ライフサイエンスコーパス: freezing tolerance

1 Elevated temperature and CO2 also impaired freezing tolerance.

2 ay present opportunities for improving plant freezing tolerance.

3 s the major process that prepares plants for freezing tolerance.

4 whereas overexpression of PLDdelta increased freezing tolerance.

5 naling has been postulated to play a role in freezing tolerance.

6 that the SFR2 gene product is essential for freezing tolerance.

7 in transgenic tomato plants did not increase freezing tolerance.

8 rgeted genes, the CBF regulon, that increase freezing tolerance.

9 F regulon, resulting in an increase in plant freezing tolerance.

10 significant reduction in plant chilling and freezing tolerance.

11 ecrease in endogenous raffinose and impaired freezing tolerance.

12 genes), which contributes to an increase in freezing tolerance.

13 However, this comes at the cost of impaired freezing tolerance.

14 pression of CBF-targeted genes that increase freezing tolerance.

15 absent under long photoperiod, and increased freezing tolerance.

16 limation, define genes that are required for freezing tolerance.

17 uces COR gene expression and increases plant freezing tolerance.

18 cleus to activate genes needed for increased freezing tolerance.

19 of several cold-regulated genes involved in freezing tolerance.

20 ow that BRs participate in the regulation of freezing tolerance.

21 affected specifically in the development of freezing tolerance.

22 raising the question of SFR2 function beyond freezing tolerance.

23 regulon, which contribute to an increase in freezing tolerance.

24 han 100 genes, the CBF regulon, which impart freezing tolerance.

25 gene, inducing flowering with a reduction of freezing tolerance.

26 which reprograms gene expression to increase freezing tolerance.

27 e proteins had on global gene expression and freezing tolerance.

28 nes that are required for the acquisition of freezing tolerance.

29 r subunits, as does cold acclimation-induced freezing tolerance.

30 tional activators of gene pathways imparting freezing tolerance.

31 es showed improved germination and increased freezing tolerance.

32 outside the CBF pathway, and increase plant freezing tolerance.

33 osome underlying important traits, including freezing tolerance.

34 leading from cold perception to chilling and freezing tolerance.

35 induction of CBF-targeted genes that impart freezing tolerance.

36 of the CBF regulon results in an increase in freezing tolerance.

37 camta1 camta3 mutant plants are impaired in freezing tolerance.

38 ssion of the CBF gene regulon, which imparts freezing tolerance.

39 nce, whereas MPK3/MPK6 activation attenuates freezing tolerance.

40 e been shown to control genetic pathways for freezing tolerance.

41 cold acclimatization and the acquisition of freezing tolerance.

42 ng stress whereas its overexpression reduces freezing tolerance.

43 ation of CBF genes and in the development of freezing tolerance.

44 to chilling stress and defective in acquired freezing tolerance.

45 anscription factor required for chilling and freezing tolerance.

46 gulon) that act in concert to increase plant-freezing tolerance.

47 lon, which act to bring about an increase in freezing tolerance.

48 mutant of Arabidopsis displays a deficit in freezing tolerance after cold acclimation.

49 olanum cardiophyllum) exhibiting extremes of freezing tolerance and acclimation capacity.

50 ions as a negative regulator of constitutive freezing tolerance and cold acclimation in Arabidopsis t

51 ith ET biosynthesis to modulate constitutive freezing tolerance and cold acclimation in Arabidopsis.

52 nd that MYB88 and MYB124 positively regulate freezing tolerance and cold-responsive gene expression i

53 original sfr6-1 mutation, these both disrupt freezing tolerance and COR gene expression.

54 development, proline and sugar composition, freezing tolerance and gene expression.

55 * The trade-off between freezing tolerance and growth rate supports the range li

56 uercus series Virentes) were associated with freezing tolerance and growth rate, and whether species

57 ompetition, resulting in a trade-off between freezing tolerance and growth rate.

