ライフサイエンスコーパス: general surgery

1 (1 in 33 for cardiac surgery vs 1 in 258 for general surgery).

2 3.2% underwent emergency surgery) undergoing general surgery.

3 All of them are practicing general surgery.

4 entered residency with a desire to practice general surgery.

5 rest of contemporary medical students toward general surgery.

6 rent parts of the world choose not to pursue general surgery.

7 d the perceptions of medical students toward general surgery.

8 splantation and cardiothoracic, vascular and general surgery.

9 hortage of surgeons who practice broad-based general surgery.

10 al critical care, and elective and emergency general surgery.

11 e cohort of patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery.

12 cemic control in patients who have undergone general surgery.

13 fections (POI) in patients who had undergone general surgery.

14 t predictor of perioperative mortality after general surgery.

15 lated to trauma and one quarter to emergency general surgery.

16 oposed as a practice model for the future of general surgery.

17 ortality rate in elderly patients undergoing general surgery.

18 e, ophthalmology, pathology, psychiatry, and general surgery.

19 tients comparable with that seen after major general surgery.

20 ular surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, and general surgery.

21 ancial outcomes in the delivery of emergency general surgery.

22 e morbidity and mortality of the woman after general surgery.

23 C-indices of 0.942 (general surgery), 0.915 (vascular surgery), and 0.934 (g

24 The median LOS was 1 day (general surgery: 0; upper GI: 2; small and large intesti

25 Lower C-indices (0.778, general surgery; 0.638, vascular surgery; 0.760, general

26 d: 1,053 acute care emergency surgery, 1,964 general surgery, 1,491 transplant surgery, 995 facial su

27 Of 173643 patients undergoing general surgery (101632 females and 72011 males), 130235

28 The most commonly represented specialty was general surgery (120, 38%), but subspecialty surgery suc

29 for all procedures, 14.7% (580 of 3956) for general surgery, 15.5% (128 of 828) for vascular surgery

30 Data from 2,747 (general surgery 2,251; vascular surgery 496) non-VA hosp

31 iety of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class was 2 (general surgery: 2; upper GI: 3; small and large intesti

32 tal cases were compared to data from 41,360 (general surgery 31,393; vascular surgery 9,967) VA cases

33 s: acute care emergency surgery 10.8% versus general surgery 4.3%, transplant 6.6%, oral-maxillofacia

34 Overall 30-day readmission was 7.8% (general surgery: 5.0%; upper GI: 6.9%; small and large i

35 Fourteen studies looked at general surgery, 6 at obstetrics-gynecology, 2 at urolog

36 s: acute care emergency surgery 73.4% versus general surgery 64.9%, transplant 63.3%, oral-maxillofac

37 e emergency surgery (13.5 +/- 17.4 d) versus general surgery (8.7 +/- 12.9), transplant (7.8 +/- 11.6

38 left lip or palate repair ($47.74 per DALY), general surgery ($82.32 per DALY), hydrocephalus surgery

39 er study surveyed 21 US program directors in general surgery about their opinions regarding resident

40 ed controlled superiority trial, we included general surgery adult inpatients (age >/=18 years) at tw

41 that most continued to practice broad-based general surgery and believed that such training was high

42 rom oral anticoagulant studies in orthopedic/general surgery and extrapolation to actual clinical pra

43 Thirty-five residents and fellows from General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Medicine were recru

44 A bibliometric review was performed among general surgery and medicine journals to identify the 50

45 However, in general surgery and medicine, the aOR for death favored

46 chemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is common in general surgery and organ transplantation, and in the ca

47 ospectively reviewed operative case-logs for general surgery and orthopaedic cases at both hospitals

48 on included patients treated before or after general surgery and patients admitted to a surgical serv

49 om the field of pediatric urology, pediatric general surgery and pediatric neurosurgery are cited.

50 1013 voluntarily participating residents in general surgery and surgical specialties at ACGME-accred

51 e dramatically increased entry of women into general surgery and surgical subspecialties, traditional

52 consider to be essential to the practice of general surgery and then we measured the actual operativ

53 oscopic and robot-assisted surgeries in both general surgery and urology have been performed with tec

54 dovascular procedures has increased for both general surgery and vascular residents, but the increase

55 I COUGH was implemented for all general surgery and vascular surgery patients at our ins

56 QIP protocols to abstract clinical data from general surgery and vascular surgery patients.

57 urgery) or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (general surgery); and management of chronic pain (anesth

58 hopedic surgery, 92808 procedures (39.2%) in general surgery, and 42801 procedures (18.1%) in vascula

59 fied; 78.9% for trauma and injury, 12.5% for general surgery, and 8.6% for ophthalmology.

