ライフサイエンスコーパス: fundamental difference

1 talline metals, and others indicating strong fundamental differences.

2 spatial navigation, while highlighting some fundamental differences across species in these oscillat

3 Due to this fundamental difference, acupuncture may circumvent adver

4 Our results thus uncover fundamental differences among animal methylomes and sugg

5 olonocyte gene expression profiles discerned fundamental differences among animals treated with n-3 P

6 One of the fundamental differences among mammals is the mechanism o

7 Hence, gene expression profiling can discern fundamental differences among SERMs and provides insight

8 here that these discrepancies are not due to fundamental differences among the site-specific transcri

9 These structures illustrate fundamental differences among various mechanisms of inhi

10 Technical aspects, fundamental differences, and pros and cons of these nove

11 The observations reported here suggest a fundamental difference at the gene expression level betw

12 tment of FOG-1 and Med1 to chromatin, with a fundamental difference being the quantitatively greater

13 g-specific T cell expansion and highlights a fundamental difference between Ag presented by an infect

14 This suggests that there exists either a fundamental difference between auditory and visual stimu

15 detected in sciatic nerves, thus revealing a fundamental difference between central and peripheral ax

16 s in LYRATE expression may contribute to the fundamental difference between compound and simple leave

17 Our kinetic studies highlight the fundamental difference between EGP- and P-bodies and ref

18 A fundamental difference between enzymes and small chemica

19 This study uncovers a fundamental difference between haplophase and diplophase

20 A fundamental difference between models is the presence/ab

21 in, is necessary and sufficient to explain a fundamental difference between native and recombinant Kv

22 these binuclear Ni complexes highlights the fundamental difference between Ni and Pd in mediating bo

23 in cancer because its alteration provides a fundamental difference between normal and cancer cells.

24 plex and thus provide further evidence for a fundamental difference between photoreceptor ribbon syna

25 receptor ribbon synapses, which represents a fundamental difference between photoreceptor ribbon syna

26 One fundamental difference between plants and animals is the

27 Our results also uncover a fundamental difference between populations in which gene

28 ructural and thermodynamic data highlights a fundamental difference between protein recognition of ss

29 t splicing factors in Arabidopsis reflects a fundamental difference between protein-facilitated group

30 A fundamental difference between short-term and long-term

31 ns critical for virus assembly and suggest a fundamental difference between Sindbis virus assembly in

32 and robotics to demonstrate that there is a fundamental difference between steady swimming and forwa

33 ned with the prism experiments, confirming a fundamental difference between subjects with normal and

34 In human populations, a fundamental difference between the CD1 and major histoco

35 This observation highlights a fundamental difference between the essential and the non

36 These observations reveal a fundamental difference between the mechanisms of ring-sh

37 inversely correlated, which may highlight a fundamental difference between the processes that influe

38 ction with increasing oligomer size and show fundamental differences between 1D and 2D "band gap engi

39 ar PM and organelle membranes to demonstrate fundamental differences between active (nonlinear) and p

40 These results reveal fundamental differences between acute and long-term modu

41 veral risk factors and mechanisms, there are fundamental differences between arteries and the aortic

42 To reveal fundamental differences between benign and malignant gro

43 However, previous work has revealed fundamental differences between Caco-2 cells and in vivo

44 This specificity stems from fundamental differences between cancer cells and their n

45 It is shown that there are also more fundamental differences between catalysts based on these

46 l activation and will help us understand the fundamental differences between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

47 dent role for CRY in the periphery and imply fundamental differences between central and peripheral o

48 ther analyses of biological samples revealed fundamental differences between DMRfinder and another so

49 These findings point to fundamental differences between FcgammaRIA and FcgammaRI

50 e considered, it is not clear that there are fundamental differences between form priming effects in

51 Thus, this study uncovered fundamental differences between HDAC1 and HDAC2.

52 Together, these results demonstrate fundamental differences between hESC-derived hematopoiet

53 These observations imply fundamental differences between HIV-1 and HTLV-1 Gag tra

54 Fundamental differences between hMSH2-hMSH6 and hMSH4-hM

55 ansmembrane signalling in malaria and reveal fundamental differences between host and parasite ionic

56 These results underscore fundamental differences between human and mouse ES cells

57 hese results are discussed in the context of fundamental differences between in vitro brain slice sup

58 ts, attesting to the persistence, if any, of fundamental differences between in vivo and in vitro par

59 Our results reveal fundamental differences between intracellular elasticity

60 These data highlight fundamental differences between memory CD8(+) T cells en

61 The data indicate fundamental differences between mesenchymal and epitheli

62 ely, the gene expression results reflect the fundamental differences between metal and non-metal resp

63 However, there are fundamental differences between mouse and human tumors i

64 The data reveal fundamental differences between natural ACR and CCR cond

65 Our findings demonstrate fundamental differences between NR2A and NR2B that help

66 Fundamental differences between perception and cognition

67 Our findings indicate that there are fundamental differences between polycystic and normal ov

68 genetics of PsA that could begin to explain fundamental differences between psoriasis and PsA.

