ライフサイエンスコーパス: flowering time

1 y known for these taxa (e.g., differences in flowering time).

2 m4 mutant exhibits slower growth and delayed flowering time.

3 t dosage-dependent effects on ear length and flowering time.

4 pression in the vegetative meristem controls flowering time.

5 iolation, and is also involved in regulating flowering time.

6 e this cold-exposure information to regulate flowering time.

7 i (genes) associated (34% combined PVE) with flowering time.

8 s hypocotyl elongation, root elongation, and flowering time.

9 lored to temperature-dependent plasticity in flowering time.

10 icting the consequences of climate change on flowering time.

11 is was reduced in frequency by selection for flowering time.

12 ely been acknowledged as possible drivers of flowering time.

13 1 and COP1 controls CO stability to regulate flowering time.

14 trated a role of this gene in the control of flowering time.

15 nds on synchrony between insect activity and flowering time.

16 egulates key physiological responses such as flowering time.

17 -regulatory changes in adaptive variation of flowering time.

18 obiota also altered patterns of selection on flowering time.

19 isms whose abundance in soil correlates with flowering time.

20 LASE6, and play a central role in regulating flowering time.

21 ordered chloroplast development, and delayed flowering time.

22 MAF2 variants 2 and 4 had limited effect on flowering time.

23 omposition of cell walls, and caused delayed flowering time.

24 its nuclear roles of GI, thereby lengthening flowering time.

25 -0 is non-responsive to elevated [CO(2)] for flowering time.

26 rocesses, including hypocotyl elongation and flowering time.

27 ed in a screen for mutations that accelerate flowering time.

28 lorophyll accumulation, shade avoidance, and flowering time.

29 ied by altered leaf morphology and a delayed flowering time.

30 ant seasonal effect of night temperatures on flowering time.

31 B1) and RSB2, which themselves do not affect flowering time.

32 f CO protein stability, in the regulation of flowering time.

33 Americas and the complex genetic control of flowering time.

34 petioles as well as with an acceleration of flowering time.

35 he multiple roles of GI in the regulation of flowering time.

36 ation, quality and intensity of light affect flowering time.

37 aling networks to regulate plant defense and flowering time.

38 hich modulates defense against pathogens and flowering time.

39 ut responses determining seasonal growth and flowering time.

40 ated with altitude were also associated with flowering time.

41 ation, impairs COP1 function in coordinating flowering time.

42 s, and three major loci were found to govern flowering time.

43 is responsible for photoperiodic control of flowering time.

44 1 while the ICCV 96029 form had no effect on flowering time.

45 ways exhibit the strongest associations with flowering time.

46 with the environmental sensitivity of maize flowering time.

47 e exploration of the genetic architecture of flowering time.

48 a with allelic perturbations known to affect flowering time.

49 ing germination, vegetative growth rate, and flowering time.

50 Thus, plants face tradeoffs with advanced flowering time.

51 SNPs exhibited high accuracy for predicting flowering time.

52 its, such as grain quality, fruit shape, and flowering time.

53 mperature changes combine to modulate FT and flowering time.

54 nt temperature are major stimuli controlling flowering time.

55 e for a role of FRIGIDA in the regulation of flowering times.

56 hat are locally adapted and display distinct flowering times.

57 regimes, have also been linked to changes in flowering times.

58 edforward mechanisms that accurately control flowering timing.

59 Early flowering time, a prolonged reproductive growth phase, a

60 tle about how biotic interactions can affect flowering times, a significant knowledge gap given ongoi

61 discuss the circadian regulation of growth, flowering time, abiotic and biotic stress responses, and

62 appreciable variation in genetic effects on flowering time across both time and space; the greatest

63 coordination of plant metabolic function and flowering time across seasons.

64 FT levels correlated strongly with flowering time across treatments.

65 mapping (FOAM) to map the genes that control flowering time, across 22 environments, and identified 1

66 hat phytochrome B (phyB) is able to regulate flowering time, acting in the phloem companion cells, as

67 nts of the photoperiod pathway that regulate flowering time, also control stomatal aperture in a dayl

68 Much is known about the genes influencing flowering time, although their relevance to changing [CO

69 essenger RNA levels generally correlate with flowering time among accessions grown in different photo

70 Warming caused a divergence in flowering times among species in the forest community, r

71 the ZTL N-terminus lengthens period, delays flowering time and alters hypocotyl length.