60 nts conducted in orthopedic surgery, trauma, general surgery, and acute medical settings can help def

61 significant mortality and morbidity risk in general surgery, and should not be underestimated even i

62 c approaches to orthopedic surgery, urology, general surgery, and thoracic surgery, it now is apparen

63 eath favored the low FFP:RBC ratio subgroup; general surgery: aOR, 4.27 (95% CI, 1.28-14.22; P = .02)

64 General surgery appears to be as safe for pregnant women

65 The overall rate of interest toward general surgery as a career choice was 24%.

66 e the perceptions of medical students toward general surgery as a career choice with a particular emp

67 Using general surgery as the reference, the Star scores varied

68 e, but they do show that patients undergoing general surgery at hospitals with better nursing environ

69 conducted with surgical residents (n = 59), general surgery attending physicians (n = 36), and surgi

70 e reasons behind why medical students choose general surgery between very high HDI countries and medi

71 s for minimally invasive surgery that guided General Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery has progressed w

72 A survey about student perceptions of a general surgery career was distributed to 9 medical scho

73 General surgery cases at a single tertiary care center r

74 Additionally general surgery cases from the ACS NSQIP 2008 PUF data w

75 Improvement Program database to capture all general surgery cases performed at 435 hospitals nationw

76 cal outcomes for both emergency and elective general surgery cases using a national database.

77 Ten general surgery cases were observed and assessed using O

78 Ninety general surgery cases were observed in real time.

79 Bedrock general surgery cases-trauma, vascular, pediatrics, and

80 e General Surgery Qualifying Examination and General Surgery Certifying Examination of the American B

81 ournals to identify the 50 most highly cited general surgery clinical research studies from 4 consecu

82 o visited the Obstetrics and Gynaecology and General Surgery Clinics of University of Malaya Medical

83 mplished by the American College of Surgeons General Surgery Coding & Reimbursement Committee (GSCRC)

84 General surgery department pilot projects were then impl

85 All patients evaluated by the general surgery department through outpatient clinics, c

86 atient was admitted to our hospital, and the general surgery department was consulted.

87 The patient was hospitalized by general surgery department with the diagnosis of jejunal

88 tudinal follow-up, and scholarly focus after general surgery education.

89 on and fellowships will impact the future of general surgery education.

90 o assess the seasonal variation in emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions.

91 Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients have a disproportionate b

92 rivers of care discontinuity among emergency general surgery (EGS) patients.

93 -64 yr) and older adult (>/=65 yr) emergency general surgery (EGS) patients; (2) vary by diagnostic c

94 ital or a different hospital after emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures do not exist.

95 Emergency general surgery (EGS) represents 11% of surgical admissi

96 Risk groups were divided into elective general surgery (ELECTIVE), urgent/emergent, nontrauma g

97 This study examines the age of retirement of general surgery Fellows of the American College of Surge

98 Forty-four residents (51.8%) left general surgery for another surgical discipline, 21 (24.

99 amined for all graduating chief residents in general surgery from our program over the past 17 years.

100 s the most common subject (26%), followed by general surgery/gastrointestinal (24%).

101 Because of increasing diversion of general surgery graduates into surgical specialties, tot

102 ons, most studies reported low confidence in general surgery graduates.

103 tality, 59.1%); among the 12 patients in the general surgery group who required 7 or more days of CRR

104 ificantly increase financial productivity of general surgery groups in academic medical centers.

105 ency serves 2 purposes-prepare graduates for general surgery (GS) practice or postresidency surgical

106 his study evaluates the current state of the General Surgery (GS) residency training model by investi

107 andate was expected to reduce attrition from general surgery (GS) residency.

108 0 graduating CR residents with 10 graduating general surgery (GS) residents from across North America

109 ity and individual career goals has led most general surgery (GS) residents to pursue fellowship trai

110 ify and clarify the causes and extent of the general surgery (GS) workforce shortfalls.

111 , and surgical specialization-categorized as general surgery (GS), surgical oncology (SO), and transp

112 rauma, surgical critical care, and emergency general surgery) has been developed to increase interest

113 geographic and socioeconomic regions toward general surgery, has been broadly disseminated.

