ライフサイエンスコーパス: fund

1 ion (CDC), and the United Nations Children's Fund.

2 rican Medical Research Council, and MAC AIDS Fund.

3 to keep their connections with companies and funds.

4 llocating health-care resources and research funds.

5 treatment of cancer was, and is, government funded.

6 All but 1 of the studies were industry-funded.

7 erventions, clinical outcomes, and source of funding.

8 mmediate and escalating threats with limited funding.

9 placement in schools, and even fewer provide funding.

10 ty was associated with increased rates of MD funding.

11 is is often an explicit constraint placed on funding.

12 ces and relinquish authority, influence, and funding.

13 d supporting countries not eligible for Gavi funding.

14 maxillofacial pathologists garnered the most funding.

15 requirements and bridge the remaining gap in funding.

16 an men to have National Institutes of Health funding (2.0% vs 3.6%; P = .004) and generated less annu

17 on programmes received the largest amount of funding ($2.6 billion), followed by HIV/AIDS ($1080.7 mi

18 In 2013 England and Wales began to fund a live attenuated influenza vaccine programme for i

19 the Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) secretly funded a review in the New England Journal of Medicine t

20 d Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded a two-state collaborative to reduce ventilator-as

21 ouri, and other National Institutes of Aging-funded AD centers in the United States.

22 Funding administered through the National Institute of D

23 approach is important to ensure that public funds advance the mission of federal agencies.

24 In the United States, federal funding agencies and foundations collectively distribute

25 ademic and research institutions and federal funding agencies in the United States.

26 om individual scientists to publishers, from funding agencies to hiring committees.

27 p in biology and challenges institutions and funding agencies to redouble their support for computati

28 d bioinformatics expertise; and oversight by funding agencies to review priorities, progress, and pot

29 Funding agencies use many different criteria and peer re

30 sed by investigators and authors, reviewers, funding agencies, and editors.

31 care; and (4) asks the government and other funding agencies, including the American Heart Associati

32 ansparency from the scientific community and funding agencies, one critical step is to make finding a

33 The amount of funding allocated to the health sector has increased sub

34 ealth has created a special division and has funded an intervention programme to reduce the infant mo

35 Burroughs Wellcome Fund and American Diabetes Association.

36 this development: towards more discretionary funding and away from core or longer-term funding; towar

37 Future funding and research should be directed at both identify

38 f surgery departments by increasing both NIH funding and scholarly productivity.

39 nors; China is creating its own multilateral funds and banks and challenging the existing global arch

40 in 1913 to cover relations between sickness funds and doctors, which in turn led to the right for in

41 areholders, who are classified as companies, funds and individuals.

42 ro variables but also within-country flow of funds and labor migration.

43 spending channelled through social security funds and other government agencies.

44 spending channelled through social security funds and other government agencies.

45 tal-University Health Network AMO Innovation Fund, and Stanford University Medical Scholars Programme

46 hannelled mostly through GAVI and the Global Fund, and used for programmes for new and underused vacc

47 nclusion criteria; of these, 40 (35.7%) were funded, and 31 of the 40 were interventions.

48 nsibilities, difficulty obtaining extramural funding, and desire for work-life balance.

49 e of this study was to examine the planning, funding, and internal evaluation of an SRF-funded resear

50 sion to accept or decline surgery, source of funding, and the relative importance of various factors

51 mpowered by motivated governments, dedicated funds, and compassionate scientific partnership.

52 SRF subsequently funded animal research to evaluate sucrose's CHD risks.

53 ces, allocations of research and health-care funding are dependent upon high-quality evidence.

54 nt assistance for health, and new investment funds are complementary and reinforcing, with China shap

55 ch Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Fund, AstraZeneca, Sanofi Aventis.

56 ld be of use to decision makers and research-funding authorities charged with allocating health-care

57 re should be no prohibition on making public funds available to support this research.

58 Should funds be made available and used as planned, the ambitio

59 eptual changes that should be implemented by funding bodies and academic institutions.

60 including researchers, clinicians, patients, funding bodies and policymakers.

