ライフサイエンスコーパス: fusiform

1 tant visual cues in social perception (right fusiform).

2 get-evoked activation decreases in the right fusiform.

3 hildren, a positive correlation between left fusiform activation and nonword reading was observed, su

4 ing thoracic aortic aneurysms (n=10 total, 5 fusiform and 5 saccular) underwent 3-dimensional reconst

5 This analysis reveals a network of fusiform and anterior temporal areas that carry informat

6 s in prefrontal, lateral and medial frontal, fusiform and cerebellar regions, whereas auditory-specif

7 from the undiseased portion) and small SMCs (fusiform and growing in multilayers, from the undiseased

8 ateral sulcus, in a region lying between the fusiform and lingual gyri.

9 s well as increases in the precuneus and the fusiform and lingual gyrus.

10 etween the posterior cingulate and both left fusiform and medial frontal gyri.

11 al prefrontal, posterior cingulate, temporal fusiform and occipitotemporal cortex.

12 gender, race, and emotion categories in the fusiform and orbitofrontal cortices were stereotypically

13 Besides fusiform and saccular aneurysms that can thrombose, SA/C

14 yma such as in the ventromedial nucleus were fusiform and showed a bipolar morphology.

15 Consistent with this, left mid-fusiform and superior temporal regions that showed readi

16 istics into three subtypes: "octopus-like", "fusiform" and "stellate", suggesting underlying differen

17 e and emotion processing including amygdala, fusiform, and insula.

18 ivation to SS in the precentral, prefrontal, fusiform, and posterior cingulate cortices before CBT-I.

19 al regions, including the cuneus, precuneus, fusiform, and posterior parietal cortical regions.

20 ion neurons have been described: multipolar, fusiform, and pyramidal.

21 us, hippocampus, posterior cingulate cortex, fusiform, and visual cortex (P < .05 significance thresh

22 aortic repair (1993-2013), predominantly for fusiform aneurysm (n = 144), saccular aneurysm (n = 94),

23 form dilations of cerebral vessels and giant fusiform aneurysm in supraclinoid segment of the interna

24 In advanced cases, formation of a fusiform aneurysm is possible.

25 es of the circle of Willis coexisting with a fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery.

26 , 178 aneurysms) with unruptured saccular or fusiform aneurysms or recurrent aneurysms after previous

27 n the internal carotid artery were included; fusiform aneurysms, infundibulae, and vascular segments

28 e a significantly higher normalized PWS than fusiform aneurysms.

29 olgi-impregnated neurons had round or ovoid, fusiform, angular, and polygonal cell bodies (10-30 mum

30 ss) of the right inferior parietal and right fusiform areas was shown to play a key role in ET charac

31 05 [0.02], P = .07, P for interaction = .04; fusiform: beta>50 [SE], 0.09 [0.03], P = .002, beta</=50

32 t the swollen ER bodies were derived from ER fusiform bodies.

33 ing the extrastriate body area (EBA) and the fusiform body area (FBA).

34 s have shown that in normal hearing animals, fusiform cell activity can be modulated by activation of

35 ereas deep afterhyperpolarizations following fusiform cell spike trains potently inhibited stellate c

36 onstrate increased synchrony and bursting of fusiform cell spontaneous firing, which correlate with f

37 synapses on bushy cells (AN-BC synapses) and fusiform cells (AN-FC synapses) and PF synapses on FC (P

38 mably reflecting direct excitatory inputs to fusiform cells and an indirect inhibitory input to fusif

39 eveal that 5-HT exerts a potent influence on fusiform cells by altering their intrinsic properties, w

40 rm cells and an indirect inhibitory input to fusiform cells from the granule cell-cartwheel cell syst

41 , a reduction in KCNQ2/3 channel activity in fusiform cells in noise-exposed mice by 4 days after exp

42 taneous firing (hyperactivity) is induced in fusiform cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) foll

43 several higher auditory stations but not in fusiform cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), key

44 In fusiform cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus, excitator

45 Optogenetically activated populations of fusiform cells reliably enhanced interneuron excitabilit

46 e of increased synchrony and bursting in DCN fusiform cells suggests that a neural code for phantom s

47 stellate cells were more strongly coupled to fusiform cells than to other stellate cells.

48 o suppress tinnitus-related hyperactivity of fusiform cells using the cholinergic agonist, carbachol.

