ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluorescent signal

1 ethod based on integration of the associated fluorescent signal.

2 nzymatically coupled to the development of a fluorescent signal.

3 ine binding interface produces an integrated fluorescent signal.

4 and each other in their contributions to the fluorescent signal.

5 n molecules, giving rise to amplification of fluorescent signal.

6 excitation, DDAO generates a far-red-shifted fluorescent signal.

7 (CTX:Cy5.5) bioconjugate that emits near-IR fluorescent signal.

8 e probe is efficiently cleaved, generating a fluorescent signal.

9 ement, therefore, its fluorophore releases a fluorescent signal.

10 t hybridization resulted in quenching of the fluorescent signal.

11 those areas in the dermal tissues lacking a fluorescent signal.

12 inhibition for caspofungin as measured by a fluorescent signal.

13 m temperature with immediate generation of a fluorescent signal.

14 tificial wound extract were converted into a fluorescent signal.

15 llations of the correlation functions of the fluorescent signal.

16 es, such as the correlation functions of the fluorescent signal.

17 in an approximately 100-fold increase in the fluorescent signal.

18 ivatized by fluorescamine, thus generating a fluorescent signal.

19 format and an automated end-point capture of fluorescent signal.

20 he illuminating fiber to collect the emitted fluorescent signal.

21 airpin structure to induce a decrease in the fluorescent signal.

22 esulting in YFP complementation and a bright fluorescent signal.

23 converting an electrochemical signal into a fluorescent signal.

24 deoxyribozyme catalytic cores that produce a fluorescent signal.

25 alized with Frmpd1-GFP based upon the merged fluorescent signals.

26 the generation and transmission of multiple fluorescent signals.

27 er exo-/endocytosis-associated pH changes to fluorescent signals.

28 ossible to isolate near-field from far-field fluorescent signals.

29 t as juxtaposed or overlapping red and green fluorescent signals.

30 is quantitative image analysis of cells and fluorescent signals.

31 ins (E1, E2, and C), reflected by immunoblot fluorescent signals.

32 resulting in the significant decrease of the fluorescent signals.

33 onucleotides (oligos) to produce and enhance fluorescent signals.

34 s of DNA logic gates are oligonucleotides or fluorescent signals.

35 citation was found to elicit a better deGFP4 fluorescent signal above cellular autofluorescence when

36 fected the uniformity and reproducibility of fluorescent signal across DNA microarrays.

37 measurements are obtained by calibrating the fluorescent signal against chemically synthesized standa

38 ccurate quantification of N-glycans from the fluorescent signal alone.

39 the next strand cycle to produce exponential fluorescent signal amplification for miRNA detection.

40 up to 16 MS2 binding motifs to enable robust fluorescent signal amplification.

41 ntact duplex has an extremely low background fluorescent signal and provides up to 50-fold fluorescen

42 by direct base-calling from the unprocessed fluorescent signals and improved heterozygote analyses o

43 amplicons, we can distinguish between their fluorescent signals and quantify each independently.

44 imple and effective mechanism to enhance the fluorescent signal, and hence the sensitivity of the sys

45 nt nucleotide into the DNA, detection of the fluorescent signal, and photocleavage of the fluorophore

46 SGFP4 allows for spectral separation of each fluorescent signal, and provides the means to image thes

47 For enumeration of T4-LacZ phage, the fluorescent signal appeared in as little as 90 min.

48 It is likely that this approach to producing fluorescent signaling aptamers is of general use for pro

49 A new approach to creating fluorescent signaling aptamers using fluorescent nucleot

50 Fluorescent signals are relatively photostable, allowing

51 bound Abs can be scored by counting discrete fluorescent signals arising from individual Ag-Ab comple

52 lulose and measuring the attenuation of this fluorescent signal as a hydrogel consisting of poly(ethy

53 ngineered reporter cell lines that produce a fluorescent signal as a proxy for protein expression.

54 re they display robust function and distinct fluorescent signals as detected by TIRF microscopy.

