ライフサイエンスコーパス: fundus photograph

1 the standardized ETDRS severity scale (using fundus photographs).

2 by systematic grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs.

3 ear of follow-up, atrophy was measured using fundus photographs.

4 AREDS) grading scheme of corresponding color fundus photographs.

5 re independently obtained from corresponding fundus photographs.

6 used to stitch together overlapping retinal fundus photographs.

7 neration status was determined by grading of fundus photographs.

8 er temporal by grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs.

9 224) was determined in 1993-1995 from graded fundus photographs.

10 was determined by grading stereoscopic color fundus photographs.

11 sessment of disc proliferations using stereo fundus photographs.

12 abetic retinopathy was graded using standard fundus photographs.

13 randomization with gradable DRSS on baseline fundus photographs.

14 opathy and diabetic macular edema in retinal fundus photographs.

15 as assessed via grading of color stereo film fundus photographs.

16 AMD was determined from graded, stereoscopic fundus photographs.

17 nged despite the lack of evidence other than fundus photographs.

18 lated macular degeneration was assessed from fundus photographs.

19 40 years or older with diabetes mellitus and fundus photographs.

20 s in this cohort, 38% were not detectable on fundus photographs.

21 ed 45-84 years with genotype information and fundus photographs.

22 Semi-automated evaluation of fundus photographs (1 eye/participant) determined centra

23 Semi-automated grading of fundus photographs (1 eye/participant) determined centra

24 e three features of papilledema from digital fundus photographs: (1) sharpness of the optic disc bord

25 ic retinopathy (NPDR) to PDR based on graded fundus photographs, (2) panretinal photocoagulation (PRP

26 ons, DME and CSME prevalences from monocular fundus photographs (28.5% and 21.0%, respectively) appro

27 re detected in 68.4% versus 0.0% using color fundus photographs, 73.3% versus 9.1% using FAF images,

28 fined based on grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs according to the Wisconsin Age-Relate

29 To examine resolution, 40 fundus photographs acquired on high-resolution film were

30 for the case presented, first based on color fundus photographs alone, and then based on color fundus

31 Two posterior fundus photographs and 1 anterior segment photograph wer

32 Thirty-two sets (16 color fundus photographs and 16 color fundus photographs paire

33 Eye examinations were conducted with annual fundus photographs and best-corrected visual acuity asse

34 edema was defined as absent or present from fundus photographs and confirmed by optical coherence to

35 s photographs alone, and then based on color fundus photographs and corresponding FA images.

36 s images alone versus interpreting the color fundus photographs and FA images was 47% (range, 35.3% t

37 egions were graded as to their appearance on fundus photographs and FAF images, and changes in FAF si

38 Incident GA most often appears on color fundus photographs and FAs as a small, singular, parafov

39 Baseline stereoscopic color fundus photographs and FAs of participants in the CATT s

40 Image analysis performed on serial fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms did not de

41 monotherapy, including examination of RetCam fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms.

42 Digital fundus photographs and fluorescein angiography (FA) usin

43 Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF)

44 Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misd

45 of zone in 28 (62%) of 45 cases using color fundus photographs and in 31 (69%) of 45 cases using FA

46 The color fundus photographs and infrared scanning laser ophthalmo

47 Ophthalmic examinations, including fundus photographs and mfERG testing, were performed at

48 onal study of DME grading based on monocular fundus photographs and OCT images obtained from patients

49 inal surface elevation estimated from stereo fundus photographs and OCT scans were positively correla

50 Twenty-nine pairs of stereoscopic fundus photographs and optic nerve head (ONH) centered s

51 in retinal thickening measured by grading of fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (OCT

52 on including color, red-free autofluorescent fundus photographs and spectral-domain optical coherence

53 fundus photographs compared with using color fundus photographs and the corresponding FA images.

54 Comparisons of fundus photographs and ultrasound measurements were perf

55 story, or other covariates or had ungradable fundus photographs and were excluded, leaving 9481 parti

56 on simulators or human volunteers, or use of fundus photographs) and recognition of normal and abnorm

57 ined by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs), and NEI-VFQ-25 subscale scores.

58 diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed on stereo fundus photographs, and glaucoma was diagnosed on the ba

59 Best-corrected visual acuity, fundus photographs, and spectral-domain optical coherenc

60 atus was assessed by standardized grading of fundus photographs, and stored fasting blood specimens d

61 mfERG z-scores were mapped onto fundus photographs, and the relationship between baselin

62 graphic atrophy) were evaluated using annual fundus photographs assessed centrally.

63 tages of AMD based on ocular examination and fundus photographs at baseline.

64 ascertained from grading stereoscopic color fundus photographs based on a standard protocol.

65 oved after specific teaching about assessing fundus photographs before testing (P = .02).

66 agreement of retinal pathologies observed on fundus photographs between an ophthalmologist and two-mi

67 Fundus photographs, blood glucose (BG) concentration, Hb

68 diagnosis, determined from the diagnosis of fundus photographs by 3 experienced readers in combinati

69 , determined from the diagnosis of the color fundus photographs by 3 experienced readers in combinati

70 ogists could be responsible for interpreting fundus photographs captured in a telemedicine program.