49 we show that excitatory projection neurons (fusiform cells) and inhibitory stellate interneurons of

50 nitus, we recorded spontaneous activity from fusiform cells, the principle neurons of the DCN, in nor

51 gic axon terminals increased excitability of fusiform cells.

52 n dorsal cochlear nucleus principal neurons, fusiform cells.

53 Incorporation of UPEC into BEC fusiform compartments enabled bacteria to escape elimina

54 such as the temporal poles, the significant fusiform correlations cannot be attributed to floor-leve

55 ding difficulties, showed activation of left fusiform cortex (BA 37), a region implicated in orthogra

56 Results indicate that the fusiform cortex and amygdala respond differentially in t

57 vident in both face-selective regions of the fusiform cortex and domain-general regions of the prefro

58 ial expressions in amygdala, as well as left fusiform cortex and right middle frontal gyrus (cluster-

59 ncement of face-selective responses in right fusiform cortex during deep- versus superficial-encoding

60 isorders, for example, aberrant amygdala and fusiform cortex structure and function occurring in the

61 lume in the hippocampus, parahippocampus and fusiform cortex, and a white-matter index for the fornix

62 w that the right orbitofrontal cortex, right fusiform cortex, and right hypothalamus respond to airbo

63 including the amygdala, anterior insula, and fusiform cortex, even after accounting for prescan state

64 n manifested in neural patterns of the right fusiform cortex.

65 mic response enhancement within the temporal fusiform cortices to indirectly related (relative to unr

66 Is, activation of the posterior parietal and fusiform cortices was associated with WM and perceptual

67 ors thereof within the medial prefrontal and fusiform cortices.

68 but task-independent) responses in bilateral fusiform cortices.

69 these measures but increased the density of fusiform DCX cells per section.

70 Both round and fusiform DCX-immunoreactive (DCX-ir) cells were found in

71 esent a rare case of a patient with multiple fusiform dilations of cerebral vessels and giant fusifor

72 only occurring, and 'other types', including fusiform/dolichoectatic, dissecting, serpentine, posttra

73 Individuals with LOX variants had fusiform enlargement of the root and ascending thoracic

74 ross human inferior temporal cortex from the fusiform face area (FFA) (apparently selective for faces

75 ves a network of brain regions including the fusiform face area (FFA) and anterior inferotemporal cor

76 in the occipital and temporal lobe, and the fusiform face area (FFA) and anterior temporal lobe play

77 Baseline activity in regions within the fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area

78 houses enhanced the sensory responses in the fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area

79 Mirroring the arrangement of human regions fusiform face area (FFA) and PPA (which are adjacent to

80 gory-selective visual regions, including the fusiform face area (FFA) and the parahippocampal place a

81 presenting architectural styles included the fusiform face area (FFA) in addition to several scene-se

82 brain -i.e. face patches in monkeys and the fusiform face area (FFA) in humans.

83 The fusiform face area (FFA) is a region of human cortex tha

84 The fusiform face area (FFA) is a well-studied human brain r

85 The fusiform face area (FFA) is thought to be a computationa

86 the amplitude of gamma oscillations, in the fusiform face area (FFA) of individuals diagnosed with A

87 e fMRI responses in the right face-selective fusiform face area (FFA) was closely associated with ind

88 ng hypothesis, this dedifferentiation in the fusiform face area (FFA) was driven by increased activat

89 The fusiform face area (FFA) was individually localized in e

90 functional network connectivity of the left fusiform face area (FFA) with the hippocampus and inferi

91 category-selective visual regions, like the fusiform face area (FFA), reflect a summation of activit

92 A gaze processing network comprising fusiform face area (FFA), superior temporal sulcus, amyg

93 r superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and to the fusiform face area (FFA), using a searchlight approach t

94 magnetic resonance imaging and examined the fusiform face area (FFA), which is implicated in face re

95 nd race of faces, it remains unclear whether fusiform face area (FFA)-the portion of fusiform gyrus t

96 rnal or external features of the face in the fusiform face area (FFA).

97 lectrical responses from electrodes over the fusiform face area (FFA).

98 retation of domain-specific regions like the fusiform face area (FFA).

99 ells the story behind our first paper on the fusiform face area (FFA): how we chose the question, dev

100 localized region in the fusiform gyrus [the fusiform face area (FFA)] that responds selectively to f

101 gion of the visual association cortex [i.e., fusiform face area (FFA)].

102 ivers and nonperceivers were observed in the fusiform face area and extrastriate visual cortex.

