ライフサイエンスコーパス: foreign body

1 human pathogen, often in association with a foreign body.

2 atment has generally involved removal of the foreign body.

3 d was informed of the possible presence of a foreign body.

4 inded fashion and recorded the presence of a foreign body.

5 urethra depends on the size and shape of the foreign body.

6 nding on the physical characteristics of the foreign body.

7 c factors were: RD at presentation and large foreign body.

8 ers have chorioamnionitis or an intrauterine foreign body.

9 enia, malignancy, and an indwelling vascular foreign body.

10 ope to confirm the suspected presence of the foreign body.

11 ous response to inflammation, infection, and foreign bodies.

12 d effective for radiopaque and nonradiopaque foreign bodies.

13 primary enucleation and retained intraocular foreign bodies.

14 with immunocompromised hosts with indwelling foreign bodies.

15 intestinal tract and manifest as symptomatic foreign bodies.

16 llent modality for evaluation of radiolucent foreign bodies.

17 sions were performed without implantation of foreign bodies.

18 rising 48% of all closed claims for retained foreign bodies.

19 nonaggressive course and an association with foreign bodies.

20 rgery patients are at high risk for retained foreign bodies.

21 patients with posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies.

22 patients with certain implants and metallic foreign bodies.

23 inflammation, and birefringent intravascular foreign bodies.

24 or infection include 1) retained intraocular foreign body, 2) a rural injury setting, 3) delay in pri

25 Thirty-seven of the patients with retained foreign bodies (69 percent) required reoperation, and on

26 ptures (6 eyes), and conjunctival or corneal foreign bodies (7 eyes).

27 Alloplasts are inert foreign bodies acting as osteoconductive space maintaine

28 The risk of retention of a foreign body after surgery significantly increases in em

29 Children with an 'impaired' normal (foreign body, allergy, and inflammation) or an expected

30 Patients with retained foreign bodies also had a higher mean body-mass index an

31 (CoNS) form a thick, multilayered biofilm on foreign bodies and are a major cause of nosocomial impla

32 toperative care of patients with intraocular foreign bodies and present a management algorithm.

33 literature on the assessment of intraocular foreign bodies and techniques for their removal.

34 minal radiography was 90% for intraabdominal foreign body and 49% for bowel obstruction.

35 on, ventilation, laboratory, diet, activity, foreign body, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

36 evious surgery, malignancy, steroid therapy, foreign body, and immunodeficiency.

37 is a cellular process by which particles and foreign bodies are engulfed and degraded by specialized

38 Given that many foreign bodies are radiographically undetectable, the ac

39 Both the material and size of the foreign body are considerations in the choice of instrum

40 US can be used effectively to locate wooden foreign bodies as small as 2.5 mm in length.

41 Sand and foreign-body aspiration may accompany drowning and near-

42 Using a murine model of foreign body-associated peritonitis, we demonstrated tha

43 We optimized a murine model of foreign body-associated UTI in order to mimic conditions

44 Using a recently optimized murine model of foreign body-associated UTI, we found that the implanted

45 n in humans supports the recommendation that foreign-body-associated infections should be treated wit

46 oculum murine skin abscess model including a foreign body at the infection site, strains deleted for

47 significant decrease in the thickness of the foreign body capsule, as compared to that observed in wi

48 minimal scarring and form well-vascularized foreign body capsules.

49 ections: the presence of devitalized tissue, foreign bodies, clots, fluid collections, and contaminat

50 manipulation before implantation results in foreign body contamination and increased neointimal hype

51 erves displayed hemorrhage, leukostasis, and foreign body crystallization.

52 omputed tomography (MDCT) revealed a tubular foreign body density, compatible with intestinal perfora

53 In this model, the presence of a foreign body elicits major histological changes and indu

54 Coins are the most commonly ingested foreign body encountered in the pediatric population.

55 ial pathogenesis as well as the mechanism of foreign body entry to a human cell, which may provide in

56 formed on 150 children with MPP or bronchial foreign body (FB) admitted in our hospital.

