ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluorescence in situ hybridization

1 basis of immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

2 t in nine sex-mismatched recipients using XY fluorescence in situ hybridization.

3 alyzed by immunohistochemistry and telomeric fluorescence in situ hybridization.

4 sigmoidoscopy were studied in a subgroup by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

5 lities were identified using microarrays and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

6 were identified and physically mapped using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

7 ell as FLT3 and NPM1 mutational analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

8 e, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, Gram stain, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

9 techniques and chromosome composition using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

10 tissue was used for immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

11 d identity using traditional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

12 ns including the eye, which was validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

13 2 amplification status was assessed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

14 echniques: CRISPR imaging and DNA sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization.

15 the barcodes out using massively multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization.

16 RC mRNAs in RNA granules that correlate with fluorescence in situ hybridization.

17 vs Rd by baseline cytogenetics according to fluorescence in situ hybridization.

18 rding to cytogenetic risk, as assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

19 6), del(17p), and/or ampl(1q) as assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

20 ng cell numbers are already available (e.g., fluorescence in situ hybridization, 16-S rRNA gene ampli

21 myeloid compartments at initial diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization after cell sorting.

22 Single-cell sequencing and multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses mapped the e

23 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses showed that

24 20 samples, immunostaining was combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses.

25 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis demonstrated

26 % homozygous deletions of the OLFM4 gene via fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis from 44 diff

27 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis mapped the E

28 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of 5 additio

29 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of fluoresce

30 smid clones for use as probes in comparative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of pachytene

31 Whole-genome sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two de no

32 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis offered an i

33 Pyrosequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed tha

34 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showed that

35 Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis with the hum

36 that would not benefit from more costly EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis).

37 ber alterations other than those detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis.

38 57 hormone-refractory prostate cancers using fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis.

39 t(11;14) chromosomal abnormality detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis.

40 le conventional molecular methods, including fluorescence in situ hybridization and array comparative

41 ata demonstrate the complementary utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization and capture sequencin

42 Fluorescence in situ hybridization and culture assay sho

43 In the present study, fluorescence in situ hybridization and DNA sequencing we

44 ooping, as successfully confirmed by 4C-seq, fluorescence in situ hybridization and Hi-C, as well as

45 Here, using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunochemistry o

46 were assessed by combined telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunofluorescenc

47 ncoated viral intermediates were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization and indirect immunofl

48 Here we show, using fluorescence in situ hybridization and live-cell imaging

49 with breakpoints in PDE9A were identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization and molecular copy nu

50 s was performed and cytogenetic testing with fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligatio

51 Furthermore, we analyzed SMARCB1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligatio

52 mphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement using fluorescence in situ hybridization and negative for EGFR

53 were required to have CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and retinoblastoma pr

54 aining of SGs markers and COX-2 protein, RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and RNA immunoprecipi

55 Fluorescence in situ hybridization and transmission elec

56 A was stained in liver sections using 16sRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and was detected in t

57 ed with transmission electron microscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridization and was grown in huma

58 we use whole-genome sequencing, fiber-FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), and other methods t

59 ble gene rearrangement, 58% with del(17p) by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and 54% with a compl

60 By combining immunofluorescent staining, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and BrdU incorporati

61 y chromosome counting, spectral karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and DNA content flow

62 Combined data from karyotype, DNA index, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain

63 yanate-uridine 5'-triphosphate labeling, RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, and quantitative rev

64 typic markers; and conventional cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and single nucleotid

65 Using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and spectral karyoty

66 hroughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted metagen

67 d reverse transcription-PCR, single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, and was not inhibite

68 We describe a strategy that uses NGS, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and whole-genome map

69 sed a quantitative, dual-labeling interphase-fluorescence in situ hybridization approach to compare a

70 By using a novel, advanced, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization approach, we enumerat

71 Using a quantitative interphase-fluorescence in situ hybridization approach, we previous

72 Using spectral imaging fluorescence in situ hybridization as guided by metageno

73 ce of a new three-color peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization assay that identifies

74 We applied a sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to measure freq

75 e chain reaction and interphase quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization assays.