72 In contrast, flowering time and anthocyanin abundance (a metric of co

73 ization at 8 degrees C, both at the level of flowering time and FLC chromatin silencing.

74 d vernalization pathways interact to control flowering time and floret fertility in response to ambie

75 otyped this population for traits related to flowering time and for petiole length and successfully m

76 pread concordance of C3 grasses accelerating flowering time and general delays for C4 grasses with in

77 The relationship of flowering time and geographic origin indicates likely ro

78 addition, we observed a correlation between flowering time and heat tolerance.

79 * In summary, seed dormancy influences flowering time and hence life history independent of its

80 es declined through time owing to changes in flowering time and lower defensive ellagitannins in frui

81 gene networks for two major breeding traits, flowering time and oil metabolism, and revealed new cand

82 luding the FT protein signal which regulates flowering time and other developmental switches.

83 ly, in opium poppy, these genes also control flowering time and petal identity, suggesting that AP1/F

84 d around genes involved in the regulation of flowering time and phenology.

85 Using association tests between flowering time and polymorphisms, 6 of these genomic are

86 ine and validated two novel miPs involved in flowering time and response to abiotic and biotic stress

87 Variation in flowering time and response to overwintering has been ex

88 unctional protein regulating plant immunity, flowering time and responses to hormones through interac

89 issue is critical and sufficient to regulate flowering time and root growth; control of cotyledon and

90 ontribute to domestication traits, including flowering time and seed dormancy.

91 Flowering time and seed size are traits related to domes

92 wild cereals in Israel over the last 28 y in flowering time and simple sequence repeat allelic turnov

93 F4 as regulators of endopolyploidization and flowering time and suggest an involvement of cell cycle

94 ation across an altitudinal gradient both in flowering time and the expression and regulation of gene

95 pmental and environmental signals to control flowering time and the fate of shoot meristems.

96 Of the five genes associated with flowering time and the three genes associated with seed

97 ially contribute to phenotypic plasticity of flowering time and to differential selection observed be

98 rature increases could differentially affect flowering times and pollinator flight periods, leading t

99 nd suggest the possibility of convergence in flowering times and therefore an increase in gene flow a

100 systems, highlight a key life history trait (flowering time) and discuss emerging conservation issues

101 Many drought escape (e.g. flowering time) and drought avoidance (e.g. specific lea

102 henotype, reduced internodal length, delayed flowering time, and enhanced biomass yield.

103 n chromosomes 11 and 15 were associated with flowering time, and four on chromosomes 11 and 16 were a

104 nd shorter leaves, exhibit a strong delay in flowering time, and generally do not reach sexual maturi

105 ic [CO(2)] has recently been shown to affect flowering time, and may produce even greater responses t

106 ci associated with abiotic stress responses, flowering time, and morphology.

107 cryptochromes regulate the circadian rhythm, flowering time, and photomorphogenesis in higher plants

108 s genotypic correlations between Delta(13)C, flowering time, and plant height were not significant.

109 , GNC and GNL control germination, greening, flowering time, and senescence downstream from auxin, cy

110 stream from ARF2 in the control of greening, flowering time, and senescence.

111 an initiation, accessory meristem formation, flowering time, and senescence.

112 enarios, changes in carbon metabolism during flowering time are a consequence rather than a cause of

113 Major alleles for seed dormancy and flowering time are well studied, and can interact to inf

114 tic basis of divergence in floral traits and flowering time associated with mating-system evolution,

115 Subsequently, the flowering time-associated expression of eight potential

116 and down-regulation (>three folds) of eight flowering time-associated genes (including six genes val

117 Six flowering time-associated major genomic loci harbouring

118 y of the three panels identified nearly 1000 flowering time-associated SNPs, mainly distributed aroun

119 andidate gene-based association mapping in a flowering time association panel (92 diverse desi and ka

120 fy QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) that affect flowering time at elevated [CO(2)] in Arabidopsis thalia

121 T) as a potential candidate gene for altered flowering time at elevated [CO(2)].

122 nderlying genetic architecture that controls flowering time at elevated [CO(2)].

123 We identify associations with flowering time at multiple loci, including in a homolog

124 ome 1 that explains 1/3 of the difference in flowering time between current and elevated [CO(2)] betw

125 ody perennials involves pathways controlling flowering timing, bud dormancy and outgrowth in response

126 ences on key agricultural traits, especially flowering time but also yield, biomass, and biennial gro

127 Rising temperatures have begun to shift flowering time, but it is unclear whether phenotypic pla

128 all component of the phenotypic variation in flowering time, but were sufficient to produce a signatu

129 xport, and regulates the circadian clock and flowering time by binding to chromatin of the flowering

130 ial of EDLL by analysis of the regulation of flowering time by NF-Y (nuclear factor Y) proteins.