61 Regulators, research funding bodies, and public policy makers may need to pla

62 We encourage journals, funding bodies, and scientists to unite in promoting a n

63 participate in the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

64 y applied mainly to the payers (the sickness funds) but was extended in 1913 to cover relations betwe

65 This work was funded by a generous gift provided by Inga-Lill and Davi

66 ology and wildlife research programs led and funded by African institutes and private companies.

67 us 3.7% (CI, 2.6% to 4.7%) at facilities not funded by RWHAP.

68 ice settings, particularly at facilities not funded by RWHAP.

69 oud (ISB-CGC) is one of three pilot projects funded by the National Cancer Institute to explore new a

70 This trial was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

71 industry-sponsored trials, depression trials funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

72 Among patients at facilities funded by the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP), 12.5%

73 e Cell Census Consortium, ten pilot projects funded by the U.S. BRAIN Initiative, in developing, vali

74 National studies were funded by the UN Population Fund in Bangladesh and China

75 This project is also supported and partly funded by UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre and The Ro

76 We projected available funding by country and year, taking into account economi

77 tute (NCI) established a network of publicly funded cancer cooperative research groups to systematica

78 are is compromised when developers graduate, funding ceases, or investigators turn to other projects.

79 Clinical demands, funding challenges, and other factors play important rol

80 e-public ventures to meet infrastructure and funding challenges, streamlining medical product develop

81 The NIH-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed

82 The Innovative Medicines Initiative-funded COMBACTE consortium fosters academic-industry par

83 2001, the Welsh Government, United Kingdom, funded Communities First, a program of neighborhood rege

84 PhDs had the greatest proportion of NIH funding compared to both MDs and MD/PhDs.

85 ademic ranks, 50.2% of PhDs had received NIH funding compared with 15.2% of MDs and 33.9% of MD/PhDs

86 e under which scientists who receive federal funding conduct research involving human subjects.

87 a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded consortium.

88 All 67 funded countries successfully switched from tOPV to bOPV

89 WHO and United Nations Children's Fund data from 2013-2015 were used to assess multiple-in

90 Research funding data related to malaria for 1997-2013 were sourc

91 hilanthropic global health funders, and from funding databases.

92 and National Human Genome Research Institute-funded DCM Precision Medicine Study, which aims to enrol

93 ic understanding, but potentially policy and funding decisions for neuroscience research.

94 contributions, or for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.

95 As polio funding declines, it is time to take stock of the resour

96 the practice level in the context of a state-funded dental service.

97 rucial for maintaining their presence in NIH-funded dermatology research.

98 dules happen owing to strengthen links among funds during the time that they are main participants in

99 ease) that collaborate in the European Union-funded Early Nutrition project combined, harmonized, and

100 t and funding independent of the overall NIH funding environment of their department.

101 nts section omitted the Department of Energy-funded Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory i

102 national operational switch plans, securing funding, establishing oversight and implementation commi

103 ollaborate to ensure that quality science is funded, explored, and published.

104 We show that increasing reward funds facilitates the maintenance of prosocial rewarding

105 those at Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP)-funded facilities and in private practices.

106 RWHAP-funded facilities may face attrition of highly qualified

107 in private practice, more providers at RWHAP-funded facilities were HIV specialists (71% vs 43%; P <

108 Australia instituted funded female human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization in

109 However, funding for basic science research has not kept up, such

110 knowledge, providing nearly US$2 billion of funding for cancer research and precision medicine.

111 Ensuring adequate funding for dedicated, preventive paediatric care and ta

112 ren and their families, securing sustainable funding for health promotion and injury prevention progr

113 Funding for human papilloma virus-related projects gradu

114 ribution PMI has made to malaria control via funding for long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs

115 that received little research investment or funding for malaria control included Central African Rep

116 nts are typically highest in countries where funding for malaria control is also high.

117 We also considered funding for malaria control.

118 Total domestic and international funding for malaria is inadequate to achieve WHO global

119 rces as taxonomy experts age and retire, and funding for morphological studies and species descriptio

120 inimally toxic agents have been few, and the funding for research and development is almost non-exist

121 ing from a prospective decline in government funding for research and education, shifting payment mod

122 coveries-that is, those who can provide more funding for researchers-there are important audiences th

123 Funding for the purchase of BPG by countries was not eva

124 Funding for these grants in 2015-2016 was $71 million.

125 research: (1) the availability of dedicated funding for ZIKV research; (2) the prior existence of bo

126 oecological impacts, and half of the federal funds for fire suppression are spent each year in Califo

127 equired simultaneous control of them demands funds for new hardware, software, and licenses, in addit

128 eriod when inflation-corrected congressional funds for NIH almost tripled.