58 cold-responsive gene transcription, acquired freezing tolerance and plant resistance to chilling unde

59 The Mvp/- plants showed reduced freezing tolerance and reduced transcript levels of seve

60 ity is that Arabidopsis accessions differ in freezing tolerance and that those collected from colder

61 in Suc solution in the dark at 2 degrees C, freezing tolerance and the incidence of freeze-induced l

62 based on root elongation, quantification of freezing tolerance and the use of electrolyte leakage ex

63 ntrolling gene expression under cold stress, freezing tolerance, and flowering time.

64 ed photosynthetic rates, leaf carbohydrates, freezing tolerance, and proteins involved in photosynthe

65 n, hos1-1 plants acquired the same degree of freezing tolerance as did the wild type.

66 y expression of cold-induced transcripts and freezing tolerance assays.

67 se in CBF expression is sufficient to confer freezing tolerance at temperatures higher than those req

68 Analysis of freezing tolerance at the whole plant level and measurem

69 pha-Gal in petunia results in an increase in freezing tolerance at the whole-plant level in nonacclim

70 mote proper cold-induced gene expression and freezing tolerance before and after cold acclimation.

71 so reduces the capacity of plants to develop freezing tolerance but does not impair the vernalization

72 sis at low temperature did not contribute to freezing tolerance, but had a major role in configuring

73 uction probably accounts for the increase in freezing tolerance by cooling acclimation.

74 ndidate gene for improving plant drought and freezing tolerance by genetic transformation.

75 disordered protein that contributes to leaf freezing tolerance by stabilizing cellular membranes.

76 nt growth and development, and for a part of freezing tolerance, by affecting the activity of genes i

77 ortion of the variance for the nonacclimated freezing tolerance can be best explained by an additive-

78 Here we show that freezing tolerance can be manipulated in Arabidopsis tha

79 e flowering time (vernalization) and improve freezing tolerance (cold acclimation).

80 ited stunted growth, poor yield, and greater freezing tolerance compared to non-transformed 'Golden P

81 also have strong constitutive heat shock and freezing tolerance compared with mountain plants, where

82 nts initiate their reproductive development, freezing tolerance decreases, suggesting a connection be

83 ts native to cold climates acquire increased freezing tolerance during exposure to low nonfreezing te

84 ate climate zones are able to increase their freezing tolerance during exposure to low, above-zero te

85 To acquire freezing tolerance, higher plants require a period of lo

86 understanding of the molecular mechanisms of freezing tolerance in apple.

87 ions of 51 genes suspected of involvement in freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

88 eezing2 (SFR2) gene has an important role in freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

89 E TO FREEZING 2 (SFR2), a gene essential for freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis, encodes a galactolipi

90 /lhy-21 double mutation resulted in impaired freezing tolerance in both nonacclimated and cold-acclim

91 roach can be designed to genetically enhance freezing tolerance in important crops.

92 et COR (cold-regulated) genes and to enhance freezing tolerance in nonacclimated plants.

93 hich negatively regulates CBF expression and freezing tolerance in plants.

94 -regulation of the CBF pathway and increased freezing tolerance in preparation for coming cold temper

95 rance in response to heat shock and acquired freezing tolerance in response to cold shock.

96 During cold acclimation plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low non-freezing tempe

97 e process whereby certain plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low nonfreezing temper

98 tion, the process whereby plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low nonfreezing temper

99 Many plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low temperature, a pro

100 y plants, including Arabidopsis, increase in freezing tolerance in response to low, nonfreezing tempe

101 Many plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low, nonfreezing tempe

102 s resulted in a 5.5 degrees C improvement in freezing tolerance in the absence of cold acclimation.

103 mponents of this survival in crop plants are freezing tolerance in the nonacclimated state and cold a

104 xpression of the Nicotiana PK1 gene enhances freezing tolerance in transgenic maize plants that are n

105 pression of CBF-targeted genes and increased freezing tolerance indicating that LeCBF1 encodes a func

106 aused a small, but reproducible, increase in freezing tolerance, indicating a role for the ZAT12 regu

107 da') were compared with a goal to reveal how freezing tolerance is achieved in this distinctive overw

108 Although freezing tolerance is acquired through cold-induced gene

109 other than CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3, and whether freezing tolerance is dependent on a functional CBF-CRT/

110 mperatures results in cold acclimation where freezing tolerance is enhanced.

