戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                                             Food frequency questionnaire to derive the Alternate Healthy
2                                                           A food frequency questionnaire assessed diet.
3 ent Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (P-SCCAI)) and a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
4 ipants of the Rotterdam Study with a skin examination and a food frequency questionnaire were included.
5                      Dietary intake was recorded applying a food frequency questionnaire previously validated.
6             Dietary intake was prospectively evaluated by a food frequency questionnaire.
7                        A total of 156,911 women completed a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at enrollment (1993-1998).
8                                    Participants completed a food frequency questionnaire in 1998 about their high school
9  function of self-reported sodium-to-potassium ratio from a food frequency questionnaire, age, body mass index, race, sup
10                 Inclusion criteria included completion of a food frequency questionnaire and no baseline coronary heart d
11                       Rice consumption was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire administered as part of a popula
12 ssessed at baseline and yearly during the follow-up using a food frequency questionnaire.
13 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and had completed a food-frequency questionnaire at baseline.
14 f dietary pattern-adherence scores that were derived from a food-frequency questionnaire and plasma biomarker concentrati
15   Our outcomes included 61 food items with estimates from a food-frequency questionnaire in the UK Biobank (n = 361,194).
16                         Dietary intake was estimated from a food-frequency questionnaire.
17 clinical phenotype, body composition, lifestyle including a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and a 4-d weighed food di
18 onsumptions were determined through the administration of a food-frequency questionnaire.
19 m consumption was assessed at baseline through the use of a food-frequency questionnaire.
20 hers from the Danish National Birth Cohort who filled out a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) covering midpregnancy diet
21 sociations of changes in dairy consumption (assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire) with parallel changes in cardio
22 for Americans and derived from a 137-item self-administered food-frequency questionnaire.
23  was collected annually using a structured youth/adolescent food-frequency questionnaire during 1997-2001.
24 cted dietary data by combining a food diary, interview, and food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and the Northern Swedish
25 ~68.8 y; 50% female, 50% minority) underwent dietary (Block Food Frequency Questionnaire 2005) and neuropsychological ass
26            Protein intake was assessed at year 2 by a Block food-frequency questionnaire in participants (aged 70-79 y) o
27 rom dietary intakes estimated by a baseline-validated Block food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ).
28                       Diet and supplements were assessed by food frequency questionnaire.
29                              Dietary data were collected by food-frequency questionnaire.Over a mean follow-up period of
30 y the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer) Food Frequency Questionnaire and categorized as none/rare con
31 d cost came from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Food-Frequency Questionnaire linked to retail food prices.
32                                 The E-DII was computed from food frequency questionnaire information on usual dietary int
33      Dietary data were collected using a validated 170-item food frequency questionnaire, and food intakes were categoriz
34 ncy participants answered a comprehensive semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire assessing diet since the start o
35 between coffee drinking, as assessed by a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, and the risk of four common can
36 t was assessed at baseline through a validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire.
37 ication "Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire" by Willett et al., that paper w
38 thors evaluated the validity of a 152-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) by comparing it with two
39 previous 12 months was assessed by using a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ).
40 rmation obtained from a validated 143-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire was used to calculate 6- and 12-
41 essed with the use of a validated 192-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire.
42              The same comparisons in men, based on a single food frequency questionnaire, displayed hazard ratios of 1.31
43                   We assessed dietary intake by a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at baseline and every 4 ye
44              Nut consumption was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire and updated every 2 to 4 years.
45 y (NHS; 1980-2010) and NHSII (1991-2011), using a validated food frequency questionnaire completed every 4 years after di
46               Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire.
47 d from relevant food items in a self-administered validated food frequency questionnaire in early pregnancy.
48 egnancy Study Online)] in which women completed a validated food-frequency questionnaire 10 d after enrollment.
49                          Participants completed a validated food-frequency questionnaire and provided a fasting serum sam
50            Dietary intake was assessed by using a validated food-frequency questionnaire.