field strength.

12 es or by changing the effective spin-locking field strength.

13 ength, counterflow acceleration, and applied field strength.

14 ssing has been previously limited by scanner field strength.

15 tivity that increases with inferred magnetic field strength.

16 r the observed antipodal decline in magnetic field strength.

17 affects the distribution of local electrical field strength.

18 ration channel length under 30 V/cm electric field strength.

19 icantly affected by pore size and transverse field strength.

20 coherence each increasing monotonically with field strength.

21 that the preferred angle is proportional to field strength.

22 linear dependency of spike timing changes on field strength.

23 oiting the MRI signal phase at high magnetic field strength.

24 ion of the current for certain ranges of the field strength.

25 cillatory frequencies increase linearly with field strength.

26 o be quantified in a xenograft model at this field strength.

27 rrowing the gap and increasing the effective field strength.

28 istic dependence of ion mobility on electric field strength.

29 larizing/hyperpolarizing pulses of very high field strength.

30 MI (P<0.001) but not in CMI (P>0.20) at both field strengths.

31 from different vendors and between different field strengths.

32 ive this procedure for the relevant range of field strengths.

33 chemiluminescence at relatively low electric field strengths.

34 ast on T(1)-weighted images at high magnetic field strengths.

35 ing among readers, imager manufacturers, and field strengths.

36 shold within the range of in vivo endogenous field strengths.

37 changes in copper levels by MRI at clinical field strengths.

38 led from one another after contact at higher field strengths.

39 a range of Mg2+ concentrations and electric field strengths.

40 separation efficiency and maintaining higher field strengths.

41 loaded states of the protein at two magnetic field strengths.

42 a range of flow rates, particle sizes, and E-field strengths.

43 ll-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) experiments at two B1 field strengths.

44 ehydrated zeolite HY, by using high magnetic-field strengths.

45 olites that would otherwise overlap at lower field strengths.

46 function of acoustic and velocity potential field strengths.

47 s consistent with previous findings at lower field strengths.

48 rs from different vendors and with different field strengths.

49 t different times, thereby probing different field strengths.

50 between 1.0 and 0.12 times recent equatorial field strengths.

51 of variance; the within-subject factors were field strength (0, 1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 T) and state (stati

52 the application of electric fields at a low field strength (0.4V/cm) constant temperature (65 degree

53 ions, we show that a series of pulses at low field strength (0.9 to 1.4 V/cm) is sufficient to entrai

54 lectrode size (10 microm-3 mm), and magnetic field strengths (0-1.77 T) generated with electromagnets

55 the cluster orientation at very low electric field strengths (0.18 V mum(-1) ) is achieved.

56 o determine the impact of different magnetic field strengths (1, 1.5, 3, and 7 T) and the effect of c

57 c examination while in MR units of differing field strengths (1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 T), including a mock

58 phenomenon has only been observed with large field strengths (~10 kV cm(-1)), an obstacle for technol

59 ) diffusivity were measured at high magnetic field strength (11.7T) and analyzed relative to quantita

60 tures (29 and 34 degrees C) and two magnetic field strengths (11.7 and 14.1 T).

61 n concentrations (<or=100 microM) and at two field strengths (14.4 and 18.8 T) for 135 of 162 backbon

62 membranes (20 and 50kDa) and two electrical field strengths (2 and 14V/cm) were used as separation p

63 High field strength (+2 kV/cm) enables rapid second-dimension

64 sses the safety implications of the new high-field-strength (3 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging scan

65 rged perivascular spaces (ePVSs) in clinical-field-strength (3.0-T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging d

66 time, 4.1 ms; echo times, 0.09/1.09/2.09 ms; field strength, 3 T).

67 antitative diffusometry even at low magnetic field strengths (30 MHz).

68 species when employed under modest magnetic field strength (3T) and a data acquisition duration of 1

69 c resonance spectroscopy (1H NMRS) at a high field strength (4 T), assessing a large muscle volume in

70 Larger field strength (400 mV mm(-1)) was required to induce di

71 The bubble cell permitted higher separation field strengths (600 V/cm) and reduced background noise

72 We used high-field strength (7-T) fMRI techniques to image the PAG at

73 atial resolution and tissue contrast at high field strength (7.0 T) MR imaging can be used to consist

74 afted capsules were imaged in vivo with high-field-strength (9.4-T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging,

75 oteins in that it lowers the sigma-donating (field strength) ability of the distal ligand and, theref

76 By increasing the field strength about iron, odd-electron reactivity was c

77 Here we report the existence of a critical field strength above which oppositely charged drops do n

78 further subdivided according to the applied field strength and administration of contrast agent.