114 finements in the field of minimally invasive general surgery have made laparoscopic adrenalectomy the

115 ately obese patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery have paradoxically "lower" crude and adj

116 Dialysis patients undergoing nonemergent general surgery have significantly elevated risks of pos

117 eases the likelihood that they will practice general surgery in a similar setting despite initial spe

118 Emergency general surgery in elderly patients with preoperative DN

119 surgical outcomes among patients undergoing general surgery in participating Michigan hospitals.

120 Most continue to practice general surgery, indicating the value of complete traini

121 anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, and pediatrics) in l

122 anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, pediatrics, and psyc

123 Today's general surgery interns are faced with increased duty ho

124 A total of 249 categorical general surgery interns from 10 general surgery residenc

125 A cross-sectional survey of categorical general surgery interns was conducted between June and A

126 A significant proportion of academic general surgery is composed of bariatric surgery, yet su

127 General surgery is unique among graduate medical educati

128 As in other areas of general surgery, laparoscopic techniques are being used

129 vel malpractice risk was measured using mean general surgery malpractice insurance premiums; paid cla

130 gnificantly higher among hospitals with high general surgery mortality (mortality quartile >/= 50%; o

131 ail survey of 824 Pennsylvania physicians in general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, obste

132 tive, obstetric fistula, neurosurgery, burn, general surgery, obstetric emergency procedures, anaesth

133 nts without prior GME in specialties such as general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergenc

134 es the potential effect on the work force in general surgery of age of retirement.

135 ctive field observations during 148 elective general surgery operations using standardized intake for

136 with a traditional counting protocol in 300 general surgery operations.

137 Reduced general surgery operative experience in GS+ residencies

138 eady include meaningful trauma and emergency general surgery operative experience.

139 A subset of 1013 residents training in general surgery or a surgical subspecialty was identifie

140 al transfers for tertiary care services than general surgery or transplant (24.5% vs 15.5% and 8.3% r

141 Instead, they are practicing in either general surgery or vascular surgery, or obtaining additi

142 ics, family practice, obstetrics/gynecology, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, psychiatry, and ane

143 were histologically confirmed; controls were general surgery, orthopedic, and trauma patients who wer

144 uded 284 098 ambulatory surgical procedures (general surgery, orthopedic, neurosurgical, gynecologic,

145 lass scores were similar across departments (general surgery, orthopedics, urology, etc), race, or ag

146 standard of care in dermatology and surgery (general surgery, otolaryngology, plastics, oculoplastics

147 has brought to the critically ill trauma and general surgery patient in the past few years.

148 Quasi-experimental study of general surgery patient outcomes 2 years before (academi

149 r reform was not associated with a change in general surgery patient outcomes or differences in resid

150 prospectively collected among 202 trauma and general surgery patients admitted to a level I trauma ce

151 gned to compare ICU utilization of emergency general surgery patients admitted to an acute care emerg

152 ICU needs of nontrauma emergency general surgery patients are poorly described.

153 urgical residents and program directors, and general surgery patients from July 1, 2014, to June 30,

154 All general surgery patients from the National Surgical Qual

155 Emergency general surgery patients have increased ICU needs in ter

156 This study included 25752 elderly Medicare general surgery patients treated at focal hospitals and

157 r hypothesis is that tertiary care emergency general surgery patients utilize more ICU resources than

158 emia was associated with adverse outcomes in general surgery patients with and without diabetes.

159 sociated with DVT formation among trauma and general surgery patients.

160 te care emergency surgery service with other general surgery patients.

161 form of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis for general surgery patients.

162 The study population consisted of 470,108 general surgery patients.

163 ter AAA repair, although hospitals with poor general surgery performance (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.63

164 ociation has been seen with common emergency general surgery performed at safety-net hospitals.

165 d by patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, general surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and urolog

166 should be considered for routine use in the general surgery population.

167 e DVT rate did not differ between trauma and general surgery populations or in patients receiving onc

168 yet DVT rates remain high in the trauma and general surgery populations.

169 ghty-five residents matched into categorical general surgery postgraduate year 1 spots from July 1, 1

170 ted the rural year were more likely to enter general surgery practice (10 of 11 [91%]) than those who

171 ersity program for the entire 5 years are in general surgery practice (P = .04).

