戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  for women from 67.0 to 81.1 years (PLWH, US general population).
2 on use and intraocular pressure (IOP) in the general population.
3 their prognosis is comparable to that of the general population.
4 marker profiles between women and men in the general population.
5 ople in the USA as compared with that in the general population.
6 , and county were randomly selected from the general population.
7 e management of different pathologies in the general population.
8 led 2149 adults aged 25 to 41 years from the general population.
9 efits, and disability pension funds than the general population.
10 eleterious nature and a low frequency in the general population.
11 e associated with cardiovascular risk in the general population.
12 period, mirroring the trend described in the general population.
13 ine and an increased risk of dementia in the general population.
14 h DLBCL in remission compared with a matched general population.
15 esidual risk of cardiovascular events in the general population.
16 greater impact than do those that target the general population.
17 ed with peers of the same age and sex in the general population.
18 ns higher in HIV-positive people than in the general population.
19 igher rate of PTSD amongst veterans than the general population.
20  sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the general population.
21 red with the age-, sex-, and country-matched general population.
22  with 2,412 age-matched individuals from the general population.
23  30-70 fold higher incidence compared to the general population.
24  among immigrants to Ontario, Canada, to its general population.
25  only moderately increased compared with the general population.
26 th a lifetime prevalence of nearly 8% in the general population.
27 mental disorder that affects up to 1% of the general population.
28 e rate ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-1.8) than the general population.
29 y ratios (SMRs) to make comparisons with the general population.
30 igher dental decay risk as compared with the general population.
31  of ILD hospitalization and mortality in the general population.
32 the risk of AMD in matched controls from the general population.
33 is significantly higher than reported in the general population.
34 ns revealed variants had MAF of </=1% in the general population.
35 incidence and antithrombotic drug use in the general population.
36 ividuals at risk for HBV reactivation in the general population.
37  urothelial carcinoma (UC) compared with the general population.
38 ers and cognitive deficits than women in the general population.
39 ervational, retrospective data, often in the general population.
40 y rhinitis significantly more often than the general population.
41 e associated with all-cause mortality in the general population.
42 utcomes in those with T1DM compared with the general population.
43 um disorders, compared to individuals in the general population.
44 patients with chronic kidney disease and the general population.
45 netic data on half a million adults from the general population.
46 nt, they were close to those observed in the general population.
47 ults with AD compared with psoriasis and the general population.
48 served among males than among females in the general population.
49 rtionately affected by HIV compared with the general population.
50 blood pressure-lowering effect of ANP in the general population.
51  with large potential distribution among the general population.
52 dates for toric IOL implantation than in the general population.
53 mmunodeficiency disorders (PIDs) than in the general population.
54 ss common in schizophrenia cases than in the general population.
55 her rates of frailty and disability than the general population.
56 ation are associated with incident AF in the general population.
57 k HIV-uninfected persons, and 9.4% in the US general population.
58  with HIV in the HAART era compared with the general population.
59 a 200-fold increased risk as compared to the general population.
60 er survivors were compared with rates in the general population.
61 a have increased mortality compared with the general population.
62 re prevalent among males than females in the general population.
63  associated with ageing and morbidity in the general population.
64 y increased risk for dental decay versus the general population.
65 hed controls each randomly selected from the general population.
66  is associated with lower risk of CVD in the general population.
67  developing clinical symptoms of MS than the general population.
68 or alcoholic liver cirrhosis compared to the general population.
69 esymptomatic diabetes risk prediction in the general population.
70 chotic-naive schizophrenia compared with the general population.
71 rs (HCWs) is estimated to be higher than the general population.
72 roke are higher than, those reported for the general population.
73 s oesophagus compared with controls from the general population.
74 ected high-risk persons, and 12.8% in the US general population.
75 g individuals with HCV infection and for the general population.
76  frequency of each of these genotypes in the general population.
77  with or without cirrhosis compared with the general population.
78 itamin D supplementation prevents CVD in the general population.