71 Stereoscopic color fundus photographs centered on the macula were taken on

72 o correlate hyperpigmentary changes on color fundus photographs (CFP) with abnormal morphology on SDO

73 lectance, fundus autofluorescence, and color fundus photographs (CFP).

74 hose identified from review of digital color fundus photographs (CFPs).

75 ifference in zone diagnosis when using color fundus photographs compared with using color fundus phot

76 ng papilledema patients obtained from stereo fundus photographs compares favorably with that from OCT

77 Stereoscopic fundus photographs demonstrated a yellow-orange, localiz

78 mprehensive eye examination in which dilated fundus photographs (disc and macula centered) were obtai

79 e Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study fundus photograph field 1.

80 Reading center staff evaluated digital color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography (FA) images,

81 d baseline and follow-up morphology in color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography (FA), and op

82 lity of procedure, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography, and optical

83 art during a 20-year period and had gradable fundus photographs for AMD and genotype information on C

84 Students preferred fundus photographs for both learning and examining the o

85 the MLOPs and the ophthalmologist in grading fundus photographs for retinal hemorrhages and maculopat

86 Adults > or = 50 years of age whose fundus photographs for the eye to be tested psychophysic

87 We assessed images of previously obtained fundus photographs for the presence of macular pigmentat

88 for 36 months with ETDRS VA measurements and fundus photographs (FP) every 3 to 6 months.

89 Digital color stereoscopic fundus photographs from 4203 AREDS2 subjects collected a

90 Fundus photographs from 7 Early Treatment Diabetic Retin

91 Digital ocular fundus photographs from a random cohort of children with

92 and Relevance: In this evaluation of retinal fundus photographs from adults with diabetes, an algorit

93 Board, digitized images of field 2 (macular) fundus photographs from AREDS obtained over a 12-year lo

94 Stereoscopic color fundus photographs from eyes with PCC were reviewed by 2

95 ined using side-by-side comparisons of color fundus photographs from the initial and final visit as r

96 ted visual acuity, fundus examination, color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluor

97 Color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence, and spectra

98 says of oxidized low-density lipoprotein and fundus photographs gradable for diabetic retinopathy and

99 tep AMD classification system based on color fundus photographs graded by experienced and masked eval

100 ge-related macular degeneration according to fundus photographs graded using a modified Wisconsin Age

101 Diabetic retinopathy was based on fundus photograph grading, using the Early Treatment Dia

102 e AMD, assessed by annual masked centralized fundus photograph grading.

103 -related macular degeneration from digitized fundus photographs has high sensitivity and specificity

104 vascular caliber measured from digital color fundus photographs have been independently associated wi

105 nosed as not having DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs have DME on OCT.

106 diagnosed as having DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs have no DME based on OCT CST, while m

107 ssed by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs in 1,709 persons who participated in

108 erity levels on reading center assessment of fundus photographs in eyes without PDR at baseline, (3)

109 ed 40 years or older with diabetes and valid fundus photographs in the 2005 to 2008 National Health a

110 evaluation (slit lamp), Amsler chart, color fundus photographs, infrared reflectance, red-free image

111 tudents (70%) said they would prefer to have fundus photographs instead of using the ophthalmoscope d

112 Fundus photographs, near infrared reflectance and enhanc

113 urrounding retina was documented with stereo fundus photographs obtained at multiple time points thro

114 same amount of details as conventional color fundus photographs obtained by an expert photographer.

115 ased grading algorithm can be used to screen fundus photographs obtained from diabetic patients and t

116 A nonmydriatic fundus photograph of one eye, taken in a mobile examinat

117 Fundus photographs of 478 patients with IIH were reviewe

118 Fundus photographs of 500 eyes of 500 subjects were asse

119 Phenotypical features on fundus photographs of both eyes of patients were graded

120 .001) for creating automontages from digital fundus photographs of eyes with CMV retinitis.

121 hotomontage software programs, using digital fundus photographs of eyes with cytomegalovirus (CMV) re

122 ased metrics and the clinical disc margin on fundus photographs of glaucoma subjects.

123 rded from the central 45 degrees, and stereo fundus photographs of the diabetic eyes were taken.

124 ts who were 40 years and older with gradable fundus photographs of the Fourth and the Fifth Korea Nat

125 SD-OCT scans and corresponding stereo fundus photographs of the optic nerve head were obtained

126 Fundus photographs of the remaining eyes showed that 18/

127 Prevalence of DME based on monocular fundus photographs or OCT.

128 tive means (examination of the patient or of fundus photographs) or by quantitative techniques such a

129 ts (16 color fundus photographs and 16 color fundus photographs paired with the corresponding FA imag

130 direct ophthalmoscope) and 1 dilated digital fundus photograph per eye (graded by an ophthalmologist

131 ot receive specific training on interpreting fundus photographs prior to accuracy assessments.

