ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluorescent antibody

1 from the analysis of diffusion rates of the fluorescent antibody.

2 proach that is based on chemically cleavable fluorescent antibodies.

3 ules using sequential binding and elution of fluorescent antibodies.

4 into unfixed transplanted skin tissues using fluorescent antibodies.

5 ession under fluid shear after labeling with fluorescent antibodies.

6 6 nm in diameter, which, when labeled with a fluorescent antibody [2] or a latex bead [5], are seen t

7 Double-label fluorescent-antibody analysis with anti-IncA and an anti

8 Gene expression was confirmed with fluorescent antibodies and confocal microscopy.

9 nt detection of single target molecules with fluorescent antibodies, and we show that these antibodie

10 ure assay (SVA), real-time PCR, and a direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) for rapid detection of

11 ne encephalitis (VEE) viruses by an indirect fluorescent antibody assay.

12 rlichiosis by comparing them to the indirect fluorescent-antibody assay "gold standard." The specific

13 The direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) detected 132 (66.3%) po

14 Cytospin-enhanced direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) detected 49 (92.5%) and

15 RSV; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD), a direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) for RSV (Bartels; Trini

16 sing 9 diagnostic kits were compared: direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) kits (TechLab Giardia/C

17 ensitive than the traditional culture/direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) method for detecting RS

18 re used to resolve the discrepancies: direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) of sediment from a spun

19 performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA), commercial PCR, and li

20 A comparison of direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA), culture, and two PCR a

21 responses of the 37 E. chaffeensis indirect fluorescent-antibody assay (IFA)-positive and 20 IFA-neg

22 further analyzed for Y. pestis infection by fluorescent-antibody assay and/or culture.

23 healthy humans were positive by the indirect fluorescent-antibody assay for all three antigens.

24 who were PCR positive but culture and direct fluorescent-antibody assay negative had clinical disease

25 d increase in sensitivity compared to direct fluorescent-antibody assay of seeded stool samples.

26 gative and CHL positive by a positive direct fluorescent-antibody assay or PCR test.

27 Indirect fluorescent-antibody assay procedures and virus neutrali

28 from cell culture supernatants and by direct fluorescent-antibody assay staining of the cell culture

29 r (77%) had E. chaffeensis-reactive indirect fluorescent-antibody assay titers of > or = 1:64; and th

30 Direct fluorescent-antibody assay was used to resolve discrepan

31 The evaluation was performed by the indirect fluorescent-antibody assay with Ehrlichia chaffeensis Ar

32 ELISA, ova and parasite test, and/or direct fluorescent-antibody assay.

33 nts that were negative by culture and direct fluorescent-antibody assay.

34 yme immunoassay (20%), culture (12%), direct fluorescent antibody assays (3%), and rapid tests (<1%).

35 hrlichiosis relies predominantly on indirect fluorescent-antibody assays and immunoblot analysis.

36 imers/microns2 as determined by quantitative fluorescent antibody binding.

37 ric labeling of proteins is achieved through fluorescent-antibody binding.

38 Bacteria samples, treated with a fluorescent antibody complex specific to Streptococcus p

39 his behavior is in stark contrast to that of fluorescent antibody conjugates.

40 Finally, fluorescent antibodies demonstrate the presence of IRBP

41 ded Chlamydiazyme (Abbott), MicroTrak direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) (Syva), MicroTrak enzyme immu

42 tCycler PCR (LC-PCR) methods and by a direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assay, which detects L. pneum

43 Direct-fluorescent antibody (DFA) detection remains the gold st

44 iratory symptoms were examined by the direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) technique.

45 f reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test, and viral culture perfo

46 with the performance of cell culture, direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay (Syva MicroTrak; Syva C

47 obtained by testing 50 specimens by a direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay.

48 red these methods to both culture and direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assays with microscopy for th

49 Lx system was tested in parallel with direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining and rapid shell vial

50 A combination of direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining and virus culture wa

51 formed by a combination of reculture, direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining of specimen sediment

52 r resolution of discrepant results by direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining or PCR assay, the re

53 ed by both Amplicor PCR and Microtrak direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining.

54 le expertise; enzyme immunoassays and direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) stains have lowered hands-on

55 -flow immunoassay, with the MERIFLUOR direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) test, the ProSpecT EZ micropl

56 With observed increases in direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) testing volumes, we retrospec

57 elate the APTIMA assays with culture, direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA), and LCx CT and GC assays.

58 ere tested by both immunofluorescent (direct fluorescent-antibody [DFA]) staining and PCR.

59 By fluorescent antibody (FA) staining, persistent viruses V

60 iagnostics, Inc.]) and two commercial direct fluorescent-antibody (FA) assays for G. lamblia (Crypto/

61 Conventional fluorescent-antibody (FA) methods were compared to real-

62 lular proteins of interest were labeled with fluorescent antibodies for fluorescence-activated cell s

63 g to membrane-bound TNF (mTNF), we created a fluorescent antibody for molecular mTNF imaging in this

64 se data indicate that molecular imaging with fluorescent antibodies has the potential to predict ther

65 with E. chaffeensis as detected by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) assay.

66 ins, respectively, as determined by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) staining methods.

67 cted of having HGE were examined by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) testing with the HGE agent no

68 Twenty-nine indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA)-positive dog plasma specimens

69 A new indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) assay with antigen produced i

70 Indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) staining methods with Ehrlich

71 specimens from 176 patients by the indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) technique with Ehrlichia equi

72 R and cell culture with that of the indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) test for the diagnosis of Pot

73 nosis has traditionally been by the indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) test.

