ライフサイエンスコーパス: forepaw

1 hisker pad, the ipsilateral or contralateral forepaws).

2 ermal nociception of the hindpaw but not the forepaw.

3 alateral forepaw and ipsilateral whisker and forepaw.

4 ated by cutaneous noxious stimulation of the forepaw.

5 on of the glabrous skin on the contralateral forepaw.

6 ght septa outline the palm and digits of the forepaw.

7 of MS with somatosensory stimulation of the forepaw.

8 e of thermal hyperalgesia in the ipsilateral forepaw.

9 p and consume food pellets with the affected forepaw.

10 e or of its head and tail, not of individual forepaws.

11 with healthy ankles (1.4 +/- 0.3 %ID/g) and forepaws (1.5 +/- 0.5 %ID/g), as early as 1 d after the

12 rcentage injected dose per gram [%ID/g]) and forepaws (2.1 +/- 0.3 %ID/g), compared with healthy ankl

13 ccupied by physiologically active CTB traced forepaw afferents that had been spared by the initial co

14 entral pads of either contra- or ipsilateral forepaws also evoked OIS activation in the posteriorly l

15 n cervical and lumbar regions ipsilateral to forepaw and hindpaw inflammation, respectively.

16 normal cytochrome oxidase barrel pattern in forepaw and hindpaw regions of S1.

17 is affected by stimulation of contralateral forepaw and ipsilateral whisker and forepaw.

18 We located the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representation (forepaw/lower jaw

19 gate this, we located the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representation of SI in vivo, and

20 which the location of the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representations in rat S1 was dete

21 dritic arbor close to the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representations.

22 d shoulder to VPL, and (c) from sites in the forepaw and shoulder representation in VPL to forelimb a

23 ation in VPL with particular emphasis on the forepaw and shoulder representations and showed that VPL

24 he forelimb and shoulder to SI, (b) from the forepaw and shoulder to VPL, and (c) from sites in the f

25 creased connectivity between impaired (left) forepaw and the contralesional (left) motor cortex after

26 t are normally present in the regions of the forepaw and the hindpaw representations were absent, whe

27 d the connection between the impaired (left) forepaw and the ipsilesional (right) motor cortex.

28 peripheral targets such as the whisker pad, forepaw, and heart explants.

29 We measured forepaw- and hindpaw-evoked sensory responses in rat, be

30 In contrast to the contralateral forepaw area, where neuronal activity, blood oxygenation

31 substrate for large-scale reorganization in forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) cortex.

32 r large-scale cortical reorganization in the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) of primary somatosensory c

33 ble to support the normal development of the forepaw barrels.

34 of 12 neurons with tactile RFs on the volar forepaw began firing toward the end of swing, with peak

35 njections and after the onset of symptomatic forepaw bias.

36 cal allodynia occurred in both hind paws and forepaws by 7 d postlesion and were maintained >31 d.

37 orepaw, hindpaw, or on both the hindpaw plus forepaw concurrently.

38 en the ipsilateral whisker and contralateral forepaw conditioning stimuli preceded the contralateral

39 o evidence of abnormal connections of VPM to forepaw cortex.

40 significantly effective for promoting distal forepaw cortical representation.

41 eurons in the reorganized region of S1 after forepaw denervation.

42 tal level T1/T2, capsaicin injected into the forepaw did not depress bradykinin-induced plasma extrav

43 The same mechanical stimulus applied to a forepaw did not produce NK1R or MOR internalization in t

44 ated with the representation of the glabrous forepaw digits and pads and adjacent non-cluster zones t

45 (CTB) tracer injection into the ipsilateral forepaw digits and pads.

46 eate nucleus of rats partially denervated of forepaw dorsal column axons was examined.

47 aneously tracking the movement of individual forepaws during spontaneous grooming in multiple freely-

48 deprived S1, activity in response to intact forepaw electrical stimulation was significantly increas

49 (EEG) studies conducted in a rat model with forepaw electrical stimulation.

50 water nor isotonic saline infusion affected forepaw escape latencies.

51 rease in the somatosensory-evoked potential (forepaw-evoked potential, reflecting cortical synaptic t

52 ons grew heavily into the same age heart and forepaw explants and to a lesser extent into the whisker

53 get-specific patterns in the whisker pad and forepaw explants.

54 rarely seen in the absence of toxin, namely forepaw fluttering.

55 uring somatosensory stimulation of the right forepaw, fMRI demonstrated that cortical reorganization

56 ivity was also produced in the contralateral forepaw for all injuries, but only the combined insult w

57 In addition to injecting the MI forepaw (Fp) region in both hemispheres, we injected the

58 Rats were trained to lift the contralateral forepaw from the floor to press a lever in the presence

59 Forepaw function was assessed for 10 weeks after injury

60 ri-infarct regions, and improved recovery of forepaw function.

