ライフサイエンスコーパス: functional residual capacity

1 0.3 mm; alveolar depth, 0.14 mm at 1 L above functional residual capacity).

2 nt breath-hold CT at total lung capacity and functional residual capacity.

3 e positive end-expiratory pressure maintains functional residual capacity.

4 eal tube in an amount estimated to represent functional residual capacity.

5 ived intratracheal perflubron to approximate functional residual capacity.

6 al ventilation to a volume approximating the functional residual capacity.

7 volume ], functional residual capacity [ FRC functional residual capacity ], 1 L above FRC functional

8 onal residual capacity (16-20 mL/kg) or half functional residual capacity (10 mL/kg) before the initi

9 ron via the endotracheal tube at either full functional residual capacity (16-20 mL/kg) or half funct

10 preinjury gas functional residual capacity (functional residual capacity = 18.6+/-1.5 [SEM] mL/kg).

11 45, or 60 mL of perflubron (initial volume = functional residual capacity + additional volume).

12 By measurements of functional residual capacity after endotracheal suctioni

13 e parameters in patients with no decrease of functional residual capacity after suctioning.

14 d oxygenation in patients with a decrease of functional residual capacity after suctioning.

15 y pressure swings, end-expiratory reading at functional residual capacity allows for minimal influenc

16 phy (less than -856 Hounsfield units [HU] at functional residual capacity and -950 HU at total lung c

17 CT was performed at suspended functional residual capacity and at residual volume in t

18 ults from (1)H signal difference between FRC functional residual capacity and FRC+1 L 1 L above FRC (

19 level as the preinjury levels ("normalized" functional residual capacity and respiratory system comp

20 t a mean airway pressure that maintained the functional residual capacity and static respiratory syst

21 ion, compliance, end-expiratory lung volume, functional residual capacity, and deadspace fraction.

22 ad an impact on distribution of ventilation, functional residual capacity, and oxygenation in patient

23 .3 +/- 0.3 [mean +/- SEM] to 7.7 +/- 0.4 L), functional residual capacity, and residual volume.

24 that liquid lung ventilation dosing at full functional residual capacity before bypass is more effec

25 Differences in pulmonary functional residual capacity, blood volume, chest wall a

26 lung strains (ratio between tidal volume and functional residual capacity) but different lung strain

27 iratory pressure levels after inflation from functional residual capacity, but peaked at moderate pos

28 e end-expiratory pressure 10) increased mean functional residual capacity by 368 mL when pleural effu

29 ed to improve tidal compliance and increased functional residual capacity by only 77 mL, whereastidal

30 nd 4 weeks after unilateral valve insertion, functional residual capacity decreased from 7.1 (1.5) to

31 -volume loops performed after inflation from functional residual capacity demonstrated incremental, c

32 Full functional residual capacity dosing may optimize alveola

33 s improve oxygen delivery compared with half functional residual capacity dosing.

34 tes static respiratory system compliance and functional residual capacity during high-frequency oscil

35 asured by average maximal expiratory flow at functional residual capacity during infancy and at age 6

36 for mild parenchymal destruction, Dlco% and functional residual capacity for severe parenchymal dest

37 above the upper limit of normal (RV-HI) or a functional residual capacity (FRC) >120% predicted (FRC-

38 the effects of tidal volume lung inflation [functional residual capacity (FRC) + 500 ml and FRC + 1

39 pacity (TLC), affects the dependent 11 cm at functional residual capacity (FRC) and almost all the lu

40 Scans were performed at functional residual capacity (FRC) and at the end of a t

41 At predetermined intervals, functional residual capacity (FRC) and forced expiratory

42 entilation at different lung volumes between functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capaci

43 ung density at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC) combined, and the two

44 Rlp); however, within 30 min of sleep onset, functional residual capacity (FRC) fell and Rlp rose mor

45 ethysmographic assessments of lung volume at functional residual capacity (FRC) in infants.

46 Forced expiratory flows (FEFs) at functional residual capacity (FRC) increase with increas

47 Functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements made usi

48 orced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), and functional residual capacity (FRC) were measured in 20 p

49 g PaO2, PaCO2, ventilation efficiency index, functional residual capacity (FRC), and pressure-volume

50 ealthy subjects (n = 7) in the right lung at functional residual capacity (FRC), FRC+500 ml, and FRC+

51 phenomenon may be related to an increase in functional residual capacity (FRC); however, no previous

52 EEVL was altered from approximated functional residual capacity ("FRC") to 1.5 and 0.5 "FRC

53 mes (residual volume [ RV residual volume ], functional residual capacity [ FRC functional residual c

54 unctional residual capacity ], 1 L above FRC functional residual capacity [ FRC+1 L 1 L above FRC ],

55 [TLC]; -1.55 g/L per year [0.24] at TLC plus functional residual capacity [FRC]; and -1.60 g/L per ye

56 a volume equal to the measured preinjury gas functional residual capacity (functional residual capaci

57 functional residual capacity value (group A: functional residual capacity >94% of baseline; group B:

58 ty before bypass is more effective than half functional residual capacity in minimizing the lung inju

59 ffect, if any, on maximal expiratory flow at functional residual capacity in uninfected infants.

60 e improved and then peaked before declining, functional residual capacity increased, and blood gas im

61 Full functional residual capacity liquid lung ventilation adm

62 r bypass compared with both control and half functional residual capacity liquid lung ventilation ani

63 Full functional residual capacity liquid lung ventilation res

64 residual capacity >94% of baseline; group B: functional residual capacity <94% of baseline).

65 iding the recruitment strategy on changes of functional residual capacity may improve patient care.

66 Despite its insensitivity to changes in functional residual capacity, measuring transpulmonary p

67 a more likely need for intubation due to low functional residual capacity, more difficult intravenous

68 to receive cardiopulmonary bypass with full functional residual capacity perflubron (n = 7), cardiop

69 on (n = 7), cardiopulmonary bypass with half functional residual capacity perflubron (n = 7), or card

70 MR imaging (at functional residual capacity plus 1 L), CT (at full insp

71 ing the same breath hold at a lung volume of functional residual capacity plus 1 L.

72 = -0.61, P < .005) and percentage predicted functional residual capacity (r = 0.47, P < .05).

73 ignificant increased inspiratory resistance, functional residual capacity, right ventricular hypertro

74 months in measures of forced vital capacity, functional residual capacity, serum vascular endothelial

75 ean airway pressure and achieve "normalized" functional residual capacity, static compliance, and gas

76 uring surfactant administration by measuring functional residual capacity, tidal volume, the alveolar

77 l HIV have normal maximal expiratory flow at functional residual capacity (V'max,(FRC)).

78 Maximal flow at functional residual capacity (V'maxFRC) was measured in

79 tified into two groups by the postsuctioning functional residual capacity value (group A: functional

80 tube in an amount estimated to represent the functional residual capacity, ventilating the animal for

81 Measurements of maximal flow at functional residual capacity (Vmax(FRC)) from partial fo

82 We measured maximal expiratory flows at functional residual capacity (Vmax(FRC)) in 169 of these

83 Maximal flow at functional residual capacity was measured using rapid th

84 yses, age-adjusted forced expiratory flow at functional residual capacity was not related to birth we

85 Functional residual capacity was significantly reduced b

86 ng lavage, respiratory system compliance and functional residual capacity were measured.

87 Changes in functional residual capacity were not significantly diff

88 abbits were killed, the lungs were filled to functional residual capacity with perflubron, followed b