ライフサイエンスコーパス: fragment length

1 ion between DnaG and DnaB determines Okazaki fragment length.

2 ng fragments was determined as a function of fragment length.

3 d temperature but independent of HTT protein fragment length.

4 sis revealed different trajectories for each fragment length.

5 four separate PCRs suitable for fluorescent fragment length analysis and demonstrated STR profiles h

6 Here we describe DNase I-released fragment-length analysis of hypersensitivity (DNase-FLAS

7 iologically interpretable features including fragment length and cleavage specificity to distinguish

8 versus alpha1beta2gamma2 isoform; while the fragment length and frontier molecular orbital energetic

9 Bayesian approach employing distribution of fragment lengths and alignment scores, Short-Pair can re

10 the distribution of fracture-dependent fiber fragment lengths and its time dependence.

11 e observe a highly structured pattern of DNA fragment lengths and positions around nucleosomes in Sac

12 ssociated markers, mean telomere restriction fragment length, and genomic stability differed signific

13 azaki fragment initiation, the regulation of fragment length, and their implications for coordinated

14 res the uniformity of both read position and fragment length, and we explain how to compute a P-value

15 Drift distance (river fragment length available for ichthyoplankton downstream

16 t in-nucleus ligation eliminates restriction fragment length bias found with in-solution ligation.

17 ng origin dependence and determining Okazaki fragment length by restricting Pol delta progression.

18 as well as the relationship of transforming fragment length, concentration, homology, symmetry, and

19 Serum DNA integrity was assessed by fragment length-dependent quantitative real-time polymer

20 Incorporation of mRNA fragment length distribution in paired-end RNA-seq great

21 Fragment length distributions are calculated to predict

22 endent resource for automatic scoring of DNA fragment lengths diversity panels and biparental populat

23 allelic crosstalk, probe affinities and PCR fragment-length effects.

24 ops corresponded to the telomere restriction fragment length from the ALT cell lines as determined by

25 The program analyzes DNA fragment lengths generated in Applied Biosystems(R) (ABI

26 identify a link between DNA methylation and fragment length in circulating cell-free DNA, identify d

27 o high rates of nucleotide damage, short DNA fragment lengths, low endogenous DNA content and the pot

28 lical fragments is examined as a function of fragment length, N-terminal amino acid, precursor confor

29 The anomaly starts at the fragment length of about 70 bp when sharp bends or kinks

30 producing long sequencing reads with average fragment lengths of over 10,000 base-pairs and maximum l

31 ation approach that reduces the influence of fragment length on signal intensity.

32 Towne-BAC, displayed an altered restriction fragment length pattern, and replicated with increased g

33 Amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) markers were used to

34 IS900 integration loci (MPIL) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analyses were used t

35 botulinum strains was examined by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis and by sequ

36 Genome-wide cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of leaves f

37 Using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) and methylation sens

38 ating collection and analysis with amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and microsatellite m

39 kage map was constructed using 148 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and six single-stran

40 Here, we use amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data to assess genet

41 eillance cultures were compared by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genomic fingerprinti

42 Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) is a whole-genome fi

43 dent segregating populations using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers and randomly

44 othesis we used highly polymorphic Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers as a means t

45 Genetic analysis using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers revealed tha

46 A genome-wide QTL scan using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers revealed thr

47 with 1501 markers, including 1498 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers, the papaya

48 s inbreeding coefficient, f, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers.

49 is neurona was evaluated using the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) method.

50 icient purity to give reproducible amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) profiles, but was un

51 nety-six primer sets were used for amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) to characterize the

52 iplex PCR for IS900 loci (MPIL) or amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) types.

53 Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was employed as a ge

54 Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was used for typing

55 lasmid replicons, virulence genes, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and pulsed-field ge

56 -field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and random amplifie

57 ber tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), surface layer prote

58 wing cluster analysis based on amplification fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), these strains were

59 results were compared to those of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), whereby we visually

60 linkage map was constructed using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP).

61 g primers for high-resolution melting (HRM), fragment length polymorphism (FLP) and sequencing experi

62 ribe inverse PCR-based amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism (iFLP), a new technology th

63 ulosis strain using IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (IS6110-RFLP) and spoligoty

64 oligotyping with IS6110-targeted restriction fragment length polymorphism (IS6110-RFLP) as the high-r

65 ethod called "multiplex-terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (M-TRFLP)" has been recentl

66 ction (qPCR), mutliplex-terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (M-TRFLP), and clone librar

67 data were used to develop a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method that rapi

68 using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method.

69 ymerase chain reaction and HinfI restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR/RFLP).