103 iarity in the model, whereas activity in the fusiform face area covaries with the prediction error pa

104 nitude of repetition suppression (RS) in the Fusiform Face Area is influenced by the probability of r

105 ce the neural response to faces in the right fusiform face area or right occipital face area.

106 cial identity and provides evidence that the fusiform face area responds with distinct patterns of ac

107 The ventral temporal fusiform face area showed sensitivity to fearful express

108 nd unexpected face and house stimuli in the "fusiform face area" (FFA) could be well-described as a s

109 Similar results were also found in the fusiform face area, a face-selective perceptual processi

110 In the fusiform face area, a face-space coding model with sigmo

111 ccur without normal functioning of the right fusiform face area, an area proposed to mediate greeble

112 (PPA) compared with adjacent regions (e.g., fusiform face area, FFA) within the temporal visual cort

113 al areas, including the occipital face area, fusiform face area, lateral occipital cortex, mid fusifo

114 connectivity of the social brain (amygdala, fusiform face area, orbital-frontal regions).

115 we show that (1) the VWFA, compared with the fusiform face area, shows higher connectivity to left-he

116 es were behaviorally relevant in the brain's fusiform face area.

117 decisions, respectively, particularly in the fusiform face area.

118 well as in the face-sensitive occipital and fusiform face areas.

119 a representation of face orientation in the fusiform face-selective area (FFA).

120 d more selective correlations: left anterior fusiform function predicted performance on two expressiv

121 ten assume uniform aortic wall thickness and fusiform geometry.

122 posterior cingulate (cue-alpha) and the left fusiform gyri (item-gamma).

123 P < .05) and FA values in the cerebellum and fusiform gyri (P < .05).

124 d enlarged GMV in the caudate, thalamus, and fusiform gyri and reduced GMV in the cerebellar vermis i

125 ipital complex, the parahippocampal, and the fusiform gyri did not predict target presence, while hig

126 amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal, and fusiform gyri in 30 of 31 subjects compared with normal

127 t posterior hippocampus, parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, and predominantly left hemisphere extra-t

128 -wise differences in the cuneus, lingual and fusiform gyri, middle occipital lobe, inferior parietal

129 stimuli resulted in greater deactivation in fusiform gyri, possibly reflecting greater suppression o

130 eam, particularly the inferior occipital and fusiform gyri, remained selective despite showing only 9

131 icularly strong in the inferior temporal and fusiform gyri, two areas important for object recognitio

132 were identified in the inferior frontal and fusiform gyri.

133 in visual areas, particularly the bilateral fusiform gyri.

134 the inferior frontal, inferior parietal, and fusiform gyri; the precuneus; and the dorsomedial prefro

135 parahippocampus (0.032 vs 0.037; p<0.0001), fusiform gyrus (0.036 vs 0.041; p<0.0001), inferior temp

136 0.001), anterior vermis (40%, P < 0.001) and fusiform gyrus (20%, P < 0.001) compared with controls o

137 iculum, and entorhinal cortex), and anterior fusiform gyrus (corrected P < .05; uncorrected P = .001)

138 s (Cohen's d=-0.293; P=1.71 x 10(-21)), left fusiform gyrus (d=-0.288; P=8.25 x 10(-21)) and left ros

139 lts, particularly those anchored in the left fusiform gyrus (FFG) (the visual word form area).

140 ns involved in face processing including the fusiform gyrus (FFG) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC

141 ition is linked to dopamine (DA) activity in fusiform gyrus (FFG).

142 ction (IFJ), middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and fusiform gyrus (FG) are active during response inhibitio

143 hat spatially informative cues activated the fusiform gyrus (FG) as well as frontoparietal components

144 le of face-selective neural responses of the fusiform gyrus (FG) in face perception in a patient impl

145 tients with lesions in the VTC including the fusiform gyrus (FG).

146 - left intraparietal sulcus (L.IPS) and left fusiform gyrus (L.FFG).

147 e right anterior cingulate cortex), and left fusiform gyrus (SDM estimate = -0.146; P = .003).

148 uperior Temporal Gyrus (t=1.403, p=0.00780), Fusiform Gyrus (t=1.26), and Parahippocampal Gyrus (t=1.

