戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 iar objects being treated as novel (that is, forgotten).
2 for scenes predicted to be remembered versus forgotten).
3 during unsuccessful retrieval (unintentional forgetting).
4 hat we have learned and what we remember and forget.
5  only easier to remember, but also harder to forget.
6 plastic, allowing us to learn, remember, and forget.
7 recollection of events that one would rather forget.
8 at least one total disaster that they try to forget.
9 ory is weakened, and it is more likely to be forgotten.
10 Two studies examined how U.S. presidents are forgotten.
11 ether scenes were subsequently remembered or forgotten.
12 ects for which the context was remembered or forgotten.
13 nt mathematical properties are overlooked or forgotten.
14  barriers to human health research cannot be forgotten.
15 flotation catheters should not be ignored or forgotten.
16 change while other memories are weakened and forgotten.
17 ce implicating the GBM is largely ignored or forgotten.
18 ether scenes were subsequently remembered or forgotten.
19 er period of time, less long, or immediately forgotten.
20 xtbooks and major reviews but is now largely forgotten.
21  AC encoding task was remembered rather than forgotten.
22 fluential aspect of his career that has been forgotten.
23  remembered compared with those subsequently forgotten.
24 y remembered, but not for words subsequently forgotten.
25 al position also showed a regular pattern of forgetting.
26 ibitory mechanisms in episodic retrieval and forgetting.
27 vior and dissolve them equally fast to allow forgetting.
28  rehearsal and active inhibition in directed forgetting.
29 dicted a subsequent reduction in associative forgetting.
30 ociated with either better overall recall or forgetting.
31 sociated with better overall recall, but not forgetting.
32 plicated previously in learning, memory, and forgetting.
33 ing sounds, these memories were rescued from forgetting.
34 earns more slowly but is less susceptible to forgetting.
35 to avoid punishments that were contingent on forgetting.
36 molecular and cellular mechanisms for active forgetting.
37 ed in mushroom body neurons, is required for forgetting.
38  listener, with a focus on retrieval-induced forgetting.
39 prior learning, leading to many instances of forgetting.
40 antly enhances memory retention and prevents forgetting.
41 icantly enhance memory retention and prevent forgetting.
42 the other two groups experienced significant forgetting.
43 the other two groups experienced significant forgetting.
44  function as a switch for remembering versus forgetting.
45 but learns gradually and shows resistance to forgetting.
46 ry, these models can explain cue-independent forgetting.
47  to previous endpoint errors, but also rapid forgetting.
48 ptation period, they showed a faster rate of forgetting.
49 ampal activations predicted the magnitude of forgetting.
50 ippocampus constitute a neural mechanism for forgetting.
51 cal model for guiding inquiry into motivated forgetting.
52 rmore, the report proposes that PP1 promotes forgetting.
53 vernight memory consolidation and leading to forgetting.
54 ila mushroom bodies neurons (MBn) for active forgetting.
55 neurons (DAn) that innervate the MBn mediate forgetting.
56 nstream of dopaminergic inputs that regulate forgetting.
57 rates the intracellular signaling for normal forgetting.
58 s in part by preventing an active process of forgetting.
59 g a past experience can, surprisingly, cause forgetting.
60 gical and neuroscience research on sleep and forgetting.
61 competition and, critically, predicted later forgetting.
62  activity and accelerates dopaminergic-based forgetting.
63 m error and reversion to baseline, a form of forgetting.
64  be to alleviate the problem of catastrophic forgetting.
65 quired skills, a problem called catastrophic forgetting.
66 coupling attentional focus from cue-directed forgetting.
67 points and there is evidence for accelerated forgetting.
68  lose the competition, leading to subsequent forgetting.
69 w which information to preserve and which to forget?
70 e each day, which will be retained and which forgotten?
71 memory for what induced the emotion has been forgotten?
72 at molecular and cellular processes underlie forgetting?
73 ing to whether they were later remembered or forgotten [1].
74                  Recent evidence validates a forgotten 40-year-old hypothesis: the MHC-related Fc rec
75 is too hot" (75 participants [39.3%]) and "I forget." (72 [37.7%]).
76 uring the first postnatal period are rapidly forgotten, a phenomenon known as 'infantile amnesia'.
77 tes habituation, and demonstrate learning to forget: a key feature of animal and human brains.
