ライフサイエンスコーパス: floral

1 Both substances smell citrussy, fresh and floral.

2 Floral abscission is controlled by the leucine-rich repe

3 Declines in floral abundances were associated with drought and reduc

4 NA interference had significantly attenuated floral accumulations of defensive compounds known to be

5 l transition by repressing the expression of floral activator genes such as CONSTANS (CO) and FLOWERI

6 a floral repressor and TgSOC1-like2 being a floral activator in tulip.

7 eriods leading to elevated expression of the floral activator, FT-like gene FTa1.

8 lating the onset of expression of the potent floral activator, FTa1.

9 ce of currency affects the interpretation of floral allocation responses to the environment.

10 to characterize the genetic architecture of floral allocation, including its sensitivity to environm

11 oury to fresh green, citrus, tropical fruit, floral and confectionery.

12 uta, such that LFY has more obvious roles in floral and leaf development in C. hirsuta than in A. tha

13 ce the connectivity of populations and erode floral and nesting resources to undermine pollinator abu

14 We propose that activation of a floral antagonist that promotes SAM growth in concert wi

15 atisfying explanation for how this conserved floral architecture is genetically specified.

16 olite profile of fruit vinegar with a slight floral aroma profile derived from pineapple waste.

17 ub-fraction presented a much more noticeable floral aroma than the distillate obtained with a traditi

18 ecific distillate fractions to emphasize its floral aroma.

19 ers and acetates), grassy notes (3-hexenol), floral aromas (2-phenylethanol and beta-linalool) and ch

20 isoprenoids, responsible for white fruit and floral aromas, were higher in wines from the right bank

21 rough pollinator responses to differences in floral attractants, and that the effects of water on pol

22 hat such effects occur through alteration of floral attractants.

23 attributes and increased positive fruity and floral attributes.

24 criptomes from these same organs, those from floral bud are evolutionarily youngest and least conserv

25 strand-specific RNA-seq data from seedling, floral bud, and root of 19 Arabidopsis thaliana accessio

26 of early flower development and showed that floral buds developed more slowly at 15 degrees C versus

27 In summary, the growth and maturation of floral buds is associated with variable petal number in

28 rom cold-pressed saffron (Crocus sativus L.) floral by-products were evaluated as a potential source

29 LHGW, but in IHGW declined, while terpenic, floral, chemical, pungent and ripe fruit aroma compound

30 es of mutations in a single gene controlling floral chemicals influenced pollinator preferences, like

31 We investigated early season (April and May) floral choice by honey bees provided with a very high di

32 that may drive macroevolutionary patterns of floral color.

33 On the other hand, pollinators memorize floral colors as consistent advertisements of reward qua

34 have been key to the remarkable diversity of floral colour patterns and pollination systems.

35 his sexual trimorphism, plants can also show floral colour polymorphism.

36 Age, as a threshold of floral competence acquisition, prevents precocious flowe

37 nd recent N loadings (TN, NO2 + NO3), chl-a, floral composition, and net primary productivity (NPP) t

38 rs preferred wines with prominent red fruit, floral, confectionery and honey characters, and without

39 ature patterns may therefore represent a new floral cue that could assist pollinators in the recognit

40 , pollinators could employ a specific set of floral cues regardless of environment.

41 pairwise comparisons in the absence of other floral cues, B impatiens workers still preferred pollen

42 By successively reducing environmental and floral cues, we analyzed pollen-foraging preferences of

43 ying any a priori assumptions concerning the floral cues, we measured, predicted, and finally artific

44 tes to the suppressive function of NaJAZi on floral defenses.

45 y in changes to local community diversity of floral-dependent species, but also in shifts in seasonal

46 reen with ag-10 plants, which exhibit a weak floral determinacy defect, and isolated a mutant with a

47 defect, and isolated a mutant with a strong floral determinacy defect.

48 round to isolate mutations that suppress the floral determinacy defect.

49 m transposition events for the regulators of floral development (APETALA3 and PI) and flowering time

50 sed as a genetic framework for understanding floral development and evolution.

51 Ppd-H1 or a mutant Hvelf3 allele accelerated floral development and maintained the seed number under

52 in Ppd-H1 prevalent in spring barley delayed floral development and reduced the number of florets and

53 loid genome and exhibits many vegetative and floral development complexities.

54 Ppd-H1 only accelerated floral development in the background of a spring HvVRN1

55 y role in the progression from vegetative to floral development, and in woody perennials SVP-like gen

56 ical patterning of global gene expression in floral development, and supports the roles of "faded ABC

57 hat crucial links, central to the control of floral development, may already have existed before the

58 e pathways while VRN-A1 genetically promoted floral development.