149 ies have described a localized region in the fusiform gyrus [the fusiform face area (FFA)] that respo

150 l thickness in the right parahippocampal and fusiform gyrus across both time points was found in both

151 was inversely correlated with the change in fusiform gyrus activation in the fasted state but not in

152 Amygdala, anterior cingulate, and fusiform gyrus activity increased linearly with the CS-U

153 ior hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex, and fusiform gyrus activity linearly increased across the 30

154 modulation of the afferent connections from fusiform gyrus and AMG to VPFC.

155 ault mode network, superior parietal lobule, fusiform gyrus and anterior insula.

156 matter loss in the left parahippocampal and fusiform gyrus and greater gray matter increases in the

157 s in the pars orbitalis, paracentral lobule, fusiform gyrus and inferior temporal gyrus was lowest in

158 d with less perfusion in the right occipital/fusiform gyrus and left subgenual ACC.

159 ion and the ankle DF/PF tasks, the bilateral fusiform gyrus and middle temporal gyrus, right inferior

160 effects within right amygdala, hippocampus, fusiform gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex.

161 mygdala and orbitofrontal cortex and between fusiform gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex.

162 in right lateral occipital cortex and right fusiform gyrus and sources in a control region (left V1)

163 in ReHo between the two bands were found in fusiform gyrus and superior frontal gyrus (slow-4> slow-

164 ted by visual semantic loops within the left fusiform gyrus and that these neural processes may be me

165 duced grey matter volume in the right middle fusiform gyrus and the inferior temporal gyrus.

166 uced and increased fMRI responses in the mid-fusiform gyrus and the lateral occipital cortex, respect

167 in the left inferior prefrontal cortex, the fusiform gyrus and the medial temporal lobe including bo

168 amage to the inferior temporal gyrus, to the fusiform gyrus and to a white matter network including t

169 l resolution imaging techniques identify the fusiform gyrus as subserving processing of invariant fac

170 of the salience network; and a subregion of fusiform gyrus associated with face perception.

171 temporal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus during memory encoding reduced odds of re

172 Clinically, the ability to recruit the fusiform gyrus during the task in noise was negatively c

173 regions (temporal pole for word matching and fusiform gyrus for face matching).

174 auditory spelling task and from calcarine to fusiform gyrus for the visual spelling task.

175 Face-selective neural responses in the human fusiform gyrus have been widely examined.

176 oked responses in the left amygdala and left fusiform gyrus in both runs and experiments.

177 ability was evident in the temporal pole and fusiform gyrus ipsilateral to the seizure focus followin

178 ese findings indicate that the right lateral fusiform gyrus is critically involved in object recognit

179 ortical dysfunction in the temporal lobe and fusiform gyrus may be related to epileptic activity in I

180 fMRI revealed that the left fusiform gyrus may facilitate the production of backward

181 work and that a right anterior region of the fusiform gyrus plays a central role within the informati

182 Although prior research suggests that fusiform gyrus represents the sex and race of faces, it

183 The right fusiform gyrus showed adaptation to faces (not objects)

184 ons, the lateral section of the right middle fusiform gyrus showed the largest face-selective respons

185 The mid fusiform gyrus showed the strongest, earliest response a

186 ateral occipito-temporal sulcus and adjacent fusiform gyrus shows maximal selectivity for words and h

187 the visual word-form area (part of the left fusiform gyrus specialized for printed words); and persi

188 esion also extended laterally to involve the fusiform gyrus substantially.

189 wer spectra in the primary visual cortex and fusiform gyrus that are maximally discriminative of data

190 ther fusiform face area (FFA)-the portion of fusiform gyrus that is functionally-defined by its prefe

191 eralized hyperactivation in the amygdala and fusiform gyrus that was subject to intersession habituat

192 ct patches of face-selective activity in the fusiform gyrus that were interspersed within a large exp

193 Reduced right parahippocampal and fusiform gyrus thickness are familial trait markers for

194 ediated the association with inattention and fusiform gyrus thickness mediated the association with i

195 found positive correlations between the left fusiform gyrus to amygdala connectivity and different st

196 , and may serve in concert with amygdala and fusiform gyrus to modulate visual attention toward motiv

197 over time in activation of the amygdala and fusiform gyrus to neutral facial stimuli in adults with

198 es modulated unidirectional connections from fusiform gyrus to orbitofrontal cortex.