78 et lost in the vast amount of literature and forget about the fundamentals of the field, which are ba
79 yesian credit-assignment model with built-in forgetting accurately predicts their trial-by-trial lear
80 d into two components--a fast-learning, fast-forgetting adaptation process that is sensitive to vecto
81 uently reported individual barriers included forgetting (adults 41.4%, 95% CI 37.3%-45.4%; adolescent
82 est a neurobiological model of how motivated forgetting affects the unconscious expression of memory
83 al brain glucose uptake, they display faster forgetting after a long delay following performance to a
84 monstrated in TEA: (i) accelerated long-term forgetting (ALF): the excessively rapid loss of newly ac
85                  In this report, we study a 'forgotten' allele of ftsL from Escherichia coli, which e
86 ts whether they would be punished or not for forgetting an upcoming scene image.
87 ses thereafter (retroactive function) (i.e., forgetting and augmentation).
88                        Accelerated long-term forgetting and autobiographical amnesia, which are invis
89 learning mechanism that enables control over forgetting and learning.
90                        Accelerated long-term forgetting and remote memory impairment are common among
91 genesis-based forgetting, interference-based forgetting, and intrinsic forgetting, the latter term de
92             Healthy men showed only moderate forgetting, and performance was still above chance at 12
93 s encoded, maintained over a delay with some forgetting, and ultimately retrieved.
94                                      Much is forgotten, and of those memories retained, their subsequ
95 lowed to decline memory tests when they have forgotten, and should decline tests most frequently when
96 take over, and the behavior exhibits a quick forget-and-learn pattern.
97 periences will be subsequently remembered or forgotten-and to compare these correlates to the neural
98 hanisms for acquisition, memory storage, and forgetting; and the output pathways for memory expressio
99                                     The long forgotten Archives of Clinical Surgery provides a unique
100  cellular, and circuit mechanisms underlying forgetting are poorly understood.
101                      Traditional theories of forgetting are wedded to the notion that cue-overload in
102 essments, and sometimes at the risk of being forgotten, are more subtle analyses that rationalize the
103 ve theory states that such retrieval-induced forgetting arises due to inhibition of competing memory
104                                              Forgetting arises when other competing traces interfere
105 press enter produced as much cue-independent forgetting as no-think instructions.
106  synaptic inputs and power-law statistics of forgetting avalanches, emerge naturally from this mechan
107         Cues associated with high versus low forgetting based on analysis of subsequent recall perfor
108 ems later remembered compared to those later forgotten, both age groups robustly recruited medial pre
109             Temporary sharing may bring back forgetting, but not without introducing new (self-presen
110 tegy use was associated with lower levels of forgetting, but only at higher levels of numeric ability
111 felike, complex events that are resistant to forgetting, but somewhat inflexible and semantic-like in
112  interference explanation of cue-independent forgetting by modifying the think/no-think paradigm.
113       These findings indicate that, although forgetting can be frustrating, memory might be adaptive
114  In this paper, we test whether catastrophic forgetting can be reduced by evolving modular neural net
115 d pathway for intrinsic forgetting includes "forgetting cells" that release dopamine onto engram cell
116                      However, RV is still a "forgotten" chamber during routine SE.
117 te of unexpected encounters, often with long-forgotten colleagues, evoking a feeling of shared intell
118 rustrating, memory might be adaptive because forgetting confers neural processing benefits.
119                Conditions of high versus low forgetting corresponded to stimulation timing at differe
120 ng the stage for prospective studies in this forgotten disease.
121 mide resulted in the recurrence of an almost forgotten disease.
122 ortantly, is the perspective that PTSD is a "forgetting" disorder.
123  information about a prior episode mitigates forgetting due to retroactive interference.
124 een-day (offline) effects and on the rate of forgetting during a 3-month follow-up (long-term retenti
125  received delayed-TMS showed normal rates of forgetting during deadaptation, the memory of those who
126 ese earliest motor commands displayed little forgetting during the rest periods.
127 ese late motor commands showed near-complete forgetting during the rest periods.
128 imulation specifically boosts the behavioral forgetting effect and induces a reduction in neural sync
129 MRI to test whether this "inhibition-induced forgetting effect" is caused by competition for neural r
130  recently documented the "inhibition-induced forgetting effect": no-go cues are remembered more poorl
131 ly negative words prone to the same directed forgetting effects as neutral words, but that these effe
132            The results demonstrated directed forgetting effects for both neutral and negative words,
133 sis underlying the model and also to explore forgetting effects for which there were indications for
134 ortex, as were reversed effects ('subsequent forgetting' effects) in anterior prefrontal regions.