59 etween petals and other floral organs during floral development.

60 uantitative trait loci (QTL) responsible for floral differences.

61 Although the magnitude and direction of floral differentiation varied between regions, sympatric

62 han that of many animal displays because the floral diffraction grating is not perfectly regular [5-9

63 ypothesis in Aconitum gymnandrum by studying floral display and rewards, pollinator visitation, and p

64 quantified pollinator-mediated selection on floral display area, inflorescence height and corolla le

65 onship of fitness to inflorescence height or floral display area.

66 linator body size, plant size (as a proxy of floral display), local plant density, and local plant ki

67 drought universally reduced flower size and floral display, but there were species-specific effects

68 tentially leading to geographic variation in floral divergence between allopatric and sympatric popul

69 opy is common among the loci responsible for floral divergence.

70 ew that abiotic selection is associated with floral diversification among species.

71 In this review, we explore the evolution of floral diversity, focusing on our recent understanding o

72 ntinuing through several transitions between floral dominance by lignin-poor lycopsids and lignin-ric

73 es, allowing us to examine the trajectory of floral evolution over time.

74 ation influences the tempo and trajectory of floral evolution.

75 OsMADS1 controls rice (Oryza sativa) floral fate and organ development.

76 m as a determinate structure that can assume floral fate upon ectopic GhUFO expression.

77 ibed as "sensory billboards" [10], with many floral features contributing to a conspicuous display th

78 toolkit underlies the development of diverse floral forms among angiosperms.

79 rget genes contribute to the wide variety of floral forms that we see within and across species.

80 at has allowed an almost infinite variety of floral forms to emerge.

81 ly, and tissue-specifically regulated in the floral/fruit/pedicel tissues of pea.

82 Floral, fruity, and honey-like notes were perceived at s

83 as much in A. dorsata and A. florea), these floral generalists detected and avoided BA as strongly a

84 Floral headspace samples collected in the field were sur

85 Floral headspace samples contained microbial-associated

86 the current S locus assemblage which led to floral heteromorphy in Primula.

87 Duplication of a floral homeotic gene 51.7 million years (Myr) ago, follo

88 ess FTa1 and other suites of genes including floral homeotic genes.

89 Among the floral honeys, the highest concentrations were found in

90 2b, FT2c and FT2d that are homologues of the floral inducer FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT).

91 axillary meristems in phyB-1 from precocious floral induction and decrease bud sensitivity to sugar s

92 Inter-annual variation in floral induction and the degree to which seeding is reso

93 icitly capturing the interaction between the floral induction cue and internal resource state underly

94 dopsis thaliana), very little is known about floral induction in tulip.

95 We find support for resource-limited floral induction with multiple empirical models consiste

96 resentation of genes potentially involved in floral induction, bulb maturation, and dormancy establis

97 rs renders Arabidopsis plants incompetent to floral inductive signals, including long-day (LD) photop

98 Floral initiation is regulated by various genetic pathwa

99 Notably, these include key regulators of floral initiation such as TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1), which

100 Following floral initiation, the level of sucrose and other non-st

101 y in leaves of the sweet sorghum Della until floral initiation, then stems until anthesis, followed b

102 o obtain deeper insights into the control of floral initiation, we monitored the activity of LFY in t

103 yl elongation and long-day (LD) promotion of floral initiation.

104 lack phytochrome B (58M, phyB-1) until after floral initiation.

105 e amplitude of clock genes and repressed the floral integrator gene FLOWERING LOCUS T1 independently

106 The behavioral impacts of floral iridescence and its potential ecological signific

107 However, "imperfect" floral iridescence does not lead to mistaken target iden

108 Yet floral iridescence is more subtle to the human eye than

109 role of petal microstructure in influencing floral light capture and optics, analysing colour, gloss

110 ogenitor morphology) increases with time for floral limb shape and tube length, and that most polyplo

111 ughput DNA sequencing (SELEX-seq) on several floral MADS domain protein homo- and heterodimers to mea

112 teractions affect DNA binding specificity of floral MADS domain proteins.

113 ounds are shown to be plant species-specific floral markers due to their appearance in specific unifl

114 ic volatile compounds which could be used as floral markers.

115 ues such as the inflorescence meristem (IM), floral meristem (FM), and carpel margin meristem (CMM).

116 This extended phase of floral meristem formation, coupled with slower growth of

117 biosynthetic gene EaGA3ox1 and GA-responsive floral meristem identity gene EaLFY were absent in both

118 eased transcription of LHP1 targets, such as floral meristem identity genes, which are more likely to

119 apical auxin signaling domains in the early floral meristem remnants allowing for lateral domain ide

120 the inflorescence stem, and early arrest of floral meristems and floral organ primordia.

