コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ntagonizing AG activity in the center of the flower.
2 tated the evolution of the perfect, bisexual flower.
3 f reproductive versus perianth organs in the flower.
4 e SAM, usually by its differentiation into a flower.
5 in the recognition and learning of rewarding flowers.
6 re patterns comparable to those seen in real flowers.
7 ction and proteasome activity feminized male flowers.
8 al influenced microbial beta diversity among flowers.
9 not carrying any reward, or resembling real flowers.
10 solitary flower but are composed of multiple flowers.
11 impeded fertilization only on opposite-morph flowers.
12 e developmental program for the formation of flowers.
13 ch earlier than the appearance of angiosperm flowers.
14 ) that removed vernalization requirement for flowering.
15 ckground show early, photoperiod-insensitive flowering.
16 repressing COL2 in cultivated cotton delays flowering.
17 teracting genetic variation for dormancy and flowering.
18 (F-box of flowering 2) negatively regulates flowering.
19 hat reduce Hd3a and RFT1 expression to delay flowering.
20 t simply due to a delay in the transition to flowering.
21 on of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), which promotes flowering.
22 ion is a critical mechanism in photoperiodic flowering.
23 ) and positive (Germany) effects during crop flowering.
24 nally, loss of JMJ27 function leads to early flowering.
25 iations by monitoring day length to initiate flowering.
26 ion of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and PERPETUAL FLOWERING 1 (PEP1), two orthologous MADS-box TFs that re
31 pid-flowering accession Bd21 and the delayed-flowering accession Bd1-1 were grown in a variety of env
32 ation derived from a cross between the rapid-flowering accession Bd21 and the delayed-flowering acces
35 gene was expressed in all organs except the flower and its expression was induced by various stresse
36 ) in phloem companion cells results in early flowering and a decreased sensitivity to photoperiod in
37 Spatial and temporal overlap between mass flowering and co-blooming crops alters the strength and
38 ), two orthologous MADS-box TFs that repress flowering and confer vernalization requirement in the Br
39 as having restricted root growth, being late flowering and displaying an overall delayed growth pheno
41 as9-engineered mutations in SP5G cause rapid flowering and enhance the compact determinate growth hab
42 reased tolerance to high temperatures during flowering and grain filling using donors such as NL-44,
44 lose correspondence between the phenology of flowering and the detection of plants within the honey.
47 enological data (number of flower buds, open flowers and fruits) from specimens of two common New Eng
49 mporal emission of volatile attractants from flowers and leaves, enabling attraction of the predators
52 heet into a face, a cylindrical sheet into a flower, and a flat sheet into a complex canyon-like stru
53 targets regulations in the control of double flowers, and we found that miR172-AP2, miR156-SPLs were
57 study, we report that exogenous treatment of flowering Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants with
64 and to make these plants competent to induce flowering at low postvernalisation temperatures in the s
66 ncreased within-season fecundity in an early-flowering background, but decreased it in a late-floweri
68 hat peach PpeS6PDH gene is down-regulated in flower buds after dormancy release, concomitantly with c
70 postulated to mediate sorbitol synthesis in flower buds of peach concomitantly with specific chromat
71 workers collect phenological data (number of flower buds, open flowers and fruits) from specimens of
73 rticularly at northern latitudes, where late-flowering but southern-adapted varieties have high winte
78 emonstrate that alkaloids enhance pollinator flower constancy, opening new perspectives in co-evoluti
80 re climates (decades 2060 and 2090), showing flower date change varies considerably across the landsc
81 sponse to reductions in diversity, with peak flowering date advancing an average of 0.6 days per spec
85 sis is entirely blocked at an early stage in Flower-deficient CTLs and is rescued to wild-type level
88 FY and its MADS-box gene targets, central to flower development, might also contribute to gymnosperm
92 novo assembly of the transcriptome of three flower developmental stages from the three Vitis vinifer
94 w that bumblebees can distinguish artificial flowers differing in temperature patterns comparable to
97 grassland and found that many plant species flowered earlier in response to reductions in diversity,
98 leaves, but they also uniquely display early flowering, earlier stem lignification, and lodging stems
99 ity can alter the timing and distribution of flowering events, and that these changes to phenology ar
103 , as well as evidence of recent selection in flowering genes possibly associated with the feralizatio
106 three genders; dark female and hermaphrodite flowers had higher sugar content than light morphs, wher
