ライフサイエンスコーパス: food preference

1 s flexibly according to the female's current food preference.

2 also display impaired social transmission of food preference.

3 lating concentrations of micronutrients, and food preferences.

4 l memory and memory for socially transmitted food preferences.

5 g, spatial learning and socially transmitted food preferences.

6 choices for them as well as their individual food preferences.

7 hoices of agents with similar and dissimilar food preferences.

8 h play important roles in shaping children's food preferences.

9 y explained all of the remaining variance in food preferences.

10 nt unique to each individual twin influenced food preferences.

11 llingness to eat certain foods and by strong food preferences.

12 Food texture has enormous effects on food preferences.

13 in the home as a key influence on children's food preferences.

14 ith a high protein status on food intake and food preferences.

15 n, ecology, and culture in determining human food preferences.

16 al differences in taste and perhaps cultural food preferences.

17 the eating environment to produce phenotypic food preferences.

18 x diseases, innate and adaptive immunity, or food preferences, 32 loci were identified at the suggest

19 mory in the rat using social transmission of food preference, a nonspatial memory task.

20 ces is fundamentally social: They generalize food preferences across individuals who affiliate, or wh

21 foundation for the continuing development of food preferences across the lifespan, and is shaped by t

22 distributed neural mechanisms contribute to food preference and food cravings.

23 in the nucleus accumbens increased palatable food preference and food-seeking behavior.

24 articipants received information about their food preferences and 2 diet options (low-carbohydrate di

25 ets can be tailored to personal and cultural food preferences and appropriate calorie needs for weigh

26 fferences in taste perception that influence food preferences and dietary behavior with subsequent li

27 e on ways in which early learning influences food preferences and eating behavior, which, in turn, sh

28 Individual patterns of food preferences and eating behaviors emerge and differ

29 eers and food availability, continue to mold food preferences and eating behaviors.

30 Our evolutionary heritage of food preferences and eating habits leaves us mismatched

31 , smell, and texture of foods help determine food preferences and eating habits.

32 Food preferences and food choices of populations are fur

33 Both food preferences and food frequencies predicted dietary

34 The objective was to determine whether food preferences and food-frequency scores are associate

35 Self-reported food preferences and frequencies of food consumption hav

36 The slope of the relation between food preferences and frequency of consumption varied wit

37 roups, nor was any association found between food preferences and gustatory acuity.

38 In addition, food preferences and intakes were measured.

39 For virtually all item pairs tested, food preferences and reported frequencies of consumption

40 erstand how infants and toddlers develop the food preferences and self-regulatory processes necessary

41 lso modulates ongoing behaviors ranging from food preferences and social affiliation with the caregiv

42 nt for infants and children to learn healthy food preferences and targeted actions that enable disadv

43 suggests that the interaction between human food preferences and the environment in which those pref

44 Weighed intake, food preference, and weight and height data were obtaine

45 etween taste perceptions, taste preferences, food preferences, and food choices and the amount of foo

46 ere adjusted for age, log fat and lean mass, food preferences, and intake during a buffet test meal o

47 t into the development of sensory processes, food preferences, and the formation of social affiliatio

48 Food preferences are acquired through experience and can

49 ng habits, but within these boundaries human food preferences are remarkably varied, both within and

50 Thus, whereas food preferences are seen as embedded within social grou

51 eople to like the same objects, infants view food preferences as meaningfully shared across individua

52 on to new foods and (b) the ability to learn food preferences based on associations with the contexts

53 Overall, no differences were observed in food preferences between the two groups, nor was any ass

54 e provide evidence that neural regulation of food preference but not ingestion rate may involve direc

55 environment play important roles in shaping food preferences; but the aetiology of variation in non-

56 e their eating behaviour and adopt healthier food preferences by avoiding high-calorie and high-fat f

57 sonance signal change corresponding to these food preferences constituted the food valuation signal t

58 Experiment 1 asked how long an acquired food preference could be remembered.

59 ion resulted in a return to normal palatable food preference despite continued locomotor suppression,

60 hoice in the test for social transmission of food preference, despite showing a normal level of socia

61 e variation in early feedings to investigate food preference development.