79 r MR examination, independent of the applied field strength and administration of gadolinium-based co

80 PDFF estimated by MRI scanners of different field strength and at different sites, accurately classi

81 ating Scale, age, gender, magnetic resonance field strength and Dementia Rating Scale interval.

82 been introduced to quantify the appropriate field strength and frequency for this new adjuvant thera

83 Vs labeled with fluorescent membrane probes, field strength and frequency-dependent vesicle deformati

84 ar reorientation, with dependence on applied field strength and frequency.

85 if the technique can be performed with lower field strength and if changes in fetal or placental oxyg

86 nically-feasible sodium MRI at a moderate 3T field strength and imaging time with fluid attenuation b

87 is trapping can be minimized by lowering the field strength and increasing the time of electrophoresi

88 This technique is independent of field strength and is applicable to a broad range of mol

89 ital (LUMO) energy is governed by the ligand field strength and is related to Lewis acid/base propert

90 lvin-Helmholtz instabilities beyond magnetar field strength and may therefore represent the strongest

91 The magnetic field strength and not the magnet type is important in c

92 in the heliosheath to determine the magnetic field strength and orientation in the interstellar mediu

93 f a stacked-ring ion guide design, where the field strength and pressure ratio can be operated such t

94 manner (the radiologists were unaware of the field strength and prior DSA and MR angiographic results

95 ropriate experimental conditions of magnetic field strength and rotational speed of the capillary.

96 linewidth, an undesirable trade-off between field strength and signal precision occurs.

97 eduction in near-Earth heliospheric magnetic field strength and solar wind speed, and up to a factor

98 ced forms and signal intensity dependence on field strength and temperature) demonstrated that Fdx bi

99 progressively well with increasing magnetic field strength and that the alignment is effectively pre

100 vides mixed information of both the local EM field strength and the local density of states.

101 s a stark boundary as a function of magnetic field strength and toggle frequency distinguishing the t

102 with more homogeneous fields suffer from low field strength and typically cannot probe volumes larger

103 in the record is an increase in both average field strength and variability that is observed to occur

104 ences, as well as for differences related to field strength and vendor, with repeated-measures analys

105 ectional area determining the local electric field strength and, thus, the local interaction time bet

106 , as well as non-DNP spectra at a variety of field strengths and at temperatures in the range 213-243

107 nts of the DNA at several different electric field strengths and extrapolating the results to zero el

108 Higher magnetic field strengths and improved signal detectors have allow

109 Use of higher field strengths and longitudinal studies may reveal a pr

110 By making measurements over a range of field strengths and scan parameters, we tested the key a

111 e in sensitivity and specificity with higher field strengths and should enable the detection of a wid

112 oximately 1 mM(-1)s(-1)) at typical magnetic field strengths and so requires high levels of expressio

113 laxation data measured at different magnetic field strengths and temperatures.

114 head movement nor dynamic change in magnetic field strength) and directional (sensitive to magnetic f

115 nce parameters, spatial resolution, magnetic field strength, and image post-processing, emphasising t

116 peatability across the various manufacturer, field strength, and pulse sequence combinations (n = 10)

117 The overall ICC for all manufacturer, field strength, and sequence combinations (n = 10) was 0

118 iques is highly reproducible across readers, field strengths, and imaging platforms.

119 of variability between imager manufacturers, field strengths, and pulse sequences.

120 ss measurements across imager manufacturers, field strengths, and pulse sequences.

121 This unique structure presents a high-field-strength anionic coordination site, which confers

122 nt thermostability depending on the electric field strength applied.

123 red million volts per centimetre of electric-field strength are required to field-ionize gas species.

124 d that the size of the immunocomplex and the field strength are the critical factors for the separati

125 ly in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET im

126 A field strength as low as 0.12 T offers some signal enhan

127 cularly poorly understood especially at high field strengths as they are rarely encountered at ground

128 tic anisotropy scales with increasing ligand field strength at the iron(II) center.

129 m magneto-rheological fluids by toggling the field strength at varied frequencies.

130 in diameter and to E*, the critical electric field strength at which ion emission from droplets occur

131 The magnetic field strength B increased across this boundary from app

132 Below 140 km, the median field strength became steady but the short period fluctu

133 conditions of pH, temperature, and magnetic field strength, because changes in conditions can distor

134 However, they do mix when their field strength becomes comparable to electron binding en

135 d on these scaling relationships, an optimal field strength becomes identifiable.