61 ces a profound increase in the length of the forepaw grooming trajectories.

62 d with water at 50 degrees C either on their forepaw, hindpaw, or on both the hindpaw plus forepaw co

63 o, a short segment of the border between the forepaw-lower jaw representations in rat S1 was mapped u

64 horizontal axonal projections that cross the forepaw/lower jaw border as compared to projections rema

65 ulations of neurons in layer II/III near the forepaw/lower jaw border in rat somatosensory cortex, co

66 en the forepaw and lower jaw representation (forepaw/lower jaw border,(1) FP/LJ border) in SI of adul

67 thdrawal latency of the hindpaw, but not the forepaw, measured with a radiant heat stimulus.

68 CKII(-/-) mice recovered use of the affected forepaw more quickly than did controls.

69 led to faster and more complete recovery of forepaw motor function (P < 0.05).

70 e platform to perform trajectory analysis of forepaw movement during distinct grooming episodes.

71 Hz spindle burst activity reliably elicited forepaw movements.

72 ty, whereas 23.7% of the M1 bursts triggered forepaw movements.

73 V muscle afferents as assessed by an ex vivo forepaw muscles/median and ulnar nerves/dorsal root gang

74 Injection of a MOMIA intradermally into the forepaw of rats provided spatially and temporally coregi

75 ns and no transplanted cells did not use the forepaw on the lesioned side for directed reaching.

76 Murine forepaw ossification occurred sequentially.

77 hemia showed better symmetry of movement and forepaw outstretching, and reduced infarct volumes, comp

78 Relative to hind paws, forepaws performed ~4 times more steps, they were ~20% l

79 Significant dysfunction in forepaw placement test persisted up to day 1 and correla

80 onnection of the redirected afferents to the forepaw processing region of S1.

81 ng in rats that underwent an excision of the forepaw radial, median, and ulnar nerves.

82 measuring successful performance of directed forepaw reaching (DFR), expressed as percentages.

83 bridge across the lesion exhibited directed forepaw reaching on the lesioned side.

84 the cuneothalamic pathway from shoulder and forepaw receptive field zones in CN to determine whether

85 he shoulder was observed in the deafferented forepaw region in VPL.

86 nted FBS is relayed from cells in the former forepaw region in VPL.

87 to horseradish peroxidase were placed in the forepaw region of granular S1 and surrounding dysgranula

88 eiving smaller proportion of inputs from the forepaw region of S1 compared with CFA, and receiving fe

89 gm was used to trigger BOLD responses in the forepaw region of the somatosensory cortex (SSFP) of an

90 veral nuclei in the thalamus, whereas the MI forepaw region projects almost exclusively to the ipsila

91 While the MI forepaw region projects mainly to the ipsilateral basila

92 By contrast, the MI forepaw region sends few projections to the claustrum of

93 By contrast, the MI forepaw region sends virtually no projections to the con

94 ross both hemispheres than those from the MI forepaw region.

95 n, whereas others received tracers in the MI forepaw region.

96 We found that both the whisker and forepaw regions in MI project most strongly to the basal

97 ribution of projections from the whisker and forepaw regions in the primary motor (MI) cortex.

98 The neurons in the forepaw regions of S1 either did not respond to the stim

99 Connections of the forepaw regions of somatosensory cortex (S1) were determ

100 teral tracer injections in the MI whisker or forepaw regions revealed robust projections to the corre

101 sker regions were injected, but not when the forepaw regions were injected.

102 bilateral coordination of the left and right forepaws remain unaltered during the execution of distin

103 ermore, in adult rats subjected to perinatal forepaw removal, (1) the patterns of SYN-IR in the middl

104 recordings were then used to map the former forepaw representation in forelimb amputated young adult

105 hemical staining of the arthritic ankles and forepaws revealed a strong correlation with the in vivo

106 ucing an expansion of trunk motor cortex and forepaw sensory cortex into the deafferented hindlimb co

107 This "forepaw" SII region also exhibited significant although

108 Cervical spinal cord, DRG, and forepaw skin were removed from C57Bl/6 mice and multiple

109 Thus, forepaw steps were classified as exploratory, hind paw m

110 atosensory cortex due to periodic electrical forepaw stimulation (4 s in duration) before and during

111 atosensory cortex for both resting state and forepaw stimulation before and following cocaine adminis

112 Remarkably, ipsilateral forepaw stimulation evokes a beam-like response in Crus

113 high and low energy, respectively, in which forepaw stimulation excited the contralateral primary so

114 measured in the somatosensory cortex during forepaw stimulation from two different baselines.