121 and lengthened the time interval over which floral meristems matured.

122 sults suggest that WOX function in shoot and floral meristems of Arabidopsis is restricted to the mod

123 qJAG was strongly expressed in shoot apices, floral meristems, lateral root primordia and all lateral

124 ume primordia of spikelet pair meristems and floral meristems, respectively.

125 ing found in all shoot meristems, but not in floral meristems, with the level and distribution changi

126 source (e.g. tropical forests), this form of floral mimicry could represent a common mimicry class wi

127 rstanding the perceptual biases exploited by floral mimicry illuminates the evolution of these signal

128 We place this review in the context of floral mimicry of a broader spectrum of nonfloral resour

129 Interestingly, floral mimicry of fruit is least documented in the liter

130 his review, we summarize current research on floral mimicry of fruit.

131 Floral mimicry of nonfloral resources is found across ma

132 of plant species can have a major impact on floral morphology and capacity of autonomous selfing, mo

133 of reciprocity based on theory that relates floral morphology to reproductive fitness.

134 ined the relationship between mating system, floral morphology, interspecific and interpopulation com

135 We conclude that floral nanostructures have evolved, on multiple independ

136 Honey bees feed on floral nectar and pollen that they store in their coloni

137 Microbes commonly inhabit floral nectar and the common species differ in volatile

138 ssues and the presence of such substances in floral nectar means that pollinators often encounter the

139 cinerea had a positive impact on fruity and floral notes while several earthy smelling compounds wer

140 ion with such mutants, hws loses its delayed floral organ abscission ("skirt") phenotype, suggesting

141 s auxin-mediated ovary patterning as well as floral organ abscission and lateral organ lamina outgrow

142 Floral organ abscission and lateral root emergence are b

143 STTM160-expressing plants displayed abnormal floral organ abscission, and produced leaves, sepals and

144 of its downstream genes that are involved in floral organ and silique growth is still incomplete.

145 ding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the floral organ arrangement in Arabidopsis thaliana.

146 factors with partially overlapping roles in floral organ development in Arabidopsis thaliana.

147 ped, and loci related to nitrogen uptake and floral organ development were located within mapped quan

148 r relationships, cumulatively contributes to floral organ development.

149 Floral organ identities in plants are specified by the c

150 tic networks underlying the determination of floral organ identity are well studied, but much less is

151 more diverse than the well-conserved B and C floral organ identity functions.

152 s controlling the spatial restriction of the floral organ identity genes are more diverse than the we

153 1/tpc.117.tt1117/FIG1F1fig1A basic model for floral organ identity has been developed using model sys

154 ese genes suggest that ANT and AIL6 regulate floral organ initiation and growth through modifications

155 greening, hypocotyl elongation, phyllotaxy, floral organ initiation, accessory meristem formation, f

156 of AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE6 at high levels alters floral organ initiation, growth and identity specificati

157 ral aspects of flower development, including floral organ initiation, identity specification, growth,

158 d symmetry can change, and the ways in which floral organ position can be varied.

159 em, and early arrest of floral meristems and floral organ primordia.

160 ss the various ways in which flower size and floral organ size can be modified, the means by which fl

161 ANT:gAIL6 can rescue the floral organ size defects of ant mutants when AIL6 is ex

162 erent, the same general organization of four floral organ types arranged in concentric whorls exists

163 als, stamens and carpels, with each of these floral organ types having a unique role in reproduction

164 lls in the Arabidopsis sepal, a reproducible floral organ.

165 istem identity genes LEAFY (LFY) and UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO) in Gerbera hybrida, we show that GhU

166 Overexpression of UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS also alters C. hirsuta leaf shape in an LF

167 ly expressed to ensure proper development of floral organs and fruits, which are essential for genera

168 l phenotypes that include reduced numbers of floral organs and the production of mosaic floral organs

169 cal adhesion forces between petals and other floral organs during floral development.

170 Stepwise conversion of floral organs into leaves in the most severe RNA interfe

171 omics interrogation of gene expression among floral organs of wild type and "formal double" and "anem

172 postpones the development of cold-sensitive floral organs until the spring.

173 ng primordia initiation and distal growth of floral organs, and laminar development of leaflets.

174 suggest that the miR156/SPL2 pathway affects floral organs, silique development and plant fertility,

175 By combining silicone flower parts with real floral organs, we created chimeras that identified the m

176 sive transcriptomic data from vegetative and floral organs.