132 r DR severity and DME in a masked fashion by Fundus Photograph Reading Center (Madison, WI) graders.

133 in the CATT study were assessed at a central fundus photograph reading center by masked readers.

134 Grading of fundus photographs showed a statistically significant de

135 in the absence of a clinical examination or fundus photographs, subject self-report could be a relia

136 plitude and implicit time were compared with fundus photographs taken at the time of testing.

137 scale and applied this scale to nonmydriatic fundus photographs taken during routine ED patient encou

138 y were assessed from grading of stereoscopic fundus photographs taken in 2001-2004.

139 presence of a notch or disc hemorrhage) from fundus photographs taken with a nonmydriatic portable ca

140 ticipants underwent eye examinations and had fundus photographs taken.

141 , including FDT perimetry screening, and had fundus photographs taken.

142 racy of answers was better when interpreting fundus photographs than when performing ophthalmoscopy o

143 he capabilities of angiography imaging, a 2D fundus photograph that requires an intravenous injection

144 ts, slit-lamp examinations, and stereoscopic fundus photographs that were centrally graded for develo

145 ophthalmic histories (n = 25), and clinical fundus photographs that were graded using the Wisconsin

146 We captured mosaic fundus photographs through a dilated pupil using a digit

147 hthalmologist and had independent grading of fundus photographs to confirm their disease status.

148 gnificant macular edema (CSME), on monocular fundus photographs used definitions from the Multi-Ethni

149 imension) were measured from digital retinal fundus photographs using a computer-assisted program fol

150 l shape of the ONH was estimated from stereo fundus photographs using an automated multi-scale stereo

151 %) were diagnosed as having DME on monocular fundus photographs using MESA and NHANES definitions, re

152 ed as having either DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs using MESA and NHANES definitions, re

153 Features of AMD were graded on fundus photographs using the 3CC AMD severity scale.

154 o expert grading of papilledema from digital fundus photographs using the Frisen grading scale.

155 ined by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs using the modified Early Treatment Di

156 AMD was diagnosed based on fundus photographs using the Rotterdam Classification.

157 was determined by grading stereoscopic color fundus photographs using the Wisconsin Age-related Macul

158 ined by masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs using the Wisconsin Age-Related Macul

159 An OCT fundus image, akin to a fundus photograph was generated by axial summation of th

160 Based on stereoscopic fundus photographs, we evaluated diabetic macular edema

161 Axial lengths (ALs) and 45 degrees fundus photographs were acquired from 64 eyes (34 health

162 Baseline and annual stereoscopic fundus photographs were assessed centrally by masked gra

163 Gradable fundus photographs were available for 1809 participants

164 Fundus photographs were collected from one quarter of th

165 Of 4,381 participants, fundus photographs were gradable for 3,304 persons (75.4

166 Fundus photographs were gradable for 665 (90.4%) of thes

167 Fundus photographs were graded for ARM using a modificat

168 Fundus photographs were graded for drusen and retinal pi

169 Digital color fundus photographs were graded for predominant phenotype

170 Fundus photographs were graded for the presence or absen

171 Baseline color fundus photographs were graded using an innovative gradi

172 Fundus photographs were graded using the Wisconsin AMD g

173 .5%) based on MESA definitions for monocular fundus photographs were greater than the DME prevalence

174 mfERG and fundus photographs were measured in both eyes of 68 adol

175 al data and standardized red-reflex lens and fundus photographs were obtained at baseline and annuall

176 Color retinal fundus photographs were obtained at each examination.

177 To evaluate the retinal vasculature, digital fundus photographs were obtained at the same ages, and t

178 mfERGs and fundus photographs were obtained from 28 eyes of 28 diab

179 Nonmydriatic fundus photographs were obtained of each eye and graded

180 Fundus photographs were performed at each examination an

181 nthoma elasticum and at least 1 set of color fundus photographs were reviewed (41 eyes of 21 patients

182 Fundus photographs were reviewed to assess the presence

183 Fundus photographs were reviewed to compare SD OCT ascer

184 Bilateral, 7-field fundus photographs were scored by masked readers for dia

185 Color fundus photographs were taken and graded in a masked man

186 Eye examinations and fundus photographs were taken at baseline and year 4.

187 Fundus photographs were taken of all participating famil

188 Two fundus photographs were taken of each eye with a digital

189 ehensive ocular evaluation was conducted and fundus photographs were taken to measure the size of the

190 ere recorded from 103 retinal locations, and fundus photographs were taken within 1 month of each rec

191 or identifying early GA.(23) Color-optimized fundus photographs were viewed concurrently with the FAs

192 perpigmentation, selected using stereo color fundus photographs, were quantified in three types of po

193 interpreted 40 sets (20 sets with individual fundus photographs with >/=3 fields and 20 computer-gene

194 erimetry (PHP) testing, stereoscopic digital fundus photographs with FA, and OCT imaging.

195 Comparison of fundus photographs with fluorescein angiograms showed th