69 not critical for budding and that there are fundamental differences between PTAP-containing viruses

70 ts from repeated retrieval, and they suggest fundamental differences between repeated study and repea

71 However, fundamental differences between reprogramming processes

72 Fundamental differences between reversible suicide inact

73 e centuries-old problem of understanding the fundamental differences between silver and gold in terms

74 reported experiments using glycerol exposes fundamental differences between small and macromolecular

75 hese historical differences are reflected in fundamental differences between species in the scale and

76 We address whether 2 fundamental differences between studies of decedents and

77 erties in the denatured ensembles as well as fundamental differences between the denatured and native

78 bserved in terrestrial analogues, suggesting fundamental differences between the dominant sulphur che

79 We found fundamental differences between the dorsal (dCA3) and th

80 ue functions of a secreted protein highlight fundamental differences between the export mechanism of

81 his Symposium Review we discuss how, despite fundamental differences between the G-C model and the ne

82 Despite the fundamental differences between the gestural communicati

83 Moreover, there do not appear to be fundamental differences between the magnitude of the for

84 mutual solubility allows us to report on the fundamental differences between the mechanisms controlli

85 DAT blockers is consistent with the idea of fundamental differences between the mechanisms of abused

86 Fundamental differences between the mouse and human exis

87 Fundamental differences between the nAChRs of insects an

88 has been questioned by claims that there are fundamental differences between the parietal cortex in h

89 The findings illustrate and explain the fundamental differences between the properties of single

90 Together, these data point to fundamental differences between the role(s) of RpoS in B

91 AD) in a SMAD-dependent manner, highlighting fundamental differences between the species.

92 hough there are broad similarities, we found fundamental differences between the species.

93 However, there are fundamental differences between the spontaneous disease

94 Our results reveal fundamental differences between the synaptic organizatio

95 These data demonstrate fundamental differences between the target-specific and

96 This article reviews these fundamental differences between the thioredoxin reductas

97 Our results demonstrate that there are no fundamental differences between the transposition mechan

98 These results suggest that fundamental differences between the two genome assemblie

99 pounds that were synthesized highlighted the fundamental differences between their electronic propert

100 vents, and the possibility that there may be fundamental differences between their roles in human and

101 We conclude that some of the fundamental differences between these 2 fields, such as

102 Here, we show fundamental differences between these ascending pathways

103 RNA-Seq across infection time courses reveal fundamental differences between these pathogens.

104 of human and MAC DHFR is expected to reveal fundamental differences between these two pharmacophores

105 -specific resistance (R) genes, highlighting fundamental differences between these two resistance for

106 While there are fundamental differences between these types of transmiss

107 culture situation, only briefly alluding to fundamental differences between utilization in animals v

108 t kinetochores early in mitosis and suggests fundamental differences between yeast mitosis and mitosi

109 These results reveal fundamental differences by which the systemic, mucosal,

110 Understanding these fundamental differences enables several different practi

111 rily conserved, recent studies indicate that fundamental differences exist between Drosophila and ver

112 the antiviral activity of MX2, implying that fundamental differences exist between the antiviral mech

113 We conclude that fundamental differences exist in the upstream regulatory

114 Fundamental differences exist, however, in the regulatio

115 They also implicate that no fundamental difference exists between charge transport i

116 These data suggest that a fundamental difference exists between feeding for susten

117 t, in some aspects, analogy, in some aspects fundamental difference exists between growth and surviva

118 These findings suggest fundamental differences for the function of the ER in ce

119 phorolysis of class II enzymes establishes a fundamental difference from class I enzymes, and it is a

120 e performed entirely by zygotic hunchback, a fundamental difference from Drosophila in which maternal

121 Subjects with BDD demonstrate fundamental differences from controls in visually proces

122 f nonoverlapping sets of loci highlights the fundamental differences implicit in the use of either me

123 ls but not Gram-negative cells, suggesting a fundamental difference in DNA metabolism between these t

124 Thus, our findings reveal a fundamental difference in IL-18 and IL-1beta regulation

125 chromatids in homologous recombination is a fundamental difference in meiotic versus mitotic cells.