129 approaches, with supporting activities (and funding) for capacity building, communication, and insti

130 o surgical departments relative to total NIH funding from 2007 to 2014.

131 ons, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding from PhD scientists in US departments of surgery

132 the need to advocate for sustainable science funding from the federal government and for acceptance o

133 least 50% of the time of personnel receiving funding from the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GP

134 ial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG), with funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infec

135 This study examines funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to

136 ere to characterize oral cavity cancer (OCC) funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) wit

137 o reviewed publicly available data regarding funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

138 , 95% CI 1.13-1.31), and inability to borrow funds from family or the community (OR 6.49, 95% CI 4.10

139 cted only to harnessing the time, labor, and funds from the public but can also be used as a tool to

140 This funding generated a targeted, sustained investment in ty

141 The funds generated by IFIs were channelled mostly through G

142 Fewer than half of funded grants aimed for clinically related targets (eg,

143 a re-analysis of these data for the 102,740 funded grants with percentile scores of 20 or better, we

144 Comparing the 40 funded grants with the 72 unfunded grants, the overall s

145 ices, policy guidance, outreach efforts, and funding has broadened the reach and capacity of the VA t

146 instances of poor value from stroke research funding have resulted from the way in which stroke resea

147 sustainability of the network after research funds have been expended.

148 ne and web) to FNP plus usual care (publicly funded health and social care) or to usual care alone.

149 lost earnings and a shift toward government-funded healthcare coverage.

150 r costs from a perspective covering publicly funded healthcare services and productivity impacts on p

151 ive review was conducted of all nonfederally funded hospitals in the California state inpatient datab

152 -country context, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) plays a crucial role in determining how gover

153 nal studies were funded by the UN Population Fund in Bangladesh and China, UN Women in Cambodia and I

154 k of the resources made available with polio funding in Africa and begin to find ways to keep some of

155 enerally, and the increasing role of private funding in determining why certain polarizing themes are

156 The proportion of PhDs with NIH funding in the top 10 departments did not differ from th

157 Health care funding in the United States is undergoing dramatic chan

158 OCC had a 2014 funding:incidence ratio of $785, much lower than for oth

159 o have similar levels of academic output and funding independent of the overall NIH funding environme

160 her improved if the tax revenue were used to fund initiatives benefiting those with greater disadvant

161 ions both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&D.

162 y local Rotarians, the program for emergency funding, innovative tactics, and additional approaches f

163 Funders are poorly equipped to evaluate and fund international collaborative efforts.

164 If funding is maintained, PMI-funded interventions are estimated to avert a further 16

165 ility Adjusted Life Year (DALY) averted, PMI-funded interventions are highly cost-effective.

166 sufficient prior knowledge exists, emergency funding is made available, and interagency cooperation i

167 If funding is maintained, PMI-funded interventions are esti

168 Funding lags well behind amounts needed to protect all t

169 Comparison of 2014 funding levels with other malignancies was also performe

170 itute support increased and approached NIDCR funding levels.

171 s to different perturbations, the NIH Common Fund Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signat

172 Insufficient funding, low education levels, and social inequalities r

173 alia is one of only several countries with a funded male HPV immunization program.

174 velopment pressures grow, which implies that funding may need to increase over time.

175 This article describes the design of the funding mechanism that was developed, its implementation

176 diagnostics design must account for limited funds, modest public health infrastructure, and low powe

177 (ADGC), a National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded national data repository (reflecting samples coll

178 als (DAAs) into Egypt through the government funded National Treatment Program.

179 sents a significant and growing platform for funding new and unique projects, causes, and products.

180 urden should a proposed 44% reduction in PMI funding occur.

181 as the first systematic analysis of research funding of antibacterial resistance of this scale and sc

182 l Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute increased funding of career development grants, only a small numbe

183 establishment of biomonitoring programs, and funding of community-based epidemiology and wildlife res

184 Planning and funding of intervention efforts focused on LTACHs is one

185 lege of Cardiology members have benefited as funding of the entire cohort has decreased.

