ライフサイエンスコーパス: freezing behavior

1 tions, resulted in the reduction of the CER (freezing behavior).

2 d-footshock group displayed a fear response (freezing behavior).

3 approach behavior, while 22 kHz USVs lead to freezing behavior.

4 ) was selective to those with high levels of freezing behavior.

5 mory or directly affecting the expression of freezing behavior.

6 hat experienced 2-VO showed no disruption in freezing behavior.

7 ive sensory stimulation but did not regulate freezing behavior.

8 CS was significantly coupled to EMG-related freezing behavior.

9 on attenuated the OBX-induced abnormality in freezing behavior.

10 ry of learned fear but not for generation of freezing behavior.

11 and shortened the duration of stress-induced freezing behavior.

12 itioned inhibition or extinction of acquired freezing behavior.

13 iously fear-conditioned rats, as measured by freezing behavior.

14 the present study by measuring fear-related freezing behavior after electrolytic and neurotoxic lesi

15 with BLA lesions expressed normal and robust freezing behavior, although they required at least 10 ti

16 After extinction, freezing behavior (an index of learned fear) to the audi

17 first phylogenetic characterization of xylem freezing behavior and dehydrin-like proteins.

18 ty (including reduced exploration, increased freezing behavior and erratic movement), which are quant

19 timulus reverses the conditioning-associated freezing behavior and odor learning-induced structural c

20 Our data suggest that both freezing behavior and the accumulation of dehydrin-like

21 Footshock-sensitivity, freezing behavior, and corticosterone response to variou

22 pothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity, freezing behavior, and expressive vocalizations.

23 TMT presentation induced freezing behavior, and this effect was attenuated by NBM

24 ed the effectiveness of oxytocin at reducing freezing behavior as compared to vehicle controls.

25 ed threats, we observe a higher incidence of freezing behavior at higher approach rates.

26 icient to depolarize BNST neurons and induce freezing behavior; both responses depended on ASIC1A.

27 ngs indicate that BLA lesions do not disrupt freezing behavior by producing hyperactivity, an inabili

28 behavior correlations between FDG uptake and freezing behavior confirmed that subjects with higher pr

29 However, freezing behavior could also be affected by fatigue, esp

30 dministration of a Cnr1 antagonist increased freezing behavior during a cued fear expression test in

31 Freezing behavior during the testing session of the CFC

32 Isoflurane-exposed rats had reduced freezing behavior during the training sessions in the fe

33 ring manner in the expression of conditioned freezing behavior elicited by both olfactory and context

34 In Phase 3, freezing behavior elicited by CS2 was tested without dru

35 rimination task, suggesting that deficits in freezing behavior exhibited by BLA subjects were not due

36 Mice predominantly displaying freezing behavior had preferential neural activity in th

37 d that despite no overall sex differences in freezing behavior, HF and LF phenotypes emerged in male

38 Freezing behavior, however, has previously been induced

39 ested for conditioned stimulus (CS)-elicited freezing behavior in a distinct context.

40 in wild-type subjects, but had no effect on freezing behavior in CCKBR knockout littermates.

41 However, analysis of freezing behavior in different contexts indicated that t

42 e examined in the present study by comparing freezing behavior in exercising and nonexercising rats t

43 ked some of the effects of OBX; it decreased freezing behavior in response to mild footshock and prod

44 Reduced freezing behavior in Tg2576 mice during fear conditionin

45 g, contextual fear was assessed by measuring freezing behavior in the conditioned context (in the abs

46 ited spike firing in the MGN and conditional freezing behavior in vehicle-treated rats receiving pair

47 r conditioning in rats, measured by lack of "freezing" behavior in the presence of cues previously pa

48 suggesting that exposure to AAS may override freezing behavior induced by low serotonin.

49 is important to understand the often complex freezing behavior of solutions of biomolecules.

50 Freezing behavior of the NON rats declined significantly

51 ne responses in PL that were correlated with freezing behavior on a second-to-second basis during the

52 n aversive footshock in a novel chamber, and freezing behavior served as an index of conditional fear

53 he extinction context or in another context; freezing behavior served as the index of conditional fea

54 ed footshock in a novel observation chamber; freezing behavior served as the measure of conditional f

55 Freezing behavior served as the measure of fear.

56 were exposed to isoflurane 30 min later had freezing behavior similar to that of control animals.

57 These data suggest that learning-induced freezing behavior, structural alterations, and enhanced

58 Lesioned mice exhibited a higher level of freezing behavior than controls on each of the 3 session

59 r only those from the left dHb, prolongs the freezing behavior that follows shock.

60 lowed by assessment of cue fear by measuring freezing behavior to the conditioned tone presented in a

61 No differences in freezing behavior to the discrete auditory cue were obse

62 e foot shock demonstrated robust conditioned freezing behavior to the stressor environment and defici

63 were decreased in the EPM and acquisition of freezing behavior to the tone was increased in a fear-co

64 ning amygdala lesions blocked stress-induced freezing behavior, ultrasonic vocalizations, adrenocorti

65 ssociated with these individual differences, freezing behavior was examined in infant rhesus monkeys

66 No effects on freezing behavior were observed following preproENK gene

67 the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) and freezing behavior were recorded during tests in which ea

68 1 month or 1 h before CFC, exhibited reduced freezing behavior when compared with mice administered s

69 ed behavior when exposed to a snake and less freezing behavior when confronted by a human intruder.

70 Freezing behavior when presented with the conditioned to

71 xtual fear memory, as evidenced by increased freezing behavior when rats are returned to a training e

72 ed 2-VO exhibited a significant reduction in freezing behavior whereas estradiol-treated mice that ex

73 or the acquisition and recall of conditioned freezing behavior, which has been used as an index of de