177 f floral organs and the production of mosaic floral organs.

178 nt marginal growth to leaves, cotyledons and floral organs.

179 nes to specify the identity of each whorl of floral organs.

180 The betacyanins content from the floral parts of G. globosa is higher than those normally

181 lower shape and visible color but vary in UV floral pattern.

182 ers in cultivated camellias are divergent in floral patterns which present a rich resource for demons

183 Over 43 years, aspects of floral phenology changed in ways that indicate species-s

184 rmined (1) growth-inhibiting effects of nine floral phytochemicals and (2) variation in phytochemical

185 Combining comparative studies of floral pigmentation and geography can reveal the bioclim

186 of the covariation of UV-B irradiance and UV floral pigmentation from within species to that among sp

187 Losses of floral pigmentation represent one of the most common evo

188 Although most floral pigmentation studies have focused on how pigment

189 cum, a gynodioecious plant with a light/dark floral polymorphism.

190 between light conditions and the autonomous floral promotion pathway in Arabidopsis.

191 We provide evidence that current floral quartets specifying male organ identity, which co

192 is an aggregate fruit consisting of a fleshy floral receptacle that bears a cluster of real dry fruit

193 petala1 (ap1) alleles in a mutant screen for floral regulators in C. hirsuta.

194 We found that LFY and AP1 are conserved floral regulators that act nonredundantly in C. hirsuta,

195 bined mapping results indicate that although floral regulatory network genes contribute substantially

196 g next-generation sequencing and identifying floral-related genes that are differentially expressed b

197 time phenotypes in line with TgTFL1 being a floral repressor and TgSOC1-like2 being a floral activat

198 studies have overestimated the effect of the floral repressor FLC on flowering time by using constant

199 es with Polycomb to mediate silencing of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) during the proc

200 e of TERMINAL FLOWER1 (FvTFL1) as the causal floral repressor.

201 the shoot apical meristem, the expression of floral repressors in tulip is suppressed by increased am

202 e medial domain of the gynoecium, the female floral reproductive structure.

203 suggests that climate-driven alterations in floral resource phenology can play a critical role in go

204 This national-scale assessment of floral resource provision affords new insights into the

205 ities against the effects of drought-induced floral resource scarcity.

206 Bombus vosnesenskii colonies in relation to floral resources and land use.

207 nd A. mellifera, species that share the same floral resources and predators.

208 Queen production increased with floral resources and was higher in semi-natural areas th

209 y less compared to natural habitats in which floral resources are relatively scarce in the dry summer

210 hat conservation interventions that increase floral resources at a landscape scale and throughout the

211 ple pressures facing pollinators, decreasing floral resources due to habitat loss and degradation has

212 ed long-term data to examine how climate and floral resources have changed over time.

213 t the importance of direct and indirect (via floral resources) climate effects on the interannual abu

214 igh-value foraging habitat, including spring floral resources, within 250-1,000 m of the natal colony

215 mbus numbers also correlated with diminished floral resources.

216 s of climate on the temporal distribution of floral resources.

217 Floral rewards are known to vary between sexually dimorp

218 Here we show that overall floral rewards can be estimated at a national scale by c

219 within a species may have complex effects on floral rewards.

220 We address this gap by manipulating floral scent bouquets in the field.

221 Manipulation of floral scent bouquets led to quantitative as well as qua

222 tive principal pathway to the characteristic floral scent compound 2-phenylethanol (2PE) in roses.

223 We found that floral scent functions to increase the fitness of indivi

224 Previously, we have shown that floral scent is important to mediate pollen transfer bet

225 Indeed, we found that the floral scent of C. sandersonii is comparable to volatile

226 lored upright spathe, profuse flowering, and floral scent, some of which have been introgressed into

227 ind-tunnel assays to explore the function of floral scent.

228 Thus, floral scents may be of major importance in partitioning

229 he insects' species-specific preferences for floral scents, rather than for visual or morphological f

230 e reconstruct the evolutionary shift towards floral simulation in orchid mantises and suggest female

231 tion from camouflaged, ambush predation to a floral simulation strategy, gaining access to, and visua

232 oncentration cut-off was established for the floral source-specific markers: leptosperin (94mg/kg), l

233 y higher H2O2 levels in plant tissues at the floral stage.

234 Early floral stages constitutively accumulate greater amounts

235 maintenance gene WUSCHEL (WUS) to terminate floral stem cell fate, AP2 promotes the expression of WU

236 role of AP2 in promoting the maintenance of floral stem cell fate, not by repressing AG transcriptio

237 change their fate from female to male, while floral stem cells proliferate longer, allowing for the p

238 istantly related plant with a very different floral structure.