79 ity-score-matched comparison sample from the general population.
80  cirrhosis in these patients relative to the general population.
81 in Parkinson's disease and addictions in the general population.
82 eterogeneous disorder, affecting 1-3% of the general population.
83 n approximately 22.5 cases per 10 000 in the general population.
84 n 98.7% (zone I) and 94.9% (zone III) of the general population.
85 f uMg with fasting insulin and fat mass in a general population.
86 ents with HS and 4,354,137 subjects from the general population.
87 the factors influencing GCC thickness in the general population.
88 t 3.6 for exhibiting AVNRT compared with the general population.
89 which are also associated with ageing in the general population.
90  and suicide are markedly higher than in the general population.
91 predicts future cardiovascular events in the general population.
92 s a tool used to assess fracture risk in the general population.
93 thout cirrhosis in Denmark compared with the general population.
94 ndicate future risk of kidney disease in the general population.
95 form to optimize vitamin D status within the general population.
96 6 months to prevent hen's egg allergy in the general population.
97 ion of employment compared with the employed general population.
98 nd sex-matched group of 1347 people from the general population.
99 cide rates and rate ratios compared with the general population.
100 e pathogenesis of depressive symptoms in the general population.
101 man immunodeficiency virus (HIV) than in the general population.
102 ients and 2.33 (1.47-3.67) compared with the general population.
103 nally representative samples of the US adult general population.
104 ene NKPD1 affects depressive symptoms in the general population.
105 and the patient's survival compared with the general population.
106 rritin (SF) concentrations than those of the general population.
107 ) and cirrhosis (2.4-4.0%) than those in the general population.
108 atients, but the MR remained higher than the general population.
109 f all major organ-system outcomes versus the general population.
110 r significantly between women and men in the general population.
111 patients with pericarditis compared with the general population.
112  residential location from households of the general population.
113 ica, seroprevalence was 0.05% (0.00-1.78) in general populations.
114  is higher than the 6-year risk in the local general population (0.62).
115 e population was higher than in the employed general population (1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI],
116 n did their HIV-negative counterparts in the general population [29.1 years (SD 0.1) vs 65.4 years (0
117 ival was inferior to survival in the matched general population (78%; 95% CI, 76 to 80; v 87%; standa
118 sical activity compared with adults from the general population, a fact which has not changed in the
119 rdiovascular complications compared with the general population (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.45; 95% co
120  presence of prevalent HSV-2 infection among general populations (adjusted RR 2.7, 95% CI 2.2-3.4; nu
121 ents < 50 years of age was normalized to the general population after achieving pEFS24 ( P = .99).
122 ost-bronchodilator airflow limitation in the general population aged 40 years and over.
123                 The pooled prevalence in the general population aged 60 to 74 years and >75 years was
124 ciated with psychosis, but a minority of the general population also experience them frequently and w
125 st survey in 5,119 preschool children in the general population and among household contacts of tuber
126 tralizing antibodies (Nab) are common in the general population and exclude many patients from clinic
127 sease population, the risk was lowest in the general population and highest in the chronic kidney dis
128 ing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the general population and in HCV-monoinfected kidney transp
129 sorders have higher mortality rates than the general population and more detailed estimates of mortal
130 ion is that dental disease was common in the general population and not necessarily associated with a
131  people bereaved by spousal suicide with the general population and people bereaved by other manners
132  CVD risk in PLWH in care compared to the US general population and persons HIV-uninfected, but at hi
133 t recipients remains much higher than in the general population and should be of continuous concern f
134 rearrangements occur constitutionally in the general population and somatically in the majority of ca
135 ocial health outcomes when compared with the general population and spouses bereaved by other manners
136  intake may increase the risk of ESRD in the general population and substituting alternative sources
137  findings somewhat differ from those for the general population and suggest a shared etiology for cut
138                         Individuals from the general population and those having a first-degree relat
139 sthma severity among asthmatic patients in a general population and to describe risk factors for asth
140 , and date of cohort entry to members of the general population and to the chronic kidney disease pop
141 plications in OCD patients compared with the general population and unaffected full siblings of OCD i
142 , seroprevalence was 25.64% (12.09-42.00) in general populations and 37.77% (12.13-67.54) in liver-di
143 ith CF is 5-10 times greater compared to the general population, and 25-30 times greater in CF patien
144 d factors, how these rates compared with the general population, and changes over the past decade.