136 After PEF treatment at the electric field strength between 0.2 and 0.5kV/cm, AAO became ther

137 Various PEF treatments using electric field strength between 0.2 and 1.2kV/cm and pulsed elect

138 It also examined the potential role of CMR field strength by comparing 1.5-T versus 3.0-T imaging.

139 e obtained in minutes at a moderate magnetic field strength by using dynamic nuclear polarization (DN

140 -sized magnetic features, in which the local field strength can greatly exceed that of the global-sca

141 ed by the progress in parallel imaging, high-field-strength cardiac MR imaging, and other technical a

142 de that RH421 detects intramembrane electric field strength changes arising from charge transport ass

143 aracterizing the optimal electrode geometry, field strength, channel configuration, and electrophoret

144 rements across all three imager manufacturer-field strength combinations also showed excellent interi

145 Increased field strength consistently results in water-filling and

146 opriately adjusting temperature and electric field strength could facilitate their applications in 2D

147 Ex vivo high field strength DTI measurements of fractional anisotropy

148 anet, little is known about Earth's magnetic field strength during that time.

149 ed is increased in proportion to the reduced field strength E/N (N is the carrier gas number density)

150 c field (PEF) treatment at moderate and high field strengths (E=0.8kV/cm & 5kV/cm) prior and during a

151 a function of pulse duration, tau, delivered field strength, ED, and pulse number, n.

152 e field to the material (for a peak electric field strength exceeding 2.5 volts per angstrom) in turn

153 This study establishes the use of high-field strength fMRI as a promising technique for reveali

154 We infer a surface magnetic field strength for the white dwarf in MV Lyrae of betwee

155 here was a strong level of agreement between field strengths for all morphologic variables, with ICCs

156 ng to explain the observed range of magnetic field strengths for isolated, high-field magnetic white

157 ntials needed to achieve 100's V/cm electric field strengths for rapid electrophoresis.

158 nelle channels, and even sufficient, at some field strengths, for the poration of organelle membranes

159 Here I obtain an indirect estimate for the field strength from measurements of tidal dissipation.

160 20 cm respectively in the range of magnetic field strengths from 0 to 200 mT.

161 F processing variables studied were electric field strength (from 0.4 to 2.0kV/cm) and number of puls

162 of-saturation profiles at two radiofrequency field strengths gives an estimate for k(off) of 73 s(-1)

163 ical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at low field strength has yet to fully visualize the exocrine,

164 Field strengths have been inferred on T Tauri stars and

165 de (high vs low) was compared with ultrahigh-field-strength high-resolution GRE MR analysis by using

166 Ultrahigh-field-strength high-resolution GRE MR imaging and histop

167 tified as a tumoral pseudoblush at ultrahigh-field-strength high-resolution GRE MR imaging without co

168 Due to limitations in scanner field strength, however, the functional neuroanatomy of

169 se a well-trained operator, those with 1.5-T field strength imaging units, and those with longer time

170 The unique changes in the axial field strength implied by the variable zero-field splitt

171 An estimate of the electric field strength in the CT state yields approximately 25 M

172 We find that the field strength in the local interstellar medium is 3.7-5

173 on velocity near the wave tip decreased with field strength in the region of depolarization at the ob

174 is still a challenge to obtain the required field strengths in free space from table-top laser syste

175 by standard UV photolithography, with local field strengths in the multi-ten-MV/cm range at kHz repe

176 out amplification, producing modest electric field strengths in the nanochannels (0.2-2 kV/cm) and en

177 Treating fruit mash with a moderate electric field strength increased juice yield and improved juice

178 eakage of nicked subchromosomal fragments is field strength independent, some high-molecular-weight s

179 e studied cases is quadrupolar dominated and field-strength independent.

180 The measured field strength is approximately 50 to 70% that of the pr

181 When the field strength is comparable to or greater than the spec

182 The field strength is consistent to within an estimated unce

183 This critical field strength is determined by the properties of the ex

184 he pulse amplitudes increase as the electric field strength is increased.

185 The field strength is proportional to the 0.4th power of the

186 s as a function of frequency offset and B(1) field strength is quantified to obtain the minor-state p

187 ability to scale to multi-megavolt-per-metre field strengths is demonstrated.