76 apping using bacterial artificial chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization (BAC-FISH).

77 Here we utilize a fluorescence in situ hybridization-based approach to sco

78 mined by combining BONCAT with rRNA-targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization (BONCAT-FISH).

79 on binning and catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH), we show

80 thout global DNA denaturation (Cas9-mediated fluorescence in situ hybridization, CASFISH).

81 partment analysis of temporal activity using fluorescence in situ hybridization (catFISH) for Arc mRN

82 Microautoradiography and fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed bicarbonate

83 In 1 subject, fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed loss of CDK

84 Moreover, comparison with single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed that RBMBs

85 iated with metabolic cluster activation; DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed that transc

86 Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the deletio

87 Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization confirmed the presenc

88 Using fluorescence in situ hybridization coupled to nanoscale

89 g the ensuing transcription cycle (using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization coupled to super-reso

90 in germline stem cells using single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization coupled with automate

91 Global nascent RNA sequencing and RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrate the exist

92 Fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated active i

93 ons assayed by next-generation sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated evidence

94 Fluorescence in situ hybridization detected APOL1 mRNA i

95 ly increased numbers of telomeric signals by fluorescence in situ hybridization due to increased geno

96 fic repositioning events were then tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization during T-cell activat

97 were calibrated according to an independent fluorescence in situ hybridization experimental data.

98 DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments revealed

99 tage of endotoxin tolerance, whereas RNA-DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments showed th

100 Fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments showed th

101 Furthermore, fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments validated

102 combination of three-dimensional and immuno-fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments, the radi

103 ingle cells agrees well with single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments.

104 Here we established a fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (fastFISH) method tha

105 lication) were employed; ultrastructural and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were

106 A 130-kb deletion was confirmed both by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and b

107 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis indic

108 In fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis, IFI1

109 oligonucleotide- and PCR-based strategy for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a bioinfor

110 Traditional CNV detection methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comp

111 nization of the amplified EPSPS copies using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and extended D

112 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and genomic in

113 Single-cell-level studies using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and growth in

114 standard method for gene fusion detection is Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and while high

115 Chromosome conformation capture (3C) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are two widely

116 UND & AIMS: Digital image analysis (DIA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to

117 alidate our predictions experimentally by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments an

118 RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments sh

119 using the geometric constraints derived from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments.

120 maps, as well as distances measured using 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments.

121 We used multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosome

122 Sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosome

123 nohistochemistry for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC were p

124 ines whole-mount immunofluorescence (IF) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the simult

125 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) further confir

126 Single-molecule mRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) has been estab

127 PHIP copy number was determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a tissue mi

128 We validate this observation using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in an addition

129 level by microautoradiography combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in coastal wat

130 lyze the utility of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in distinguish

131 netic abnormalities determined by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in patients wi

132 ough infected cells were still detectable by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in prostate at

133 Mapping of the 6p21 breakpoint by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) indicated that

134 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful

135 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is used to stu

136 Here, International Staging System (ISS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) markers, and g

137 The fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method has bee

138 A novel rapid peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method, Staphy

139 us that improves the sensitivity of existing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods; the p

140 In parallel, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) micronucleus a

141 and ionic spacer was used to perform in-line fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of bacterial c

142 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of infected ce

143 Pancreatobiliary cancer is detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of pancreatobi

144 st studies of genome organization use either fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromosome

145 t occur in regions uncovered by the standard fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel have pro

146 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes specifi

147 rements in nonadherent mammalian cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes.

148 ementary oligos and target viral RNA using a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) process.

149 s of genome transcription and replication, a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocol was e

150 ER immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses, HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ratio, and cop

151 Accordingly, single-molecule mRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reveals that,

152 Immunofluorescence analysis (IFA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) show that both

153 using Papanicolaou (Pap) staining and (iii) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting the

154 Currently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique is r

155 escribe recent technological advances in RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques tha

156 The development of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technologies e

157 antibody against the protein LIN28A, and (3) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for th

158 single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) that enables t

159 investigated using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect prot

160 were used to investigate telomere fusions by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a peptid

161 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes s

162 We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes t

163 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) was carried ou

164 and >5.0 mm, sufficient biopsy material for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was obtained i

165 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed

166 d in pure C. difficile culture; additionally fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed.