107 wers composition have shown that lyophilized flowers harvested at the middle of ripening stage (A) co
109 d DNE, and recessive ppd mutants on a spring-flowering hr mutant background show early, photoperiod-i
110 velopment, in male, female and hermaphrodite flowers, identified new loci outside of annotated gene m
111 onses but have opposite functions to control flowering in Arabidopsis, presumably due to the evolutio
116 mechanism underlying the evolution of white flowers in I. loxense differs from that uncovered in pre
118 e development on an array of five artificial flowers in which minimising travel distances between ind
121 fails to rescue endocytosis, indicating that Flower interacts with proteins of the endocytic machiner
122 tudied, but much less is known about how the flower is partitioned into four developmentally distinct
124 e reciprocity index applied to heterostylous flowers is meant to measure the degree of correspondence
125 le scenario for the early diversification of flowers, leading to new testable hypotheses for future r
127 and assessed the effects on transcription of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and PERPETUAL FLOWERING 1 (PEP1)
130 notype of ftip1-1 possibly through affecting FLOWERING LOCUS T in different manners, exemplifying tha
131 y conditions by decreasing the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T This phenotype is genetically dependen
132 We conclude by showing that CONSTANS and FLOWERING LOCUS T, components of the photoperiod pathway
133 miR172-resistant (35S::TOE1(R) ) and mutant (flowering locus T-10 (ft-10)) lines were used for functi
134 recent advances in our understanding of how flowers manipulate physical forces to attract animal pol
136 ns contributing to organ differentiation and flower meristem fate, and uniquely, to patterning of the
140 ion is how generalist pollinators recognize "flower objects" in vastly different ecologies and enviro
142 A variable petal number distinguishes the flowers of Cardamine hirsuta from those of its close rel
144 lar extracts obtained from stems, leaves and flowers of R. eriocalyx by HPLC, and determined the anti
145 es to paternity in seed from open-pollinated flowers of S. subcuneata decreased rapidly with the spat
147 ning stage and the lyophilization of cardoon flowers on their chemical composition, enzymatic activit
149 ss conditionally expressed genes involved in flowering or DNA repair, including the DNA glycosylase R
151 redict observed nectar concentrations of bat flowers or negative correlations between pollinator body
153 vernalization, in contrast to the Ku (early-flowering) parent, which showed constitutively high LanF
155 with the B. distachyon homologs of the major flowering pathway genes VRN2 and FT, whereas no linkage
157 A similar pattern was seen over time for the flowering phenology of a widespread species, Cassiope te
159 that mctp6-1 significantly enhances the late-flowering phenotype of ftip1-1 possibly through affectin
165 by PIN proteins is a primary determinant of flowering plant branching patterns regulating both branc
167 d sPPases, Pr-p26.1a and Pr-p26.1b, from the flowering plant Papaver rhoeas were inhibited by phospho
169 ansion of PP2A subunit gene families in both flowering plants and animals was driven by whole-genome
171 ave expanded into multigene families in both flowering plants and mammals, and the extent to which di
172 y is a pervasive evolutionary feature of all flowering plants and some animals, leading to genetic an
173 concomitantly with the land colonization by flowering plants and, by inference, could have been a ma
175 al variation in C. hirsuta, such that spring flowering plants developed more petals than those flower
177 lus guttatus, collecting the early- and late-flowering plants from each of three neighboring populati
179 tures in the previous year, and that of late-flowering plants primarily by temperatures 2 years earli
180 ramming during the sporophytic life cycle of flowering plants regulates genes is presently unknown.
183 -function of FRS7 and FRS12 results in early flowering plants with overly elongated hypocotyls mainly
184 bees provided with a very high diversity of flowering plants within the National Botanic Garden of W
185 mpacts of wildflower gardens on urban native flowering plants, and we reveal substantial gaps in our
188 ass of iridoids, found in various species of flowering plants, harbors astonishing chemical complexit
194 rtilizers; (b) loss of nectar resources from flowering plants; and (c) degraded overwintering forest
195 llular diploid sporophyte in both mosses and flowering plants; however, the morphological context in
197 whether morally neutral as toward insects or flowers, problematic as toward race or gender, or even s
200 restored sites only, where the proportion of flowers producing fruit increased with pollinator visita
201 for inflorescence architecture with improved flower production and yield is common to many domesticat
202 ield tomatoes, resulting in a quick burst of flower production that translates to an early yield.
