ライフサイエンスコーパス: formula-fed

1 a feeding plus 1 month of infant zidovudine (formula fed).

2 0 infants (36 breastfed, 9 mixed-fed, and 25 formula-fed).

3 ies (17 498 subjects; 12 890 breastfed, 4608 formula-fed).

4 from 50 girls (28 soy formula-fed and 22 cow formula-fed).

5 .054) concentrations than did those who were formula fed.

6 dian duration: 7 mo) and 62 were exclusively formula fed.

7 esembles that of infants who are exclusively formula fed.

8 combination feeding, and 6 were exclusively formula fed.

9 e; however, 50-70 % of infants in the US are formula-fed.

10 sulin concentrations than did those who were formula fed (6 studies; 4800 subjects; percentage differ

11 abetes in later life than did those who were formula fed (7 studies; 76 744 subjects; odds ratio: 0.6

12 th and 9 months of age from 50 girls (28 soy formula-fed and 22 cow formula-fed).

13 ificant differences in plasma leptin between formula-fed and breast-fed infants at 1 and 4 mo of age,

14 gnitive development and early growth between formula-fed and breastfed infants.

15 ested differences in methylation between soy formula-fed and cow formula-fed infants at three CpGs in

16 A methylation in vaginal cells from four soy formula-fed and six cow formula-fed girls from the Infan

17 e expression in epithelial cells between the formula-fed and the breast-fed infants.

18 In formula-fed animals, increases in ileum and jejunum vill

19 IQ in individuals who were breast-fed versus formula-fed as infants, suggest that exogenous DHA (and

20 abies; 1 suggested possible effectiveness in formula-fed babies with colic, and 1 suggested ineffecti

21 ompared growth trajectories in breastfed and formula-fed boys and girls.

22 ere found in urine and saliva samples of soy formula-fed boys compared to cow formula-fed boys.

23 ples of soy formula-fed boys compared to cow formula-fed boys.

24 ignificantly different between breastfed and formula-fed children (nonmetric multidimensional scaling

25 oacuity (high-grade or < 100 s/arc) than did formula-fed children (odds ratio: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4, 4.5)

26 measured the weight and height of 448 (41%) formula-fed children at 6 y of age.

27 eding, insulin was significantly elevated in formula-fed compared with breast-fed infants.

28 were initially breastfed and those who were formula-fed (expressed as breastfed minus bottle-fed), w

29 Formula-fed (FF) infants are at risk for diseases that i

30 r LH level was found in urine samples of soy formula-fed girls compared to cow formula-fed girls.

31 cells from four soy formula-fed and six cow formula-fed girls from the Infant Feeding and Early Deve

32 les of soy formula-fed girls compared to cow formula-fed girls.

33 at 7 months was significantly higher for the formula-fed group than for the breastfed plus zidovudine

34 infection rates were 5.6% (32 infants in the formula-fed group) vs 9.0% (51 infants in the breastfed

35 In the formula-fed group, children were randomly assigned to re

36 All formula-fed groups had higher plasma threonine concentra

37 ere lowest for breast-fed infants; among the formula-fed groups the UHT-13 group had the lowest value

38 The difference between randomized formula-fed groups was independent of potential confound

39 y life (eg, birth by cesarean section, being formula-fed, growing up in an urban environment or with

40 Formula-fed hUGT1 mice had lower serum levels of bilirub

41 For the formula fed infant group the same ratios were 1.20 and 1

42 k samples and 39 infant urine samples, and 5 formula-fed infant-mother pairs who provided 21 formula

43 ke by NHBCS infants was 5.5 times higher for formula-fed infants (0.22 mug/kg/day) than for breastfed

44 Breastfed infants acquired CMV earlier than formula-fed infants (median age of acquisition, 4.26 vs

45 Formula-fed infants (n = 1090) were randomly assigned to

46 = 0.001) and was lower in breast-fed than in formula-fed infants (P: = 0.01).

47 ) breastfed infants compared with 19 (18.8%) formula-fed infants (relative risk, 2.37; P = 0.006).

48 Conversely, at 12 mo, fat mass was higher in formula-fed infants [0.29 kg (-0.03, 0.61 kg)] than in b

49 s have higher serum levels of bilirubin than formula-fed infants and are at risk for bilirubin-induce

50 tein intake may differ between breastfed and formula-fed infants and by the source of protein.

51 ) arise in early infancy between breast- and formula-fed infants and to describe longitudinal changes

52 DHA supplementation on the visual acuity of formula-fed infants at 12 mo of age.

53 ecal microbiota of 4 breastfed infants and 4 formula-fed infants at 17 consecutive time points during

54 methylation between soy formula-fed and cow formula-fed infants at three CpGs in the gene proline ri

55 ours after their birth, we randomly assigned formula-fed infants born to women with a peripartum diag

56 theses that the acceptance of novel foods by formula-fed infants could be facilitated by providing th

57 In formula-fed infants eating table foods, preferences for

58 Formula-fed infants gained more lean mass (difference: 3

59 ass (difference: -42 g; 95% CI: -299, 215 g).Formula-fed infants gained weight more rapidly and out o

60 fed and formula-fed infants may differ, with formula-fed infants growing more rapidly than breastfed