62 The shifting of food preference driven by nutrient-specific hunger can b

63 ity has been well documented, and it affects food preferences (eg, avoidance of cruciferous vegetable

64 Normal rats exhibited memory of the acquired food preference for at least 3 months after learning.

65 ious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.

66 In addition, after the low-protein diet, food preferences for savory high-protein foods were enha

67 In formula-fed infants eating table foods, preferences for the basic tastes reflected the ty

68 Food preferences had a moderate genetic basis in late ad

69 This was not caused by alterations to food preference, hypothalamic signaling of neuropeptides

70 tia identified overeating or increased sweet food preference in 80 (78%), new or increased alcohol or

71 ession to backcross loci that control innate food preference in Drosophila simulans into the genomic

72 red environmental experiences that influence food preferences in childhood may not have effects that

73 ch tubers, a conclusion further supported by food preferences in fasted animals.

74 hanges in sweet taste perception might alter food preferences in GDM, making dietary compliance diffi

75 e influences of genes and the environment on food preferences in late adolescence are unknown.

76 n of genetic and environmental influences on food preferences in older adolescents.

77 hors investigated the social transmission of food preferences in pine voles (Microtus pinetorum) and

78 provides an eating environment that fosters food preferences inconsistent with dietary guidelines, w

79 However, postingestive effects can influence food preferences independently of palatability, although

80 and health ought to take sensory factors and food preferences into account.

81 The test for social transmission of food preference is based on the normal ability of mice i

82 reference in rodents but their role in human food preference is unknown.

83 The social transmission of food preferences is affected by factors including the le

84 Importantly, infants' reasoning about food preferences is flexibly calibrated to their own exp

85 Infants' reasoning about food preferences is fundamentally social: They generaliz

86 luding reduced appetite and changes in taste/food preferences, is now recognized as a key driver of t

87 d questionnaire measures of their children's food preferences (liking for vegetables and fruit) and t

88 Conversely, on a formal test of food preference, monkeys with amygdala lesions showed ab

89 gational task and the social transmission of food preference olfactory memory test.

90 e found six loci contributing to D. simulans food preference, one of which overlaps a previously disc

91 as designed using the social transmission of food preference paradigm.

92 motivation to work for a food reinforcer, or food preferences, per se.

93 After a protein deficit, food intake and food preferences show adaptive changes that suggest that

94 Social transmission of food preference (STFP) is a test of olfactory memory tha

95 ade amnesia for the social transmission of a food preference (STFP) within our experimental protocol.

96 recognition (SOR) and social transmission of food preference (STFP), but no LTM 24 h post training.

97 During social transmission of food preference (STFP), mice form long-term memory of fo

98 for the acquisition of socially transmitted food preferences (STFPs) in mice.

99 -) mice failed in the social transmission of food preference task, another cognitive paradigm.

100 n allowed to choose foods alone, either on a food preference test among six different foods or after

101 s intrinsic reward value, as determined from food preference testing.

102 o showed a lower incidence of acquired sweet food preference than patients without C9ORF72 mutations.

103 er genetic predispositions are manifested in food preferences that foster healthy diets depends on th

104 s the nutrient value of sugar and influences food preference, the neural circuitry that mediates the

105 contrast, parents often perceive children's food preferences to be inborn.

106 her she will constrain her generalization of food preferences to people who speak the same language.

107 eating habits (U = 69.5, z = 3.8, P = .001), food preferences (U = 57.0, z = 4.1, P = .001), swallowi

108 Food preferences vary substantially among adults and chi

109 rawal, when drug preference was elevated but food preference was decreased.

110 glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and food preference were analyzed.

111 Food preferences were a predictor of dietary intakes and

112 alpha- and beta-carotene were measured, and food preferences were assessed by questionnaire.

113 Food preferences were measured by using a self-report qu

114 est meal, and their total caloric intake and food preferences were measured.

115 semantic-like memory (social transmission of food preference) were detected from 3 to 4 months of age

116 Learned food preferences, which are developed through repeated p

117 ce that IP can be used to alter high-calorie food preferences, which could promote healthier eating h