70 enes were analyzed by LDR-FM and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses.

71 ystis jirovecii that is based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis after polym

72 s were genotyped by IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and spoligo

73 al outbreaks were typed by Afut1 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and three P

74 We used restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis as a primar

75 Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis is one of t

76 e-proven tuberculosis, combining restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Mycobact

77 acidic repeat protein gene, (2) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of T. palli

78 Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the PCR-

79 ence typing (MLST) and performed restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of three vi

80 Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was used to

81 assess the -455G/A polymorphism, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis with HaeIII

82 le, and molecular relatedness by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

83 ormance liquid chromatography or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

84 s were sequenced or subjected to restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

85 ting, IS1004 fingerprinting, and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

86 This variation, revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and nucleotide seque

87 Conventional block PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and real-time LightC

88 solates were genotyped by IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and spoligotyping.

89 yotic species, and we describe a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay that allows th

90 d from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction-fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) data and allozymes.

91 ence tag polymorphism (ESTP) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers.

92 n of 479 samples was done with a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method and the RT-PC

93 o compared to an established PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method previously ap

94 nts and all were genotyped using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) or sequencing.

95 ingle serotype had a single wbiI restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern, while isola

96 tly demonstrate identical IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns (i.e., RFLP

97 The restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns obtained by

98 fied unique HaeIII and HpaII gag restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) profiles resulting f

99 n of the utility of IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing compared to a

100 The manual IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing method is hig

101 ospital by spoligotyping, IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and 24-locus-based

102 to determine how pyrosequencing, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and direct conventi

103 cases were compared by means of restriction-fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), rapid amplified pol

104 olates were analysed with IS6110-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), spoligotyping, myco

105 encing of the plasmid DNA and/or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

106 simplex virus (HSV) isolates use restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

107 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

108 la tularensis to type strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

109 d 1,077 controls using PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP-PCR) analysis, but fo

110 Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis is a wide

111 d spacer (ITS) database terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) approach.

112 We used terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) of 18S rDNA and cl

113 ing (SIP) combined with terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), high-throughput s

114 plaque was analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (t-RFLP).

115 s were characterized by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP).

116 We used terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis to infer d

117 ques, quantitative PCR, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) and next generation

118 ent were profiled using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) and sequencing of c

119 ion of polymorphic DNA [RAPD], and amplified fragment length polymorphism [AFLP]) for the characteriz

120 polymorphism (SNP) (screened by restriction fragment length polymorphism [RFLP] analysis) that corre

121 n of the genome, demonstrating a restriction fragment length polymorphism among an encapsulated and n

122 e to conventional nested PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses for the rapid dete

123 Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses indicate complex a

124 ed for polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PCR-RFLP).

125 nd 27 cats were typed using URA5 restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (RFLP), PCR finger

126 h a small subunit rRNA-based PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and a 60-kDa glyco

127 genotype was determined by both restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and phylogenetic a

128 osition was assessed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and pyrotag sequen

129 Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and RNA gel blots

130 Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and sequencing dis

131 a in France were analyzed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and sequencing of

132 in A (ompA) gene sequencing, and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis are currently used

133 he banding patterns generated from amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis but not in their D

134 ts (MIRU-VNTR), and IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis cumulatively suppo

135 lysis, and sequencing as well as restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identifying po

136 s or a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in 160 individuals

137 ped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in 58 white patien

138 mic by polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in all samples fro

139 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 60 human DNA sa

140 Restriction-fragment length polymorphism analysis of human isolates

141 roborated by methylation-sensitive amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of meristem DNA.

142 med DNA sequencing and PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of several putativ

143 f isolates was determined by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 18S rRNA an

144 The assay agreed with PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the Cryptospori

145 the TIGR4 genetic background by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the whole locus

146 PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis reconfirmed the pr

147 monocytogenes by serotyping and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis using pulsed-field

148 IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was performed for

149 Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis with a highly poly

150 painting, Southern blotting and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, subcloning, and D

151 variation of methylation-sensitive amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis, was used to inves

152 , and for RSTs by nested PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

153 p-specific LGV real-time PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

154 owed by species-specific PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

155 by direct PCR amplification and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

156 ain reaction (PCR), or PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

157 of T. gondii infection based on restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

158 ntional methods and confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

159 e polymorphisms were detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

160 ied by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

161 f the IS6110 copies predicted by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

162 Isolates underwent IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

163 DNA was analyzed using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and 16S pyrotag sequencing,

164 using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism and 5'-end [gamma-P] ATP-la