57 No differences in foreign body feeling or quality of life scores were dete

58 arameters included chronic pain, recurrence, foreign body feeling, and quality of life scores.

59 The prosthetic mesh induces a chronic foreign-body fibroblastic response creating scar tissue

60 h the pars plana sclerotomy with intraocular foreign body forceps.

61 The predominant foreign bodies found were titanium and dental cement.

62 Debridement (removal of necrotic tissue and foreign bodies from the wound) at different frequencies.

63 eripheral blood derived macrophage adhesion, foreign body giant cell (FBGC) formation and inflammator

64 esive mechanisms that support multinucleated foreign body giant cell (FBGC) formation.

65 s endocytic/phagocytic receptor in mediating foreign body giant cell formation at sites of chronic in

66 (MCP-1) was demonstrated to be required for foreign body giant cell formation in the foreign body re

67 te) scaffolds containing NSC23766 attenuated foreign body giant cell formation in vivo.

68 is characterized by macrophage infiltration, foreign body giant cell formation, and fibrotic encapsul

69 IL-13 acts independently of IL-4 to promote foreign body giant cell formation, it may trigger a comm

70 ocyte-macrophage fusion provides a model for foreign body giant cell formation.

71 anti-human IL-13 Abs inhibited IL-13-induced foreign body giant cell formation; the fusion-inducing e

72 vascular occlusion and moderate intraluminal foreign body giant cell reaction; the acutely embolized

73 acterized by the presence of macrophages and foreign body giant cells (FBGC), can result in structura

74 The formation of foreign body giant cells (FBGC), which damage the surfac

75 Multinucleated foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) form by monocyte-derive

76 ocyte-macrophage adhesion and fusion to form foreign body giant cells are provided by substrates with

77 ent studies involving mainly osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells have revealed a number of commo

78 ty on the formation of interleukin-4-induced foreign body giant cells in vitro Giant cell formation w

79 ytic macrophages, wound-healing macrophages, foreign body giant cells, and bone-resorbing osteoclasts

80 sia, encapsulation, mononuclear infiltrates, foreign body giant cells, and eosinophilic infiltrates.

81 Although foreign body giant cells, Langhans' giant cells, and ost

82 es including macrophages in the formation of foreign body giant cells.

83 adherent cells that included macrophages and foreign body giant cells.

84 Xid mice also failed to form multinucleated foreign body giant cells.

85 ials undergo fusion to form surface-damaging foreign body giant cells.

86 nstrated variable inflammatory reactions and foreign-body giant cell reaction and no angionecrosis or

87 tly as a result of degradation by an ongoing foreign-body giant cell reaction that peaked at 8-12 d p

88 izing pneumonia (OP) pattern developed, with foreign-body giant cells and granulomas.

89 monocyte adhesion and macrophage fusion into foreign-body giant cells while inducing adherent-macroph

90 mplanting small surgical sponges to elicit a foreign body granulation tissue response, or by ligating

91 day 4) in the type 2 than for the type 1 or foreign body granulomas.

92 erature on the imaging detection of surgical foreign bodies has focused on retained sponges, even tho

93 sulted a young doctor about a buried corneal foreign body hidden in a small, hard mass that partly co

94 ry diseases, fibrotic alterations induced by foreign body implants, "spontaneous" fibrosis, and tumor

95 in diminished delivery of leukocytes to the foreign body implants.

96 e performed a case-control study of retained foreign bodies in surgical patients in order to identify

97 ray examinations of the orbit to exclude any foreign bodies in the eyeball, as well as pantomographie

98 Coins have long been considered innocuous foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tracts of childre

99 Accidental retention of surgical foreign bodies in the peritoneal cavity is estimated to

100 arthritis presented with the sensation of a foreign body in her right eye; she reported no symptoms

101 Corneal abrasions (13.7%) and foreign body in the external eye (7.5%) were the leading

102 us mirabilis UTIs were more likely to have a foreign body in the lower urinary tract (48% versus 30%

103 Foreign body in the lower urinary tract has a low incide

104 It was hypothesized that the presence of a foreign body in the peritoneal cavity (PC) might alter t

105 body insertion; location, type, and size of foreign body; incision size; imaging modality; and succe

106 0.05) without evidence of gingival tissue or foreign body inclusions.