115 usion markedly increased escape latencies to forepaw stimulation in both CFA-treated and control rats

116 y (Deltanu/nu) of a neuronal ensemble during forepaw stimulation in the alpha-chloralose anesthetized

117 aining results, neurons responding to intact forepaw stimulation in the deprived cortex were identifi

118 Forepaw stimulation induced release of ATP in the SSFP r

119 S1) and M1 in vivo, we observed that tactile forepaw stimulation induced spindle bursts in S1 and gam

120 With alpha-chloralose, forepaw stimulation induced strong and reproducible fMRI

121 by underlying neuronal activity using a rat forepaw stimulation model under different conditions of

122 li by applying a step-wise graded electrical forepaw stimulation paradigm, with comparison to healthy

123 RI, neuronal activation following electrical forepaw stimulation revealed somatotopic signal enhancem

124 the somatosensory cortex and used electrical forepaw stimulation to evoke neural and vascular activit

125 have implemented a rat model with electrical forepaw stimulation under alpha-chloralose anesthesia us

126 At each level of CBF reduction, electric forepaw stimulation was conducted, and signal-averaged l

127 upling (AFC) response to periodic electrical forepaw stimulation was investigated using signal averag

128 el, and the cerebral hemodynamic response to forepaw stimulation was measured.

129 A characteristic flow response to electrical forepaw stimulation was reliably recorded from the somat

130 y and postexcitatory inhibitory responses to forepaw stimulation were enhanced when preceded by phasi

131 Post-MTBI fMRI responses to hypercapnia and forepaw stimulation were significantly impaired and show

132 al signatures (p < 0.001) to 2 mA electrical forepaw stimulation, found to be innocuous in the contro

133 tiunit activity (MUA) from the cortex during forepaw stimulation, in which stimulus number and freque

134 coincident with the partial recovery of the forepaw stimulation-evoked current sinks in layer IV/V 3

135 Spontaneous, ChR2, or forepaw stimulation-evoked electroencephalogram (EEG) or

136 In contrast, the forepaw stimulation-evoked neuronal activity was not cha

137 ng inhibition at the lumbar cord level after forepaw stimulation.

138 onal MR imaging of rat sensory cortex during forepaw stimulation.

139 cortex of rat brain both at rest and during forepaw stimulation.

140 RI responses triggered in the SSFP region by forepaw stimulation.

141 losotomy immediately disrupted SBs evoked by forepaw stimulation.

142 y autoradiography, in response to unilateral forepaw stimulation.

143 airing of TH(VTA) neuronal activation with a forepaw stimulus of a particular frequency expanded the

144 jaw-opening reflex in the anesthetized rat; forepaw subdermal capsaicin also elevated the mechanical

145 n following stimulation of the contralateral forepaw suggests the possible involvement of extracortic

146 ntidromically-activated a cell in the former forepaw territory in VPL; however, similar stimulation f

147 level of skilled reaching using the impaired forepaw to preoperative levels.

148 ging agent (MOMIA) during transport from the forepaw to the axillary lymph node region of a rat.

149 s of acute FEN, namely flat body posture and forepaw treading, were also blunted in FEN-pretreated ra

150 food deprivation and produced a syndrome of forepaw treading.

151 aviors, including reduced wet-dog shakes and forepaw tremor after naloxone injection (10 mg/kg i.p.).

152 including jumping, wet-dog shakes, rearing, forepaw tremor, increased locomotion, grooming, diarrhea

153 These results suggest that forepaw VPL also receives input from shoulder receptive

154 In addition, microstimulation delivered to forepaw VPL antidromically-activated cells in shoulder r

155 r the new shoulder input in the deafferented forepaw VPL projected to a new shoulder site in the deaf

156 , in SI did not activate cells in the former forepaw VPL.

157 ovide a possible source of shoulder input to forepaw VPL.

158 also gave off small collateral branches into forepaw VPL.

159 The innervation of the digits on the raccoon forepaw was examined by using immunochemistry for protei

160 The inhibition elicited from the forepaw was larger than that from the hindpaw.

161 The (18)F-FLT uptake in the ankles and forepaws was quantified on the basis of the PET images b

162 ion from body extremities, including ear and forepaws, was ablated.

163 l stimulation of both hindpaws and the right forepaw were recorded under urethane anaesthesia in thre

164 Normal neonatal mouse forepaws were imaged by micro-computed tomography and ex

165 ral deficits in sensorimotor function of the forepaw, which could not be rescued by chronic insulin t

166 ral pad of either the contra- or ipsilateral forepaw with a 25-Hz sinusoidal vertical skin displaceme