199 ced modulation of connectivity from the left fusiform gyrus to the left amygdala and from the right a

200 that the intensity of the activation in the fusiform gyrus was associated with significantly stronge

201 ing, whereas PrC, anterior HC, and posterior fusiform gyrus were recruited during discrimination lear

202 ocampal gyrus, left orbitofrontal cortex and fusiform gyrus whereas patients with left hippocampal sc

203 ed fMRI to measure neural responses from the fusiform gyrus while subjects observed a rapid stream of

204 l gyrus) and 37 (posterior-inferior temporal/fusiform gyrus) best predicted impairment in reading wor

205 that responded to viewing pictorial stimuli (fusiform gyrus) correlated with self-reported visualizer

206 s placed over high-order visual areas (e.g., fusiform gyrus) showed both effects of spatial and objec

207 s in orthographic processing circuits (i.e., fusiform gyrus) was predictive of smaller gains in fluen

208 cortex), BA 37 (posterior, inferior temporal/fusiform gyrus), BA 38 (anterior temporal cortex) and BA

209 cipants (both absolutely and relative to the fusiform gyrus), despite apparently normal levels of fac

210 as well as the insula, cingulate cortex, and fusiform gyrus, a regional distribution that was nearly

211 We found that activity in the fusiform gyrus, an area associated with the processing o

212 ate cortex, superior temporal gyrus, insula, fusiform gyrus, and caudate nucleus.

213 ippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, fusiform gyrus, and choroid plexus but not in other brai

214 rome group was found in the cingulate gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and frontal cortex in response to all fa

215 ed decreased activity in the right amygdala, fusiform gyrus, and inferior occipital gyrus compared wi

216 eral temporal lobe, including temporal pole, fusiform gyrus, and insula, and extending into occipital

217 lts showed that the visual cortex, bilateral fusiform gyrus, and right parahippocampal gyrus were act

218 left hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus, and significantly greater gray matter in

219 cur in the anterior medial temporal lobe and fusiform gyrus, and that these changes occur at least 3

220 r areas are consistently activated: the left fusiform gyrus, bilateral middle and inferior frontal gy

221 ly increased in temporal regions, insula and fusiform gyrus, consistent with those areas known to be

222 with ASD had lower FC than TC in cerebellum, fusiform gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus and posterior i

223 ed abnormal hyperactivation in the amygdala, fusiform gyrus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and d

224 flood in the Parahippocampal Gyrus, and Left Fusiform Gyrus, of those afflicted with AN.

225 e area in specific cortical regions (cuneus, fusiform gyrus, pars triangularis) in both populations.

226 processing and structural alterations in the fusiform gyrus, part of the ventral visual stream.

227 gyrus and bilateral middle/inferior temporal/fusiform gyrus, respectively) that showed reversed effec

228 laims have been made, and within the lateral fusiform gyrus, they are restricted to a small area (200

229 wed that repetition suppression in bilateral fusiform gyrus, was selectively correlated with priming

230 cal area in the collateral sulcus and medial fusiform gyrus, which was place-selective according to b

231 us, left temporoparietal junction, and right fusiform gyrus, with patients showing relative hypoactiv

232 the downstream face-selective region in the fusiform gyrus.

233 9557 in the right occipital cortex and right fusiform gyrus.

234 t posterior hippocampus, parahippocampus and fusiform gyrus.

235 hesis in relation to face selectivity in the fusiform gyrus.

236 redict functional activation to faces in the fusiform gyrus.

237 tion following a lesion to the right lateral fusiform gyrus.

238 and FH effects were found bilaterally in the fusiform gyrus.

239 ct responses, especially in the amygdala and fusiform gyrus.

240 timuli, whereas the opposite was true in the fusiform gyrus.

241 l gyrus, left parahippocampal gyrus and left fusiform gyrus.

242 ween higher-level language areas and the mid fusiform gyrus.

243 onse profiles such as the lateral and medial fusiform gyrus.

244 olor, and place selectivity that tracked the fusiform gyrus/collateral sulcus.

245 /middle temporal gyrus plus the right middle fusiform gyrus/inferior temporal gyrus.

246 ties in the right temporal pole and anterior fusiform gyrus; while in the Alzheimer's disease group,

247 , ventral IPS, lateral occipital region, and fusiform gyrus], which was accompanied by activation tha

248 Left fusiform habituation in female participants was directly

249 There were no group differences in overall fusiform habituation.

250 demonstrated strong task sensitivity of the fusiform hemodynamic response evoked by faces, and thus

251 tual aneurysm model of 6 cm wide x 6 cm long fusiform hyper-elastic anisotropic design.