107 mplement activation (RCA) can attenuate this foreign body-induced activation, simple and efficient ap

108 ses of acute abdominal pain include ingested foreign bodies, infected congenital anomalies, and perfo

109 Studies using a mouse foreign body infection model demonstrated that the virul

110 different phenotypes of S. epidermidis in a foreign body infection model is most effective in inbred

111 Although foreign body infection models are well-established, limi

112 In a murine model of foreign body infection, the rbf mutations in strain Newm

113 pathogenesis of S. epidermidis experimental foreign body infection.

114 opportunistic pathogen and a major cause of foreign body infections.

115 portunistic pathogen and is a major cause of foreign body infections.

116 terium acnes) is recognized as a pathogen in foreign-body infections (arthroplasty or spinal instrume

117 planations about the development of C. acnes foreign-body infections.

118 unction of PECAM-1 in the chronic process of foreign body inflammation.

119 -death signals concomitant with a localized "foreign-body" inflammatory response.

120 Foreign body ingestion complicated by perforation of the

121 in older children and adolescents, recurrent foreign body ingestion is usually seen in mentally retar

122 Visual outcomes of intraocular foreign body injuries are similar to other series despit

123 Patients with burns, foreign body injury, toxic effects, or late complication

124 foreign bodies; number of repeat episodes of foreign body insertion; location, type, and size of fore

125 Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) are an important cause of visual

126 a vitrectomy(PPV) for removal of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs).

127 Preventing retained foreign bodies is critical for patient safety.

128 ly prevention and identification of retained foreign bodies is increasingly important because of moun

129 artifacts and their origin, and of possible foreign bodies is necessary to eliminate them or to redu

130 y embolus or deep venous thrombosis (PEDVT), foreign body left during procedure (FB), iatrogenic pneu

131 Heavy nasopharynx foreign body load and loss of gland protection alters th

132 In cases of implant failure, implantation of foreign bodies may play a role with subsequent developme

133 Our results showed that a foreign body multinucleate giant cell-type reaction was

134 Evaluated data included number of foreign bodies; number of repeat episodes of foreign bod

135 multivariate analyses to have an indwelling foreign body (odds ratio [OR]=18.2, 95% confidence inter

136 uded 54 patients with a total of 61 retained foreign bodies (of which 69 percent were sponges and 31

137 Accumulation of large foreign body particles in the bulla stimulates granuloma

138 The method of extraction of a foreign body per urethra depends on the size and shape o

139 The foreign body reaction (FBR) develops in response to the

140 n of this phenotype suggested to us that the foreign body reaction (FBR) might be altered in thrombos

141 In this work, the foreign body reaction (FBR) to small subcutaneous implan

142 site coatings have been shown to prevent the foreign body reaction (FBR) to subcutaneous implants in

143 ials and biomedical devices generally induce foreign body reaction and end up with encapsulation by a

144 ors, due to the reduction of the detrimental foreign body reaction and of consequent potential failur

145 A focal foreign body reaction at the device-tissue interface per

146 ite is an innovative approach to control the foreign body reaction at the tissue-device interface to

147 In vivo, both shunts were devoid of foreign body reaction but exhibited fibrosis, and GS sho

148 capsular thickness, indicative of an altered foreign body reaction in SPARC-null mice, implicates SPA

149 n we asked whether SPARC might influence the foreign body reaction to biomaterial implants.

150 The foreign body reaction to implanted biomaterials, charact

151 examination, and clinical history, a benign foreign body reaction to silicone implant material was d

152 lead to failure from intimal hyperplasia and foreign body reaction.

153 al within the gingival tissues, initiating a foreign body reaction.

