ライフサイエンスコーパス: forage

1 o visually based long-distance navigation to forage.

2 flecting from nearby objects to navigate and forage.

3 ws and woodlands to provide major plants for foraging.

4 plicated in behaviors that promote efficient foraging.

5 essary for efficient action selection during foraging.

6 rted flying foragers and inhibited A. cerana foraging.

7 rategic disengagement and exploration during foraging.

8 occurrence in more open environments during foraging.

9 how long-term fidelity to trawler-associated foraging.

10 ntact calls to maintain group cohesion while foraging.

11 s that pollinators often encounter them when foraging.

12 and is likely the predominant sense used in foraging.

13 eads to efficient and ethological individual foraging.

14 earch (ARS) behaviours, believed to indicate foraging activities.

15 ities through its influence on the nocturnal foraging activity of dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus), a wid

16 atory, we investigated whether the basal and foraging activity of this predator was affected by expos

17 ging theory to compare the importance of the forage and movement hypotheses.

18 (Lolium arundinaceum) is one of the primary forage and turf grasses in temperate regions of the worl

19 individuals by increasing task efficiency in foraging and anti-predator behaviors [1-4].

20 fear governs the balance between exploration/foraging and avoidance of predators and is thus fundamen

21 ors and social bonding behaviors and less to foraging and comfort behaviors.

22 Such exposure may impair foraging and homing, which are vital to normal colony fu

23 food density because of body size effects on foraging and metabolism and this sensitivity could drive

24 nced by insects' behavioral decisions during foraging and oviposition.

25 hales is often described by two states; deep foraging and shallow, non-foraging dives.

26 context strongly predicted focal crop pollen foraging and total pesticide residues, which were domina

27 Here, we determine the combined benefit (forage) and cost (insecticide) of oilseed rape grown fro

28 of exploration (searching) and exploitation (foraging) and show that foraging effort, time in patch a

29 surements of PCBs and PCDD/Fs on site (soil, forage, and paint) and in cattle (blood, fat, and milk)

30 pecies vocalize at key life stages or whilst foraging, and disruption to the acoustic habitat at thes

31 Foraging animals balance the need to seek food and energ

32 While foraging, animals can form inter- and intraspecific soci

33 xtrinsic drivers of variation in ontogeny of foraging are poorly understood for many species.

34 roup should depart a camp and its associated foraging area and move to another based on declining mar

35 by different processes and threats in their foraging areas during the breeding and nonbreeding seaso

36 system for observing and manipulating large foraging areas in a coral reef with a class of dynamical

37 ng foraging hotspots; females using southern foraging areas laid nests that produced more offspring i

38 variability in the relative contribution of foraging areas to the nesting adults.

39 Foraging areas were identified using area-restricted sea

40 ecide when to feed on algae and when to flee foraging areas.

41 nced a significant unfavorable change in its foraging areas.

42 ntification to assess short-term fidelity to foraging around trawlers, and used photographic and gene

43 xplored by monitoring changes in density and foraging as habitat availability varies.

44 at the amount of sulfatase secreted by mucin-foraging bacteria such as B. thetaiotaomicron, inhabitin

45 ation structure (such as migratory birds and foraging bats) as well as the recreational and cultural

46 icult as assessing the potential exposure of foraging bees to pesticide.

47 functional genes that correspond to cultural foraging behavior and habitat use by the different ecoty

48 VB2 level critically impacts food uptake and foraging behavior by regulating specific protease gene e

49 at playing a video game modeled from sensory foraging behavior can improve the aging brain's ability

50 irmed that fish populations exhibit adaptive foraging behavior in response to temperature variation a

51 teria) experimental system in which the worm-foraging behavior leads to a redistribution of the bacte

52 of public good production resulting from the foraging behavior of C. elegans, which has important pop

53 The foraging behavior of primates is especially complex and

54 These networks may represent a collective foraging behavior of this parasite, which may in turn fa

55 s with for to regulate strain-specific adult foraging behavior through allele-specific histone methyl

56 ard changing reward locations, as in natural foraging behavior.

57 mework provided the best fit to the observed foraging behavior.

58 This is observed when foraging behaviors are guided by superior nutritional de

59 eal reproducible trajectories of spontaneous foraging behaviors that are stereotyped within and betwe

60 An individual's foraging behaviour and time allocated to feeding have di

61 nguins (Pygoscelis papua) and recorded their foraging behaviour during chick guarding.

62 o which such individual-level variability in foraging behaviour is under selection.