172 As the scope of general surgery practice continues to evolve, general su

173 The scope of general surgery practice has evolved tremendously in the

174 More importantly, it demonstrates that general surgery practice in the United States is extreme

175 points included completion of a fellowship, general surgery practice, and practice setting populatio

176 all non-Hispanic white and African American general surgery, private sector patients included in the

177 To examine opioid prescribing patterns after general surgery procedures and to estimate an ideal numb

178 A substantial portion of general surgery procedures currently are performed by GS

179 ied 141,010 patients who underwent emergency general surgery procedures in the 2005-2010 Surgeons Nat

180 Inpatient general surgery procedures with National Surgical Qualit

181 luding 90% of obstretric surgeries, 38.5% of general surgery procedures, and 43% of non-obstetric lap

182 ed with improved surgical outcomes following general surgery procedures, apart from existing temporal

183 ssociated with adverse outcomes in emergency general surgery procedures.

184 GS+ surgeons performed 15% to 33% of all general surgery procedures.

185 riability in opioid prescriptions for common general surgery procedures.

186 patients who underwent nonemergent inpatient general surgery procedures.

187 resources can overcome the WE seen in urgent general surgery procedures.

188 parting residents often relocated to another general surgery program (20%; 95% CI, 15%-24%) or switch

189 ough 5 training in a single university-based general surgery program from July 1, 2011, through June

190 pothesized that visa sponsorship policies of general surgery programs (GSPs) may be discordant with t

191 General surgery programs coexisted with 35 colorectal (C

192 General surgery programs have relatively high attrition,

193 nt to residency program directors at the 254 general surgery programs in the US accredited by the RRC

194 The general surgery programs were chosen on the basis of the

195 Attendings in 14 General Surgery programs were trained to use a) the 5-le

196 that reported on residents (n = 19821) from general surgery programs.

197 the percentage was lowest among graduates of general surgery, psychiatry, and primary care specialtie

198 ars) as well as first-time pass rates on the General Surgery Qualifying Examination and General Surge

199 ypothesized that fellowships coexisting with general surgery residencies do not negatively impact GSR

200 A statewide survey of residents enrolled in general surgery residencies in New York was administered

201 ntation of resident work hour limitations in general surgery residencies may have negative consequenc

202 Survey sent to all 239 program directors of general surgery residencies participating in the Nationa

203 icant pool, the relative competitiveness for general surgery residency (GSR) is undefined.

204 was to identify a group of operations which general surgery residency program directors believed res

205 neral surgery residents in a single academic general surgery residency program over a 10-year period.

206 y requesting residents within a large single general surgery residency program to rate their understa

207 aduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved US general surgery residency programs (n = 118), their affi

208 lected using stratified random sampling from general surgery residency programs across the United Sta

209 A total of 118 general surgery residency programs and 154 hospitals wer

210 General surgery residency programs are facing multiple p

211 To evaluate and financially reward general surgery residency programs based on performance,

212 ragmatic, noninferiority trial involving 117 general surgery residency programs in the United States

213 categorical general surgery interns from 10 general surgery residency programs in the western United

214 c noninferiority cluster-randomized trial of general surgery residency programs with 2 study arms.

215 We analyzed (1) operative cases for general surgery residency programs with and without coex

216 e clinical outcomes achieved by graduates of general surgery residency programs.

217 procedures performed by 454 surgeons from 73 general surgery residency programs.

218 General surgery residency training among accredited prog

219 However, clinical experience in general surgery residency training has undergone relativ

220 eneral surgery practice continues to evolve, general surgery residency training will need to better i

221 Shortening general surgery residency would not necessarily limit ex

222 To address concerns related to shortened general surgery residency, the American Board of Colon a

223 or mean number of cases per graduating chief general surgery resident (GSR) and vascular surgery fell

224 c review of the PubMed indexed literature on general surgery resident confidence was performed in Mar

225 General surgery resident performance on the annual in-tr

226 Survey of all graduates of an academic general surgery resident program from 1990 to 2005 (n =

227 measured the eye movements of members of the general surgery resident team at St.

228 Nearly 80% of general surgery residents (GSR) pursue Fellowship traini

229 of appendectomies performed by unsupervised general surgery residents (GSRs) with those performed in

230 All general surgery residents (n = 49) and surgical patients

231 rams, an anonymous survey of 371 categorical general surgery residents and 10-year attrition rates fo

232 as administered to 141 internal medicine and general surgery residents and 497 RNs in a single academ

233 he surgical community, there is concern that general surgery residents are choosing subspecialty trai

234 US General Surgery residents are not universally ready to i

235 D PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of all general surgery residents completing a survey in January