111 Here we show that the increase in freezing tolerance is not associated with any increase i

112 The increased freezing tolerance is the result of a decreased incidenc

113 ecotypes that condition local adaptation and freezing tolerance map to a region that includes the C-r

114 t ADA2b may directly or indirectly repress a freezing tolerance mechanism that does not require the e

115 estion thus raised is whether differences in freezing tolerance might contribute to local adaptation

116 2.6 degreesC by cold acclimation whereas the freezing tolerance of 26 mutant lines ranged from -6.8 d

117 We screened for mutations deleterious to the freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. e

118 idopsis CBF-targeted genes and increases the freezing tolerance of both nonacclimated and cold-acclim

119 on of CBF3 in Arabidopsis also increases the freezing tolerance of cold-acclimated plants.

120 The freezing tolerance of isolated protoplasts (LT(50) of -9

121 nduced COR gene expression and increased the freezing tolerance of nonacclimated Arabidopsis plants.

122 vides an additional method for improving the freezing tolerance of plants.

123 The minimum source temperature predicted the freezing tolerance of populations under temperate condit

124 Moreover, the freezing tolerance of SD plants was greater than that of

125 Based upon electrolyte leakage tests, freezing tolerance of the antisense lines increased from

126 During cold acclimation freezing tolerance of the Hv-CBF2A overexpressing lines

127 T CBF2 protein also contributes to the lower freezing tolerance of the IT plants compared with the SW

128 of the CBF regulon in the cold and improves freezing tolerance of the transgenic plants.

129 that of 'Golden Promise' and paralleled the freezing tolerance of the winter hardy barley 'Dicktoo'.

130 Freezing tolerance of wild-type Arabidopsis was increase

131 suggesting that quantitative trait loci for freezing tolerance previously mapped on this chromosome

132 iciency but impaired dehydrin expression and freezing tolerance similar to ETAC seedlings.

133 mated conditions, sfr4 protoplasts possessed freezing tolerance similar to that of wild type, with th

134 lay central roles in low-temperature-induced freezing tolerance, spike architecture and hormone metab

135 s (FROST RESISTANCE-1), as proposed in early freezing tolerance studies.

136 ession strongly correlated with increases in freezing tolerance, suggesting its involvement in the de

137 -1 is sufficient to determine differences in freezing tolerance, suggesting that quantitative trait l

138 ezing temperatures results in an increase in freezing tolerance that involves action of the C-repeat

139 hly interconnected; and that the increase in freezing tolerance that occurs with cold acclimation is

140 Mutations in the ESK1 gene provide strong freezing tolerance through genetic regulation that is ap

141 ER OF CBF EXPRESSION1, a master regulator of freezing tolerance, thus implicating a potential link be

142 ny downstream genes that confer chilling and freezing tolerance to plants.

143 n activate many downstream genes that confer freezing tolerance to plants.

144 F7, act to down-regulate the CBF pathway and freezing tolerance under LD conditions.

145 l conditions were negatively correlated with freezing tolerance under temperate conditions.

146 e process whereby certain plants increase in freezing tolerance upon exposure to low temperature.

147 ragaria x ananassa) cultivars that differ in freezing tolerance was conducted.

148 Differences in freezing tolerance were apparent only upon cold acclimat

149 uble carbohydrates, dehydrin expression, and freezing tolerance were impaired.

150 cts of growth temperature and photoperiod on freezing tolerance were most pronounced in plants grown

151 plants like Arabidopsis thaliana increase in freezing tolerance when exposed to low nonfreezing tempe

152 mutant plants are less capable of developing freezing tolerance when treated with low non-freezing te

153 creased expression of CBF genes and enhanced freezing tolerance, whereas constitutive activation of t

154 d the mpk3 mpk6 double mutants show enhanced freezing tolerance, whereas MPK3/MPK6 activation attenua

155 revealed that the WXP1 plants had increased freezing tolerance while the WXP2 plants were more sensi

156 on of one pathway can result in considerable freezing tolerance without activation of other pathways.