186 major publishers, as well as scientists and funding officials.

187 ontal cortex predicted individual choices to fund on a trial-to-trial basis in the neuroimaging sampl

188 ts and caregivers, and U.S. federal research funding organizations.

189 health expenditure spent by social security funds, other government agencies, private insurance sche

190 d, controlled, National Institutes of Health-funded out-of-hospital cardiac arrest clinical trial fro

191 NAcc activity generalized to forecast market funding outcomes weeks later on the Internet.

192 ing sample, however, did not forecast market funding outcomes.

193 ductive, maternal, newborn, and child health funding over the period 2003-13 is encouraging.

194 he National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry.

195 cribes the self-reported profile of how GPEI-funded personnel allocate their time toward immunization

196 In all countries, GPEI-funded personnel perform critical tasks in the strengthe

197 es with very weak immunization systems, GPEI-funded personnel provide critical support for the immuni

198 of non-polio-related tasks performed by GPEI-funded personnel varied among countries and included sur

199 mately 1000 field managers of frontline GPEI-funded personnel was conducted by Boston Consulting Grou

200 percent of the time (range, 23%-61%) of GPEI-funded personnel was dedicated to tasks related to stren

201 try-specific reports on the training of GPEI-funded personnel were reviewed, and an analysis of the t

202 lio eradication activities (hereafter, "GPEI-funded personnel") should be dedicated to the strengthen

203 ies conducted periodic trainings of the GPEI-funded personnel.

204 ology, FEDER - European Regional Development Fund, Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology,

205 Future research and funding priorities should prioritize patients' care pers

206 c medication, and community mental health as funding priorities.

207 The focus is on extramurally funded programs that have a national or international im

208 likely to have National Institutes of Health funding (proportion with at least 1 National Institutes

209 uman subjects (14 female) decided whether to fund proposed projects described on an Internet crowdfun

210 This funding provided target countries with the necessary cat

211 Access to research funds, provision of incentives for acquisition of advanc

212 dialysis, and transplantation services were funded publicly and free at the point of care delivery i

213 countries were ranked by amount of research funding received.

214 directions aimed at any funder and potential funding recipient worldwide.

215 e to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and funding recommendations in the United Kingdom and Canada

216 correlations with QALYs and with NICE/pCODR funding recommendations, suggest different constructs of

217 h Organization and United Nations Children's Fund regional offices, and national governments.

218 nd care providers planning the resources and funding required for the care of their future ageing pop

219 ant systematic reviews, and survey currently funded research from the two most active funders in the

220 , funding, and internal evaluation of an SRF-funded research project titled "Project 259: Dietary Car

221 have developed RImmPort that prepares NIAID-funded research study datasets in ImmPort (immport.org)

222 l application of TEK principles in federally funded research when implemented with respect for the un

223 Evaluating the impact of federally funded research with a broad, methodical, and objective

224 of bringing new vaccines to market, such as funding, research and development, manufacturing, determ

225 ntries comprising the International Monetary Fund's advanced economies index.

226 the reports from the International Monetary Fund's Article IV consultations, rating agencies and ris

227 tions will change regulatory, reporting, and funding schemes for noninvasive studies such as neuroima

228 nce residency, National Institutes of Health funding, scientific publications (first or last author a

229 A successful 2005 congressional campaign to fund screening for aortic aneurysms brought the disease

230 Receiving more classes of RW-funded services is associated with improved HIV outcomes

231 For some populations with insurance, RW-funded services may still be required for optimal health

232 ternal and external challenges, from its own funding shortfalls to antimicrobial resistance and immen

233 sea-scape model to determine whether limited funds should be directed to 1 of 4 alternative conservat

234 th received the most substantial increase in funding since 2003 (286%), followed by reproductive and

235 In a multivariate analysis, funding source remained significantly associated with re

236 Information on funding source, outcome, and methodological quality was

237 There was no relationship between trial funding source, use of statistician and article section,

238 compared by journal type, disease type, and funding source.

239 emphasizes the necessity for declaration of funding source.