188 We find that field strengths larger than ~10(5) gauss may produce the

189 factor-of-2 equator-to-pole increase in mean field strength, leaving the core dynamo process an enigm

190 The presence of a high field strength ligand such as an NHC in the complexes gi

191 Higher field strength magnetic resonance imaging is a promising

192 We used high field strength magnetic resonance microscopy (muMRI) to

193 ntration ratio (PCr/ATP) was similar at both field strengths (mean +/- standard deviation, 1.48 +/- 0

194 By specifically varying gradient field strength, molecular displacement in a tissue can b

195 ing, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager.

196 inflammation that can be seen with clinical-field-strength MR imaging and use of the enzyme-sensitiv

197 caling level, no damage was observed at high-field-strength MR imaging or histologic examination 8 da

198 Ultrahigh-field-strength MR imaging permitted detection of selecti

199 adily visualized with positive-contrast high-field-strength MR imaging, micro-CT, and US both in vitr

200 High-field-strength MR microscopy yielded pronounced differen

201 ween sequences while fixing manufacturer and field strength (n = 8).

202 e sequences across manufacturers (n = 4) and field strengths (n = 5), respectively.

203 Spectrometers now offer the field strengths necessary to visualize mammalian cells b

204 oscopy and the availability of high magnetic field strengths now offer the possibility to record real

205 the risks associated with MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 tesla for patients who had a pacem

206 dy to assess the safety of MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 Tesla in 1509 patients who had a p

207 or clinically indicated nonthoracic MRI at a field strength of 1.5 tesla.

208 crease by at least eightfold at the clinical field strength of 3 T.

209 ved homogeneity over all liver segments at a field strength of 3.0 T.

210 At optimal PEF parameters: electric field strength of 3kV/cm and pulse width of 10mus after

211 he best separation efficiency at an electric field strength of 400 V/cm.

212 one source, we have inferred a high magnetic field strength of 5 x 10(13) G.

213 ded on all three aporepressors at a magnetic field strength of 600 MHz ((1)H Larmor frequency) were a

214 PMMA micro-chip was tested under an electric field strength of 705 V cm-1.

215 a separation length of 22 cm and an electric field strength of 750 V/cm, analysis times were less tha

216 ion, and in one case we infer a minimum core field strength of approximately 10(7) gauss.

217 The vortex-assisted lysis only requires a field strength of approximately 100 V/cm, yet it efficie

218 When combined with the field strength of carbonyl ligands, such high coordinati

219 urotransmission because, enabled by the high field strength of the animal scanner, we detected a prof

220 The change in field strength of the bis(imino)pyridine coupled with th

221 e terahertz (THz) range requires significant field strength of the light fields.

222 wo replicate examinations, and, finally, the field strength of the MR imaging unit.

223 low rates of 8 mL/min and less, and electric field strengths of 25 V/cm and greater.

224 emonstrated in glycogen phantoms at magnetic field strengths of 4.7 and 9.4 T, showing improved detec

225 ponential decay pulses with initial electric field strengths of approximately 13.3 kV/cm and approxim

226 this bond is able to withstand high applied field strengths of at least up to 4 kV x cm (-1).

227 potentials of up to approximately 1500 V and field strengths of up to 3000 V/cm, using a standard Ag/

228 etic injection and separation were used with field strengths of up to 400 V/cm.

229 cterize the effects of pressure and electric field strength on compensation voltage, ion transmission

230 ting grapes using moderate and high electric field strength on the enhancement of CI and TPI of the w

231 e of the sensitivity factors and the plasmon field strength on the wall thickness and the size of the

232 d spin relaxation rates at multiple magnetic field strengths on the C-terminal domain of the nucleopr

233 tly related to either the simulated electric field strength or the distance between the IRE electrode

234 ime, without altering the separation column, field strength, or electrolyte system.

235 subject (P < .005), k-space (P < .005), and field strength (P = .02) for sensitivity and subject (P

236 oning, NASH diagnosis, fibrosis, or magnetic field strength (P = .65).

237 ores without hemorrhage were similar between field strengths (P = .9).

238 No significant influences of higher field strength, postcontrast acquisition, or qualitative

239 nd strongly affected by non-uniform electric field strength profile.

240 ts performed over 310-140 K and two magnetic field strengths provide insights into conformational var

241 age of highly focused and localized electric field strength provided by the micronozzle array over co

242 pillary interactions by exceeding a critical field strength, providing unprecedented control of the b

243 Previous estimates of the field strength range from 1.8-2.5 microG and the field w

244 nd relaxivities were determined at different field strengths ranging from 0.47 to 11.7 T.

