ライフサイエンスコーパス: formulae

1 e a cheaper alternative to conjugate vaccine formulae.

2 CDO2 were calculated by the use of standard formulae.

3 vitamin E esters and beta-carotene in infant formulae.

4 miR-196 is a critical player defining axial formulae.

5 s for N, P, S, and (13)C to assign molecular formulae.

6 with those contained in the AREDS and AREDS2 formulae.

7 of the new derived formula with existing GFR formulae.

8 ting O2 was estimated by each of 3 published formulae.

9 can be expressed using simple combinatorial formulae.

10 Nearest-Neighbor parameters, corrections and formulae.

11 eatest accuracy compared to that of existing formulae.

12 ng the 4 commonly used IOL power calculation formulae.

13 djusted for CCT using 4 different correction formulae.

14 at IOP was adjusted for CCT using correction formulae.

15 t confidence interval and hypothesis testing formulae.

16 cation of Diet in Renal Disease (GFR-4VMDRD) formulae.

17 of red oak trees from Black Rock Forest, our formulae agree with the estimates obtained by least-squa

18 V was estimated by the Watson formulae and BSA by the Dubois formula in these studies.

19 y (FT-ICR-MS), which delivered the molecular formulae and ion intensities of the compounds present.

20 nce >20 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) between existing formulae and mGFR was observed in 226 (48.2%) patients.

21 This paper describes the major life table formulae and mortality models used to analyze the actuar

22 Formulae and other supporting materials are provided.

23 and introduces a large set of thermodynamic formulae and parameters, to facilitate the calculation o

24 Here we define a general form for these formulae and show that they all have two desirable prope

25 e absolute prediction error with each of the formulae and the formula that gave least variability was

26 ical data, derivation of explicit analytical formulae, and extensive simulations we demonstrate that

27 hird generation intraocular lens (IOL) power formulae, and refinements in technology such as partial

28 ct, Schofield, Mifflin, Cunningham, and Owen formulae, and the disease-specific Muller formula.

29 ng and how well this was predicted by simple formulae, and the performance of methods for trimming th

30 In particular simple formulae are defined for lodging risk that are functions

31 basic Hardy-Weinberg dynamics and admixture formulae are delimited.

32 Formulae are derived to calculate the parameters of the

33 Analytic formulae are given for the equilibrium values of all sin

34 ates of resting O2 derived from conventional formulae are inaccurate, especially in severely obese in

35 lution), when used in combination with these formulae, are guaranteed to infer the correct tree when

36 omplementary analysis that recovers existing formulae as a special case but is also capable of handli

37 aw attention to the limitations of molecular formulae as predictive tools for achieving properties re

38 d applications--including addition to infant formulae--as similar to breast milk oligosaccharides, th

39 The AXs were added to 100g white bread formulae at dosages of 0.8-1.2% with flour removal of 2-

40 the accuracy of these new (to our knowledge) formulae by measuring D for soluble enhanced green fluor

41 l cases, Traditional Chinese Medicinal (TCM) formulae can achieve synergistic effects in therapeutics

42 Prediction formulae can be used to estimate REE but have not been v

43 cts, meaning that simple reproduction number formulae cannot be used.

44 Compounds with the formulae CaZr1-xCexTi2O7 with x = 0.1-0.5 were synthesiz

45 s transmetallated to yield two novel MOFs of formulae Co2 (II) {Co(II) 4 [Cu(II) 2 (Me3 mpba)2 ]3 }56

46 g risk prediction tools, risk stratification formulae, comparative trials to identify the most approp

47 These formulae confirm a conjecture formulated by V. I. Arnold

48 positions of an isobaric series of molecular formulae consisting of C, H, and O are displayed in a va

49 ucting selenide materials are of the general formulae (CP)4-2xMxSnSe4 (where 1.0 < x < 1.3; M=Mn, Fe,

50 n metal thiophosphates (TPS), with a general formulae Cu1-xIn1+x/3P2S6, have shown ferroelectric pola

51 The formulae demonstrate that the production rate of deposit

52 ely on stochastic simulations or approximate formulae (derived using the fluctuation dissipation theo

53 ely on stochastic simulations or approximate formulae (derived using the fluctuation dissipation theo

54 ustment of GAT IOP with CCT-based correction formulae, especially in thicker corneas.

55 These two new predicting formulae for %FEV(1)/FVC and %FEV(3)/FVC, which require

56 um of Markovian random variables, we propose formulae for approximating the statistical significance

57 es closer than previously published separate formulae for each ethnicity and sex.