145 ially lower for people with CKD than for the general population, and falls as GFR declines.
146 lem worldwide, affecting more than 7% of the general population, and represent an important public he
147 of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with the general population, and risk is higher among those who r
148  with severe mental illness, relative to the general population, and to identify independent risk fac
149 ost-bronchodilator airflow limitation in the general population appears to be explained by the associ
150 d cumulative incidence for CDA in the Denver general population at 5, 10, and 15 years of age was 2.4
151 nd efficiently identify individuals from the general population at risk for conversion to a clinical
152 GF1R, IGF2R, or IGFALS all were found in the general population but with allele frequencies of <1:30,
153 clinical effects of alleles that are rare in general populations but occur at higher frequencies in t
154  bariatric patients was more common than the general population, but an increased incidence of delibe
155 ution has been linked to hypertension in the general population, but data on gestational hypertension
156 urgery was higher in the elderly than in the general population, but in relative terms, the risk incr
157 e was higher among patients with AD than the general population, but lower than psoriasis patients.
158  males compared to 54.8% for males in the US general population, but similar among females.
159               Type 2 MIs are uncommon in the general population, but their frequency in human immunod
160 nd decreased cardiovascular mortality in the general population, but whether similar benefits would b
161 rm models of diabetes risk prediction in the general population by analyzing the effect of 27 HNF1A v
162 ates of FASD among children and youth in the general population by country, by World Health Organizat
163 isk in people with HIV compared with the USA general population, by dividing the observed number of c
164 y the expected number (estimated by applying general population cancer-incidence rates to person-time
165  easily scored, detects the vast majority of general population cases at a threshold that also has hi
166                            Compared with the general population cohort, MI was not associated with al
167 eft ventricle (LV) have been well studied in general population cohorts, few data are available descr
168  rheumatology registries and matched 1:10 to general population comparator subjects.
169 sex-, birth year-, and calendar year-matched general population comparison cohort without MI (1980-20
170 ad a slightly higher mortality rate than the general population comparison cohort, adjusted mortality
171 ty of patients undergoing CABG surgery and a general population comparison cohort.
172 or stroke, respectively, than members of the general population comparison cohort.
173 e-cohort design, patients were compared with general population control subjects (1:10 ratio).
174 ls diagnosed with OCD, compared with matched general population controls (1:10).
175 sed risk of HF among survivors compared with general population controls (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95
176                                  Compared to general population controls (n = 8583), children with IB
177 al and psychiatric comorbidities compared to general population controls, adult patients with AD had
178 d with age-/sex-/county-of-residence-matched general population controls.
179 erences in risk for HF between survivors and general population controls.
180 evalence of comorbid conditions than matched general population controls.
181 L from 2000 to 2010 and sex- and age-matched general-population controls.
182 calendar year to 400380 individuals from the general population (controls).
183 cardio-metabolic risk in adults with AD in a general population could be made.
184 ate whether the incidence of dementia in the general population covaries with long-term exposure to m
185 ersons with CRC diagnosed in the Netherlands general population during the same period, in the same a
186 e follow-up period, a rate comparable to the general population during the same time period (IRR 0.61
187  (OSCC) earlier and more frequently than the general population, especially after hematopoietic stem
188  of cardiovascular disease compared with the general population, even after accounting for difference
189  sexual and vertical HIV transmission in the general population, female sex workers (FSW), and men wh
190 urth, recent advances in PH treatment in the general population focus on World Health Organization gr
191  mortality was significantly higher than the general population for all causes (SMR 5.7, 95% CI 5.5-5
192 mparative incidence rate ratios (IRR) to the general population from the same country of origin were
193 ng pneumonia, are most representative of the general population from which cases arose and the least
194                                       In the general population, GLS provides independent and increme
195 IV-TR) criteria and ID (n = 181), as well as general population (GP) controls (n = 418).
196 nia Department of Developmental Services and general population (GP) controls (n=418) from state birt
197 opmental delay (DD) without ASD (N=188), and general population (GP) controls (N=428) using a bead-ba
198 ons with synucleinopathies compared with the general population has not been conducted.