135                                         This forgotten epidemiologic study is the oldest study using
136 bations but the adapted behavior seems to be forgotten equally rapidly.
137 patial memory span length and committed more forgetting errors on a spatial working memory task.
138 ts with Alzheimer's disease seem not only to forget events but also to express false confidence in re
139 began to circulate biological preprints in a forgotten experiment called the Information Exchange Gro
140 m to identify underexplored areas, resurrect forgotten findings and ideas, deconvolute the spaghetti
141 d with the no-think paradigm, which produces forgetting following repeated practice of not thinking a
142 itions but was, despite its success, largely forgotten following Lock's early death in 1915.
143 ity did not predict subsequent resistance to forgetting for the short delay or novel associations.
144                      These studies show that forgetting from collective memory can be studied empiric
145 ries were categorized according to amount of forgetting from pre- to post-nap.
146 we describe the debate over the reason about forgetting from short-term memory, whether interference
147 the channel, it spends enough time there to "forget" from what entrance it was captured.
148                                       We fit forgetting functions to the data to predict when six rel
149  the extent to which competing memories were forgotten; greater forgetting of competing memories was
150                                              Forgetting has been thought to occur as a result of the
151  but the conditions required for this severe forgetting have remained unknown.
152 he history of American surgery has long been forgotten, his effort afforded the men who performed sur
153 nt mode of TF action supports a classic, but forgotten, "hit-and-run" transcription model, which enab
154                                What is often forgotten, however, are the many prior advances that wer
155 ntly remembered (i.e., hits) to subsequently forgotten (i.e., misses) items.
156 own abilities, traits and attitudes (e.g. 'I forget important things', 'I'm a good friend', 'I have a
157 n SmNiO3 perovskites to address catastrophic forgetting in a dynamic learning environment via hydroge
158 chronic allocentric learning and accelerated forgetting in a status epilepticus model of mesial tempo
159 digm) capture the most important elements of forgetting in everyday life.
160 t study employed the item-method of directed forgetting in order to examine whether emotionally negat
161 e memory can be studied empirically, as with forgetting in other forms of memory.
162 n that such procedures may pertain mainly to forgetting in the laboratory and that everyday forgettin
163 nd predicted the amount of retrieval-induced forgetting in the subsequent memory test.
164  the associated learning in eye movement are forgotten in <6 s, but facilitate long-term behavioral l
165 care unit management that might otherwise be forgotten in the setting of more urgent care requirement
166 ory effects (SMEs; items later remembered vs forgotten) in hippocampus and midbrain, and in pupil dil
167 sodes of amnesia; (ii) accelerated long-term forgetting, in which newly acquired memories fade over d
168    The currently known mechanisms for active forgetting include neurogenesis-based forgetting, interf
169 The best-characterized pathway for intrinsic forgetting includes "forgetting cells" that release dopa
170                                 People often forget information because they fail to effectively enco
171 ke out the garbage, as it were, erasing and "forgetting" information built up throughout the day that
172 active forgetting include neurogenesis-based forgetting, interference-based forgetting, and intrinsic
173 s bind disparate molecular players in active forgetting into a single signaling pathway: Dopamine-->
174 oral studies of model organisms suggest that forgetting is a common and biologically regulated proces
175 it has been widely thought that catastrophic forgetting is an inevitable feature of connectionist mod
176 rgetting in the laboratory and that everyday forgetting is attributable to an altogether different fo
177    However, it is unknown whether RE-induced forgetting is common to all species.
178                                 This form of forgetting is considered to be adaptive because it reduc
179 y related cue, it has been assumed that this forgetting is due to an inhibition process.
180                                   Therefore, forgetting is regulated by the behavioral state modulati
181                                     Although forgetting is the common fate of most of our experiences
182                          The reason for this forgetting is unclear, as is how to overcome it to promo
183      The fate of a memory, whether stored or forgotten, is determined by the ability of an active or
184                                  Because the forgotten item is not retrieved even when tested with an
185 was greater for subsequently remembered than forgotten items [7-9].
186 arity or priming with ERP waveform for later forgotten items.
187 s where activity is greater for subsequently forgotten items.
188 ng representations of the remembered-but not forgotten-locations within regions of occipital, parieta
189                                    Intrinsic forgetting may be the default state of the brain, consta
190 ion, Nomis Foundation, Anonymous Foundation, Forget Me Not Initiative, Boston University Department o
191 ion, Nomis Foundation, Anonymous Foundation, Forget Me Not Initiative, Colciencias, National Institut
192  and human brain disorders that alter active forgetting mechanisms.