252 ewis-Sumner syndrome patients had multifocal fusiform hypertrophy in the nerve trunks.

253 ection neurons were multipolar, globular, or fusiform in shape.

254 diagnosis interaction was found in the left fusiform/inferior temporal cortex: participants with aut

255 to represent the information being encoded (fusiform/lateral occipital cortex), they each exerted op

256 ressive verbal tasks, whereas right anterior fusiform metabolism predicted performance on a non-verba

257 uron numbers as well as the total numbers of fusiform (migrating) and round (differentiating) DCX neu

258 gic features, such as wide neck, large size, fusiform morphology, incorporation of side branches, and

259 yramidal cells and conspicuously larger than fusiform neurons of layer VI.

260 Fusiform neurons were located rostrally, in the anterome

261 oring layer V pyramidal neurons and layer VI fusiform neurons were obtained by using a design-based s

262 A urease-negative, fusiform, novel bacterium named Helicobacter saguini was

263 leus in the posterior BST or the dorsomedial/fusiform nuclei in the anteroventral BST.

264 more bilateral or right-sided inferotemporal/fusiform object recognition network, which remained rela

265 eous fibrillar echotexture; grade 2, a focal fusiform or diffuse enlarged tendon; and grade 3, a hypo

266 ions and sad faces modulating unidirectional fusiform-orbitofrontal connections.

267 orm face area, lateral occipital cortex, mid fusiform, parahippocampal place area, and extending supe

268 During adipogenesis, fusiform preadipocytes change into sphere-shaped adipocy

269 GA-HRP into the anteromedian nucleus labeled fusiform premotor neurons within the OPt, as well as mul

270 t 5-HT directly enhances the excitability of fusiform principal cells via activation of two distinct

271 in superior frontal lobe, cingulate cortex, fusiform, putamen, and medial temporal lobe.

272 y a region within the left occipito-temporal/fusiform region (L-OT/F) often referred to as the visual

273 his is consistent with an involvement of the fusiform region in both early and midlatency face-proces

274 These analyses confirm a role for the right fusiform region in early to midlatency responses consist

275 was degree of hypometabolism in the anterior fusiform region subjacent to the head and body of the hi

276 he N/M170-as having a major generator in the fusiform region; however, this evoked component is not b

277 xhibited hypoactivation in left parietal and fusiform regions but equal activation in all four areas

278 rior and superior parietal, hippocampus, and fusiform regions was stronger in individuals older than

279 posterior hippocampal, parahippocampal, and fusiform regions, as well as a posterior neocortical VOI

280 e ventral aspects of the form pathway (e.g., fusiform regions, ventral extrastriate body area) are no

281 mFus-faces and pFus-faces (mid and posterior fusiform, respectively)].

282 Interestingly, for fusiform rust disease-resistance traits, Bayes Cpi, Baye

283 -pathogen interactions in the development of fusiform rust gall.

284 Fusiform rust is controlled by few genes of large effect

285 o predict polygenic (height) and oligogenic (fusiform rust resistance) traits in a structured breedin

286 We found that activation in the fusiform semantic area (FSA), an area that converges wit

287 umbrella cells a subapical pool of discoidal/fusiform-shaped vesicles (DFVs) undergoes Rab11a-depende

288 Fusiform-shaped, retrogradely labeled cells fell within

289 corded multiunit spontaneous activity in the fusiform soma layer (FSL) of the DCN in control and tone

290 olved in sensory processing and integration (fusiform, somatosensory cortex, and thalamus), salience

291 al in predicting face selectivity within the fusiform, suggesting a possible mechanistic architecture

292 n one object-selective region, the posterior fusiform sulcus, and a strong sensitivity to these rever

293 fication task showed activation of amygdala, fusiform, thalamus, inferior and midfrontal regions.

294 O-1 [6] and an anterior center in the medial fusiform that has been labeled V4alpha[3, 4].

295 Trichodesmium forms macroscopic, fusiform (tufts), spherical (puffs) and raft-like coloni

296 regulated exocytosis of subapical discoidal/fusiform vesicles (DFV) during bladder filling, and may

297 The discoidal/fusiform vesicles (DFV) of bladder umbrella cells underg

298 knockout in vivo led to the accumulation of fusiform vesicles in mouse urothelial superficial umbrel

299 the hinge areas in the uroplakin-delivering fusiform vesicles, as well as at the apical surface; and

300 As hypometabolism in the patients' rostral fusiform was even more extreme than the abnormality in o