199 ion of clinical cardiovascular events in the general population have not been examined, RCTs have ass
200 carriers of neurodevelopmental CNVs from the general population have significant cognitive deficits.
201  a broad range of noninvasive diagnostic and general population health monitoring applications.
202  female cohort for each of 3 populations: US general population; HIV-uninfected, at high risk for HIV
203     Memory skills strongly differ across the general population; however, little is known about the b
204 ased from 31.0 per 1000 individuals from the general population in 2000 to 76.9 per 1000 individuals
205 imates of prevalence and distribution in the general population in China are still lacking.
206 terventions included training members of the general population in CPR and in the use of automated ex
207 tic and symptomatic, undiagnosed COPD in the general population in Denmark.
208 he UK Office for National Statistics for the general population in England and Wales to our cohort, a
209 iberate self-harm, which was higher than the general population [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.47, 95%
210                              Relative to the general population, incidence was similarly elevated (ap
211 llness have excess mortality relative to the general population irrespective of ethnicity.
212     Screen-detected gallstone disease in the general population is associated with pooled gastrointes
213  finding these as standing variations in the general population is low.
214     Its true incidence and prevalence in the general population is still not confirmed despite advanc
215 ardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population is unknown.
216                                       In the general population, keratinocyte cancers are associated
217 vere early childhood caries (S-ECC) than the general population, leading to speculation that the etio
218                              In humans, even general population level exposures to some PFAAs are ass
219 BG patients and 513 070 individuals from the general population matched on age, sex, and calendar yea
220 son cohort members randomly sampled from the general population (median age, 70 years; 63% male).
221 nmark during 2006 to 2010 and 99,080 matched general population members.
222 he state cancer registry (n = 5,455) and the general population (n = 16,340) using driver's license f
223 arkers of exposure in urine samples from the general population (n = 35).
224 l known PLHIV and a 10% random sample of the general population of British Columbia, and with longitu
225 about the incidence of celiac disease in the general population of children in the United States.
226 ncidence ratios (SIRs) using as standard the general population of England in 2007.
227 se seem to have a lower risk of PCP than the general population of immunosuppressed dermatology patie
228 cause of secondary hypertension, even in the general population of patients with hypertension, and in
229  ratios, or rates compared with those in the general population of the same sex and similar age, were
230 in the CWU HEDS patients (23.9%) than in the general population of the United States (6.1%).
231 l effect can be extended to cirrhosis in the general population or cirrhosis due to other causes, suc
232 ations for using passive immunization in the general population or for therapy in immunocompromised p
233 imate the cumulative incidence in the Denver general population, outcomes by each genotype were weigh
234                            Compared with the general population, participants were less likely to be
235 nts having isolated CABG surgery than in the general population, particularly during 0 to 30 days (3.
236                            Compared with the general population, patients with schizophrenia have a 2
237                                       In the general population, physical activity is associated with
238  for dental anomalies when compared with the general population, prior studies have shown conflicting
239        We included healthy controls from the general population, recruited as part of another study i
240          QOL did not differ from that of the general population, regardless of the presence or absenc
241 atment discontinuation were low (<10% in the general population); regimens that included ribavirin ha
242 f dietary protein on the risk of ESRD in the general population remain unclear.
243 esity, and adiposity-related diseases in the general population remains uncertain.
244           In these people, compared with the general population, risk was elevated (p<0.0001 for all)
245  A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a general population sample of 2415 people aged 40 years a
246 all-cause mortality during follow-up in this general population sample of blacks.