58 Our purpose was to compare formulae for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR)

59 c and periplasmic volumes provide analytical formulae for extraction of accurate diffusion coefficien

60 y equivalent to FST and we show how existing formulae for FST can be used to estimate md when diagnos

61 We provide mathematical formulae for obtaining the optimal pool size as a functi

62 ippering arises naturally through well-known formulae for overdamped dynamics, thereby providing a me

63 However, many of the basic formulae for R(0)break down when we consider transmissio

64 We derive explicit formulae for the direct response coefficients in terms o

65 We provide asymptotic formulae for the exponentially small splitting of separa

66 We show how exact analytic formulae for the first and second moments of resident ti

67 The resulting formulae for the production rate of the deposit are pres

68 The formulae for the time-integrals reveal how the kinetic p

69 We give approximate formulae for the TL parameters and their uncertainty.

70 ffect of Yinchenhaotang (YCHT), a well-known formulae for the treatment of jaundice and liver disorde

71 d distributions, and the corresponding exact formulae for their mean and variance can therefore be us

72 d distributions, and the corresponding exact formulae for their mean and variance can therefore be us

73 ression analysis we also derive mathematical formulae for these waves and calculate their summary cur

74 We emphasize that our formulae fully agree with results obtained by stochastic

75 The Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulae gave equally good results and had the best pred

76 Based on variance-covariance formulae, I describe a simple metric for the rate of com

77 Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae in 46,942 NSTE ACS patients from 408 CRUSADE (C

78 and O/C ratios that correspond to "molecular formulae" in which the stoichiometric coefficients of so

79 Based on these physics-based analytical formulae, mechanical properties are investigated for dif

80 difference between the Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulae (median difference, 0.3 D).

81 milar results using the Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulae (median difference, 0.3 D).

82 on in foods (infant formulae, n=4; follow-on formulae, n=3; processed cereal based-foods, n=7; and ba

83 or vitamin C quantification in foods (infant formulae, n=4; follow-on formulae, n=3; processed cereal

84 ied in the current practice and the chemical formulae of biomass components such as proteins, nucleic

85 l/min, and 31.7 (14.4, 54.5) ml/min, for the formulae of Dehmer, LaFarge, and Bergstra, respectively

86 ing melting temperatures using approximative formulae or Nearest-Neighbor approaches, where one can s

87 ula was significantly better than with other formulae (P < .001).

88 n error with Holladay (P = .05) and Hoffer Q formulae (P = .002).

89 ve high mass accuracy that enables molecular formulae peak annotations.

90 wing to the analytic nature of the resulting formulae, provides an easy way to characterize also rare

91 using IOP adjusted for CCT by each of the 5 formulae published to date.

92 cc, and adjustment of GAT IOP with CCT-based formulae resulted in even poorer agreement (range of 95%

93 Adjusting IOP using CCT-based formulae resulted in poorer agreement with PDCT IOP when

94 quations turn out to be extremely similar to formulae seen in standard linear model analysis.

95 in population analyses, CCT-based correction formulae should not be applied to individuals.

96 nd symmetry of the dispersal matrix, and new formulae show how to calculate relatedness from dispersa

97 Both of these formulae show that the potency achieved by increasing th

98 Comparison between different formulae showed that the absolute prediction error with

99 high with all present IOL power calculation formulae, SRK II was the most predictable formula in our

100 s are easy to implement, and, since explicit formulae tend to be either unavailable or unilluminating

101 r the determination of FA and 5-MTHF in milk formulae than enzymatic treatments.

102 Whereas simplified formulae that estimate the per-treatment dose of hemodia

103 Likewise, all molecular formulae that fall on a line that passes through a given

104 of C, H, and O when searching for molecular formulae that have a given exact mass.

105 We show, presenting explicit formulae that provide a quantitative basis for comparing

106 ecular formula and matching of the molecular formulae to a reference file of metabolites.

107 We then applied these formulae to a validation cohort.

108 n algebraic methodology that yields explicit formulae to analyse the effect of moderate multi-compone

109 n four adult volunteers and applied the same formulae to calculate D.

110 e challenge is that there are no closed-form formulae to calculate power for the popularly applied te

111 Formulae to calculate the additional percentiles were si

112 We present formulae to calculate the power of various statistical t

113 he deterministic task of assigning molecular formulae to exact masses that are generated by ultrahigh

114 ion of the Newton-Girard theorem and Viete's formulae to the polynomial coding of different aggregate

115 udies to constrain the possible nuclear mass formulae used in r-process calculations, to help determi

116 By examining the formulae used to calculate coherence, we show that if co

117 udied by: (1) mathematical comparison of the formulae used to estimate V (Watson and Hume) with the D

118 These formulae usually use serum creatinine levels, i.e., a ma

119 are calculated exactly by several analytical formulae we have developed or by enumeration.

120 ficance are calculated exactly by analytical formulae we have developed.

121 fter trial and error iterations, the optimal formulae were %FEV(1)/FVC = 98.8 - 0.25 x years - 1.79 x

122 Various formulae were adopted to quantitate these effects.

123 Results from theoretical and semi-empirical formulae were compared.

124 Formulae were developed to quantify binding heterogeneit

125 Current and new formulae were evaluated, first considering the populatio

126 The most precise formulae were the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease

127 and Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff theoretic (SRK/T) formulae were used to calculate predicted postoperative

128 calculate the Haigis-L and Masket regression formulae (when prior data were available), and the Optov

129 fungicides were found in the European pooled formulae, while genistein was found at 9.7mug/g in soy f

130 ed from first principles and a number of new formulae will be established for different swimming stra

131 The proposed formulae will enable efficient characterization of mecha

132 yltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) from infant milk formulae with enzyme-free heat extraction.

133 th atopic dermatitis who received hydrolyzed formulae with or without GF/Bb.

134 We validate our formulae with the experimental measurements of different

135 significantly from values derived from all 3 formulae, with median (interquartile range) absolute dif