126 This suggests a fundamental difference in pathogenesis between head/neck

127 strong in both litter and soil, without any fundamental difference in plasticity between these two c

128 This fundamental difference in RAF isoform regulation explain

129 These findings reveal a fundamental difference in telomere damage signaling in h

130 selected for rather than against, there is a fundamental difference in the affinity of XIST RNA for a

131 These results suggest a fundamental difference in the antigen-binding mechanisms

132 This work demonstrates a fundamental difference in the catalytic strategy of prop

133 ce is independent of charges, and point at a fundamental difference in the codes for folding and inte

134 The fundamental difference in the electrostatic surface pote

135 These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in the fate of live S. aureus aft

136 These findings reveal a fundamental difference in the innate antiviral strategie

137 This fundamental difference in the isotopic character of CAIs

138 The fundamental difference in the mechanisms of oral toleran

139 e manner as the control animals, revealing a fundamental difference in the nature of the requirement

140 These findings demonstrate a fundamental difference in the neural mechanisms underlyi

141 s that the polymorphism is associated with a fundamental difference in the neurophysiology of food th

142 crystalline (commercial) Li2O2, revealing a fundamental difference in the OER process depending on t

143 togenetic energy constraints rather than any fundamental difference in the overall pace of growth in

144 n it affects H3K4me2, suggesting a potential fundamental difference in the recruitment of methyltrans

145 These data indicate a fundamental difference in the regulation of cyclin D1 pr

146 Further evidence of the lack of any fundamental difference in the selectivity of the two typ

147 This is the first indication of a fundamental difference in the signaling potential of EP(

148 These results imply a fundamental difference in the substrate of cortical proc

149 d genes by PHV (4- to 229-fold) represents a fundamental difference in the temporal regulation of cel

150 taining nonpathogenic bacteria, uncovering a fundamental difference in the trafficking of phagosomes

151 Nkx2-5 enhancer of Nkx2-5 binding suggests a fundamental difference in the transcriptional circuitry

152 eral ABC exporters and possibly represents a fundamental difference in the transport mechanism betwee

153 This suggests a fundamental difference in the way bees process visual in

154 domain mutations, implying that there was no fundamental difference in the way these forms of activat

155 y of these two groups of bacteria suggests a fundamental difference in their ability to either exploi

156 The fundamental difference in their probe selection strategi

157 These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in these memory systems in their

158 These results suggest a fundamental difference in turnover mechanisms at minisat

159 These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in visual processing between ON a

160 These findings confirm fundamental differences in Ad-induced expression of vIL-

161 Finally, our studies revealed that, despite fundamental differences in alloreactive B cell fates in

162 Despite fundamental differences in assumptions, both categories

163 extrafollicular B cell responses, revealing fundamental differences in autoimmune- and infection-ind

164 n Schistocerca, we have found surprising and fundamental differences in axial patterning, and have id

165 the site of blood-brain interface suggesting fundamental differences in brain iron acquisition in ind

166 Given the fundamental differences in carrier generation and device

167 Thus, fundamental differences in CD44 function between these l

168 Collectively, our results help to clarify fundamental differences in cell envelope ultrastructure

169 nd subsequent chimera analyses confirmed the fundamental differences in cellular potency between thes

170 iac remodeling in ICM are largely related to fundamental differences in cellular remodeling rather th

171 se that this unwillingness could result from fundamental differences in conservatives' and liberals'

172 Our model explains fundamental differences in crustal accretion variables b

173 There follow fundamental differences in design principle in respect t

174 We highlight the fundamental differences in dynamics between systems with

175 In addition, these studies demonstrate the fundamental differences in early aggregation events betw

176 Our analysis thus highlights fundamental differences in expression of TFR subtypes wi

177 ational differences might correlate with the fundamental differences in gene and promoter organizatio

178 in addition to similarities, there are also fundamental differences in global gene expression as pat

179 These findings suggest fundamental differences in global RNA regulation between

180 ut T cell glycoproteins were not, suggesting fundamental differences in glycosylation machinery or me

181 variation in virulence genes contributes to fundamental differences in host-pathogen interactions am

182 d elderly populations after sepsis is due to fundamental differences in host-protective immunity and