63 sea ice concentration and advance affect the foraging behaviour of a top Antarctic predator, the sout

64 The searching and foraging behaviour of bolder birds placed them towards t

65 istribution of engineered structures and the foraging behaviour of consumers that use these structure

66 many oceanic taxa, with implications for the foraging behaviour of nocturnal marine predators.

67 The effect of such substances on the foraging behaviour of pollinators is poorly understood.

68 Previously, we have shown that the foraging behaviour of the slime mould can be applied in

69 Hence, studies of foraging behaviour should consider the extent to which s

70 puter modelling we uncovered patterns of the foraging behaviour that might shed a light onto developm

71 tent in their tactics, and also adjust their foraging behaviour with changes in local competition.

72 f investment in chemical signalling, and not foraging behaviour, as a leading factor driving the dive

73 our' was unrelated to both measures of daily foraging behaviour.

74 ving patterns, group association events, and foraging behaviour.

75 causes substantial losses of grain yield and forage biomass in susceptible maize worldwide.

76 In contrast to chicken, a visually foraging bird, the majority of duck trigeminal neurons a

77 able rates and completed a similar number of foraging bouts per day in the field.

78 d asked whether reward specialists made more foraging bouts than generalists.

79 vels of disorder in order to investigate how foraging bumblebees respond to this optical effect.

80 ial of 9-O-acetylated mucus sialic acids for foraging by bacteria that otherwise are prevented from a

81 flowers honey bees (Apis mellifera) use for forage can help us to provide suitable plants for health

82 es for their colony over the course of their foraging career.

83 Advantageous foraging choices benefit from an estimation of two aspec

84 When the whole foraging community had access to food resources, we foun

85 e food resources available to: (i) the whole foraging community, (ii) only invertebrates and (iii) on

86 arger animals are more sensitive to changing forage conditions than smaller animals with implications

87 Salience signals were stronger in poor foraging contexts than rich ones, suggesting low harvest

88 rists may represent a form of disturbance to foraging cranes but is habitat dependent.

89 ass conservation properties in bioenergy and forage crops.

90 therer residential mobility using historical foraging data from nomadic, socially egalitarian Batek h

91 or understanding how this important class of foraging decisions might be biologically implemented, bu

92 eceptors previously implicated in C. elegans foraging decisions NPR-1 and TYRA-3, for NPY-like neurop

93 omain-general way in which stress might bias foraging decisions through changing one's appraisal of t

94 Despite much research on population-level foraging decisions, few studies have investigated indivi

95 In such foraging decisions, the quality of the overall environme

96 ible temperature patterns on flowers to make foraging decisions.

97 body size shifts, attributable to changes in foraging depth and environmental forcing, as well as re-

98 y two states; deep foraging and shallow, non-foraging dives.

99 Tactile-foraging ducks are specialist birds known for their touc

100 or grazing in open savannahs, relates to its foraging ecology and habitat.

101 the same area to examine long-term trends in foraging ecology and sea ice productivity.

102 These findings indicate that changes in foraging ecology, not declining environmental concentrat

103 ages relevant to coordinating behaviour in a foraging ecology, such as cooperation, sex equality and

104 eir range and likely reflect shifts in their foraging ecology.

105 Young animals must learn to forage effectively to survive the transition from parent

106 Our results highlight the trade-off between foraging efficiency and interspecific competition, and u

107 esis that the timing of such moves maximizes foraging efficiency as hunter-gatherers move across the

108 f lateralized feeding strategies may enhance foraging efficiency in environments with heterogeneous p

109 prey at depth) and filter-feeding (enhancing foraging efficiency on small prey).

110 ible cost-benefits computations that improve foraging efficiency.

111 lethal effects, such as reduced learning and foraging efficiency.

112 d that hook geometry in turn affected crows' foraging efficiency.

113 opogenic noise and disturbance, which reduce foraging efficiency; and high levels of stored contamina

114 ioral differences emerge with latitude, with foraging effort and energy expenditure increasing when b

115 As expected, subordinates reduce their foraging effort following our treatments.

116 surface meridional wind anomalies and female foraging effort, but not for males.

117 g) and exploitation (foraging) and show that foraging effort, time in patch and size of patch are str

118 s) winter range occupancy across a long-term foraging exclusion experiment in the sagebrush steppe of

119 Furthermore, winter foraging exclusion increased soil cellulolytic and hemic

120 a greater beta-diversity response to winter foraging exclusion was observed.