154 cells, foamy macrophages) consistent with a foreign body reaction.

155 ration biopsy of the largest node revealed a foreign body reaction.

156 iocompatibility, related to the inflammatory foreign-body reaction of the eye against the implant, as

157 Gossypiboma or textiloma is the result of a foreign-body reaction to extraneous material, usually a

158 , although histological examination showed a foreign-body reaction to the microspheres.

159 At histologic evaluation, a marked foreign-body reaction with superimposed thrombosis was d

160 radiation-induced vascular inflammation, or foreign-body reaction, such as synthetic arterial graft.

161 antable biomedical devices is impeded by the foreign-body reaction, which results in formation of a d

162 ikely due to increased thrombogenicity and a foreign-body reaction.

163 metals and plastics, significantly abrogated foreign body reactions and fibrosis when compared with s

164 containing analogs that substantially reduce foreign body reactions in both rodents and, for at least

165 implanted biomaterials often trigger adverse foreign body reactions such as inflammation, fibrosis, i

166 improved biomaterial design and will reduce foreign body reactions.

167 ithout damaging neural tissues or triggering foreign body reactions.

168 lapses and are associated with an indwelling foreign body, receiving vancomycin therapy, and hemodial

169 oids intestinal bypass and implantation of a foreign body; recent data from adult series demonstrate

170 s play a central role in osteoporosis and in foreign body rejection, respectively, the molecular mech

171 sion of delayed versus immediate intraocular foreign body removal must be guided by the patient's med

172 imaging modality; and success or failure of foreign body removal.

173 ime of pars plana vitrectomy and intraocular foreign body removal.

174 We report an unusual case of a foreign body removed from the urinary bladder of a 63-ye

175 ndin (TSP)-2-null mice have an altered brain foreign body response (FBR) characterized by increases i

176 This alloy also exhibits compromised foreign body response (FBR) determined by human peripher

177 ibrous encapsulation resulting from the host foreign body response (FBR) reduce sensor sensitivity to

178 soft tissues leads to the development of the foreign body response (FBR), which can interfere with im

179 tion of synthetic biomaterials initiates the foreign body response (FBR), which is characterized by m

180 Reducing the foreign body response and restoring the function of cell

181 decreased intensity and delayed onset of the foreign body response following implantation of drug fre

182 Moreover, attenuation of the foreign body response in intraperitoneal implants in MCP

183 The foreign body response is an immune-mediated reaction tha

184 The foreign body response plays a prominent role in implanta

185 een identified as important mediators of the foreign body response that includes inflammation, angiog

186 Host recognition and immune-mediated foreign body response to biomaterials can compromise the

187 The foreign body response to implantable biosensors has been

188 ng for implantable biosensors to prevent the foreign body response, and thus enhance sensor performan

189 f a biomaterial into the body elicits a host foreign body response, during which polymorphonuclear le

190 which was associated with attenuation of the foreign body response.

191 for foreign body giant cell formation in the foreign body response.

192 ARC family of matricellular proteins, in the foreign body response.

193 important modulator of wound healing and the foreign body response.

194 o the implant spanning the acute and chronic foreign body response.

195 ation, combat possible infection or stem the foreign body response.

196 scovery of other materials that mitigate the foreign body response.

197 bial or thrombotic agents as a result of the foreign body response.

198 ePTFE at 3 months had foreign-body response with necrosis and calcification.

199 erstanding will shed insight on the cause of foreign body responses, which will lead to improved biom

200 ns, has been implicated in tissue repair and foreign body responses.

201 mputational modeling discloses the nature of foreign body responses.

202 mpromised by host recognition and subsequent foreign body responses.

203 to immune competent mice resulting in absent foreign body responses.

204 h alginate derivatives capable of mitigating foreign-body responses in vivo and implanted into the in

205 reaction due to permanent implantation of a foreign body, restriction of vascular vasomotion due to

206 the lens insertion, lid eversion revealed a 'foreign body' retained beneath her right upper eyelid, w

207 perianal pain (63 %), weight loss (31 %) and foreign body sensation (22 %).