183 Therefore, we show that there are fundamental differences in how stem cells maintain their

184 Taken together, these results highlight fundamental differences in immunodominance of CD4(+) and

185 These suggest fundamental differences in imprinting control mechanisms

186 lly novel extraocular muscles (EOMs) exhibit fundamental differences in innervation and neuromuscular

187 Fundamental differences in interactions with posterior a

188 These results highlight fundamental differences in KA receptor physiology betwee

189 eart failure (HF) patients, but there may be fundamental differences in LA properties between HF with

190 Here we report fundamental differences in long-term potentiation (LTP)

191 Moreover, with few exceptions, the quest for fundamental differences in male and female brain structu

192 and to degradation in the knee, resulting in fundamental differences in matrix turnover in these lesi

193 Fundamental differences in mechanisms of action and use

194 comparison of two similar models identified fundamental differences in model behavior, and revealed

195 We suggest that fundamental differences in movement kinematics in autism

196 Despite fundamental differences in organismal complexity and lif

197 e functionally different and soils exhibited fundamental differences in P cycling.

198 ical condition of synaesthesia--which causes fundamental differences in perception and cognition thro

199 on of the environment or whether it reflects fundamental differences in perceptual processing between

200 These data suggest fundamental differences in peroxisome composition, devel

201 Due to fundamental differences in physiology and swimming strat

202 These results emphasize fundamental differences in population dynamics under dif

203 Our analysis reveals fundamental differences in programs of gene expression b

204 ees C vs subzero temperatures, as opposed to fundamental differences in protein structure for enzymes

205 Fundamental differences in recognition of analogous prot

206 Fundamental differences in scale raise the possibility t

207 Regardless, possible fundamental differences in SCCHN between ever smokers an

208 tes but are not found in rodents, indicating fundamental differences in selective connectivity that s

209 We report fundamental differences in size distributions of marine

210 Species' range sizes are shaped by fundamental differences in species' ecological and evolu

211 s but not at excitatory synapses, suggesting fundamental differences in spontaneous neurotransmission

212 lth risks, and societal benefits, as well as fundamental differences in stakeholder priorities, compl

213 Fundamental differences in structure between MutS2 and o

214 We conclude that there are fundamental differences in sympathetic neuroeffector mec

215 They also indicate that fundamental differences in synapse function may occur wi

216 trA, and demonstrate its role in determining fundamental differences in T3SS phenotypes among Bordete

217 similar passive whisker stimulation revealed fundamental differences in tactile signal processing dur

218 These findings emphasize fundamental differences in the 2 HF phenotypes and sugge

219 )) and supports previous observations of the fundamental differences in the activities of nitroreduct

220 This divergence of COTTOT is likely due to fundamental differences in the biomechanical determinant

221 representation in the spinal cord and reveal fundamental differences in the coding of heat and cold.

222 erimental data, we have found that there are fundamental differences in the conducting properties of

223 In this study, fundamental differences in the considerations for RNA in

224 Fundamental differences in the distribution of oceans an

225 These results suggest fundamental differences in the dominant pathogenic mecha

226 ween bacterial and archaeal viruses with the fundamental differences in the envelope compositions of

227 These results reveal fundamental differences in the function and organization

228 This study also shows that there were no fundamental differences in the gene expression patterns

229 Our data suggests that fundamental differences in the germinal center microenvi

230 th the termite hindgut microbiome, there are fundamental differences in the glycoside hydrolase conte

231 These data indicate fundamental differences in the hydrogen transfer step fr

232 d effector function profile in both species, fundamental differences in the IgG2 and IgG4 Ab subclass

233 of metabolism at the subcellular level, and fundamental differences in the importance of other varia

234 effect on receptor affinity, as a result of fundamental differences in the interactions of halogen a

235 erent product distributions that result from fundamental differences in the ionic character of these

236 ant in the two diverse host cells arise from fundamental differences in the lipid composition of the

237 (vs. single-species biofilms) demonstrating fundamental differences in the matrix assembly, survival

238 These fundamental differences in the mechanism of action and i

239 stem cells mobilized with G-CSF, suggesting fundamental differences in the mechanism of AMD3100-medi

240 Moreover, fundamental differences in the mechanism of stimulation

241 sorting of transmembrane endolyn, suggesting fundamental differences in the mechanisms by which solub

242 al substrate specificity, presumably reflect fundamental differences in the mechanisms of antiviral s