61 Formula-fed infants had lower birth-weight z scores than

62 st-fed infants at 1 and 4 mo of age, whereas formula-fed infants had significantly higher ( approxima

63 Formula-fed infants had similar developmental scores to

64 tent of formula needs to be reduced, because formula-fed infants have significantly higher concentrat

65 differences in growth between breastfed and formula-fed infants in such populations do not appear to

66 ifferences in plasma metabolite profiles for formula-fed infants included a rapid increase in circula

67 seen over this period in both breastfed and formula-fed infants is a novel observation, which sugges

68 High intake of cow-milk protein in formula-fed infants is associated with higher weight gai

69 ence in protein intake between breastfed and formula-fed infants is likely to play a role in the diff

70 Growth patterns of breastfed and formula-fed infants may differ, with formula-fed infants

71 in the intestinal microbiota of breastfed vs formula-fed infants or differences in microbial richness

72 that microbiota development of breastfed and formula-fed infants proceeds according to similar develo

73 and pulmonary outcomes between breastfed and formula-fed infants through the age of 2 y.

74 ssue or IHCL accretion between breastfed and formula-fed infants up to 2 mo.

75 Three hundred forty-three healthy, term, formula-fed infants were enrolled at 1-9 d of age and we

76 ention study was conducted where exclusively formula-fed infants were fed formula containing either l

77 load, pregnant HIV-infected women and their formula-fed infants were followed prospectively in Bangk

78 d (aMOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .023), formula-fed infants were more likely to be given a parti

79 centage) between predominantly breastfed and formula-fed infants, adjusting in linear regression for

80 fed infants have lower arsenic exposure than formula-fed infants, and that both formula powder and dr

81 In formula-fed infants, fat-free mass was higher at 3-4 mo

82 probiotic use to manage colic, especially in formula-fed infants, or to prevent infant crying.

83 In formula-fed infants, weight gain during the first week o

84 nfant body composition between breastfed and formula-fed infants, which may reflect future obesity ri

85 omparisons between exclusively breastfed and formula-fed infants, with little consideration given to

86 s in body composition between breast-fed and formula-fed infants.

87 r sex affect plasma leptin in breast-fed and formula-fed infants.

88 e long-term risk of overweight or obesity in formula-fed infants.

89 ection was assessed in 138 breastfed and 134 formula-fed infants.

90 stools in well-appearing young breast-fed or formula-fed infants.

91 adipose tissue or IHCL between breastfed and formula-fed infants.

92 role in the difference between breastfed and formula-fed infants.

93 se in partially hydrolyzed formula use among formula-fed infants.

94 cognitive development between breastfed and formula-fed infants.

95 e of three-month-old exclusively breast- and formula-fed infants.

96 al profiles was observed between breast- and formula-fed infants.

97 microbiome of breastfed infants compared to formula-fed infants.

98 the percentage of fat mass in breastfed and formula-fed infants.

99 ves the composition of the gut microbiota in formula-fed infants.

100 tant implications for optimizing the diet of formula-fed infants.

101 growth patterns differ between breastfed and formula-fed infants.

102 rations are not higher in breast-fed than in formula-fed infants; however, sex and adiposity affect l

103 outcome) in previously breastfed (n = 78) or formula-fed (n = 184) children aged 4-6 y who had been f

104 y breastfed (n = 22) and the other, standard formula-fed (n = 49).

105 rides (HMOs) in urine of breast-fed, but not formula-fed, neonates.

106 o account for ~ 70% of median exposure among formula-fed NHBCS infants.

107 s and grouped into 4 categories: exclusively formula fed or breastfed for <3, 3-6, or >6 mo.

108 arge number of infants are still exclusively formula-fed or rarely breastfed for an extended period o

109 east-fed (B), term/formula-fed (T-), preterm/formula-fed (P-), and preterm/formula (P+) supplemented

110 p in the sow fed group in comparison to milk formula-fed piglets, whereas in milk formula-fed pigs En

111 to milk formula-fed piglets, whereas in milk formula-fed pigs Enterobacteriaceae spp was 5-fold highe

112 but did not produce an increase in Tregs in formula-fed rats on DOL1.

113 subjects) between those breastfed and those formula-fed (reported as exclusive feeding in 20 studies

114 pment, and health of breastfed children with formula-fed (SF and MF) children from birth through age

115 A cohort of European American formula-fed subjects, measured on 7 occasions during inf

116 rawn from healthy, exclusively breast-fed or formula-fed Swedish infants at 1, 4, and 6 mo of age (n

117 groups: term-delivered/breast-fed (B), term/formula-fed (T-), preterm/formula-fed (P-), and preterm/

118 Between 2 and 6 mo of age, formula-fed term infants have the capacity to upregulate

119 er plasma and brain lipid contents of DHA in formula-fed than in breast-fed infants and reports of hi

120 In formula-fed the lymphoid follicle size (p < 0.01) and ge

121 The type of formula fed to infants has an effect on their response t

122 n rates at 18 months were 80 infants (13.9%, formula fed) vs 86 infants (15.1% breastfed plus zidovud

123 ds consisting of breast milk at both points; formula-fed was defined as >80% of feeds consisting of f

124 cholesterol concentrations (breastfed minus formula-fed) were pooled by using fixed-effect models.