208 s at day 42 in itching (nominal P = 0.0318), foreign body sensation (nominal P = 0.0418), and eye dis

209 symptoms of dry eye, vision fluctuation, and foreign body sensation after LASIK and PRK at postoperat

210 eral face, neck and ear pain, stinging pain, foreign body sensation and dysphagia can be observed wit

211 tion of the conjunctiva, blurred vision, and foreign body sensation in his left eye.

212 ymptoms of dry eye, visual fluctuations, and foreign body sensation in patients undergoing LASIK and

213 ptoms and severity, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation over baseline in the early postop

214 ymptoms of dry eye, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation returned to their baseline, preop

215 e: headaches, severe photophobia, persistent foreign body sensation, and migration of ink staining.

216 rescein staining of the cornea, reduction in foreign body sensation, and reduction in burning sensati

217 the presence of burning sensation, tearing, foreign body sensation, conjunctival hyperemia and photo

218 tional VAS items (burning/stinging, itching, foreign body sensation, eye discomfort, photophobia, pai

219 A patient suffering from foreign body sensation, frequent blinking and bilateral

220 Most of the patients reported no foreign body sensation, glare, or other side effects wit

221 20/40-20/250) and patient symptoms included foreign body sensation, tearing, redness, and/or pain.

222 , dry eye severity, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation.

223 A 37-year old AIDS patient presented with foreign body sensation.

224 ion, redness, tearing, photophobia, pain and foreign body sensation.

225 oacrylate adhesives have been shown to cause foreign-body sensation, local inflammatory reaction, and

226 on or necrosis), and postoperative symptoms (foreign-body sensation, pain).

227 ides excellent information about intraocular foreign body size, shape and location.

228 immunocompromised hosts or in patients with foreign bodies, such as catheters, where treatment has g

229 egates of foreign material consistent with a foreign body tattoo.

230 e algorithm according to which we manage the foreign bodies that are located in the posterior segment

231 n to apoptotic cells, macrophages can engulf foreign bodies that vary substantially in size from a fe

232 During removal of the foreign body, the doctor inspected the corneal incision

233 e of immunosuppression and the presence of a foreign body to the establishment of infection.

234 dentical culture conditions, and resulted in foreign body-type giant cell formation.

235 f anorganic bovine bone were present, but no foreign body-type giant cells were identified.

236 an intimate association with multinucleated foreign body-type giant cells.

237 Biopsy in all cases showed foreign body-type granulomas.

238 Foreign body types included metal (n = 40), plastic (n =

239 Presence of foreign bodies was assessed using PLM.

240 The presence of the foreign body was confirmed on computed tomography and wa

241 The foreign body was identified as an artificial fishing wor

242 The foreign body was located in the vitreous - 11 cases (52.

243 Ten foreign bodies were 2.5 x 1.0 mm (length x diameter); 10

244 and specificity for detection of 2.5-mm-long foreign bodies were 86.7% and 96.7%, respectively.

245 and specificity for detection of 5.0-mm-long foreign bodies were 93.3% and 96.7%, respectively.

246 Foreign bodies were found more commonly in I-RLs (n = 13

247 At the SEM level, radiopaque foreign bodies were identified in 34 of the 36 biopsies.

248 Seventy-six foreign bodies were inserted into the arm (n = 69), neck

249 Patients with retained foreign bodies were more likely than controls to have ha

250 Wooden foreign bodies were randomly placed in the plantar soft

251 gnificantly increased risk of retention of a foreign body were emergency surgery (risk ratio, 8.8 [95

252 Metallic and other foreign bodies which may be found on and in patients' bo

253 of the anatomic issues related to esophageal foreign bodies will be addressed.

254 Macrophages protect their host by engulfing foreign bodies within phagosomes that rapidly develop in

255 Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and foreign bodies within the patient's body may be confused

256 ght lateral pterygoid plate by a penetrating foreign body (wooden twig) in an adult male who presente