1 we explain what happens once a manuscript has been
accepted for publication.
2 f experienced statisticians before undertaking or
accepting for publication a systematic review and meta-analysis.
3 Accounting for publication bias reduced the odds ratios for the various
4 ut based on statistical techniques that evaluate and
adjust for publication bias, we question whether depletion is a real
5 Findings
adjusted for publication bias were similar.
6 all evidence of omega-3 benefit was removed after
adjusting for publication bias using the trim-and-fill method (SMD=0.01
7 After
adjusting for publication bias, the results of 14 studies indicated tha
8 After
adjustment for publication bias, the overall relative risk was reduced t
9 contrasting the results in order to select a final
assembly for publication.
10 ration of results in web reports that are readily
available for publication.
11 nd heterogeneity was addressed with I(2) index,
controlling for publication bias and quality of study.
12 Tweedie's 'trim and fill' were used to examine and
correct for publication bias.
13 We also tested and
corrected for publication bias by 3 funnel plot-based methods.
14 iation became nonsignificant after trim-and-fill
correction for publication bias.
15 generated random-effects models for analysis and
evaluated for publication bias.
16 We also evaluated heterogeneity among studies and
evidence for publication bias.
17 s and overview networks in Cytoscape, which can be
exported for publication figures.
18 o vector graphics programs to generate high-quality
figures for publication.
19 ation files offline and to generate high-resolution
figures for publication.
20 e visual context, and to download data, results, and
images for publication.
21 The Minimum
Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MI
22 improved in publications that cite the Minimum
Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MI
23 abstracts presented at the AHA meeting remained more
likely for publication relative to the ESC (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2
24 material and in determining priority of submitted
material for publication.
25 d was in mean deviation for sensitivity, which was
observed for publication timing, where studies published first on a to
26 Potential for publication bias, and evaluated health IT systems and out
27 Potential for publication bias, insufficient reporting of harms, and po
28 The
potential for publication bias was explored by using funnel plots, Begg
29 s can share datasets and automate data depository
processes for publication purposes.
30 The adjusted hazard
ratio for publication was 1.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.67)
31 sider requiring these key data when reviewing these
reports for publication.
32 More experimental data are now
required for publication, and the average time required for graduate s
33 reproducible and statistically significant results
required for publication quality data.
34 have used this guideline worldwide to prepare their
reviews for publication.
35 Mixed evidence was
seen for publication bias, but analyses by using the Duval and Twe
36 ign, conduct, and reporting of exploratory clinical
studies for publication.
37 recommendations and prevention pathway prior to
submission for publication.
38 ect that was observed only in males (Zhang et al,
submitted for publication).
39 nanobeads used in previous work (Donolato et al.,
submitted for publication), where a limit of detection of 10pM was obta
40 cal knowledge to appraise critically the articles
submitted for publication.
41 g withdrawn so that a corrected manuscript can be
submitted for publication.
42 l responsibility for the content of the documents
submitted for publication, each reviewer comment will be discussed, and
43 l responsibility for the content of the documents
submitted for publication, each reviewer comment will be discussed, and
44 0 manuscripts over the past 22 months for their
suitability for publication in our journal.
45 piPipes can also produce figures and tables
suitable for publication.
46 few mortality studies were identified to meaningfully
test for publication bias.
47 We used funnel plots and Egger's linear regression to
test for publication bias.
48 ill not consider manuscripts on human organ
transplantation for publication unless appropriate non-coerced consent of the
49 ots using the SMD in combination with the SE are
unsuitable for publication bias assessments and can lead to false-positi
50 t WHO's response during the epidemic, and have been
updated for publication.