55 e analysis of the FRET signal from the total fluorescent signal at acceptor emission wavelength, whic

56 ein isothiocyanate anti-human Fc resulted in fluorescent signals at immobilized concentrations of 6'-

57 effects of PIT are monitored using the IR700 fluorescent signal based on macroscopic fluorescence ref

58 cleavage instead of photobleaching to remove fluorescent signals between consecutive rounds of smFISH

59 the attached gold nanoparticle quenches the fluorescent signal by 95%, or less likely that the comp

60 chnique, was used to dynamically enhance the fluorescent signal by concentrating the modified particl

61 ulted in complementation of YFP and a bright fluorescent signal by confocal microcopy that localized

62 urther enhanced by the rapidity at which the fluorescent signal can be captured and the resultant mul

63 ationship between template concentration and fluorescent signal can be demonstrated down to template

64 s of magnitude, putting us in a regime where fluorescent signals can be considered to be a quantitati

65 usion proteins is induced by heat shock, the fluorescent signals can be visualized as early as 30 min

66 This substrate produces a fluorescent signal caused by the extrusion of the crucif

67 The fluorescent signal changes of the genes within the three

68 concentration were quantitated by measuring fluorescent signal changes of the single wavelength calc

69 n of DNA and its mutations by monitoring the fluorescent signal changes of the target DNA/molecular b

70 e nanoendoscope was fabricated and resultant fluorescent signals collected.

71 that the distribution of the radioactive and fluorescent signal colocalized with CEA-expressing tumor

72 gh an increased signal-to-noise ratio of the fluorescent signal compared with performing the same ass

73 three Trp residues allows assignment of the fluorescent signal completely to the three tryptophan re

74 We show that the relative amounts of fluorescent signal correlate well with the abundance of

75 ace-localized virus particles and that large fluorescent signals correlated with membranous Gag-conta

76 We found that small punctate fluorescent signals correlated with single viral particl

77 rated into surface-elongated lambda DNA, and fluorescent signals corresponding to the addition of R11

78 probe allowed in vivo renal imaging and the fluorescent signal could be specifically captured in the

79 tonic crystal (PC) in the array enhanced the fluorescent signal due to a guided mode resonance.

80 nergy transfer (FRET) probes and generates a fluorescent signal during PCR.

81 onfirmed the ability to noninvasively detect fluorescent signal during replication, which generally c

82 egative control cell line (Jurkat) showed no fluorescent signal either intra- or extracellularly.

83 breast cancer cells by quantifying the total fluorescent signal emanating from individual cells.

84 f a laparoscopic camera system to detect the fluorescent signal emanating from sentinel lymph nodes (

85 The origin of the fluorescent signal emitted by infected cells was further

86 We found that fluorescent signal emitted by NanoOrange dye increases e

87 for simultaneous selective detection of the fluorescent signals emitted by a bacterial biosensor arr

88 The time-dependent line shape of the fluorescent signal enables detection of DCV docking, fus

89 luorescent signal and provides up to 50-fold fluorescent signal enhancement following hydrolysis.

90 tify simultaneously occurring scattering and fluorescent signals, even when contaminating particles (

91 othiols is determined from the difference in fluorescent signal (excitation/emission wavelengths of 3

92 According to our data, direct fluorescent signals (FI(635)), IC(50) and K(d) values pr

93 ated nanoparticle provides an extremely high fluorescent signal for bioanalysis and can be easily inc

94 esorufin as a transduction module provides a fluorescent signal for probing the catalyzed oxidation o

95 in aggregate will generate a single, strong fluorescent signal for regions as small as a single gene

96 The fluorescent signals for pIX-mRFP1 and pV-EGFP were detec

97 release FDOM that closely match the typical fluorescent signals found in oceanic environments.

98 y demonstrate ~2.5-3 fold enhancement of the fluorescent signal from 2-10 mum sized particles.

99 dipy-650 and the subsequent detection of the fluorescent signal from Bodipy-650 and its photocleavage

100 ecline was followed by rapid recovery of the fluorescent signal from both cyto-pHluorin and pH-GluA2.