167 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) will be requir

168 visualization of Escherichia coli labeled by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 28 differ

169 both GAD65 (GAD2) and GAD67 (GAD1), and used fluorescence in Situ hybridization (FISH) with tyramide

170 e MBS cassette also enabled high-sensitivity fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), allowing dete

171 e methods are designed for data collected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), an experiment

172 yzed by nonturnover cyclic voltammetry (CV), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and 16S rRNA

173 vector transfections of insular cortex, arc fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and designer

174 th unique combinations of fluorophores using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and resolved

175 ntly, molecular cytogenetic approaches using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), array compara

176 le BONCAT with ribosomal RNA (rRNA)-targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), enabling a di

177 t tissue sections by labeling sequences with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), followed by m

178 entromeric satellite DNA using genomic data, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunofluores

179 enomas and human colorectal cancer using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative

180 Furthermore, using single-cell mRNA counting fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we found that

181 with high-throughput sequencing (4C-seq) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we identified

182 g likely progression of individual tumors is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which allows

183 We conducted a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based CNV surv

184 A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based karyotyp

185 sitive (HER2+) or -negative (HER2-) based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-supplemented i

186 with those obtained with polyP staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

187 routine metaphase cytogenetics or interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

188 orrelative CRISPR imaging and sequential DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

189 Polysomy when detected on fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is an independ

190 his study, we optimized flow cytometry-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (Flow-FISH) for IFN-g

191 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: fluorescence in situ hybridization, fluorescence imaging

192 are detected in T cells with single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization followed by flow cyto

193 Fluorescence in situ hybridization for BCL2 gene rearran

194 sent the results of TP53 gene sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization for del17p in a phase

195 Sorted cell populations were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for leukemia-specific

196 splicing patterns, which we validate by RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization for select transcript

197 array comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization has identified that l

198 As fluorescence in situ hybridization has limitations regar

199 Using fluorescence in situ hybridization here, we report that

200 RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization identified actively t

201 Gram staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization identified Salmonella

202 togenetic aberrations detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) of plasma cel

203 Fluorescence in situ hybridization images and metagenome

204 Quantification of biomass by fluorescence in situ hybridization images suggested that

205 1a cellular analysis of temporal activity by fluorescence in situ hybridization imaging method.

206 Immunofluorescence microscopy combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (immuno-FISH), the me

207 ncing, single-nucleotide polymorphism array, fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry

208 was assessed by high-throughput quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization in circulating leukoc

209 , then barcodes those loci by DNA sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization in fixed cells and re

210 tive capacity and telomere length using flow-fluorescence in situ hybridization (in situ hybridizatio

211 kelihood of EGFR amplification, as viewed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, increased with the s

212 y, linked with catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization, indicated that Nitro

213 variation (CNV) and tumour heterogeneity by fluorescence in situ hybridization (ISH) provides additi

214 vant nascent transcripts (detected using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization) lie close enough to

215 repetitive elements as probes for multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mcFISH), using an op

216 Interphase bacterial artificial chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization measurements in embry

217 Here, we report multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH), a single-m

218 ement throughput of multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH), an image-b

219 Here, we apply a new fluorescence in situ hybridization method that measures

220 We describe a fluorescence in situ hybridization method that permits d

221 mistry (n = 478), MDM2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (n = 364), and a sing

222 Fluorescence in situ hybridization of AAV transgenes was

223 Using fluorescence in situ hybridization of FHV RNAs, we disco

224 ns using lineage tracing and single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization of intestinal crypts

225 letion, t(4;14) and del17p, and detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization of t(4;14), t(14;16),

226 and tested by quantitative measurements (by fluorescence in situ hybridization) of the joint distrib

227 We performed immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on 73 ALK-negative AL

228 In this study, catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization on both ribosomes and

229 Here we use multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization on brush cytology spe

230 copies in the genome of A tuberculatus using fluorescence in situ hybridization on mitotic metaphase

231 RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization on primary HL tissues

232 Detection of 13q deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization only, in absence of o

233 h RPS14 haploinsufficiency not identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization or cytogenetic testin

234 Peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) was instit

235 , two 28S rRNA-directed peptide nucleic acid-fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) probes, P-

236 in this progression, we used four multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization probe panels consisti

237 ld several DNA nanostructures and as primary fluorescence in situ hybridization probes.