131 ed the effect of the floral repressor FLC on flowering time by using constant temperature laboratory

132 B emissions scenario, we projected shifts in flowering timing by 2100.

133 e target genes of GNC and GNL with regard to flowering time control have not been identified as yet.

134 s on the regulatory role of MCTP1 (FTIP1) in flowering time control in Arabidopsis, demonstrating tha

135 field data reveal that a cryptic function of flowering time control is to limit seed set of winter an

136 he expression and regulation of genes in the flowering time control network, often independent of FLC

137 Our knowledge of flowering time control now enables the investigation of

138 nd the MADS box transcription factor SOC1 in flowering time control on the one side and greening and

139 oduction in temperate regions depends on its flowering time control, but the underlying molecular mec

140 nctionally characterized in other plants for flowering time control, seed development and pod dehisce

141 opmental pathways, while SWP73A functions in flowering time control.

142 ily and both are non-redundantly involved in flowering time control.

143 Flowering time correlated with altitude in a nonlinear m

144 sea level) in the Swiss Alps to test whether flowering time correlated with altitude under different

145 Flowering time could be explained by the expression and

146 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using flowering time data from a switchgrass association panel

147 gene families, including those with roles in flowering time, defense response, flavor, and pigment ac

148 association potential (41% combined PVE) for flowering time differentiation in cultivated and wild ch

149 Understanding the genetic basis of flowering time divergence illuminates the origins and ma

150 y a few major loci accounted for substantial flowering-time divergence.

151 transcription factor CONSTANS that underlies flowering time diversity in Arabidopsis.

152 ncluding retarded vegetative growth, delayed flowering time, dysfunctional male and female organs, an

153 egulation of FLORE, whereas GUS-staining and flowering time evaluation were used to determine its bio

154 To clarify the molecular bases of flowering time evolution in crop domestication, here we

155 of floral development (APETALA3 and PI) and flowering time (FLC) in the Brassicales and for the regu

156 ons in the control of germination, greening, flowering time, floral development, senescence, and flor

157 naling, stress responses, and the control of flowering time, for which we also show biological valida

158 Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for flowering time (FT) and anthocyanin accumulation under a

159 for two target traits-heading date (HD) and flowering time (FT)-were identified and positioned on li

160 Flowering time (FTi) control is well examined in the lon

161 tion factor regulating the expression of the flowering time gene FLC.

162 erential expression of 4153 genes, including flowering time genes flowering locus t, suppressor of ov

163 e co-expressed with five genes homologous to flowering time genes in Arabidopsis, and Glyma11g15480 w

164 t likely by regulating a subset of clock and flowering time genes in the afternoon.

165 e expression of Brachypodium homologs of key flowering time genes in the photoperiod pathway such as

166 ime-associated expression of eight potential flowering time genes was confirmed in three tulip cultiv

167 nent of flowering time involving a subset of flowering time genes whose effects are strongly influenc

168 the increased transcriptional levels of two flowering time genes with opposing functions, FLOWERING

169 ollow-up study using Arabidopsis mutants for flowering time genes within the significant QTL suggests

170 Flowering-time genes were highly overrepresented among c

171 ization requirement and that of variation in flowering time given vernalization.

172 onomic traits, including disease resistance, flowering time, glucosinolate metabolism and vitamin bio

173 We found that the genomic architecture of flowering time has been shaped by the most recent whole-

174 date, suggesting that temperature control of flowering time has evolved to constrain seed set environ

175 e as traditional labor-intensive measures of flowering time, height, biomass, grain yield, and harves

176 early and late alleles for seed dormancy and flowering time in a field experiment.

177 s has been demonstrated for heading date and flowering time in a global forage grass.

178 ly been shown to affect natural variation in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana, most either show

179 asure changes in daylength, which influences flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana.

180 ative regulator microRNA824 (miR824) control flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana.

181 transferase that is essential for regulating flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana.

182 ecologically relevant genetic variation for flowering time in Arabidopsis, and set the stage for fun

183 pe AP2 gene family, members of which control flowering time in Arabidopsis.