101 The fluorescent signal from collagen fibers within the scler

102 mice at different stages of the disease, the fluorescent signal from pHLIP Var3 marked cancerous lesi

103 e optical imaging detected a strong tdTomato fluorescent signal from skeletal muscle grafts in mice w

104 The fluorescent signal from the 2nd-Ab is measured as mean f

105 against XIST RNA demonstrated that the major fluorescent signal from the autoantibody colocalized wit

106 The fluorescent signal from the collagen fibers of the corne

107 Green fluorescent signal from the Fam83h-GFP fusion protein wa

108 rase and dUTP-PC-Bodipy-FL-510, detected the fluorescent signal from the fluorophore Bodipy-FL-510, a

109 ulation produced rapid redistribution of the fluorescent signal from the membrane to cytosol, which w

110 We first showed that fluorescent signal from the oligonucleotide array varies

111 DNPs) that can shift the peptide's intrinsic fluorescent signal from the ultraviolet to the visible r

112 ected PCR primers and probe did not generate fluorescent signals from eight other helicobacters (H. c

113 Detecting fluorescent signals from individual labeled proteins abo

114 The routing of fluorescent signals from NADH to quantum dots (QDs) has

115 beta2AR) resulted in internalization of both fluorescent signals from the plasma membrane.

116 wly free to fluoresce, contributes to global fluorescent signal generated by 4-MU.

117 The fluorescent signals generated in the fSBA correlate to t

118 cularly imprinted polymer (MIP) containing a fluorescent signaling group on a 4-cm long polystyrene o

119 Variation in the MB/mRNA hybridization fluorescent signal has been observed for different PtK2

120 mechanochromic molecules, which emit strong fluorescent signals if sufficiently deformed.

121 medical applications, because they exhibit a fluorescent signal in a spectral region where there is m

122 The probe has low fluorescent signal in aqueous media, but its solubility

123 vo, resulting in up to a 45-fold increase in fluorescent signal in bacteria and a 3-fold increase in

124 arning approach for estimating the amount of fluorescent signal in different subcellular compartments

125 In either scenario, the observed fluorescent signal in fact arises from a large populatio

126 ssed together, these two proteins produced a fluorescent signal in human embryonic kidney 293 cells t

127 beacon (RBMB), which generates a detectable fluorescent signal in living cells that express the targ

128 n the untemplated reaction providing a clear fluorescent signal in response to the protein oligomer w

129 and cytoplasmic staining with enrichment of fluorescent signal in the nucleus and nucleolus.

130 dye for new bone formation revealed a strong fluorescent signal in treated animals that was equivalen

131 not reduce the viral titer and resulted in a fluorescent signal in viable transduced cells detectable

132 carrying the gene encoding GFP resulted in a fluorescent signal in viable transduced cells that was d

133 a transgenic zebrafish that exhibited green fluorescent signals in blood vessels.

134 tron microscopy, confirming that overlapping fluorescent signals in confocal z-stacks accurately iden

135 Whole-body fluorescence imaging detected fluorescent signals in the liver and lungs.

136 ether, YFP-N-beta1 and YFP-C-gamma7 produced fluorescent signals in the plasma membrane that were not

137 e efficiency of excitation and collection of fluorescent signals in the presence of fluorophore photo

138 eases in apparent diffusion coefficients and fluorescent signals in tumor masses immediately after th

139 The ability to directly read the TCPP fluorescent signal increases assay simplicity by reducin

140 significant differences in the amplitude of fluorescent signal indicate that the mutations also affe

141 Fluorescent signals, indicating the retention of virions

142 r to probe injection), a significantly lower fluorescent signal (inflamed paws 50%, inflamed toes 70%

143 With sham treatment, TTc transport causes fluorescent signal intensity over the thoracic spine to

144 cing up to an 850% increase in near-infrared fluorescent signal intensity.