238 esponse (P < .0001) and favorable interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization profile (P < .001).

239 rylated histone 2A (gammaH2AX) combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that TALEN p

240 Double-label fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals that these ne

241 analyses, such as conventional karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptio

242 entional cytogenetic and molecular analyses (fluorescence in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, or both) wer

243 Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed non-weaned rat

244 Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization showed PRKCA rearrang

245 licing and ribosome biogenesis proteins, and fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that MAS2 colo

246 Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that the free

247 Our method is based on single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) and quantita

248 By contrast, single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) preserves th

249 Single-molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) provides unp

250 s, it is difficult to detect single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) signals robu

251 owed by sequential rounds of single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) to read out

252 ied stress granule cores and single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) validation.

253 mbine immunofluorescence and single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH), followed by

254 fluorescence microscopy and single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH).

255 lization in combination with single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH).

256 Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies showed that p

257 develop the CO-FISH (chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization) technique with singl

258 of next generation sequencing, array-CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization technologies has enab

259 The Accelerate Pheno system uses automated fluorescence in situ hybridization technology with morph

260 ns, and telomere length assessment [telomere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (TEL-FISH) coupled wi

261 can be performed in minutes using commercial fluorescence in situ hybridization tests or mass spectro

262 lso show by immunofluorescence combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization that BNRF1 is importa

263 we present a modification to single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization that enables quantita

264 Here, we found by double fluorescence in situ hybridization that podocyte progeni

265 in situ analysis (3D-FISH [three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization]) that chromosomal lo

266 Dominant PCR markers were used with fluorescence in situ hybridization to assay 160 diverse

267 study, we used three-dimensional interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization to decipher spatiotem

268 The present studies used fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect Gad1 and Ga

269 nalysis with paired-end tag sequencing), and fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect single nasc

270 d polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assays and fluorescence in situ hybridization to determine whether

271 med mass spectrometric imaging combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization to localize Ca Entoth

272 ically varied, and used messenger RNA (mRNA) fluorescence in situ hybridization to observe how these

273 nomics, single-cell amplicon sequencing, and fluorescence in situ hybridization, to show that individ

274 ect mucin 2, as well as by 16S ribosomal RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, transcriptional anal

275 rse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence in situ hybridization, transmission electro

276 etii was tested using immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization using a specific 16S

277 The presence of iAMP21 was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization using probes specific

278 ) of individual CT, we performed multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization using six probes exte

279 CRISPR)/Cas loci and dual viral and cellular fluorescence in situ hybridization (viral FISH) analysis

280 XY-karyotyping using fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on 4 sp

281 Dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on eigh

282 Next, fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed to visu

283 Dual color fluorescence in-situ hybridization was performed to asse

284 Using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization we first identified n

285 Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we demonstrate that

286 circularizable oligonucleotides coupled with fluorescence in situ hybridization, we demonstrate that

287 Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we detected higher P

288 zing spectral karyotyping and locus-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization, we identified 10 pat

289 Using single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, we measured transcri

290 Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we show that tau mRN

291 Using single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, we show that the FGF

292 Using genomic and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we uncovered massive

293 We present a web engine boosted fluorescence in-situ hybridization (webFISH) algorithm u

294 3), was identified in 6 patients; results of fluorescence in situ hybridization were positive for fus

295 arative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to study co

296 Fluorescence in situ hybridization with a set of wheat c

297 n by the Hans classifier were analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization with BCL2, BCL6, MYC,

298 -labeled threonine i.v. to mice and combined fluorescence in situ hybridization with high-resolution

299 By coupling multiplex single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization with machine learning

300 r vertebrate early embryos, using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization with nuclear counters