193 eople show faster relearning of a previously forgotten memory.
194 phila presents new research avenues for this forgotten methanogen and reminds us of the questions tha
195 aussig is an important but almost completely forgotten milestone in the evolution of case-control stu
196  items subsequently remembered (hits) versus forgotten (misses) and retrieval success activity (RSA)
197 ed strains was attributed to a second, since-forgotten, morphology-affecting mutation that was sustai
198 neural evidence for the adaptive benefits of forgetting--namely, reduced demands on cognitive control
199 es available during encoding of subsequently forgotten no-go cues.
200  without conscious awareness) and subsequent forgotten (not retrieved).
201  following activity-filled delays, much less forgetting occurred in four of these patients after dela
202                              Although severe forgetting occurred in the amnesiacs following activity-
203 ce occurs when learning something new causes forgetting of an older memory (retrograde interference)
204 ter olfactory learning regulates the rate of forgetting of both punishing (aversive) and rewarding (a
205 h competing memories were forgotten; greater forgetting of competing memories was associated with a g
206 eural synchronization mediates goal-directed forgetting of long-term memories.
207 ibitory resource demand predicted subsequent forgetting of no-go cues and that higher inhibitory dema
208                                   Crucially, forgetting of no-go cues was predicted by high inhibitor
209 chanism by which the hippocampus tempers the forgetting of older memories as newer memories are acqui
210 c dopamine neurons was shown to regulate the forgetting of olfactory memories.
211 mory research: acquiring new memories causes forgetting of other, related memories.
212 selective consolidation of some memories but forgetting of others, even for simultaneous events that
213  a specific target memory often leads to the forgetting of related but irrelevant memories.
214  long-term memory can result in the episodic forgetting of related material.
215 n of this region was associated with greater forgetting of such details.
216 eural mechanisms that foster the intentional forgetting of such unwanted memories.
217  memories over competing memories (increased forgetting of the competing memories), here we report ne
218                    All showed roughly linear forgetting of the eight or nine presidents prior to the
219  We also show that patients have accelerated forgetting of the learned spatial task and that this is
220 etworks that cannot learn new skills without forgetting old ones, and (2) that one benefit of the mod
221 ing to whether items were: (i) remembered or forgotten on the subsequent test, and (ii) rated likely
222 e: an instruction cue that directs people to forget one item is sufficient to wipe the corresponding
223  most salient of life's experiences--who can forget one's first encounter with dandelion milk or a st
224                                              Forgetting, one part of the brain's memory management sy
225 re- and postsynaptic thresholds, (3) HD, the forgetting operation, co-occurs with LTP and targets lea
226 rs cannot examine associations, a fact often forgotten or ignored.
227 neural operations during new learning to the forgetting (or remembering) of earlier events.
228  It remains unclear how a brain that rapidly forgets, or is not yet able to form long-term memories,
229            Although the nucleolinus may be a forgotten organelle, its demonstrated role in spindle fo
230  of single-trial fear learning that shows no forgetting over the lifespan of the animal.
231                    One of the reasons why we forget past experiences is because we acquire new memori
232 the learning deficit but not the accelerated forgetting, pointing to a possible dissociation in the u
233      This contribution in the "Best (but Oft-Forgotten) Practices" series considers mediation analysi
234 cortex (dlPFC) when participants are cued to forget previously studied information.
235 odels that contain both a fast-learning-fast-forgetting process and a slow-learning-slow-forgetting p
236 e results confirm the existence of an active forgetting process and establish a neurobiological model
237 -forgetting process and a slow-learning-slow-forgetting process explain a wide range of data on motor
238 riggered amnesia constitutes an unrecognized forgetting process that may account for otherwise unexpl
239                    In complementary fashion, forgetting produced by a 120-min delay that impaired soc
240 article reports on an apparently universally forgotten publication in the American Journal of Hygiene
241 tients and controls points to an accelerated forgetting rate in the prolonged febrile seizure group.
242 avioral strategy including learning and fast forgetting rates.