74 Indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) testing on cerebrospinal flui

75 Sera from 20 HGE patients with indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) titers ranging from 1:20 to 1

76 Flow cytometry analysis after fluorescent antibody labeling revealed strong correlatio

77 show here that, in rat ventricular myocytes, fluorescent antibodies map the NBC isoforms NBCe1 and NB

78 in cycling NIH3T3 cells, using quantitative fluorescent antibody measurements of individual cells.

79 oped serum VZV antibodies as demonstrated by fluorescent antibody membrane antigen.

80 and results were in agreement with indirect fluorescent antibody methods for 86% of samples analyzed

81 orferi JMNT and N40 was analyzed by indirect fluorescent-antibody microscopy, polyacrylamide gel elec

82 , the primary colicin receptor, complexed to fluorescent antibody or colicin, is 0.05+/-0.01 mum2/s a

83 chnique can be multiplexed and combined with fluorescent antibody protein staining to address a varie

84 nd Fusarium species, we developed polyclonal fluorescent-antibody reagents to Aspergillus fumigatus a

85 th Kir6.2 or Kir6.2deltaC37 and labeled with fluorescent antibodies revealed unique honeycomb pattern

86 l antibody specificity was demonstrated with fluorescent antibody sorting of cells engineered to expr

87 Fluorescent antibodies specific for CD11b, CD11c, CD80,

88 Fluorescent antibody staining and image analysis were us

89 fects of treatment on entry were measured by fluorescent antibody staining of cells or by antigen cap

90 for LCR and culture were resolved by direct fluorescent antibody staining of culture sediments, two

91 e of large-scale serotyping studies in which fluorescent antibody staining of infected cells was used

92 Fluorescent antibody staining of the corresponding midgu

93 7 (26%) had laboratory evidence (by indirect fluorescent antibody staining or polymerase chain reacti

94 Fluorescent antibody staining revealed PCho(+) variants

95 lture transport medium with chlamydia direct fluorescent antibody staining were used to adjudicate ch

96 By fluorescent antibody staining with anti-p40 and -p35, th

97 , when rapid diagnosis could be made only by fluorescent antibody staining, a demanding technique ava

98 urface phenotype was monitored by monoclonal fluorescent antibody staining, and cytokine levels were

99 romosome-specific probes in conjunction with fluorescent antibody staining, we found that such stem c

100 r the presence of B. burgdorferi by indirect fluorescent antibody staining.

101 were compared with those obtained by direct fluorescent-antibody staining (DFA) and real-time PCR wi

102 Fluorescent-antibody staining and image analysis were us

103 ow RSV (BN) were compared to those of direct fluorescent-antibody staining and/or tissue culture for

104 T-positive specimens were resolved by direct fluorescent-antibody staining of sedimented culture tran

105 onventional virologic testing, consisting of fluorescent-antibody staining plus testing with the R-mi

106 odified trichrome blue stain and by indirect fluorescent-antibody staining with murine polyclonal ant

107 columnar epithelial cell adequacy by direct fluorescent-antibody staining.

108 entification as well as by cell culture with fluorescent-antibody staining.

109 Fluorescent-antibody studies were carried out with a spe

110 amples that had been characterized by direct fluorescent antibody test (DFA) and DNA sequencing analy

111 ere evaluated for CDV antigen using a direct fluorescent antibody test (FAT).

112 cific 16S rRNA gene fragments by an indirect fluorescent antibody test and a nested PCR assay, respec

113 years and had negative results by the direct fluorescent antibody test for respiratory syncytial viru

114 of bovine coronavirus (BCV), on an indirect fluorescent antibody test.

115 es, and infected erythrocytes in an indirect fluorescent antibody test.

116 omparison of the sensitivity of the standard fluorescent-antibody test (FAT) for rabies antigen and t

117 e specimens that tested positive in a direct fluorescent-antibody test or in a confirmatory PCR test

118 he qRT-PCR assay to the gold standard direct fluorescent-antibody test.

119 Results for Bordetella culture and/or direct fluorescent antibody testing and a second LightCycler PC

120 Samples were tested by culture and direct fluorescent antibody testing for respiratory syncytial v

121 fixed cells or cell lysates was revealed by fluorescent antibody testing or enzyme-linked immunosorb

122 Patients who had only direct fluorescent antibody testing performed or concurrent vir

123 ing the other DNA amplification test, direct fluorescent antibody testing, and a DNA amplification te

124 body specific to B. burgdorferi, by indirect fluorescent antibody testing.

125 compared the performance of culture, direct fluorescent-antibody testing (DFA), and an in-house-deve

126 Direct fluorescent-antibody testing has a specificity of 99.6%

127 children were tested for influenza by direct fluorescent-antibody testing with PCR confirmation.

128 d recognize diagnostic limitations of direct fluorescent-antibody testing, which missed one-third of

129 m infected animals did not react in indirect fluorescent-antibody tests with Babesia microti antigen,

130 proteins, HLA class I molecules labeled with fluorescent antibody; the patchiness of the HLA class I

131 Fluorescent antibodies to ciliary proteins are used to v

132 Monolayers were stained with fluorescent antibodies to detect total and dephosphoryla

133 Dissociated neurons identified by fluorescent antibodies to PLAP showed firing properties

134 cryosectioned, indirectly immunolabeled with fluorescent antibodies to sarcolemmal and myofibrillar m

135 ent with increasing nocodazole doses using a fluorescent antibody to alpha-tubulin.

136 previously validated sensitive and specific fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen (FAMA) assay.

137 and coincidence of 97.61% compared with the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen (FAMA) test.

138 demonstrated to neutralize rabies virus in a fluorescent antibody virus neutralization assay, and con

139 ted for use with our recently reported "blue-fluorescent antibodies" with the aim of probing native a