243 The results reveal some fundamental differences in the mechanisms of the two pro

244 n conserved in higher eukaryotes, indicating fundamental differences in the mechanisms of TOR signali

245 This suggests fundamental differences in the mechanisms of transtubula

246 volution of NagA and suggests that there are fundamental differences in the mechanistic details for s

247 ition modes of T and B cells could be due to fundamental differences in the methods by which TCRs and

248 However, the understanding of the fundamental differences in the mode of action of bacteri

249 Thus, fundamental differences in the mode of antigen engagemen

250 Our study reveals fundamental differences in the nature of local-scale bio

251 These findings highlight fundamental differences in the neural substrates of oxid

252 However, our results revealed that fundamental differences in the organization and constitu

253 mould, insect wings) and show that there are fundamental differences in the organization of urban and

254 tantial phenotypic differences might reflect fundamental differences in the pathogenesis of B-cell ly

255 imbs; mutant hindlimbs are normal, revealing fundamental differences in the patterning mechanisms gov

256 ns from Australia and New Zealand, we reveal fundamental differences in the phylodynamics of the two

257 Moreover, our findings reveal fundamental differences in the phytochrome-phototropism

258 These results reveal fundamental differences in the primary structure and sig

259 ed by ER Ca2+ release in particular revealed fundamental differences in the properties of UPR signali

260 ion frequency of these VH1 antibodies reveal fundamental differences in the regulation and maturation

261 We further uncover fundamental differences in the regulation of different t

262 Our findings reveal opportunities for fundamental differences in the regulation of Dyn1, which

263 These results imply that there are fundamental differences in the regulation of plasma fVII

264 Our findings indicate fundamental differences in the regulation of spontaneous

265 yza sativa) and maize (Zea mays), suggesting fundamental differences in the regulation of vitamin B6

266 Our analyses reveal fundamental differences in the replication of DNA struct

267 elicited in adults by the two vaccines imply fundamental differences in the respective B-cell populat

268 ansmembrane protein TNF-alpha, demonstrating fundamental differences in the respective shedding by AD

269 With that, our data reveal fundamental differences in the response regulation of B-

270 These distinct morphologies reflect fundamental differences in the role of the SAM and the p

271 This observation highlights fundamental differences in the signaling controlling IL-

272 Thus, these data reveal fundamental differences in the signaling pathways used b

273 This suggests that there may be fundamental differences in the social preferences that m

274 bserved in vivo and in vitro, there are thus fundamental differences in the underlying mechanisms.

275 These results suggest fundamental differences in the way chemotherapy is handl

276 us but not murine leukemia virus, suggesting fundamental differences in the way different retroviral

277 enzymes have revealed a complex regulon and fundamental differences in the way S. mutans manages ala

278 erns contrast with those on land, suggesting fundamental differences in the ways that industrial fish

279 between the two species and did not reflect fundamental differences in the wiring between the two sp

280 force and fluorescence microscopy, revealing fundamental differences in their morphology, protein org

281 f these two tricyclization processes and the fundamental differences in their reaction mechanisms are

282 hibition indicates that RGS proteins exhibit fundamental differences in their responses to small-mole

283 al behavior of the antibodies and illustrate fundamental differences in thermodynamic characteristics

284 ults from laboratory experiments that reveal fundamental differences in three-dimensional mantle circ

285 rences between PI and DRL tasks, rather than fundamental differences in timing.

286 C and monocytes and indicates that there are fundamental differences in TLR signaling pathways betwee

287 This reveals fundamental differences in ways that epidermal and hair

288 A fundamental difference is that desmosomes have a highly

289 However it remains to be determined whether fundamental differences may exist between blast-related

290 There was a fundamental difference observed between three-dimensiona

291 A fundamental difference of detection tasks in contrast to

292 starvation-induced autophagy, uncovering the fundamental difference of these autophagic modes.

293 -WASP by cellular activators that highlights fundamental differences of response at the protein-prote

294 These findings indicate fundamental differences of the Ca(2+) dependence of spon

295 which this phenotypic heterogeneity reflects fundamental differences or similarities in the underlyin

296 The neural basis for this fundamental difference remains unknown.

297 se two widely used FRET pairs highlights the fundamental differences that can arise between direct op

298 Its fundamental difference to its mammalian counterpart impl

299 1 and 2 (Per1 and Per2) in the SCN revealed fundamental differences under these two entrainment mode

300 c referential, iconic, or deictic content, a fundamental difference versus human gestures and spoken