236 Nearly 1 in every 4 categorical general surgery residents does not complete training.

237 Retrospective review of all categorical general surgery residents in a single academic general s

238 General surgery residents in our program do not report b

239 All categorical general surgery residents matriculated from July 1, 1999

240 Trained raters observed General Surgery residents performing laparoscopic cholec

241 Nearly 80% of graduating general surgery residents pursue additional training in

242 After performing a baseline TEP in the OR, general surgery residents randomized to mastery learning

243 Twenty general surgery residents received didactic training in

244 A majority of categorical general surgery residents seriously consider leaving res

245 using the following criteria: A--graduating general surgery residents should be competent to perform

246 medical specialties, a significant number of general surgery residents spend 1 to 3 years in dedicate

247 ncy of MIS relative to open operations among general surgery residents using the Accreditation Counci

248 e for the overall attrition prevalence among general surgery residents was 18% (95% CI, 14%-21%), wit

249 General surgery residents' attitudes, experiences, and e

250 Of 5345 categorical general surgery residents, 4402 (82.4%) responded, repre

251 th male (25% vs 15%, respectively; P = .008) general surgery residents, and most residents left after

252 ehaviors included university-based surgeons, general surgery residents, and preclinical student obser

253 ectional survey involving all US categorical general surgery residents.

254 family and children affect the experience of general surgery residents.

255 y In-Training Examination to all categorical general surgery residents.

256 owship is a common and costly practice among general surgery residents.

257 on has been shown to enhance the training of general surgery residents.

258 Outcome and Measure: Attrition prevalence of general surgery residents.

259 e the estimate of attrition prevalence among general surgery residents.

260 ted to quantify and measure it in graduating general surgery residents.

261 rmine promotion and fellowship candidacy for general surgery residents.

262 st median eGJS score was colorectal, whereas general surgery scored lowest (median: 33 vs 7, respecti

263 and categorical interns pursuing careers in general surgery scoring in the top quartile on the Ameri

264 Consecutive patients admitted to a busy general surgery service from January 2000 to January 200

265 service within 30 days of discharge from the general surgery service to characterize index and readmi

266 ctive chart review of deaths that occur on a general surgery service.

267 of all consecutive patients discharged from general surgery services at a tertiary care, university-

268 General surgery showed a decrease in volume in some oper

269 e volume, fewer surgeon years of experience, general surgery specialty, and preference for more exten

270 For general surgery, the odds of dying within 60 days were l

271 ernia repair is the most common procedure in general surgery, thus improvements in surgical technique

272 horacic-cardiovascular surgery, and 15.3% in general surgery to 5.2% in family medicine, 3.1% in pedi

273 rgery, urology, ENT, craniofacial, burn, and general surgery) totalled revenue of US$2.67 billion and

274 sident Education web portal was designed for general surgery trainees in the United States, and the S

275 ported to the RRC by all residents finishing general surgery training in June 2005 was reviewed.

276 Broad-based general surgery training may be jeopardized by reduced c

277 e consistent across class years and types of general surgery training program.

278 General surgery training programmes are often responsive

279 We identified descriptions of general surgery training programmes in 52 countries.

280 Attrition of residents from general surgery training programs is relatively high; ho

281 ery residents in 125 academically affiliated general surgery training programs was performed.

282 attrition rates remain a great challenge for general surgery training programs.

283 stics and destinations of residents who left general surgery training programs.

284 998, and Dec 31, 2013, describing a national general surgery training system.

285 ate the impact of endovascular procedures on general surgery training.

286 ) is a health care model combining emergency general surgery, trauma, and critical care.

287 he first half of 2007 was set up in a 56-bed general surgery unit in Lyon University Hospital, France

288 rgery (ELECTIVE), urgent/emergent, nontrauma general surgery (URGENT), and trauma surgery (TRAUMA).

289 ve log data for 3 specialties were examined: general surgery, urology, and plastic surgery.

290 recently, with the advent of laparoscopy for general surgery, various laparoscopic techniques have be

291 ttending surgeons in cardiothoracic surgery, general surgery, vascular surgery, pediatric surgery, ob

292 , the most important reason for not choosing general surgery was found to be due to perceptions of an

293 groups and initial intent to practice rural general surgery were compared.

294 factors affecting the delivery of emergency general surgery were included.

295 Fifty patients undergoing major elective general surgery were observed for a total of 659 days of

296 lar between acute care emergency surgery and general surgery, whereas transplant had fewer.

297 who completed the rural year are practicing general surgery, while only 13 of 45 (29%) who stayed at

298 of 118,707 patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery who were included in the National Surgic