247 ated with white matter hyperintensities in a general population sample.
248 ositive and HIV-negative individuals in this general population sample.
249 gby players, compared to an age-standardised general population sample.
250 valence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in a general-population sample.
251 eneral range of exposures reported for other general population samples of pregnant women and nonpreg
252         In this study, we investigate 20,152 general-population serum samples from southern Vietnam c
253 of clinically significant liver disease in a general population setting and report the prevalence of
254  hospital setting but their performance in a general population setting is unclear.
255 atify the risk of chronic liver disease in a general population setting.
256 markers of liver fibrosis, are needed in the general population setting.
257  cancer incidence was lower than that of the general population (SIR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.84).
258 tients) was significantly higher than in the general population (SIR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.57).
259 evated incidence for PCNSL compared with the general population (standardized incidence ratio = 65.1;
260 cancer incidence was much higher than in the general population (standardized incidence ratio, 19.1;
261 tic reviews and 32 primary studies, harms in general population studies include increased risk for mo
262                                         Four general population studies reported associations between
263                      We utilized data from a general population study including questionnaire data an
264 ETHODS AND A total of 1296 participants in a general population study underwent a health examination,
265  We utilized questionnaire data from a large general population study with data on social habits and
266                                       In the general population study, those with AD reported clinici
267 iduals aged 20-100 years from the Copenhagen General Population Study.
268         While extrapolation of data from the general population suggest that routine cancer screening
269 ciations between rates of prison suicide and general population suicide, any other tested prison-rela
270                   However, compared with the general population, survival was significantly lower in
271            To reconsider these criteria in a general population testing of patients.
272 n between heavy metals and hearing loss in a general population that includes adults and adolescents.
273                            Compared with the general population, the OR of BDI was 17.0 (95% confiden
274            INTERPRETATION: Compared with the general population, the risk of atrial fibrillation in m
275 ia was at least 120 times higher than in the general population, the risk of inflammatory bowel disea
276 ated with incident heart failure (HF) in the general population, the underlying mechanisms are not we
277 ed to determine whether interventions in the general population to restore autonomic balance may prev
278 from eight European isolates and two matched general populations, together with published data from t
279 ence of FASD among children and youth in the general population, used active case ascertainment or cl
280 idence in people with HIV infection with the general population, used Poisson regression to evaluate
281 Collaboration on Research and Design and the general population using data from the Surveillance, Epi
282       Results were extrapolated to the Swiss general population using national census data.
283 ts were compared with that expected from the general population using standardized hospitalization ra
284 vestigated the effect of sex and risk group (general population vs higher-risk populations) on the re
285 fferent methods, estimated prevalence in the general population was 0.7%-11.5% at ages <2 years and 0
286 iver cirrhosis in the cohort relative to the general population was 11 (95% CI, 10, 12) in men and 18
287 e estimated prevalence of keratoconus in the general population was 1:375 (265 cases per 100 000, 95%
288                       The prevalence (HS vs. general population) was 0.8% and 0.3% (odds ratio 2.04;
289 lative conditional survival (relative to the general population) was 99%.
290  Given the rising prevalence of NAFLD in the general population, we sought to identify its prevalence
291  the cohort, and predicted prevalence in the general population were calculated by inverting 99% cert
292 pidemiology) birth cohort recruited from the general population were included.
293  also encountered in approximately 1% of the general population, where they may be silent, perhaps re
294 eople with severe mental illness than in the general population, whereas the odds of HBV were 2.29 (2
295 urring with an allele frequency of 1% in the general population, which was significantly associated w
296 nd a 100-fold higher mortality rate than the general population with sepsis.
297  with stage 5D CKD and approach those of the general population with STEMI.
298  Subjects (n = 26,851) were sampled from the general population, with a follow-up using the Pittsburg
299 betes tend to be at least as inactive as the general population, with a large percentage of individua
300 ity and HrQoL differ between players and the general population, with higher musculoskeletal morbidit

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top