240 Primary Funding Source: 7th Framework Programme of the European

241 Primary Funding Source: European Union Seventh Framework Program

242 Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Aging and National

243 Primary Funding Source: None.

244 s (p-value<0.001), roles (p-value<0.001) and funding sources (p-value<0.001) of organisations concern

245 aried considerably between countries, as did funding sources and user access.

246 ed for presence and intensity of other large funding sources, individual and household characteristic

247 Primary Funding Sources: National Health and Medical Research Co

248 national disease burden to identify areas of funding strength and potentially neglected populations.

249 sitory contains bacterial isolates from ARLG-funded studies located in a centralized laboratory and t

250 cess are outlined, and examples of currently funded studies that have fully engaged key stakeholders

251 ies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises.

252 We have not modelled indirect impacts of PMI funding (such as health systems strengthening) in this a

253 There has been increased volatility in funding support in recent years possibly due to budget c

254 e National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund supports the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) as

255 laria ($1028.9 million), with no discernible funding targeted to non-communicable diseases.

256 Patients receiving commercially funded TAVR in the United States are included in the Tra

257 nstitutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-funded Technical Consultation focused on this organism.

258 en with breast cancer treated at a federally funded tertiary care referral cancer center in Trujillo,

259 sick leave benefits, and disability pension funds than the general population.

260 005, bolstered by a rapid increase in health funding that facilitated the accelerated expansion of he

261 ors have the possibility to invest in reward funds that are shared exclusively among cooperators (pro

262 es in the way we train, reward, promote, and fund the generation of health scientists who will be tas

263 ountries were primarily responsible for self-funding these activities, additional support was provide

264 PIs with research time in exchange for less funding, this may reverse a decades-long trend of more m

265 ial flows of WHO, the World Bank, the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria, and Gavi, the Va

266 pan-African bioinformatics network, which is funded to support the Human Heredity and Health in Afric

267 to new data generation and required research funding to address this large public health burden.

268 ta that suggest that over a certain level of funding to an individual investigator, there are diminis

269 fter adjusting for inflation, the decline in funding to dental institutions from the NIDCR and NIH wa

270 stagnant level of the percentage of treasury funding to health care at a level that is well below the

271 led NIH to propose and then reverse a cap on funding to individual investigators, the Grant Support I

272 port polio eradication will need to consider funding to maintain and to strengthen routine immunizati

273 Reductions in funding to PMI could lead to large increases in the numb

274 Only 5 states offer unequivocal funding to schools for purchasing AEDs.

275 tcomes Research Institute offers substantial funding to support this approach, but getting started, p

276 ealed a 27% decline in the proportion of NIH funding to surgical departments relative to total NIH fu

277 e recommendations include using Medicare GME funds to meet policy goals and to ensure an adequate sup

278 financing schemes that generate and mobilise funds-to estimate the quantum of financing mobilised fro

279 Overall funding totals decreased considerably after 2009.

280 ry funding and away from core or longer-term funding; towards defined multi-stakeholder governance an

281 opioid use disorder to California's publicly funded treatment facilities.

282 The value of publicly funded treatment of opioid use disorder in California is

283 n: Persons initially presenting for publicly funded treatment of opioid use disorder.

284 Funding trends were compared along the cancer control co

285 The NIMH-funded trials, taken together with the demonstrated effi

286 ooled analysis was undertaken in 3 federally-funded trials.

287 lth Institute, European Regional Development Fund, UK National Institute for Health Research, The Sel

288 aboration with the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and partners.

289 was obtained from United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization project repo

290 nization (WHO) and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) regional offices, and national governments

291 p between the WHO, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), and other partners and stakeholders in th

292 metrics for 3850 faculties at the top 55 NIH-funded university and hospital-based departments of surg

293 n 1993, the freedom to choose one's sickness fund was formally introduced, and reforms that encourage

294 No industry funding was associated with the guideline development.

295 If a 44% reduction in PMI funding were to occur, we predict that this loss of dire

296 is threatened, as is access to some capital funds, while Brexit threatens overall economic performan

297 Further increases in funding will be needed to accelerate maternal mortality

298 Political will and appropriate funding will be required to provide impetus to implement

299 ere is a lack of research infrastructure and funding, with few randomized controlled trials to guide

300 008 early-stage investigator (ESI) policy to fund young PIs at higher rates.