245 min using broad-range ampholytes at electric field strengths ranging from 25 to 100 V/cm.

246 o width ratios as a function of the electric field strength ratio in the control channels and first-d

247 We propose that the recurrence of low field strengths reflects core flux expulsion promoted by

248 The threshold field strength required to drive transport, the threadin

249 (continuous, proportional to static magnetic field strength, requiring neither head movement nor dyna

250 A range of electric field strengths resulting in transient electroporation w

251 Small pockets of low magnetic field strength, small radius of curvature, and high elec

252 ion to being able to simulate spectra at any field strength, spin parameters can be adjusted to syste

253 ar, functional MR imaging paradigm, magnetic field strength, statistical threshold, and analysis soft

254 ion revealed changes not visible using lower field strengths, such as hippocampal subfield atrophy in

255 ithin a nanofunnel at sub-threshold electric field strengths, suggesting the utility of nanofunnels a

256 cally improved with the introduction of high-field-strength superconducting magnets, digital RF syste

257 We find 3.2-Gyr-old field strengths that are within 50 per cent of the prese

258 Ancient field strengths that range from those similar to Mercury

259 Even at high electric field strengths the cell remained largely intact and mos

260 At higher field strengths, the increased susceptibility of calcifi

261 At clinically relevant field strengths, the relaxivities of the complexes are c

262 ion with the pores, but at sufficiently high field strengths, the T = 3 and T = 4 capsids had the sam

263 hereas the drops coalesce as expected at low field strengths, they are repelled from one another afte

264 as they electromigrated at varying electric field strength through a crystalline array of silica col

265 nditions of electrophoresis such as electric field strength, time of electrophoresis, switch time, an

266 ic energy barrier while limiting the driving field strength to a small fraction of the applied electr

267 e was used to compare the simulated electric field strength to histologic findings.

268 on requires restricting the maximum possible field strength to much less than the spectral linewidth

269 fold improvement in the ratio of the maximum field strength to precision, for field magnitudes that a

270 is, (b) avoid the need for multiple magnetic field strengths to extract dynamic parameters, (c) measu

271 insects, however, can approach close to high field strength transmission lines prompting the question

272 At low field strengths, transport of the larger T = 4 capsid th

273 were treated with PEF at different electric field strengths up to 1.2kV/cm.

274 ves applied to the device generated electric field strengths up to 1.3 x 10(5) V/cm at the tips of th

275 separation can be performed at high average field strengths (up to 1.6 kV/cm) without encountering t

276 set results from the differences in electric field strength used in the techniques.

277 tremor at different levels of gravitational field strength using a human centrifuge, thereby increas

278 ical shift anisotropy (CSA) at high magnetic field strengths varies.

279 ICC according to field strength was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.88) at 1.5 T (n

280 cell membrane happened within 30 ms when the field strength was 1200 V/cm.

281 hamster ovary cells occurred when the local field strength was increased to approximately 400 V/cm.

282 )2Fe6(L')m](n+) in which the terminal ligand field strength was modulated from weak to strong (L' = D

283 We found that magnetic field strength was nearly constant throughout this time,

284 ent intensities, cycle length increased with field strength, was sustained for the duration of the pu

285 ifuge to increase head-to-foot gravitational field strength, we were able to control for the increase

286 dic channel and applying a range of electric field strengths, we produce protocells that exhibit repe

287 uctural parameters obtained at each magnetic field strength were compared in corresponding sections.

288 ogic characteristics, and simulated electric field strengths were assessed.

289 Continuous variables from different field strengths were compared by using the intraclass co

290 Electric field strengths were strongest in superficial brain regi

291 esidue-by-residue variations in the magnetic field strengths where TROSY line narrowing is most effec

292 Blood oxygenation was quantified at 3.0-T field strength with a field mapping pulse sequence yield

293 ransmission images exhibited areas of low B1 field strength with reduced image contrast.

294 available spectrometers of varying magnetic field strengths with a standard 5 mm probe setup.

295 e forms of BSA detected at elevated electric field strengths (with and without urea).

296 et only approximately 60% of the present-day field strength, with a long-term average virtual axial d

297 onic current with a greatly reduced electric field strength, with particular benefits for live cell i

298 t this curling behavior at least doubles the field strength within shocked prey, most likely ensuring

299 ent and bursting emission, implying that the field strength within the star's outer crust is orders o

300 with experiment for three different magnetic field strengths without adjusting any parameters.