239 f novel functions, such as the production of floral structures, induction of disease resistance, and

240 er taste, astringency, bitter, caramel-like, floral/sweet, green/grassy, hay-like, malty, roasty, and

241 Our results highlight that while floral symmetry genes such as RAY3 and SvDIV1B appear to

242 vate RAY2 This highlights how recruitment of floral symmetry regulators into dynamic networks was cru

243 Using a floral synchronization system and a SHATTERPROOF2 (SHP2)

244 We report here that floral temperature often differs between different parts

245 Floral temperature patterns may therefore represent a ne

246 One such cue is floral temperature, created by captured sunlight or plan

247 tems honey bees also encounter pesticides as floral tissue contaminants.

248 performed transcriptome sequencing on mature floral tissue from both SI and SC species, constructed a

249 ferential expression analysis of contrasting floral tissue transcriptomes was employed to illuminate

250 ndicated that AtHEMN1 is expressed mainly in floral tissues and developing seeds.

251 aJAZi, specifically expressed in early-stage floral tissues.

252 lutionary association between honey bees and floral tissues.

253 ction by altering their membrane polarity in floral tissues.

254 Rose wine aromas range from fruity and floral, to more developed, savoury characters.

255 likewise show that anther-stigma distance, a floral trait associated with self-fertilisation in this

256 Floral trait differences between related species may pla

257 While most floral trait values, including corolla size and nectar,

258 the development of an ecologically important floral trait.

259 tcrossing rates, heterozygosity and relevant floral traits across populations of Dalechampia scandens

260 In this study, we investigated variation in floral traits and its implications on the capacity of au

261 Extensive covariation between floral traits and mating system among closely related po

262 ost on plant reproduction through changes in floral traits and pollinator visitation, along with dire

263 were always significantly more divergent in floral traits and the capacity to self autonomously than

264 Floral traits and the relative contribution of autonomou

265 f angiosperms, using the largest data set of floral traits ever assembled.

266 ly related populations further suggests that floral traits influencing mating systems track variation

267 as a key driving force for the evolution of floral traits of an alpine ginger (Roscoea purpurea) and

268 hesis that, when pollinators are unreliable, floral traits promoting autonomous selfing evolve as a m

269 es and costs of hybridization can select for floral traits that reduce interspecific gene flow and co

270 n intensity and selection gradients for five floral traits, including flowering phenology.

271 plots and measured effects on vegetative and floral traits, pollinator visitation and seed set.

272 tation, and pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits.

273 nts, rather than for visual or morphological floral traits.

274 68773 predicted ortholog (N13TAR) originates floral transcript variants shorter than the canonical ma

275 plant could interact with FD to regulate the floral transition and that this function was reduced due

276 d its homologs play an important role in the floral transition by repressing the expression of floral

277 wer, and reveals the positive role of GAs in floral transition in perennials.

278 l, but the underlying molecular mechanism of floral transition in sorghum is poorly understood.

279 three genes are expressed in the leaf at the floral transition initiation stage, expressed early in g

280 ist that promotes SAM growth in concert with floral transition protects it from such terminating effe

281 However, even after the floral transition, ER and ERL1 prevented precocious init

282 Upon floral transition, the hypocotyl xylem gained a competen

283 erative to mediate FTIP1 function during the floral transition.

284 kmoths more frequently pollinate plants with floral tube lengths similar to their proboscis lengths (

285 tinguished them from other New Zealand honey floral types.

286 Floral UV pattern was present in half of the species, wh

287 rovide more nuanced information to potential floral visitors and may be relatively more important tha

288 We observed floral visitors to two species of Schiedea and conducted

289 y associated with pollinator attraction, (2) floral VOCs, and (3) the visitation rates and community

290 ing two independent biosynthetic pathways of floral volatile compounds.

291 nge have the potential to strongly influence floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and, in turn, p

292 henone appears to be previously unknown as a floral volatile.

293 Here, Nicotiana attenuata plants, in which floral volatiles have been genetically silenced and its

294 ize and colour, but Z. natalensis emits more floral volatiles in the evening and presents flowers ver

295 nction (but not the C-function) in the first floral whorl, together with BEN We propose a combinatori

296 en, phosphorus, and biomass allocation among floral whorls in recombinant inbred lines of Brassica ra

297 confines the C-function to the inner petunia floral whorls, in parallel with the microRNA BLINDBEN be

298 best known for its function in the outer two floral whorls, where it specifies the identities of sepa

299 nd to antagonize the C-function in the outer floral whorls.

300 sses petal growth, confirming their roles in floral zygomorphy.