165 hese predictions were tested using amplified fragment length polymorphism and chloroplast markers to

166 We present amplified fragment length polymorphism and mtDNA datasets for the

167 ontrol samples were genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism and multilocus sequence typ

168 s had the same 16S ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism and often had the same patt

169 yzed and compared using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequence analyses of th

170 insertion sequence 6110 (IS6110) restriction fragment length polymorphism and spoligotype patterns id

171 We developed a terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism assay (TRFLP) for g23, the

172 sing a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay and for the presence

173 r a conventional PCR method (PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay), were performed on e

174 select loci is demonstrated in an amplified fragment length polymorphism dataset generated from the

175 ogical precautions, will result in amplified fragment length polymorphism datasets with reduced error

176 arkers that can be generated in an amplified fragment length polymorphism experiment.

177 three humic lakes using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting of the prote

178 Using an amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting technique wi

179 8S rRNA tag sequencing, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting, and cloning

180 ted by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism for polymorphisms in 10 gen

181 We then studied the accuracy of restriction fragment length polymorphism for the -308 site using DNA

182 sed on distinct ribosomal spacer restriction fragment length polymorphism genotypes (RSTs).

183 lassification was done by IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping and spoligotypin

184 rs was established by karyotyping, amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping, and whole-genom

185 ify the three markers by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism in parallel, analyzed B. bu

186 Amplified fragment length polymorphism is a popular DNA marker tec

187 studies, were examined by using restriction fragment length polymorphism IS6110 fingerprinting and r

188 criminating the four-band IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism isolates from each other.

189 We identified one amplified fragment length polymorphism marker that may be linked t

190 he previous high-density map using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers.

191 h with direct sequencing and the restriction fragment length polymorphism method indicated that the S

192 her genetic diversity of mtDNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism of Acomys on the AS compare

193 l alleles were demonstrated with restriction fragment length polymorphism of polymerase chain reactio

194 PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of small subunit rDNA, clon

195 DNA sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism of the PCR products showed

196 le for PCR checking, SNP typing (restriction fragment length polymorphism or amplification refractory

197 Its IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern was identical or ne

198 the 37% of isolates displaying a restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern with <6 IS6110 copi

199 nts whose isolates had identical restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns and spoligotypes w

200 of each subgroup share the same restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of the 5S-23S inte

201 patient isolates showed unusual restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns with restriction e

202 d leukocytes and analyzed with a restriction fragment length polymorphism PCR method.

203 We devised a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism screen for the associated g

204 A random amplified fragment length polymorphism survey suggested remodeling

205 ng the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique (PCR-RFLP).

206 e used polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism to evaluate genetic polymor

207 ctors, ribosomal RNA gene spacer restriction fragment length polymorphism types (RSTs), ospC group de

208 patibility complex class II DRB3 restriction fragment length polymorphism types 8/23, 3/16, and 16/27

209 SNPs, we designed a low-cost PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism typing method.

210 IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of cultured bacteria

211 of 46 heterozygotes analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphism were actually GG-homozygote

212 hese two strains, when analyzed by amplified fragment length polymorphism within a collection of over

213 trifers (assessed using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism) was interactively regulate

214 techniques such as cDNA-AFLP (Amplification Fragment Length Polymorphism).

215 lysis of this gene (16S rRNA PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism).

216 ed, on the basis of biochemical, restriction fragment length polymorphism, and 16S rRNA gene sequence

217 ted by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and CCR5Delta32, evaluated

218 xins A, B and binary toxin using restriction fragment length polymorphism, and identification of ribo

219 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and IL-1RN variable number

220 matched (by spoligotype, IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism, and mycobacterial interspe

221 thods, including pyrosequencing, restriction fragment length polymorphism, and sequencing to characte

222 random amplified polymorphic DNA, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and vacA allele molecular

223 4 nucleotide variant was done by restriction fragment length polymorphism, heteroduplex analysis, or

224 hyroid FNAB specimens by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism, plus direct sequencing in

225 By PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism, sequence, and phylogenetic

226 molecular typing methods, IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism, spoligotyping, and DNA seq

227 ial community analyses (terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, T-RFLP) were performed to

228 ods based on cDNA sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism, the microarray approaches

229 ce of the A1 allele of the TaqIA restriction fragment length polymorphism, which is associated with d

230 assigned by a combination of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism-based assays.

231 underwent CD14 genotyping using restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction.

232 yzed by pyrosequencing or by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism.