243 gest that we are not at the mercy of passive forgetting; rather, our memories can be shaped by two op
244       Anodal tDCS did not change the rate of forgetting relative to sham across the 3-month follow-up
245 ng after a new language has been learned and forgotten, relearning a few words seems to trigger the r
246 Sometimes, valuable lessons from history are forgotten, remain unknown, or worse, are ignored.
247 al memory disturbance: accelerated long-term forgetting, remote memory impairment, especially affecti
248 which the AC encoding task was remembered or forgotten, respectively).
249 on (proactive function of dopamine) and its "forgetting" (retroactive function of dopamine), our anal
250 l account states that this retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) phenomenon reflects inhibitory mechanis
251 igh-reward cues preceding remembered but not forgotten scenes activated the ventral tegmental area, n
252 quently remembered scenes than there was for forgotten scenes in MTL and PFC regions.
253 r activation for objectively remembered than forgotten scenes), but not with predicted encoding succe
254 res of implicit memory-than did subsequently forgotten scenes.
255 eta +/- standard error = 0.7 +/- 0.3]; worse forgetting score on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Tes
256 , Pak3, and Cofilin within MBn, nucleating a forgetting signalosome that is downstream of dopaminergi
257   However, the factor score for frequency of forgetting significantly correlated with global cerebral
258 gic deaths and underestimation of unknown or forgotten surgical causes of death and disease.
259 uestion in two experiments using a voluntary forgetting task.
260  'to-be-remembered' (TBR) relative to 'to-be-forgotten' (TBF) cues were enhanced when the cues follow
261 urce demands during encoding of subsequently forgotten than remembered no-go cues; and (2) this highe
262 uccessful retrieval suppression (intentional forgetting) than during unsuccessful retrieval (unintent
263                             Biologists often forget that Charles Darwin offered a way of resolving th
264                         However, we must not forget that haemophilia is a worldwide disorder that req
265 s now widely regarded as fact, we should not forget that her conceptual leap met with considerable re
266 ention the right has received, we should not forget that it is just one innovative piece of a compreh
267               In the meantime, we should not forget that niacin is an effective LDL-cholesterol-lower
268 struct participants either to remember or to forget that word.
269 sodic memories, is associated with the rapid forgetting that occurs in childhood.
270 mmunicate complex scientific topics, without forgetting that the story is king.
271                                It is easy to forget the contribution of electromyography (EMG) to the
272 hrough nonverbal communication when they had forgotten the toy location.
273 interference-based forgetting, and intrinsic forgetting, the latter term describing the brain's chron
274    As a result, and despite their being long forgotten, the importance of postgraduate medical school
275 ing learning that predicted remembering from forgetting, then decoded neural activity in later sessio
276                At the same time, we must not forget those fundamental experimental skills needed to c
277  whereas global memory models, which produce forgetting through a process of interference, include bo
278 emory acquisition through dDA1 signaling and forgetting through DAMB signaling in the mushroom body n
279                    However, clinicians often forget to ask about this information, and many lesbians
280 n clinical practice when patients frequently forget to take medication or dose irregularly.
281  in 27 of 48 (56.3%) of the cases (eg, staff forgetting to bring computers to patients at visits), pa
282 ants who provided self-reported frequency of forgetting to take medications as directed.
283 Forty-six percent of the LOS cohort reported forgetting to take medications at least some of the time
284 This study evaluated factors associated with forgetting to take medications in a large cohort of pers
285                                              Forgetting to take medications is an important cause of
286 mportant (13.8%), did not know when to go or forgot to go (13.3%), and did not have enough time (12.3
287 inor non-adherence occurred because patients forgot to take tablets or muddled doses.
288 idents (e.g., we predict that Truman will be forgotten to the same extent as McKinley by about 2040).
289 memory, they are considerably more likely to forget unrelated experiences from periods surrounding su
290   In 2006 Paolo Zamboni renewed the somewhat forgotten vascular theory of the pathogenesis of multipl
291 to provide additional evidences so that this forgotten vegetable can be reconsidered in the human die
292              In the end, we and our work are forgotten very quickly and one should realize that, afte
293 tely 250-1400 ms) compared with subsequently forgotten voices.
294                            Retrieval-induced forgetting was observed in a condition in which the comp
295  it is acquired slowly and shows substantial forgetting when remote memory is tested.
296 t of low-value associations was rescued from forgetting when the manipulation occurred during sleep.
297             A better understanding of active forgetting will provide insights into the brain's memory
298 li that at first can be recalled are usually forgotten within 1 min, but the conditions required for
299 during encoding of subsequently recalled and forgotten words.
300 g are greater for subsequently recalled than forgotten words.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top