121 We show that a total loss of foraging expression in larvae results in reduced larval

122 Bahama Bank, which support higher numbers of foraging females that provide higher rates of hatchling

123 These cascading impacts of localized forage fish depletion-unobserved in studies on adults-we

124 t System (HCS) has the highest production of forage fish in the world, although it is highly variable

125 change and industrial fishing have depleted forage fish stocks in this system [10, 11].

126 When foraging, food availability controls behavioral state sw

127 Such crops represent an important source of forage for bees, which is often scarce in agro-ecosystem

128 use flexible, undifferentiated body plans to forage for food.

129 made' 3D root system that is best adapted to forage for resources in each soil environment that a pla

130 We investigated how primates forage for social information conveyed by conspecific fa

131 d is thought to enhance a plant's ability to forage for the available Pi in topsoil.

132 Hydrotropism allows roots to forage for water, a process known to depend on abscisic

133 hermore, bees with better learning abilities foraged for fewer days; suggesting a cost of enhanced le

134 recording electrodes as male rats rested and foraged for rewards, revealing a highly consistent power

135 Foraging for resources is a fundamental behavior balanci

136 BA thereby decreased A. cerana foraging for risky sites.

137 us macaques (Macaca mulatta) spent more time foraging for social information when alternative sources

138 However, it remains unknown whether foraging for social resources also obeys such a strategi

139 The foraging (for) gene regulates behavioral differences bet

140 Consumption of mushrooms foraged from the Sobowidz forest, which is close to a fo

141 Furthermore, varying foraging gene dosage demonstrates a linear dose-response

142 -response on these phenotypes in relation to foraging gene expression levels.

143 The foraging gene in Drosophila melanogaster has previously

144 homologous recombination to precisely delete foraging, generating the for(0) null allele, and used re

145 wed albatrosses are highly faithful in their foraging habitat but it is rather site fidelity that is

146 o the influence of wing design and preferred foraging habitat on size-independent species-specific di

147 nificantly with the proportion of high-value foraging habitat, including spring floral resources, wit

148 provide an important, but often overlooked, foraging habitat.

149 e provinces that described the migratory and foraging habitats of these seals.

150 om the beginning of the growing season until forage harvest.

151 However, tool-assisted foraging has also pushed many of our prey species to ext

152 Foraging has been a canonical setting for studying rewar

153 ost studies to date testing lunar effects on foraging have focused on predator activity at-sea, with

154 ted these factors to each forager's complete foraging history, obtained using radio frequency identif

155 individual results by year, identified seven foraging hotspots and tracked these summaries to describ

156 Also reproductive success differed among foraging hotspots; females using southern foraging areas

157 Scenarios strongly support the forage hypothesis over the movement hypothesis.

158 sensitivity could drive migratory decisions (forage hypothesis).

159 climatic factors and access to high-quality forage (i.e., crops).

160 Native species that forage in farmland may increase their local abundances t

161 the production of wood in forests, livestock forage in grasslands and fish in aquatic ecosystems.

162 recorded from CA1 cells as disoriented mice foraged in chambers of various shapes.

163 While foraging in liquid food, larvae are observed to align th

164 uals may limit niche overlap by consistently foraging in specific areas, site fidelity may also emerg

165 influence the vigilance behaviour of cranes foraging in Suaeda salsa salt marshes and S. salsa/Phrag

166 ed to exclusively support a model of aquatic foraging in theropods and argue instead that an enhanced

167 come into contact with these pesticides when foraging in treated areas, with potential consequences f

168 Foraging intensity of large herbivores may exert an indi

169 hemicellulolytic enzyme potential and higher foraging intensity reduced chitinolytic gene abundance.

170 Winter foraging intensity was associated with reduced bacterial

171 ngal communities did not respond linearly to foraging intensity, a greater beta-diversity response to

172 ely to innovate in other behavioral domains (foraging, investigative, and self-directed behaviors).

173 assess xenobiotic risk to nestmates as they forage is poorly understood.

174 Foraging is a fundamental behavior, and many types of an

175 Scent guided foraging is associated with an expansion of the olfactor

176 ld be reduced to a point where tool-assisted foraging is no longer beneficial to the macaques, which

177 ogically relevant decisions that we make are foraging-like decisions about whether to stay with a cur

178 We hypothesized that such foraging-like decisions would be characteristically sens

179 etry and stable isotope analysis to estimate foraging locations for 749 individual loggerheads nestin

180 ve promoters and alternative splicing at the foraging locus creates diversity and flexibility in the

181 Females foraged longer in pack ice in years with greatest sea ic

182 on and earliest sea ice advance, while males foraged longer in polynyas in years of lowest sea ice co

183 idely reported links between personality and foraging may emerge.