233 Tissue typing was based on restriction fragment length polymorphism.

234 otyping by analysis with PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism.

235 ne (pfATP6) were assessed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

236 ped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

237 ned by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

238 454 pyrosequencing and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.

239 community composition (Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism; T-RFLP).

240 Amplified fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of the isol

241 With amplified fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP) markers and controll

242 s strains associated with IS6110 restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern clusters and

243 Isolates were genotyped using restriction-fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns.

244 996-2001 were fingerprinted with restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP).

245 Results of IS6110 restriction fragment-length polymorphism analyses were available for

246 nce (ITS) and mitochondrial cox1 Restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis of ITS revealed sw

247 s of a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis of the 16S-23S rib

248 used spoligotyping, IS6110-based restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis, and sequencing of

249 went insertion sequence (IS)6110 restriction-fragment-length polymorphism analysis, targeted gene seq

250 between these variants using PCR/restriction fragment-length polymorphism assays in 454 subjects recr

251 Ninety maize restriction fragment-length polymorphism core markers were hybridize

252 2 distinct ribosomal DNA spacer restriction fragment-length polymorphism genotypes (RSTs) was assess

253 subunit 2 (ND2) sequences and 467 amplified fragment-length polymorphism nuclear DNA markers, we sho

254 Genotyping was performed by restriction fragment-length polymorphism polymerase chain reaction a

255 isolates were analyzed, both by restriction fragment-length polymorphism typing and by sequencing fo

256 Fluorescent amplified fragment-length polymorphism typing established that no

257 spa were found to be identical by amplified fragment-length polymorphism typing.

258 Restriction fragment-length polymorphism was used to determine the E

259 nd 10q loci were screened by PCR-restriction fragment-length polymorphism.

260 analysed by means of chloroplast restriction fragment-length polymorphism.

261 Restriction fragment length-polymorphism analysis of virus isolated

262 entical genotypes as determined by amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) and multilocus sequ

263 Using molecular markers [amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) and simple sequence

264 egant analysis, we have identified amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) cosegregating with

265 e map, which is based primarily on amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and genes, consist

266 a (Ifakara) were investigated with amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and microsatellite

267 ultilocus dominant markers such as amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and randomly ampli

268 Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are widely used fo

269 ion has focused on the efficacy of amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) for resolving deep

270 port the results of an analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) in G. laevigata, f

271 Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) provide a rapid an

272 ysis of population structure using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) revealed no geneti

273 or chloroplast microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs).

274 We analysed methylation-sensitive amplified fragment length polymorphisms (MS-AFLP) to compare the e

275 dies, mainly through identifying restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP).

276 lates, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and cytochrome oxi

277 a gave identical and distinctive restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) for an amplified p

278 oeologous genes and anonymous cDNA amplified fragment length polymorphisms and with phenotypic variat

279 extensive SGS when assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphisms in the tree Fagus sylvatic

280 ehydrogenase or to determine the restriction fragment length polymorphisms of X chromosome-linked gen

281 Furthermore, analysis of 176 amplified fragment length polymorphisms revealed significant genom

282 Fragment length polymorphisms were detected at 9 of the

283 r BsmI, ApaI, TaqI, and FokI VDR restriction fragment length polymorphisms were used for both total V

284 Immunofixation, genomic restriction fragment length polymorphisms, and pulsed field gel elec

285 f multilocus DNA sequence data and amplified fragment length polymorphisms, is that a recently disper

286 berosum, genotyped with 438 robust amplified fragment length polymorphisms.

287 s of C. burnetii are revealed by restriction fragment-length polymorphisms (RFLP).

288 ges in polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment-length polymorphisms.

289 tagged sites, microsatellites, and amplified fragment-length polymorphisms.

290 ues from capture-based data by incorporating fragment length profiles into a model of methylation ana

291 lied to this technology make use of sequence fragment length profiling or reading frame occupancy enr

292 ear genomic and microbial cfDNA over a broad fragment length range.

293 versity, typing using the differences in PCR fragment length resulting from variations in numbers of

294 are separated and distinguished according to fragment length; thus the assay is generally hampered by

295 hich moves computational complexity from DNA fragment length to fragment overlap, i.e., coverage, and

296 servation need is for management to increase fragment lengths to forestall these risks.

297 From the terminal restriction fragment length (TRFL) distribution, the authors obtaine

298 PCR fragment-length variation across the subtelomeric region

299 Recombination fragment lengths were estimated for 11 events and ranged

300 enesis has a sigmoidal dependence on heparin fragment length, with an enhancement observed for oligos