184 the genetic control of natural variation in flowering time in Brachypodium distachyon, a nondomestic

185 ironmental and endogenous cues that regulate flowering time in C. hirsuta We found that petal number

186 and unravelling the domestication pattern of flowering time in chickpea.

187 Critical photoperiod and flowering time in glasshouse conditions followed distinc

188 nd analysis of SbPRR37 alleles that modulate flowering time in grain and energy sorghum.

189 Flowering time in maize is a complex trait affected by m

190 advance many phenological events, including flowering time in plants and the flight time of insects.

191 n components that participate in controlling flowering time in plants.

192 hylation may regulate defense mechanisms and flowering time in plants.

193 light signaling and photoperiodic control of flowering time in plants.

194 ient temperatures are major cues determining flowering time in spring.

195 r understanding of the genetic regulation of flowering time in switchgrass will aid the development o

196 nd then tested whether the same QTLs control flowering time in sympatry.

197 50 (AGL50), which we show directly to alter flowering time in the predicted manner.

198 st that loss of PPD function does not affect flowering time in the presence of functional HR, whereas

199 i suggests that greater complexity underlies flowering time in this nondomesticated system.

200 in the phloem effectively restores wild-type flowering times in agl15 agl18 mutants.

201 ill continue to have a large impact on plant flowering times in the future.

202 domestication-related traits, shattering and flowering time, in a mapping population derived from a c

203 round-specific effects on FLC expression and flowering time; in a rapid-cycling background fy mutants

204 Genotype productivity and flowering time increased and decreased, respectively, wi

205 Photoperiod response is one component of flowering time involving a subset of flowering time gene

206 Divergence in flowering time is a key contributor to reproductive isol

207 * Divergence in flowering time is a key contributor to reproductive isol

208 Flowering time is a major determinant of biomass yield i

209 Flowering time is a trait that has been extensively alte

210 Flowering time is an important trait in crops as well as

211 This suggests that variation in flowering time is controlled in part by a set of genes b

212 alization pathway, little is known about how flowering time is controlled in response to changes in t

213 Optimal flowering time is critical to the success of modern agri

214 Flowering time is one of the major adaptive traits in do

215 Flowering time is tightly controlled by complex genetic

216 iverging phenotypes between lines, including flowering time, leaf shape, and pollen viability.

217 tional studies to determine the link between flowering time loci and fitness.

218 types with contrasting alleles at individual flowering time loci differed significantly in potential

219 haplotyping algorithm, enabled us to map the flowering time locus in the diploid wheat Triticum monoc

220 e resequenced the entire major but conserved flowering time locus Ppd-D1 in just a few such selected

221 sured traits such as leaf area, growth rate, flowering time, main stem branching, rosette branching,

222 id depletion produces non-genetic changes in flowering time, maturation, and growth rate that are her

223 Unlike DOG1, the expression of MOTHER of FLOWERING TIME (MFT) has an opposite thermal response in

224 and role of alternative MAF2 transcripts in flowering time modulation is not understood.

225 different Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) flowering time mutants under DE-triggering conditions re

226 and the floral transition was examined using flowering-time mutants and photoperiod-induced flowering

227 otide diversity of 27 poplar homologs of the flowering-time network-a group of genes that control pla

228 , day length and vernalization influence the flowering time of 59 genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana w

229 published phenology model that describes the flowering time of Arabidopsis grown under a range of fie

230 ined the ability of the model to predict the flowering time of field plantings at different sites and

231 g the leaf angle, cell wall composition, and flowering time of switchgrass, therefore demonstrating t

232 Flowering time of teosinte and tropical maize is delayed

233 We measured flowering time of the maize nested association and diver

234 Dramatic shifts in the flowering times of cherry trees may have implications fo

235 e long-term (1895-2013) relationship between flowering times of grass species and climate in space an

236 ing temperature was significantly related to flowering time only for later-flowering species.

237 e form strictly correlate (R(2) = 0.94) with flowering time over an extended vegetative period.

238 investigate the natural diversity governing flowering time pathways in a nondomesticated grass, the

239 ith no link to known meristem maintenance or flowering time pathways.

240 such as inversions, and genes from multiple flowering-time pathways exhibit the strongest associatio

241 transitory starch synthesis and analyze its flowering time phenotype in relation to its altered capa

242 nctional analyses in Arabidopsis resulted in flowering time phenotypes in line with TgTFL1 being a fl

243 mponents that participate in controlling the flowering time point in plants.