145 The generation of fluorescent signal is controlled by strand-specific elec

146 Although most studies assume that the fluorescent signal is emitted from the surface layer of

147 Moreover, the fluorescent signal is expanded in time in a way that mak

148 he primers are designed in such a way that a fluorescent signal is generated only when the primers ar

149 Fluorescent signal is generated when the hybridization p

150 The fluorescent signal is inversely proportional to the conc

151 The fluorescent signal is measured during oxidation of 2',7'

152 citation are linear processes, but the total fluorescent signal is quadratic, proportional to the squ

153 and pillar diameter dependent enhancement of fluorescent signals is clearly demonstrated using green

154 , resulted in a strong, sporulation-specific fluorescent signal localized to the sites of sporulation

155 are given for the three experimentally used fluorescent signal mechanisms (intensity, intensity rati

156 d accurate method for detection of very weak fluorescent signals obtained in many applications such a

157 The fluorescent signals obtained with this approach exhibite

158 protein or particle and that recovery of the fluorescent signal occurs in response to enzymatic degra

159 The BDNF-induced increase in fluorescent signal of a green fluorescent protein transl

160 mic properties can cause abrupt increases in fluorescent signal of both GFP and fluorescein.

161 following a power-law; (ii) at equilibrium, fluorescent signal of different probes hybridized to the

162 The enhanced fluorescent signal of each N(3+)-aptamer solution is sel

163 The enhancement of the fluorescent signal of N(3+) by three K(+) aptamers consi

164 e efficient in lowering the quenching of the fluorescent signal of tagged insulin, in keeping the dil

165 Additionally, the inherent fluorescent signal of TCPP molecules can be measured aft

166 We report enhancement in the fluorescent signal of the carbocyanine dye Cy5 by using

167 comparison of emission spectra indicates the fluorescent signal of wild-type R67 DHFR is dominated by

168 ons with local minimums in intensity) in the fluorescent signals of mobility markers.

169 nsor, the AAO surface is used to enhance the fluorescent signals of the fluorophore-labeled hairpin D

170 Neutrophil EGFP-fluorescent signals of the S. aureus-infected mice were

171 olution microscopy detected primarily single fluorescent signals of variable intensity that parallele

172 yanocarbonate epoxides that produce a strong fluorescent signal on epoxide hydrolysis by both human a

173 steps: a cleavage reaction, which generates fluorescent signal on microsphere surfaces, followed by

174 This new approach puts the detection of fluorescent signals on a firm statistical foundation.

175 ble filter (AOTF) is used to detect multiple fluorescent signals on a fluidic microdevice.

176 chitectures, rationally designed to elicit a fluorescent signal only after target engagement.

177 anner similar to molecular beacons, yielding fluorescent signals only in the presence of a cognate li

178 reen and red SNAP ligands provide sufficient fluorescent signal, only the tetramethyl rhodamine (TMR)

179 multaneous detection of multiple independent fluorescent signals or signal multiplexing has the poten

180 appositions of presynaptic and postsynaptic fluorescent signal, or synapses, showed overall predomin

181 hippocampal neurons a large fraction of the fluorescent signal originates from intracellular pH-GluA

182 ction sensitivity, either through increasing fluorescent signal output per mRNA molecule or increasin

183 nts that could be visualized and measured as fluorescent signals over multiple cell cycles.

184 Optical mapping is a technique for capturing fluorescent signal patterns of long DNA molecules (in th

185 The fluorescent signal produced from probe-based RT-RPA or R

186 Here, we show that the fluorescent signals produced by single-copy, targeted GF

187 in which low power (a few tens of picowatts) fluorescent signals produced by the bacterial sensors ar

188 uced the average coefficient of variation of fluorescent signal ratios on DNA microarrays in addition

189 f the polymer sample are calculated from the fluorescent signals recorded over a range of dilutions.

190 septic mice had attenuated abdominal AV-750 fluorescent signal, reduced ex vivo fluorescence in the

191 A Ca2+ spark is a fluorescent signal reflecting the activation of a small

192 xin gradient across the root visualized by a fluorescent signaling reporter explained the reversed, u

193 kes into account stochastic variability in a fluorescent signal resulting from intrinsic noise of gen

194 mages showed that the intensity of the green fluorescent signal revealed much weaker signal from the

195 The number and position of the fluorescent signal(s) provides information about the rel

196 liver, adipose tissue, and bone marrow; the fluorescent signals showed complete concordance with the

197 iazole resulted in the redistribution of the fluorescent signal, suggesting that fluorescent PtdIns(4

198 They give a greater fluorescent signal than stem-loop Scorpions due to the v

199 (e.g., mRNAs, DNAs, or proteins), emitting a fluorescent signal that can be quantified and correlated