184 The adaptive foraging mechanisms of ectomycorrhizal (EcM) and fine ro

185 esult from maternal cultural transmission of foraging methods, and large-scale redistributions of spe

186 from the medial entorhinal cortex of freely foraging mice, while modulating the excitability of medi

187 Foraging mode plays a pivotal role in traditional recons

188 fer in many aspects of their biology besides foraging mode.

189 we evaluated visual learning performance of foraging naive bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) in an eco

190 fidelity to a "home tree," and more frequent foraging near their home tree.

191 lance of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) which forage, nearly exclusively, on this substrate.

192 as associated with dramatic changes in their foraging niche.

193 they typically kill 25-75% of the salmon, to forage on berries on adjacent hillsides.

194 as they make extensive vertical movements to forage on subdaily time scales.

195 th short-corollas, hummingbirds consistently foraged on well-matched flowers, leading to low niche ov

196 position of the resource pulses, the cost of foraging on poorly matched resources, and the strength o

197 ecological functions that result from bears foraging on salmon.

198 Here, we demonstrate that tool-assisted foraging on shellfish by long-tailed macaques (Macaca fa

199 stood, but each potential habitat has unique foraging opportunities and spatially explicit natural an

200 Compounding reduced foraging opportunities that result from habitat loss; ch

201 ty to solve a unique adaptive problem (e.g., foraging or mating) should be distinguished from functio

202 aterality can vary for different tasks (e.g. foraging or predator inspection/avoidance).

203 lity to induce root architectural changes to forage P.

204 a from 276 wandering albatrosses, we extract foraging parameters indicative of exploration (searching

205 d individual differences in fine-scale daily foraging patterns among wild animals.

206 ifferences, birds also showed flexibility in foraging patterns, binge-eating less and using feeders m

207 revealed consistent individual variation in foraging patterns, refuge use and social interactions.

208 or one technique were subjected to a reduced foraging payoff, 49% of birds switched their behavior to

209 tructure, leadership, movement dynamics, and foraging performance of groups can emerge from inter-ind

210 traits are not necessarily beneficial to the foraging performance of individuals or colonies in all e

211 y conditions, before monitoring the lifetime foraging performance of the same individual bees in the

212 including their collective decision-making, foraging performance, and predator avoidance.

213 85 workers tested in both their learning and foraging performance, which was not predicted by colony

214 ctivity level IIV would relate positively to foraging performance.

215 ffects of the alkaloid nicotine on bumblebee foraging performance.

216 dness" assay, explained individual and group foraging performance.

217 ice behavior can be assessed from an optimal foraging perspective whereby target selection is shaped

218 To aid foraging, plants have evolved roots whose growth and dev

219 Forage plays a critical role in the milk production of d

220 Perhaps the most common foraging problem is the choice between exploiting a fami

221 Many decisions that humans make resemble foraging problems in which a currently available, known

222 many types of animals appear to have solved foraging problems using a shared set of mechanisms.

223 Our results suggest that forage production in Africa is sensitive to changes in c

224 ts were fed to lactating cows to explore how forage quality affected the molecular mechanisms regulat

225 strong trade-off as many species have large foraging ranges and their prey often have a patchy distr

226 t-changing environments, and their extensive foraging ranges expose them to incidental mortality (byc

227 bovine milk synthesis in dairy cows fed high forage rations with different basal forage types are not

228 so revealed that departure from Beaufort Sea foraging regions by Chukchi whales was postponed in the

229 ales and examined how patterns of individual foraging related to the emergent property of residential

230 ddition, the spatiotemporal configuration of forage resources that propagate along migratory routes s

231 This study reveals the complexities of foraging responses to climate forcing by a poleward migr

232 ow) can cause 'icing', restricting access to forage, resulting in starvation, lower survival and fecu

233 al vulnerability of taxa with key functional foraging roles in processing basal resources suggests th

234 isoform- and tissue-specific requirements of foraging's functions and shed light on the genetic contr

235 Before foraging's functions can be further dissected, we need a

236 Our analysis of foraging's transcription start sites, termination sites,

237 Furthermore, rover foraging scores can be phenocopied by transgenically red

238 lation, lower pr4 RNA expression, and higher foraging scores than sitters.

239 cales can lead to personality-dependent: (1) foraging search performance; (2) habitat preference; (3)

240 plant material for grassland restoration and forage should consider changes in the phenotype that wil

241 ntegral to efficient action-selection during foraging.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Evolutionary pressure dr

242 ly studied due to the inaccessibility of the foraging site-the open ocean-to researchers.