244 h physiological (defense) and developmental (flowering time) processes in Arabidopsis.

245 , 6 of these genomic areas appeared to carry flowering time QTL, 1 of which corresponds to Ppd-D1, a

246 Many of the flowering-time QTLs are detected across a range of photo

247 f the two NAM panels, both common and unique flowering time regions were detected.

248 Genome wide, a total of 90 flowering time regions were identified.

249 en together, eight potential known/candidate flowering time-regulating genes [efl1 (early flowering 1

250 he genetic architecture and genes underlying flowering time regulation in switchgrass.

251 es insights into the evolutionary context of flowering time regulation in the Poaceae as well as eluc

252 molecular mechanisms underlying bolting and flowering time regulation in vegetable crops.

253 nRK2 substrates include proteins involved in flowering time regulation, RNA and DNA binding, miRNA an

254 nvolvement in stamen and leaf development or flowering time regulation.

255 differentiation required changes of genes in flowering timing regulation, while transition to floral

256 enetic control of long-distance signaling in flowering-time regulation.

257 t the two GATA factors act upstream from the flowering time regulator SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF

258 Consistent with the SnRK2 phosphorylation of flowering time regulators, the snrk2.2/2.3/2.6 triple mu

259 nd shows that it also binds to a plethora of flowering-time regulatory and floral homeotic genes.

260 demonstrate the new methods, we analyzed six flowering time related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana an

261 further validate pKWmEB, we re-analyzed four flowering time related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana, a

262 dentified 48 previously reported genes for 7 flowering time-related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana.

263 cuss three QTL for grain yield and three for flowering time, reporting candidate genes.

264 that miR824 and AGL16 modulate the extent of flowering time repression in a long-day photoperiod.

265 IDA4 to regulate abscisic acid responses and flowering time, respectively.

266 Seventy nine QTLs for flowering time, seed quality and root morphology traits

267 r the morphological group) and subsets (e.g. flowering time, senescence, circadian rhythms, and misce

268 To examine how seed dormancy and flowering time shape annual plant life cycles over multi

269 by 7 days, which is similar in magnitude to flowering time shifts over 2-3 decades of climate change

270 agronomically important adult traits such as flowering time, stem size and leaf node number.

271 egetative shoot and required for a wild-type flowering time, supporting that TFL1 expression in the v

272 These results show that CmNF-YB8 influences flowering time through directly regulating the expressio

273 flowering-regulatory pathways to synchronize flowering time to environmental cues.

274 nd are thus candidates for the adaptation of flowering time to environmental gradients such as altitu

275 study for quantitative dissection of complex flowering time trait in chickpea.

276 were associated with major fiber quality and flowering time traits in previously published QTL mappin

277 e maize flowering time variants we evaluated flowering time traits using an extremely large multi- ge

278 Ppd-H1-dependent variation in flowering time under different ambient temperatures corr

279 To detect more maize flowering time variants we evaluated flowering time trai

280 d quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping for flowering time variation between two winter annual popul

281 We found that a significant proportion of flowering time variation in global pea germplasm is cont

282 Our results suggest that flowering time variation in switchgrass is due to variat

283 Flowering time variation is a main factor driving rapid

284 ive trait locus on Ca5 that explained 59% of flowering time variation under short days.

285 utonomous pathways in generating switchgrass flowering time variation.

286 nt interactions as an important influence on flowering time variation.

287 ent, is involved in endopolyploidization and flowering time via genetic interaction with MOS1, a nega

288 nd that WIN3 and NPR1 synergistically affect flowering time via influencing the expression of floweri

289 Flowering time was delayed for most grass species with i

290 Flowering time was evaluated in F4:5 families in five en

291 urprisingly, this effect of seed chilling on flowering time was observed even when low temperatures d

292 Flowering time was sensitive to both microbes and the ab

293 Across butterfly-plant associations, flowering time was significantly more sensitive to tempe

294 rait loci (QTLs) that control differences in flowering time were identified.

295 contrast, more lateral branches and delayed flowering time were observed in SPL13 silenced plants.

296 ganism Arabidopsis thaliana to determine how flowering time (which defines seed-maturation temperatur

297 ly favorable developmental traits, including flowering time, which resulted in the creation of variet

298 on and eliminates the negative regulation of flowering time, while the analogous C76S substitution in

299 nts use day-length information to coordinate flowering time with the appropriate season to maximize r

300 We use this method to map loci for flowering time within natural populations of Mimulus gut