204 llinator group(s) that are attracted to blue flowers, raising questions on the acquisition of F3'5'H.
206 e underpinned the evolution of photoperiodic flowering regulation in soybean domestication and highli
208 OME C and VERNALIZATION2, loci identified as flowering regulators in the domesticated crops wheat and
211 d to FLC in eudicots but also functions as a flowering repressor in the vernalization pathway of Brac
213 owering without cold exposure, and the rapid-flowering rvr1 phenotype is dependent on VRN1 The precoc
215 The molecular mechanisms responsible for flower sex specification remain unclear for most plant s
216 gan size can be modified, the means by which flower shape and symmetry can change, and the ways in wh
223 For instance, iridoids in the ornamental flower snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus, Plantaginaceae fam
226 ilencing revealed that NaJAZi functions as a flower-specific jasmonate repressor that regulates JAs,
229 u p 3, a peach LTP, is located in pollinated flower styles and secreting downy hairs, transporting a
231 light ("night-break" [NB]) accelerates wheat flowering, suggesting that the duration of the night is
235 stages of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) flowering, the inflorescence stem undergoes rapid growth
237 appreciable variation in genetic effects on flowering time across both time and space; the greatest
238 d vernalization pathways interact to control flowering time and floret fertility in response to ambie
239 pread concordance of C3 grasses accelerating flowering time and general delays for C4 grasses with in
241 gene networks for two major breeding traits, flowering time and oil metabolism, and revealed new cand
243 ime-associated expression of eight potential flowering time genes was confirmed in three tulip cultiv
244 We found that the genomic architecture of flowering time has been shaped by the most recent whole-
246 ironmental and endogenous cues that regulate flowering time in C. hirsuta We found that petal number
249 r understanding of the genetic regulation of flowering time in switchgrass will aid the development o
251 investigate the natural diversity governing flowering time pathways in a nondomesticated grass, the
252 nctional analyses in Arabidopsis resulted in flowering time phenotypes in line with TgTFL1 being a fl
253 further validate pKWmEB, we re-analyzed four flowering time related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana, a
260 contrast, more lateral branches and delayed flowering time were observed in SPL13 silenced plants.
263 mapping (FOAM) to map the genes that control flowering time, across 22 environments, and identified 1
264 nts of the photoperiod pathway that regulate flowering time, also control stomatal aperture in a dayl
265 Rising temperatures have begun to shift flowering time, but it is unclear whether phenotypic pla
266 e as traditional labor-intensive measures of flowering time, height, biomass, grain yield, and harves
267 sured traits such as leaf area, growth rate, flowering time, main stem branching, rosette branching,
268 ly favorable developmental traits, including flowering time, which resulted in the creation of variet
270 dentified 48 previously reported genes for 7 flowering time-related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana.
277 tle about how biotic interactions can affect flowering times, a significant knowledge gap given ongoi
278 ome sequences from the root, leaf, stem, and flower tissues, and performed de novo sequence assembly,
282 e show that disordered nanostructures enable flowers to produce visual signals that are salient to be
283 llination by S. admonitor resulted in a high flower-to-seed conversion rate (65%), however, we estima
285 eat (Triticum aestivum), the acceleration of flowering under long days (LD) is dependent on the light
287 ly recreated multimodal cues from individual flowers visited by hoverflies in three different environ
288 of nectar-inhabiting bacteria and yeasts via flower-visiting animals to examine how dispersal influen
289 f visitation frequency and effectiveness) of flower visitors in a diverse Mediterranean flower meadow
291 vrn1 allele was strongly down-regulated, and flowering was delayed by high temperatures irrespective
292 ll species, the timing of leaf emergence and flowering was more sensitive to a given increase in summ
293 tive SAMs in ltm sp double mutants, and late flowering was partially suppressed, suggesting that LTM
300 evated in an rvr1 mutant, resulting in rapid flowering without cold exposure, and the rapid-flowering
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。