200 The probes produced a maximum fluorescent signal that could be monitored noninvasively

201 of the transcriptional regulator TetR into a fluorescent signal, thereby linking UPS activity to an e

202 hich directly converts molecular tensions to fluorescent signals, therefore enabling cellular force m

203 the cycle threshold (CT) indicating adequate fluorescent signal to signify a positive result was esta

204 ing a technical limitation to the ability of fluorescent signals to accurately represent gene express

205 ctures and generates significantly amplified fluorescent signals to achieve highly sensitive detectio

206 pen, Glomax, Flocam) measured and quantified fluorescent signal-to-background ratios (SBR) in vitro,

207 ol agent on CA IX positive cells, showed low fluorescent signal under both conditions.

208 sed technique that allows amplification of a fluorescent signal up to 1000-fold.

209 e medium was assayed for the presence of the fluorescent signal up to 32 h after transfection.

210 P sequence gives more than 100-fold brighter fluorescent signals upon excitation with 490 nm (blue) l

211 rtner and its target to generate a change in fluorescent signal using an environment-sensitive fluoro

212 Preservation of fluorescent signal was achieved by decreasing clearing t

213 The in vivo thoracic and abdominal AV-750 fluorescent signal was attributed to the thymus, liver,

214 ucing nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, and a fluorescent signal was collected.

215 A fluorescent signal was detected from 20 ng of H. bilis D

216 omoalanine or homopropargylglycine, a robust fluorescent signal was detected in somata and dendrites.

217 a strain that does not express FtsZ, and the fluorescent signal was distributed all over the cell.

218 However, the maximum area of green fluorescent signal was found at 0.04 mug/ml PCBs.

219 ptide was detected when the intensity of the fluorescent signal was measured with a charge-coupled de

220 Only a dim fluorescent signal was observed on spirochetes at the 48

221 into sternomastoid muscles, a strong rapsyn fluorescent signal was observed selectively at synapses,

222 the optimized protocol, a hardly detectable fluorescent signal was obtained after incubation of the

223 the overexpression of EGFP-tagged Orai1, the fluorescent signal was present primarily in the cell cor

224 cal imaging of arterial tissues, the average fluorescent signal was significantly higher (P <.05) in

225 The fluorescent signal was then obtained through fluorescenc

226 be (TPOFF) for sensing and quantifying tumor fluorescent signals was tested in vivo.

227 s established that measurements of the total fluorescent signal were not sensitive to the focal plane

228 Cells that incorporated both red and green fluorescent signals were considered to be hASCs that had

229 Fluorescent signals were detected as diffusely distribut

230 Fluorescent signals were found to be proportional to the

231 The Simoa fluorescent signals were highest when the koff of the de

232 starting amplicons from the two tissues and fluorescent signals were measured at each DNA spot.

233 etramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) fluorescent signals were not only located in Kupffer cel

234 Distinct fluorescent signals were observed by flow cytometry when

235 Fluorescent signals were observed only in the presence o

236 ocedure is required to provide high contrast fluorescent signal when applied to stain brain tissues.

237 Ca2+ channel beta1b subunit induces a strong fluorescent signal when interacting with the loopI-II bu

238 ed by iron and account for almost the entire fluorescent signal when iron is released.

239 rting analysis showed only a minor change in fluorescent signal when the tumor was probed with a fluo

240 ples appear as 'spots' with a fixed ratio of fluorescent signals, whereas proteins that differ betwee

241 ized AuNCs showed very good stability of the fluorescent signal with light exposure and at neutral an

242 By correlating the GCaMP3 fluorescent signal with the host ECG, we found that graf

243 s used to co-register the bioluminescent and fluorescent signals with muCT images.

244 ergy transfer (ET) primers that produce high fluorescent signals with solid-phase-capturable biotinyl

245 analysis software correlates the position of fluorescent signals with the identity of the analyte.

246 The assay produces a fluorescent signal within 15 to 20 min and worked well u

247 educed clearing time, improved efficiency of fluorescent signals without the need for electrophoretic

248 l amplification is capable of measuring weak fluorescent signals without the need of dedicated labora