243 Animals that visit multiple foraging sites face a problem, analogous to the Travelli

244 ter a brief suckling phase, and must develop foraging skills without external input.

245 themes are present in narratives from other foraging societies.

246 ularly prevalent in marine ecosystems, where foraging specialisations are evident.

247 Thus, displacement by dominant, group-foraging species may make subordinate species more depen

248 , and sedentary behaviour by two terrestrial-foraging species with low-to-moderate vagility (T. aedon

249 elevational movements by two tree- and shrub-foraging species with moderate-to-high vagility (C. cine

250 , and are competitively subordinate to group-foraging stingless bee species.

251 We suggest a concept of absorptive fine root foraging strategies involving both qualitative and quant

252 Rapid development of successful foraging strategies is particularly important for capita

253 rovides a mechanism through which individual foraging strategies may emerge.

254 ode that is homologous to the more elaborate foraging strategies of central place foragers such as an

255 tissues is likely to be a result of adaptive foraging strategies that allow these sharks to exploit m

256 ates their flexible capacity to modify their foraging strategy in relation to variable environments.

257 In vitro foraging studies demonstrated that sialidase-dependent E

258 average activity level, and two measures of foraging success in laboratory mesocosms: change in spid

259 el (personality) predicted neither metric of foraging success, indicating that behavioral IIV can pre

260 rs of these patterns, including variation in foraging success, prey availability and selection, bathy

261 an important C4 grass crop grown for grain, forage, sugar, and bioenergy production.

262 t C4 grass used for the production of grain, forage, sugar, and lignocellulosic biomass and a genetic

263 tion in prey abundance influenced lake trout foraging tactics (i.e., the balance of the number and du

264 idence that birds use consistent alternative foraging tactics at a fine temporal scale.

265 STDP that was sufficient to solve a complex foraging task involving pattern classification and decis

266 elate to performance in a virtual sequential foraging task.

267 ted such decision-making in a rapid movement foraging task.

268 Here we provide evidence from two different foraging tasks that neurons in primate posterior cingula

269 In our foraging tasks, salience refers to the difference betwee

270 ticity (STDP) are capable of learning simple foraging tasks.

271 s switched their behavior to a higher-payoff foraging technique after only 14 days, with younger indi

272 turn may lessen or extinguish the remarkable foraging technology employed by these primates.

273 ore specialised in the habitat in which they forage than the exact location they use within years, an

274 to it have significant implications for both foraging theory and ecology of grazing systems.

275 These results have implications for foraging theory and stability of grazing systems.

276 ual migratory cycle model from metabolic and foraging theory to compare the importance of the forage

277 smaller-sized prey than predicted by optimal foraging theory, to balance trade-offs between kleptopar

278 l expressions using the framework of optimal foraging theory.

279 ow computational psychiatry can benefit from foraging theory.

280 nt temperatures were associated with reduced foraging time, especially during the energetically costl

281 long run, Neolitization (the transition from foraging to food production) was associated with demogra

282 role in many aspects of animal ecology from foraging to habitat selection to predator avoidance.

283 systems involved in energy homeostasis bias foraging to maximize energy efficiency.

284 ifferent length scales from animal and human foraging to microswimmers' taxis to biochemical rates of

285 cortex (PCC) signal decision salience during foraging to motivate disengagement from the current stra

286 When subpopulations with established foraging traditions for one technique were subjected to

287 Our results suggest that foraging traits modulate competitive interactions that u

288 , the offshore call of penguins during their foraging trips has been poorly studied due to the inacce

289 ddress this, we GPS-tracked the free-ranging foraging trips of incubating Scopoli's shearwaters withi

290 nd that in the pelagic return stage of their foraging trips, anosmic birds were not oriented towards

291 birds from all three treatments embarked on foraging trips, had indistinguishable at-sea schedules o

292 ocean related with group association during foraging trips.

293 Forage type had no effect on animal performance (estimat

294 fed high forage rations with different basal forage types are not well-understood.

295 Yet focal crop pollen foraging was a poor predictor of pesticide risk, which w

296 or of sulfate reduction and habitat specific-foraging, was correlated with fish THg at all three spat

297 and of dogwhelks through stress, encouraging foraging whenever food was available, regardless of pote

298 We present an algorithm for group foraging, which we term "socialtaxis," that unifies info

299 living has focused on trade-offs surrounding foraging, while other forms of resource acquisition have

300 alculated as the similarity between pairs of foraging zones, quantifying measures for within and betw